Kidney age - chronological age difference (KCD) score provides an age-adapted measure of kidney function

Duncan J Campbell, Jennifer M Coller, Fei Fei Gong, Michele McGrady, Umberto Boffa, Louise Shiel, Danny Liew, Simon Stewart, Alice J Owen, Henry Krum, Christopher M Reid, David L Prior, Duncan J Campbell, Jennifer M Coller, Fei Fei Gong, Michele McGrady, Umberto Boffa, Louise Shiel, Danny Liew, Simon Stewart, Alice J Owen, Henry Krum, Christopher M Reid, David L Prior

Abstract

Background: Given the age-related decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in healthy individuals, we examined the association of all-cause death or cardiovascular event with the Kidney age - Chronological age Difference (KCD) score, whereby an individual's kidney age is estimated from their estimated GFR (eGFR) and the age-dependent eGFR decline reported for healthy living potential kidney donors.

Methods: We examined the association between death or cardiovascular event and KCD score, age-dependent stepped eGFR criteria (eGFRstep), and eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR60) in a community-based high cardiovascular risk cohort of 3837 individuals aged ≥60 (median 70, interquartile range 65, 75) years, followed for a median of 5.6 years.

Results: In proportional hazards analysis, KCD score ≥ 20 years (KCD20) was associated with increased risk of death or cardiovascular event in unadjusted analysis and after adjustment for age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors. Addition of KCD20, eGFRstep or eGFR60 to a cardiovascular risk factor model did not improve area under the curve for identification of individuals who experienced death or cardiovascular event in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. However, addition of KCD20 or eGFR60, but not eGFRstep, to a cardiovascular risk factor model improved net reclassification and integrated discrimination. KCD20 identified individuals who experienced death or cardiovascular event with greater sensitivity than eGFRstep for all participants, and with greater sensitivity than eGFR60 for participants aged 60-69 years, with similar sensitivities for men and women.

Conclusions: In this high cardiovascular risk cohort aged ≥60 years, the KCD score provided an age-adapted measure of kidney function that may assist patient education, and KCD20 provided an age-adapted criterion of eGFR-related increased risk of death or cardiovascular event. Further studies that include the full age spectrum are required to examine the optimal KCD score cut point that identifies increased risk of death or cardiovascular event, and kidney events, associated with impaired kidney function, and whether the optimal KCD score cut point is similar for men and women.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00400257 , NCT00604006 , and NCT01581827 .

Keywords: All-cause mortality; Cardiovascular disease; Chronic kidney disease; eGFR.

Conflict of interest statement

Bupa Australia was involved in study design, recruitment of participants, and funding, but was not involved in data collection, analysis or interpretation, or writing of the article. Bupa Australia had no control or influence over the decision to submit the final manuscript for publication.

U.B. was an employee of Bupa Australia. D.L. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Sanofi, Astra-Zeneca, Abbott, Bayer, MSD, GSK, Novartis and Nycomed. S.S. has received unrestricted educational grants from Schering Plough and Boehringer Ingelheim, and was Principal Investigator of the Novartis-sponsored Valsartan Intensified Primary Care Reduction of Blood Pressure (VIPER-BP) Study. H.K. received support from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ardian/Medtronic. D.L.P. received payment from Johnson & Johnson, Bayer and Novartis for lectures. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scattergram plot of eGFR in relation to age for 3837 SCREEN-HF participants. The black line represents the age-related decline in eGFR from 105 ml/min/1.73 m2 at age 40 years to 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 at age 90 years in healthy living potential kidney donors [3]. eGFR values below the black line represent eGFR values below that of a healthy living potential kidney donor of the same age, and correspond to a kidney age that exceeds the chronological age. A 70-year old individual with an eGFR of 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 has an eGFR of a healthy 90-year-old; thus, the kidney age is 20 years older than the chronological age, and the Kidney age - Chronological age Difference (KCD) score is 90–70 = 20 years. Whereas CKD may be defined by eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (green line), age-dependent stepped eGFR criteria of Delanaye et al. [10] define CKD as eGFR < 75 ml/min/1.73 m2 for age < 40 years, < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 for individuals between 40 and 65 years, and < 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 for age > 65 years (purple line) The red line corresponds to a KCD score of 20 years
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histograms of the numbers of participants according to eGFR (a) and KCD score (b)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hazard ratios for death or CV event according to KCD score. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval, CI) for KCD score alone (a) or adjusted (b) for age, sex, and CV risk factors (previous myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, log2(BMI), systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication, and smoking status on enrolment). Hazard ratios from proportional hazards analysis of all events during follow-up (n = 782)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sensitivity (a) and specificity (b) for the identification of individuals who experienced death or CV event during 5-year follow-up. Sensitivity and specificity for either Kidney age - Chronological age Difference score ≥ 20 years (KCD20), age-dependent stepped eGFR criteria of Delanaye et al. [10] (eGFRstep), or eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (eGFR60), for all participants, and for participants aged 60- < 70 years, 70- < 80 years, and ≥ 80 years. Among all participants, and each age category, sensitivities and specificities, compared using McNemar’s test with Yates correction, were statistically significantly different between KCD20, eGFRstep and eGFR60 (P < 0.05)

References

    1. KDIGO 2012 Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Chapter 1: definition and classification of CKD. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3:19–62. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.64.
    1. Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, El Nahas M, Astor BC, Matsushita K, Gansevoort RT, Kasiske BL, Eckardt KU. The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO controversies conference report. Kidney Int. 2011;80(1):17–28. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.483.
    1. Pottel H, Hoste L, Yayo E, Delanaye P. Glomerular filtration rate in healthy living potential kidney donors: a meta-analysis supporting the construction of the full age spectrum equation. Nephron. 2017;135(2):105–119. doi: 10.1159/000450893.
    1. Denic A, Glassock RJ, Rule AD. Structural and functional changes with the aging kidney. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016;23(1):19–28. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2015.08.004.
    1. Hommos MS, Glassock RJ, Rule AD. Structural and functional changes in human kidneys with healthy aging. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(10):2838–2844. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017040421.
    1. Denic A, Mathew J, Lerman LO, Lieske JC, Larson JJ, Alexander MP, Poggio E, Glassock RJ, Rule AD. Single-nephron glomerular filtration rate in healthy adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2349–2357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614329.
    1. Wetzels JF, Kiemeney LA, Swinkels DW, Willems HL, den Heijer M. Age- and gender-specific reference values of estimated GFR in Caucasians: the Nijmegen biomedical study. Kidney Int. 2007;72(5):632–637. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002374.
    1. Poggio ED, Rule AD, Tanchanco R, Arrigain S, Butler RS, Srinivas T, Stephany BR, Meyer KH, Nurko S, Fatica RA, Shoskes DA, Krishnamurthi V, Goldfarb DA, Gill I, Schreiber MJ., Jr Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with glomerular filtration rates in living kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2009;75(10):1079–1087. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.11.
    1. Pottel H, Delanaye P, Weekers L, Selistre L, Goffin K, Gheysens O, Dubourg L. Age-dependent reference intervals for estimated and measured glomerular filtration rate. Clin Kidney J. 2017;10(4):545–551. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx026.
    1. Delanaye P, Jager KJ, Bokenkamp A, Christensson A, Dubourg L, Eriksen BO, Gaillard F, Gambaro G, van der Giet M, Glassock RJ, et al. CKD: a call for an age-adapted definition. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(10):1785–1805. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019030238.
    1. Chertow GM, Beddhu S. Modification of eGFR-based CKD definitions: perfect, or enemy of the good? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(10):1807–1809. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019070743.
    1. Wesson DE. Does eGFR by any number mean the same? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(10):1806–1807. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019070749.
    1. Trachtman H. Age-dependent definition of CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31:447. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019090914.
    1. Coresh J, Gansevoort RT, Consortium CKDP, Levin A, Jadoul M. Kdigo. Current CKD definition takes into account both relative and absolute risk. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(2):447–448. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019101049.
    1. Rule AD, Jager KJ, van den Brand J, Delanaye P. Authors’ reply. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(2):448–449. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019111188.
    1. Glassock RJ, Delanaye P, Rule AD. Should the definition of CKD be changed to include age-adapted GFR criteria? YES Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):34–37. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.08.033.
    1. Levey AS, Inker LA, Coresh J. Should the definition of CKD be changed to include age-adapted GFR criteria?: con: the evaluation and management of CKD, not the definition, should be age-adapted. Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):37–40. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.08.032.
    1. Rovin BH. Do kidneys grow old gracefully? Kidney Int. 2020;97(1):40–41. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.08.031.
    1. Matsushita K, Coresh J, Sang Y, Chalmers J, Fox C, Guallar E, Jafar T, Jassal SK, Landman GW, Muntner P, Roderick P, Sairenchi T, Schöttker B, Shankar A, Shlipak M, Tonelli M, Townend J, van Zuilen A, Yamagishi K, Yamashita K, Gansevoort R, Sarnak M, Warnock DG, Woodward M, Ärnlöv J, CKD Prognosis Consortium Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(7):514–525. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00040-6.
    1. Hallan SI, Matsushita K, Sang Y, Mahmoodi BK, Black C, Ishani A, Kleefstra N, Naimark D, Roderick P, Tonelli M, Wetzels JFM, Astor BC, Gansevoort RT, Levin A, Wen CP, Coresh J, Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium Age and association of kidney measures with mortality and end-stage renal disease. JAMA. 2012;308(22):2349–2360. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.16817.
    1. Rule AD, Gussak HM, Pond GR, Bergstralh EJ, Stegall MD, Cosio FG, Larson TS. Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(1):112–119. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.09.026.
    1. O'Hare AM, Bertenthal D, Covinsky KE, Landefeld CS, Sen S, Mehta K, Steinman MA, Borzecki A, Walter LC. Mortality risk stratification in chronic kidney disease: one size for all ages? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(3):846–853. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005090986.
    1. D'Agostino RB, Sr, Pencina MJ, Massaro JM, Coady S. Cardiovascular disease risk assessment: insights from Framingham. Glob Heart. 2013;8(1):11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2013.01.001.
    1. Campbell DJ, Coller JM, Gong FF, McGrady M, Prior DL, Boffa U, Shiel L, Liew D, Wolfe R, Owen AJ, Krum H, Reid CM. Risk factor management in a contemporary Australian population at increased cardiovascular disease risk. Intern Med J. 2018;48(6):688–698. doi: 10.1111/imj.13678.
    1. Gong FF, Jelinek MV, Castro JM, Coller JM, McGrady M, Boffa U, Shiel L, Liew D, Wolfe R, Stewart S, Owen AJ, Krum H, Reid CM, Prior DL, Campbell DJ. Risk factors for incident heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction, and valvular heart failure, in a community-based cohort. Open Heart. 2018;5(2):e000782. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000782.
    1. Coller JM, Gong FF, McGrady M, Jelinek MV, Castro JM, Boffa U, Shiel L, Liew D, Stewart S, Krum H, Reid CM, Prior DL, Campbell DJ. Age-specific diastolic dysfunction improves prediction of symptomatic heart failure by stage B heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6(4):747–757. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12449.
    1. Campbell DJ, Gong FF, Jelinek MV, Castro JM, Coller JM, McGrady M, Boffa U, Shiel L, Wang BH, Liew D, et al. Prediction of incident heart failure by serum amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level in a community-based cohort. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;4:449–459. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1381.
    1. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.
    1. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1787–1847. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104.
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Joint ESCAAHAWHFTFftUDoMI. Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126(16):2020–2035. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058.
    1. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, Elkind MS, George MG, Hamdan AD, Higashida RT, Hoh BL, Janis LS, Kase CS, Kleindorfer DO, Lee JM, Moseley ME, Peterson ED, Turan TN, Valderrama AL, Vinters HV, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–2089. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca.
    1. Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32(30):5381–5397. doi: 10.1002/sim.5958.
    1. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Sr, D'Agostino RB, Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008;27(2):157–172. doi: 10.1002/sim.2929.
    1. Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW, D'Agostino RB., Sr Net reclassification index at event rate: properties and relationships. Stat Med. 2017;36(28):4455–4467. doi: 10.1002/sim.7041.
    1. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Sr, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med. 2011;30(1):11–21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4085.
    1. Goff DC, Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 suppl 2):S49–S73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98.
    1. Kubo SH, Schulman S, Starling RC, Jessup M, Wentworth D, Burkhoff D. Development and validation of a patient questionnaire to determine New York heart association classification. J Card Fail. 2004;10(3):228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2003.10.005.
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia . Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009.
    1. Chang A, Kramer H. Should eGFR and albuminuria be added to the Framingham risk score? Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease risk prediction. Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;119(2):c171–c178. doi: 10.1159/000325669.
    1. Cook NR. Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007;115(7):928–935. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402.
    1. Cardiovascular health compendium. . Accessed 21 May 2018.
    1. An interactive insight into overweight and obesity in Australia. . Accessed 21 May 2018.
    1. Diabetes compendium. . Accessed 21 May 2018.
    1. Ball J, Thompson DR, Ski CF, Carrington MJ, Gerber T, Stewart S. Estimating the current and future prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the Australian adult population. Med J Aust. 2015;202(1):32–35. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00238.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease - Australian facts: risk factors., Cardiovascular, diabetes and chronic kidney disease series no. 4. Cat. no. CDK 4. edn. Canberra: AIHW; 2015.
    1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–1305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031.
    1. Johnson DW, Jones GR, Mathew TH, Ludlow MJ, Chadban SJ, Usherwood T, Polkinghorne K, Colagiuri S, Jerums G, Macisaac R, et al. Chronic kidney disease and measurement of albuminuria or proteinuria: a position statement. Med J Aust. 2012;197(4):224–225. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11468.
    1. Foster MC, Hwang SJ, Larson MG, Parikh NI, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, Wang TJ, Levy D, Fox CS. Cross-classification of microalbuminuria and reduced glomerular filtration rate: associations between cardiovascular disease risk factors and clinical outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(13):1386–1392. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1386.
    1. Inker LA, Coresh J, Levey AS, Tonelli M, Muntner P. Estimated GFR, albuminuria, and complications of chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(12):2322–2331. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010111181.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera