Regional differences in reasons for consultation and general practitioners' spectrum of services in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study

Ingmar Schäfer, Heike Hansen, Thomas Ruppel, Dagmar Lühmann, Hans-Otto Wagner, Agata Kazek, Martin Scherer, Ingmar Schäfer, Heike Hansen, Thomas Ruppel, Dagmar Lühmann, Hans-Otto Wagner, Agata Kazek, Martin Scherer

Abstract

Background: Among other factors, the patients' consultation reasons and GPs' spectrum of services determine the process and outcome of the medical treatment. So far, however, there has been little information on differences in reasons for consultation and GPs' services between urban and rural areas. Our study's goal was thus to investigate these factors in relation to the regional location of GPs' practices.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study based on standardised GP interviews in a quota sampling design. All counties and independent cities within a radius of 120 km around Hamburg were divided into three regional categories (urban area, environs, rural area) and stratified proportionally to the population size. Differences in the number of reasons for consultation and services were analysed by multivariate linear regressions in mixed models adjusted for random effects on the levels of the German federal states and administrative districts. Differences in individual consultation reasons and services were identified by logistic regression via stepwise forward and backward selection.

Results: Primary care practices in 34 of the 37 selected administrative districts (91.9%) were represented in the dataset. In total, 211 GPs were personally interviewed. On average, GPs saw 344 patients per month with a slightly higher number of patients in rural areas. They reported 59.1 ± 15.4 different reasons for consultation and 30.3 ± 3.9 different services. There was no statistically significant regional variation in the number of different consultation reasons, but there was a broader service spectrum by rural GPs (ß = - 1.42; 95% confidence interval - 2.75/- 0.08; p = 0.038) which was statistically explained by a higher level of medical training. Additionally, there were differences in the frequency of individual consultation reasons and services between rural and urban areas.

Conclusion: GPs in rural areas performed more frequently services usually provided by medical specialists in urban areas. This might be caused by a low availability of specialists in rural areas. The association between medical training and service spectrum might imply that GPs compensate the specific needs of their patients by completing advanced medical training before or after setting up a medical practice.

Trial registration: The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02558322).

Keywords: General practice; Healthcare utilisation; Reasons for consultation; Regional comparison; Urban-rural differences.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Included administration districts with regional categories.© GeoBasis-DE / German Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG) 2017 (adjusted). Legend: light blue areas – administration districts of the category “rural areas”; medium blue areas – administration districts of the category “environs”; dark blue areas – administration districts of the category “urban areas”; grey and white shaded areas – not represented administration districts

References

    1. Busse R, Blümel M. Germany: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(2):1–296.
    1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Die Bedarfsplanung als Instrument zur Sicherstellung der ambulanten Versorgung. . Accessed 24 Sept 2019.
    1. Kroll LE, Lampert T. Regionale Unterschiede in der Gesundheit am Beispiel von Adipositas und Diabetes mellitus. In: Robert Koch-Institut (Hrsg.) Daten und Fakten: Ergebnisse der Studie» Gesundheit in Deutschland. Berlin, 2010: 51–59. . Accessed 17 Jan 2019.
    1. Erhart M, von Stillfried D. Analyse regionaler Unterschiede in der Prävalenz und Versorgung depressiver Störungen auf Basis vertragsärztlicher Abrechnungsdaten – Teil 1 Prävalenz. Berlin: Zentralinstitut für die kassenärztliche Versorgung in Deutschland; 2012.
    1. Maretzke S. Regionale Unterschiede in der Altersstruktur. In: Leibniz-Institut für LänderkundeKemper FJ, Gans P, editors. Bundesrepublik Deutschland : Nationalatlas. Band 4. Bevölkerung. Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum; 2012.
    1. Weishaupt H. Bildung und Region. In: Schmidt RTB, editor. Handbuch Bildungsforschung. 3., durchgesehene Auflage. Wiebaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010. pp. 217–232.
    1. Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft . Einkommensarmut in Deutschland aus regionaler Sicht. Pressekonferenz 25. 2014.
    1. Hansen H, Pohontsch NJ, Bole L, Schäfer I, Scherer M. Regional variations of perceived problems in ambulatory care from the perspective of general practitioners and their patients - an exploratory focus group study in urban and rural regions of northern Germany. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0637-x.
    1. Pohontsch NJ, Hansen H, Schäfer I, Scherer M. General practitioners’ perception of being a doctor in urban vs. rural regions in Germany - a focus group study. Fam Pract. 2018;35:209–215. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx083.
    1. Steinhäuser J, Jäkel K, Szecsenyi J, Goetz K, Ledig T, Joos S. Procedures performed in general practice - a cross-sectional study. Gesundheitswesen. 2017;79:1004–1011. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100620.
    1. Schäfer I, Hansen H, Pohontsch N, Bole L, Wagner HO, Führ M, Lühmann D, Scherer M. Regional variation of patient behaviour and reasons for consultation in the general practice of northern Germany: protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010738.
    1. Bundesinstitut für Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung. Siedlungsstrukturelle Kreistypen - Laufende Raumbeobachtung - Raumabgrenzungen. . Accessed 17 Jan 2019.
    1. WONCA International Classification Committee . ICPC-2-R: international classification of primary care. Revised 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Körner T, Saad A, Laux G, Rosemann T, Beyer M, Szecsenyi J. Die Episode als Grundlage der Dokumentation. Eine episodenbezogene Patientenakte mit einer speziell für die Allgemeinmedizin entwickelten Klassifikation verbessert die Datenbasis in der hausärztlichen Versorgung. Dtsch Arztebl. 2005;100:A3168–A3172.
    1. Cumming RG. Is probability sampling always better? A comparison of results from a quota and a probability sample survey. Community Health Stud. 1990;14:132–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1990.tb00033.x.
    1. KBV (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung). Gesundheitsdaten: Regionale Verteilung der Ärzte in der vertragsärztlichen Versorgung. . Accessed 15 Jan 2019.
    1. Pinto-Meza A, Moneta MV, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bruffaerts R, Caldas de Almeida JM, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Florescu S, Kovess Masfety V, O’Neill S, Vassilev S, Haro JM. Social inequalities in mental health: results from the EU contribution to the world mental health surveys initiative. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48:173–181. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0536-3.
    1. Rommel A, Bretschneider J, Kroll LE, Prütz F, Thom J. Inanspruchnahme psychiatrischer und psychotherapeutischer Leistungen – Individuelle Determinanten und regionale Unterschiede. J Health Monit. 2017;2(4):3–23.
    1. Boerma WG, Groenewegen PP, Van der Zee J. General practice in urban and rural Europe: the range of curative services. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:445–453. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00074-4.
    1. Mehring M, Donnachie E, Schneider A, Tauscher M, Gerlach R, Storr C, Linde K, Mielck A, Maier W. Impact of regional socioeconomic variation on coordination and cost of ambulatory care: investigation of claims data from Bavaria, Germany. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016218.
    1. Hanks H, Veitch PC, Harris MF. A rural/urban comparison of the roles of the general practitioner in colorectal cancer management. Aust J Rural Health. 2008;16:376–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2008.01019.x.
    1. Pochert M, Voigt K, Bortz M, Sattler A, Schübel J, Bergmann A. The workload for home visits by German family practitioners: an analysis of regional variation in a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20:3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0891-6.
    1. Görig T, Diehl K, Herr RM, Bock C, Mayer M, Schneider S. Differences in the provision of lifestyle counseling for cardiovascular disease prevention between urban and rural regions in Germany. Findings from a National Survey of primary care physicians. Gesundheitswesen. 2016;78:533–538. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586559.
    1. Wiens K, Williams JV, Lavorato DH, Bulloch AG, Patten SB. The prevalence of major depressive episodes is higher in urban regions of Canada. Can J Psychiatr. 2017;62:57–61. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659246.
    1. Peen J., Schoevers R. A., Beekman A. T., Dekker J. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2010;121(2):84–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01438.x.
    1. Albrecht M, Etgeton S, Ochmann RR. Facktencheck Gesundheit – Regionale Verteilung von Arztsitzen (Ärztedichte) – HNO-Ärzte, Nervenärzte, Orthopäden, Psychotherapeuten, Urologen. /GrauePublikationen/GP_Faktencheck_Gesundheit_Aerztedichte_2.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2019.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera