Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of physician education and activation versus two rehabilitation programs for the treatment of Whiplash-associated Disorders: The University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial

Pierre Côté, J David Cassidy, Simon Carette, Eleanor Boyle, Heather M Shearer, Maja Stupar, Carlo Ammendolia, Gabrielle van der Velde, Jill A Hayden, Xiaoqing Yang, Maurits van Tulder, John W Frank, Pierre Côté, J David Cassidy, Simon Carette, Eleanor Boyle, Heather M Shearer, Maja Stupar, Carlo Ammendolia, Gabrielle van der Velde, Jill A Hayden, Xiaoqing Yang, Maurits van Tulder, John W Frank

Abstract

Background: Whiplash injuries are an important public health problem that is associated with significant disability and high health care utilization. Recent cohort studies suggest that physician care may be the most effective treatment for patients with whiplash-associated disorders. However, these findings have not been tested in a randomized controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to determine which of physician care or two rehabilitation programs of care is most effective in improving recovery of patients with recent whiplash associated disorders.

Methods and design: We designed a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. A total of 444 participants (148 in each of three arms) who reside in Southern Ontario, Canada will be recruited from a large insurer. We will include individuals who are 18 years of age or older and who are diagnosed with Grade I or II Whiplash-associated Disorders. Participants will be randomized to physician-based education and activation or one of two rehabilitation programs of care currently in use in Ontario. Our primary outcome, self-rated global recovery and all secondary outcomes (neck pain intensity, whiplash disability, health-related quality of life, depressive symptomatology and satisfaction with care) will be measured at baseline by a trial coordinator and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up by an interviewer who is blind to the participants' baseline characteristics and treatment allocation. We will also collect information on general health status, other injuries, comorbidities, expectation of recovery, work status, pain coping, legal representation, and co-interventions. The primary intention-to-treat analysis will compare time to recovery between the three interventions. This trial will have 90% power at an alpha of 0.05 to detect a 20% difference in the rate of perceived recovery at one year. Secondary analyses will compare the health outcomes, rate of recurrence and the rate of adverse events between intervention groups.

Conclusion: The results of this study will provide the public, clinicians and policy makers much needed evidence on the effectiveness of common approaches used to manage whiplash-associated disorders.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00546806.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Design: Process of recruitment, randomization to treatment, treatment provision, and outcomes assessment.

References

    1. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Côté P, Lemstra M, Berglund A, Nygren A. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury.see comment. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1179–1186. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421606.
    1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine. 1995;20:1S–73S.
    1. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Côté P. Frequency, timing, and course of depressive symptomatology after whiplash. Spine. 2006;31:E551–E556. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000225979.26966.9e.
    1. Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Frank JW, Bombardier C. Initial patterns of clinical care and recovery from whiplash injuries: a population-based cohort study.see comment. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2257–2263. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.19.2257.
    1. Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C. Early aggressive care and delayed recovery from whiplash: isolated finding or reproducible result? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:861–868. doi: 10.1002/art.22775.
    1. Holm L, Cassidy JD, Sjogren Y, Nygren A. Impairment and work disability due to whiplash injury following traffic collisions. An analysis of insurance material from the Swedish Road Traffic Injury Commission. Scand J Public Health. 1999;27:116–123. doi: 10.1080/140349499445301.
    1. Quinlan KP, Annest JL, Myers B, Ryan G, Hill H. Neck strains and sprains among motor vehicle occupants-United States, 2000. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2004;36:21–27. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00110-0.
    1. Berglund A, Alfredsson L, Cassidy JD, Jensen I, Nygren A. The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future neck or shoulder pain: a cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:1089–1094. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00225-0.
    1. Berglund A, Alfredsson L, Jensen I, Cassidy JD, Nygren A. The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future health complaints. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:851–856. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00369-3.
    1. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ. Is a lifetime history of neck injury in a traffic collision associated with prevalent neck pain, headache and depressive symptomatology? Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2000;32:151–159. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00117-7.
    1. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Côté P, Frank J. Does multidisciplinary rehabilitation benefit whiplash recovery?: results of a population-based incidence cohort study. Spine. 2007;32:126–131. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249526.76788.e8.
    1. Financial Services Commission of Ontario Pre-approved framework guideline for whiplash-associated disorders Grade I injuries with or without complaint of back symptoms. Financial Services Commission of Ontario. 2003. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
    1. Moore A, Jackson A, Jordan J, Hammersley S, Hill J, Mercer C, et al. Clinical guidelines for the physiotherapy management of Whiplash Associated Disorders: Quick reference guide. The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. 2005. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
    1. Motor Accidents Authority . Guidelines for the management of whiplash associated disorders. Motor Accidents Authority, New South Wales, Australia; 2001. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
    1. Financial Services Commission of Ontario Pre-approved framework guideline for whiplash-associated disorders Grade II injuries with or without complaint of back symptoms. Financial Services Commission of Ontario. 2003. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
    1. Côté P, Hogg-Johnson S, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW. The association between neck pain intensity, physical functioning, depressive symptomatology and time-to-claim-closure after whiplash. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:275–286. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00319-X.
    1. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Frank JW, Bombardier C. A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine. 2001;26:E445–E458. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200110010-00020.
    1. Scholten-Peeters GG, Neeleman-van der Steen CW, Windt DA van der, Hendriks EJ, Verhagen AP, Oostendorp RA. Education by general practitioners or education and exercises by physiotherapists for patients with whiplash-associated disorders? A randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2006;31:723–731. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206381.15224.0f.
    1. Elashoff JD. Version 70 User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA; 2007. nQuery Advisor. Ref Type: Computer Program.
    1. Financial Services Commission of Ontario Pre-approved framework guideline for Grade I and II Whiplash Associated Disorders. Financial Services Commission of Ontario. 2007. Ref Type: Electronic Citation.
    1. Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, Lorig K, Laurent D, Holman H. Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282:1157–1162. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.12.1157.
    1. Hoving JL, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Mameren H, Deville WL, Windt DA van der, et al. Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by the general practitioner for patients with neck pain: long-term results from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2006;22:370–377. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000180185.79382.3f.
    1. Hoving JL, Gross AR, Gasner D, Kay T, Kennedy C, Hondras MA, et al. A critical appraisal of review articles on the effectiveness of conservative treatment for neck pain. Spine. 2001;26:196–205. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00015.
    1. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena.[see comment] Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227–236. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130405.
    1. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117–126. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(86)90228-9.
    1. Pinfold M, Niere KR, O'Leary EF, Hoving JL, Green S, Buchbinder R. Validity and internal consistency of a whiplash-specific disability measure. Spine. 2004;29:263–268. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107238.15526.4C.
    1. Ferrari R, Russell A, Kelly AJ. Assessing whiplash recovery–the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35:653–654.
    1. Willis C, Niere KR, Hoving JL, Green S, O'Leary EF, Buchbinder R. Reproducibility and responsiveness of the Whiplash Disability Questionnaire. Pain. 2004;110:681–688. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.008.
    1. Haley SM, McHorney CA, Ware JE., Jr Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:671–684. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90215-1.
    1. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–263. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006.
    1. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?[see comment] BMJ. 1993;306:1440–1444.
    1. Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:79–93. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00296-X.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
    1. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Côté P. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey: the prevalence and factors associated with depressive symptomatology in Saskatchewan adults. Can J Public Health. 2000;91:459–464.
    1. Blalock SJ, DeVellis RF, Brown GK, Wallston KA. Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in arthritis populations. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32:991–997. doi: 10.1002/anr.1780320808.
    1. Boyd JH, Weissman MM, Thompson WD, Myers JK. Screening for depression in a community sample. Understanding the discrepancies between depression symptom and diagnostic scales. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:1195–1200.
    1. Devins GM, Orme CM, Costello CG, Binik YM. Measuring depressive symptoms in illness populations: Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. Psychol Health. 1988;2:139–156. doi: 10.1080/08870448808400349.
    1. Orme JG, Reis J, Herz EJ. Factorial and discriminant validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42:28–33. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198601)42:1<28::AID-JCLP2270420104>;2-T.
    1. Schulberg HC, Saul M, McClelland M, Ganguli M, Christy W, Frank R. Assessing depression in primary medical and psychiatric practices. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:1164–1170.
    1. Turk DC, Okifuji A. Detecting depression in chronic pain patients: adequacy of self-reports. Behav Res Ther. 1994;32:9–16. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90078-7.
    1. Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, Prusoff BA, Locke BZ. Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:203–214.
    1. Zich JM, Attkisson CC, Greenfield TK. Screening for depression in primary care clinics: the CES-D and the BDI. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1990;20:259–277.
    1. Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine. 2000;25:3167–3177. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012.
    1. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL, Brandt PA van den. 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.005.
    1. Allison PD. Survival analysis using the SAS system: a practical guide. Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute; 1995.
    1. Cox DR. Regression Models and Life-Tables. 1972.
    1. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Assessment of model adequacy. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, editor. Applied survival analysis: regression modeling of time to event data. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999. pp. 196–240.
    1. Murray DM, Varnell SP, Blitstein JL. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:423–432. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.423.
    1. Lee KJ, Thompson SG. The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials. Clin Trials. 2005;2:163–173. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn082oa.
    1. Greeland S, Rothman KJ. Introduction to Stratified Analysis. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, editor. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. pp. 253–279.
    1. Diggle P. Analysis of longitudinal data. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera