Videoconferencing in Pressure Injury: Randomized Controlled Telemedicine Trial in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Ingebjørg Irgens, Jana Midelfart-Hoff, Rolf Jelnes, Marcalee Alexander, Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle, Magne Thoresen, Tiina Rekand, Ingebjørg Irgens, Jana Midelfart-Hoff, Rolf Jelnes, Marcalee Alexander, Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle, Magne Thoresen, Tiina Rekand

Abstract

Background: Geographical, financial and travel-related barriers may impact access to necessary health care for people in need of long-term follow-up.

Objective: The goal of the research was to perform a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healing, interaction, and satisfaction of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and PI receiving multidisciplinary videoconference consultations from a wound clinic to the participant's home versus regular outpatient care. The multidisciplinary team consisted of a medical doctor, a wound nurse, and an occupational therapist. In both groups, district nurses attended the consultations at the participant's home.

Methods: A total of 56 participants, 28 in each group, were randomized to a videoconference group (VCG) or a regular care group (RCG). Validated questionnaires were used to measure and compare the follow-up effect on HRQoL. Percentage reduction of wound volume was measured at end of the follow-up. A Likert scale was used to measure the satisfaction of the patients and district nurses regarding the interaction between different modalities of care in the 2 groups.

Results: The HRQoL did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P values ranging from .09 to .88) or the rate of PI healing, experienced interaction, and satisfaction in the groups. A total of 67% (37/55) of all PIs healed, 64% (18/28) in the VCG and 70% (19/27) in the RCG. Mean reduction in ulcer volume was 79% in the VCG and 85% in the RCG (P=.32). A Kaplan-Meier plot with a logrank test regarding time to healing did not show any significant difference between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Videoconference-based care seems to be a safe and efficient way to manage PIs in terms of HRQoL, healing, interaction, and satisfaction compared to conventional care for people with SCI. This should be considered when planning for future care. SCI has a huge impact on the individual, the family, and the health care system. There is an urgent need to improve systems of care so that individuals who live far from specialists and require long-term follow-up for conditions such as PI can get optimal treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02800915; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02800915 and Current Research Information System in Norway (CRISTIN) 545284; https://app.cristin.no/projects/show.jsf?id=545284.

Keywords: healing; health-related quality of life; outpatient follow-up; participant interaction; participant satisfaction; pressure injury; spinal cord injury; telecommunication; telemedicine; videoconference.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Ingebjørg Irgens, Jana Midelfart-Hoff, Rolf Jelnes, Marcalee Alexander, Johan Kvalvik Stanghelle, Magne Thoresen, Tiina Rekand. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 19.04.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT 2010 (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010) flow diagram of the trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Organization of follow-up for the videoconference and regular care groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Organization of the videoconference consultations.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier plot showing time to healing in the two groups (videoconference: solid line; regular care group: dotted line).

