Self-reported versus objectively assessed exercise adherence

Hon K Yuen, Ed Wang, Katy Holthaus, Laura K Vogtle, David Sword, Hazel L Breland, Diane L Kamen, Hon K Yuen, Ed Wang, Katy Holthaus, Laura K Vogtle, David Sword, Hazel L Breland, Diane L Kamen

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We examined agreement of data between self-reported and objectively assessed exercise adherence among women with systemic lupus erythematosus. METHOD. Eleven participants completed weekly exercise logs on date and duration of exercise during a 10-wk Wii Fit™ home-based program. Afterward, exercise data from the log were compared with those recorded in the Wii console. RESULTS. Of the paired data, the mean duration of exercise recorded in the Wii was 29.5 min and that recorded in the log was 33.3 min. The composite intraclass correlation for exercise duration between exercise log and the Wii Fit was 0.4. The 95% limits of agreement indicated large between-subjects variability. CONCLUSION. Exercise logs exhibit a marginally acceptable agreement with Wii estimation of exercise duration at a group level. However, caution should be applied when using the exercise log as a measure of a person's exercise behavior because of the tendency to overreport.

Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Bland–Altman plot depicting the difference in exercise duration between exercise logs and objectively measured (i.e., Wii console) plotted against the average exercise duration of the two methods. Dashed lines represent the upper and lower limits of the 95% levels of agreement.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera