Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review

Michael A Smyth, Samantha J Brace-McDonnell, Gavin D Perkins, Michael A Smyth, Samantha J Brace-McDonnell, Gavin D Perkins

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis is a common and potentially life-threatening response to an infection. International treatment guidelines for sepsis advocate that treatment be initiated at the earliest possible opportunity. It is not yet clear if very early intervention by ambulance clinicians prior to arrival at hospital leads to improved clinical outcomes among sepsis patients.

Methoda: We systematically searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and PubMed up to June 2015. In addition, subject experts were contacted. We adopted the GRADE (grading recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) methodology to conduct the review and follow PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations to report findings.

Results: Nine studies met the eligibility criteria - one study was a randomized controlled trial while the remaining studies were observational in nature. There was considerable variation in the methodological approaches adopted and outcome measures reported across the studies. Because of these differences, the studies did not answer a unique research question and meta-analysis was not appropriate. A narrative approach to data synthesis was adopted.

Conclusion: There is little robust evidence addressing the impact of prehospital interventions on outcomes in sepsis. That which is available is of low quality and indicates that prehospital interventions have limited impact on outcomes in sepsis beyond improving process outcomes and expediting the patient's passage through the emergency care pathway. Evidence indicating that prehospital antibiotic therapy and fluid resuscitation improve patient outcomes is currently lacking.

Figures

Figure
Figure
PRISMA flow chart. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

References

    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.
    1. UK Sepsis Trust. UK Sepsis Trust Homepage. 2015. [Accessed Dec 15, 2015]. Available at: .
    1. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, et al. Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1284–9.
    1. Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, et al. National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(8):1928–36.
    1. Studnek JR, Artho MR, Garner CL, et al. The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(1):51–6.
    1. Wang HE, Weaver MD, Shapiro NI, et al. Opportunities for Emergency Medical Services care of sepsis. Resuscitation. 2010;81(2):193–7.
    1. Ibrahim I, Jacobs IG. Can the characteristics of emergency department attendances predict poor hospital outcomes in patients with sepsis? Singapore Med J. 2013;54(11):634–8.
    1. Groenewoudt M, Roest AA, Leijten FMM, et al. Septic patients arriving with emergency medical services: A seriously ill population. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21(5):330–5.
    1. Roest AA, Stoffers J, Pijpers E, et al. Ambulance patients with nondocumented sepsis have a high mortality risk: a retrospective study. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015
    1. van der Wekken LC, Alam N, Holleman F, et al. Epidemiology of Sepsis and Its Recognition by Emergency Medical Services Personnel in the Netherlands. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015
    1. Femling J, Weiss S, Hauswald E, et al. EMS patients and walk-in patients presenting with severe sepsis: differences in management and outcome. South Med J. 2014;107(12):751–6.
    1. Gray A, Ward K, Lees F, et al. The epidemiology of adults with severe sepsis and septic shock in Scottish emergency departments. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(5):397–401.
    1. Robson WNT, Daniels R. Sepsis. a need for prehospital intervention? Emerg Med J. 2009;26(7):535–8.
    1. Moyer P, Ornato JP, Brady WJ, Jr, et al. Development of systems of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: the emergency medical services and emergency department perspective. Circulation. 2007;116(2):e43–48.
    1. Abdullah AR, Smith EE, Biddinger PD, et al. Advance hospital notification by EMS in acute stroke is associated with shorter door-to-computed tomography time and increased likelihood of administration of tissue-plasminogen activator. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12(4):426–31.
    1. American College of Emergency Physicians. Trauma care systems development, evaluation, and funding. Policy statement. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(2):249–50.
    1. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, AO GRADE Handbook. 2013. [Accessed Nov 21, 2013]. Available at:
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006–12.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):407–15.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–1302.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303–10.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283–93.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277–82.
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311–6.
    1. McClelland G, Jones J. A pilot study exploring the accuracy of pre-hospital sepsis recognition in the North East Ambulance Service. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2015;7(9):459–65.
    1. Band RA, Gaieski DF, Hylton JH, et al. Arriving by emergency medical services improves time to treatment endpoints for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(9):934–40.
    1. Guerra WF, Mayfield TR, Meyers MS, et al. Early detection and treatment of patients with severe sepsis by prehospital personnel. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(6):1116–25.
    1. Seymour CW, Cooke CR, Mikkelsen ME, et al. Out-of-hospital fluid in severe sepsis: effect on early resuscitation in the emergency department. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010;14(2):145–52.
    1. Chamberlain D. Prehospital administered intravenous antimicrobial protocol for septic shock: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Critical Care. 2009;13:S130–S131.
    1. Bayer O, Stumme C, Schneider K, et al. Evaluation of 1 year prehospital emergency sepsis care: An observational study. Infection, Supplement. 2013;(1):S66.
    1. Seymour CW, Cooke CR, Heckbert SR, et al. Prehospital intravenous access and fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):533.
    1. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1683–93.
    1. Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(16):1496–1506.
    1. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301–11.
    1. Erwin A, Salzman J, Wewerka S, et al. Can paramedics accurately diagnose sepsis and severe sepsis in the field? Acad Emerg Med. 2011;(1):S23–S24.
    1. Sterling SA, Miller WR, Pryor J, et al. The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(9):1907–15.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera