A Large, Open-Label, Phase 3 Safety Study of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Glabellar Lines: A Focus on Safety From the SAKURA 3 Study
Jeremy B Green, Kavita Mariwalla, Kyle Coleman, Glynis Ablon, Susan H Weinkle, Conor J Gallagher, Domenico Vitarella, Roman G Rubio, Jeremy B Green, Kavita Mariwalla, Kyle Coleman, Glynis Ablon, Susan H Weinkle, Conor J Gallagher, Domenico Vitarella, Roman G Rubio
Abstract
Background: SAKURA 3 was a Phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose safety study of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI); a component of the largest Phase 3 clinical development program of an aesthetic neuromodulator in glabellar lines.
Objective: To evaluate the use of DAXI (40U) up to 3 treatments for moderate or severe glabellar lines.
Methods: Eligible subjects rolled over from the placebo-controlled trials (n = 477) or were de novo (n = 2,214) and received 1 to 3 treatments over a maximum of 84 weeks. Safety and efficacy were evaluated at least every 4 weeks up to Week 36 (Treatments 1 and 2) and Week 12 (Treatment 3). Select subjects could be retreated after Week 12 if glabellar lines returned to baseline.
Results: Safety results are reported for 2,691 subjects, of which 882 received a second treatment and 568 a third. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17.8% of subjects, which were generally mild and resolved. No serious AEs were treatment-related. Eyelid ptosis occurred in 0.9% of treatments. Adverse events were consistent across treatments and no new safety signals were observed.
Conclusion: The safety of DAXI in this large open-label safety study confirms the findings from the pivotal Phase 3 trials, providing reassurance in its overall safety profile.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03004248.
Conflict of interest statement
J.B. Green, K. Mariwalla, K. Coleman, and G. Ablon have served as clinical trial investigators for Revance Therapeutics, Inc. S.H. Weinkle has served as a clinical trial investigator and consultant for Revance Therapeutics, Inc. D. Vitarella, C.J. Gallagher, and R.G. Rubio are employees of, and hold stock/stock options in Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.
Figures
References
- Finn JC, Cox SE, Earl ML. Social implications of hyperfunctional facial lines. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:450–5.
- Jia Z, Lu H, Yang X, Jin X, et al. Adverse events of botulinum toxin type A in facial rejuvenation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 2016;40:769–77.
- Naumann M, Boo LM, Ackerman AH, Gallagher CJ. Immunogenicity of botulinum toxins. J Neural Transm 2013;120:275–90.
- Bertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J, Yoelin S, et al. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol 2020;82:838–45.
- Fabi SG, Cohen JL, Green LJ, Dhawan S, et al. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for injection for the treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy results from SAKURA 3, a large, open-label, phase 3 safety study. Dermatol Surg 2021;47:48–54.
- Carruthers JD, Fagien S, Joseph JH, Humphrey S, et al. DaxibotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar lines: results from each of two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:48–54.
- BOTOX Cosmetic® (OnabotulinumtoxinA) [Prescribing Information]. Irvine, CA: Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, a subsidiary of Allergan, Inc.; 2018.
- DYSPORT® (AbobotulinumtoxinA) [Prescribing Information]. Basking Ridge, NJ: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2018.
- JEUVEAU (PrabotulinumtoxinA-Xvfs) [Prescribing Information]. Santa Barbara, CA: Evolus Inc.; 2019.
- XEOMIN® (IncobotulinumtoxinA) [Prescribing Information]. Raleigh, NC: Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC; 2019.
- Carruthers J, Solish N, Humphrey S, Rosen N, et al. Injectable daxibotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of glabellar lines: a phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, multicenter comparison with onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo. Dermatol Surg 2017;43:1321–31.
- Kane MA, Brandt F, Rohrich RJ, Narins RS, et al. Evaluation of variable-dose treatment with a new U.S. Botulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) for correction of moderate to severe glabellar lines: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1619–29.
- Brandt F, Swanson N, Baumann L, Huber B. Randomized, placebo-controlled study of a new botulinum toxin type a for treatment of glabellar lines: efficacy and safety. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:1893–901.
- Brin MF, James C, Maltman J. Botulinum toxin type A products are not interchangeable: a review of the evidence. Biologics 2014;8:227–41.
- Beer KR, Shamban AT, Avelar RL, Gross JE, et al. Efficacy and safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of glabellar lines in adult subjects: results from 2 identical phase III studies. Dermatol Surg 2019;45:1381–93.
- Carruthers JA, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46:840–9.
- Carruthers JD, Lowe NJ, Menter MA, Gibson J, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for patients with glabellar lines. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1089–98.
- Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Coleman WP, III, Donofrio L, et al. Multicenter, randomized, phase III study of a single dose of incobotulinumtoxinA, free from complexing proteins, in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:551–8.
- Hanke CW, Narins RS, Brandt F, Cohen JL, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar frown lines using a stringent composite endpoint. Dermatol Surg 2013;39:891–9.
Source: PubMed