References

    1. Access to Health Services/Healthy People 2020. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2020. [2021-06-02]. .
    1. Siwicki B. Telemedicine during COVID-19: benefits, limitations, burdens, adaptation. Healthcare ITNews. 2020. Mar, [2020-04-28]. .
    1. Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health. 2013 Oct;38(5):976–993. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1.
    1. Irgens I, Kleven L, Sørli H, Stanghelle JK, Rekand T. Telemedicine brings specialist healthcare services to patients' homes. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2015 Oct 20;135(19):1716–1717. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.15.0770. 3399760
    1. Lidal IB, Snekkevik H, Aamodt G, Hjeltnes N, Biering-Sørensen F, Stanghelle JK. Mortality after spinal cord injury in Norway. J Rehabil Med. 2007 Mar;39(2):145–151. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0017.
    1. Dejong G, Tian W, Hsueh CH, Junn C, Karam C, Ballard PH, Smout RJ, Horn SD, Zanca JM, Heinemann AW, Hammond FM, Backus D. Rehospitalization in the first year after traumtic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:S87–S97. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.037.
    1. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth 2009 (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, 2) 2009. [2022-01-27]. .
    1. Podcast: Is Telehealth the New Black? 2020. [2020-05-10]. .
    1. . Norwegian Centre for E-health research; 2020. [2021-01-28]. Digital kommunikasjon i helsetjenesten. .
    1. What is Telehealth? Center for Connected Health Policy. [2021-01-28]. .
    1. Irgens I, Hoff JM, Sørli H, Haugland H, Stanghelle JK, Rekand T. Hospital based care at home: study protocol for a mixed epidemiological and randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jan 24;20(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3185-y. 10.1186/s13063-019-3185-y
    1. Chi N-C, Demiris G. A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers. J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jan;21(1):37–44. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14562734. 1357633X14562734
    1. Ownsworth T, Arnautovska UBA, Beadle E, Shum DHK, Moyle W. Efficacy of Telerehabilitation for Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(4):E33–E46. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000350.
    1. Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, Adeoye OM, Audebert HJ, Fanale C, Hess D, Majersik J, Nystrom K, Reeves M, Rosamond W, Switzer J, American Heart Association Stroke Council. Council on EpidemiologyPrevention. Council on Quality of CareOutcomes Research Telemedicine Quality and Outcomes in Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017 Jan;48(1):e3–e25. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000114.STR.0000000000000114
    1. Irgens I, Rekand T, Arora M, Liu N, Marshall R, Biering-Sørensen F, Alexander M. Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review. Spinal Cord. 2018 Jul;56(7):643–655. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0033-3.10.1038/s41393-017-0033-3
    1. Trnka P, White MM, Renton WD, McTaggart SJ, Burke JR, Smith AC. A retrospective review of telehealth services for children referred to a paediatric nephrologist. BMC Nephrol. 2015 Aug 01;16:125. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0127-0. 10.1186/s12882-015-0127-0
    1. Jani PD, Forbes L, Choudhury A, Preisser JS, Viera AJ, Garg S. Evaluation of diabetic retinal screening and factors for ophthalmology referral in a telemedicine network. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 01;135(7):706–714. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1150. 2627936
    1. Thomas JT, Moeckli J, Mengeling MA, Goedken CC, Bunch J, Cram P, Reisinger H. Bedside critical care staff use of intensive care unit telemedicine: comparisons by intensive care unit complexity. Telemed J E Health. 2017 Sep;23(9):718–725. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0243.10.1089/tmj.2016.0243
    1. Øra HP, Kirmess M, Brady MC, Partee I, Hognestad RB, Johannessen BB, Thommessen B, Becker F. The effect of augmented speech-language therapy delivered by telerehabilitation on poststroke aphasia: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Mar 05;34(3):369–381. doi: 10.1177/0269215519896616.
    1. Saito T, Izawa KP. Effectiveness and feasibility of home-based telerehabilitation for community-dwelling elderly people in Southeast Asian countries and regions: a systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Oct 25;33(10):2657–2669. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01820-3. 10.1007/s40520-021-01820-3
    1. Tchero H, Tabue Teguo M, Lannuzel A, Rusch E. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 26;20(10):e10867. doi: 10.2196/10867. v20i10e10867
    1. Irgens I, Bach B, Rekand T, Tornås S. Optimal management of health care for persons with disability related to spinal cord injury: learning from the Sunnaas model of telerehabilitation. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020 Sep 24;6(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41394-020-00338-6. 10.1038/s41394-020-00338-6
    1. SPIRIT Statement. [2019-01-21].
    1. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan AC, Michie S. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348(mar07 3):g1687–g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
    1. Eldridge S, Chan C, Campbell M, Bond C, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster G, PAFS Consensus Group CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
    1. Relevant laws and regulations. Helse. [2019-07-21]. .
    1. The International Guideline 2019: Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries. 2019. [2020-05-19]. .
    1. Biering-Sørensen F, DeVivo MJ, Charlifue S, Chen Y, New PW, Noonan V, Post MWM, Vogel L. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0) including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017 Aug;55(8):759–764. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.59.sc201759
    1. Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1069–1076. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00098-5.S0895-4356(98)00098-5
    1. Stavem K, Augestad LA, Kristiansen IS, Rand K. General population norms for the EQ-5D-3L in Norway: comparison of postal and web surveys. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Oct 19;16(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1029-1. 10.1186/s12955-018-1029-1
    1. Post MWM, Adriaansen JJE, Charlifue S, Biering-Sørensen F, van Asbeck FWA. Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr 23;54(4):314–318. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.99.sc201599
    1. Norsk Ryggmargsskaderegister. [2021-06-03]. .
    1. The National Regional Ethical Committee (REC) 2014/684/REK-Nord. [2021-01-31]. .
    1. Hagen EM, Eide GE, Rekand T, Gilhus NE, Grønning M. A 50-year follow-up of the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injuries in Western Norway. Spinal Cord. 2010 Apr;48(4):313–318. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.133.sc2009133
    1. Woo Christine, Guihan Marylou, Frick Christine, Gill Carol M, Ho Chester H. What's happening now! Telehealth management of spinal cord injury/disorders. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(3):322–31. doi: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000003.
    1. Batalik L, Filakova K, Batalikova K, Dosbaba F. Remotely monitored telerehabilitation for cardiac patients: a review of the current situation. World J Clin Cases. 2020 May 26;8(10):1818–1831. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i10.1818.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera