Effects of exercise on cervical muscle strength and cross-sectional area in patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis and chronic cervical pain

Hyunghun Moon, Sung-Ki Lee, Won-Moon Kim, Yong-Gon Seo, Hyunghun Moon, Sung-Ki Lee, Won-Moon Kim, Yong-Gon Seo

Abstract

There is a lack of studies comparing the effects of different exercise types in patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis. Twenty-four subjects were divided into three groups: corrective exercise, resistance exercise, and physical therapy. The groups performed their respective interventions, two times per week for three months. Clinical outcomes, including the value of Cobb's angle, cervical muscle strength and endurance, and the cross-sectional area of the cervical deep muscles were measured pre- and post-intervention. There was a significant difference in the changes in the thoracic Cobb's angle between the groups (P < 0.001). The corrective exercise group revealed a significantly superior increase in muscle strength and endurance between pre- and post-intervention (P < 0.012). There was a significant difference in the cross-sectional area of the cervical deep muscles included longus capitis and multifidus between the groups (P < 0.036 and 0.007, respectively). The corrective exercise group showed the most significant increase in cross-sectional area between pre- and post-intervention (P < 0.012). A corrective exercise program is a more effective intervention than traditional resistance exercise and physical therapy for improving the thoracic Cobb's angle, cervical muscle strength and endurance, and the cross-sectional area of the deep muscles in patients with thoracic hyperkyphosis.Trial registration: KCT0005292.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The difference of thoracic angle and cervical muscles strength and endurance after intervention. (a) Thoracic Cobb’s angle; (b) Maximal muscle strength; (c) Muscle endurance of 80%; (d) Muscle endurance of 50%. CEG, corrective exercise group; REG, resistance exercise group; CG, control group. P < 0.0167*, P < 0.00167**: the results from Bonferroni correction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The difference of cross-sectional area in cervical deep muscles after intervention. (a) Longus colli muscle; (b) Longus capitis muscle; (c) Multifidus muscle. CEG, corrective exercise group; REG, resistance exercise group; CG, control group; CSA, cross-sectional area; DNF, deep neck flexor. P < 0.0167*, P < 0.00167**: the results from Bonferroni correction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The measurement of Cobb’s angle using picture achieving and communication system (PACS).
Figure 4
Figure 4
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) imaging of the cross-sectional area of the perivertebral space. (a) Longus colli muscle; (b) Longus capitis muscle; (c) Multifidus muscle.

References

    1. Lau KT, Cheung KY, Chan MH, Lo KY, Chiu TT. Relationships between sagittal postures of thoracic and cervical spine, presence of neck pain, neck pain severity and disability. Man Ther. 2010;15:457–462. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.03.009.
    1. Macagno AE, O’Brien MF. Thoracic and thoracolumbar kyphosis in adults. Spine. 2006;31:S161–S170. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000236909.26123.f8.
    1. Nault ML, et al. Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27:1911–1917. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00018.
    1. Quek J, Pua YH, Clark RA, Bryant AL. Effects of thoracic kyphosis and forward head posture on cervical range of motion in older adults. Man Ther. 2013;18:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.07.005.
    1. Bansal S, Katzman WB, Giangregorio LM. Exercise for improving age-related hyperkyphotic posture: a systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014;95:129–140. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.022.
    1. Katzman WB, Sellmeyer DE, Stewart AL, Wanek L, Hamel KA. Changes in flexed posture, musculoskeletal impairments, and physical performance after group exercise in community-dwelling older women. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007;88:192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.033.
    1. Bautmans L, Van Arken J, Van Mackelenberg M, Mets T. Rehabilitation using manual mobilization for thoracic kyphosis in elderly postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis. J. Rehabil. Med. 2010;42:129–135. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0486.
    1. Itoi E, Sinaki M. Effect of back-strengthening exercise on posture in healthy women 49 to 65 years of age. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1994;69:1054–1059. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61372-X.
    1. Solberg PA, et al. Effects of different types of exercise on muscle mass, strength, function and well-being in elderly. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2013;13:112–125. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2011.617391.
    1. Kamli F, Shirazi SA, Ebrahimi S, Mirshamsi M, Ghanbari A. Comparison of manual therapy and exercise therapy for postural hyperkyphosis: a randomized clinical trial. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2016;32:92–97. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1110739.
    1. Foad S, Reza R, Ismail E, Mohamad HA, Hooman M. The efficiency of corrective exercise interventions on thoracic hyper-kyphosis angle. J. Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27:7–16. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130411.
    1. Bennell KL, et al. Effects of an exercise and manual therapy program on physical impairments, function and quality-of-life in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a randomized, single-blind controlled pilot trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2010;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-36.
    1. Jang HJ, Hughes LC, Oh DW, Kim SY. Effects of corrective exercise for thoracic hyperkyphosis on posture, balance, and well-being in older women: a double-blind, group-matched design. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2019;42:E17–E27. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000146.
    1. Lehnert-Schroth C. Three-Dimensional Treatment for Scoliosis. The Schroth Orthopedic Breathing System. A Physiotherapeutic Method to Improve Deformities of the Spine. 1. Munich: Ciando; 2007.
    1. Park SY, Shim JH. Effect of 8 weeks of Schroth exercise (three-dimensional convergence exercise) on pulmonary function, Cobb’s angle, and erector spinae muscle activity in idiopathic scoliosis. J. Korea Converg. Soc. 2014;5:61–68. doi: 10.15207/JKCS.2014.5.4.061.
    1. Bergström I, Bergström K, Karlsson S, Grahn KA, Brinck J. Back extensor training increases muscle strength in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, kyphosis and vertebral fractures. Adv. Physiother. 2011;13:110–117. doi: 10.3109/14038196.2011.581696.
    1. Kjellman G, Oberg B. A randomized clinical trial comparing general exercise, Mckenzie treatment and a control group in patients with neck pain. J. Rehabil. Med. 2002;34:183–190. doi: 10.1080/16501970213233.
    1. Hakkinen A, Salo P, Tarvainen U, Wiren K, Ylinen J. Effect of manual therapy and stretching on neck muscle strength and mobility in chronic neck pain. J. Rehabil. Med. 2007;39:575–579. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0094.
    1. Feng Q, Wang M, Zhang Y, Zhou Y. The effect of a corrective functional exercise program on postural thoracic kyphosis in teenagers: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2018;32:48–56. doi: 10.1177/0269215517714591.
    1. Oxland TR. Fundamental biomechanics of the spine—what we have learned in the past 25 years and future directions. J. Biomech. 2016;49:817–832. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.035.
    1. Boyd-Clark LC, Briggs CA, Galea MP. Muscle spindle distribution, morphology and density in longus colli and multifidus muscle of the cervical spine. Spine. 2002;27:694–701. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204010-00005.
    1. Cagnie B, Hodge RD, Achten E, Cambier D, Danneels L. A magnetic resonance imaging investigation into the function of the deep cervical flexors during the performance of craniocervical flexion. J. Manipul. Phys. Ther. 2010;33:286–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.03.010.
    1. Horng MH, Kuok CP, Fu MJ, Lin CJ, Sun YN. Cobb angle measurement of spine from X-ray images using convolutional neural network. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2019;2019:1–18. doi: 10.1155/2019/6357171.
    1. Jull GA, Falla DB, Treleaven J, Hodges P, Vicenzino B. Retraining cervical joint position sense: the effect of two exercise regimes. J. Orthop. Res. 2007;25:404–412. doi: 10.1002/jor.20220.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera