The Agricultural Health Study

M C Alavanja, D P Sandler, S B McMaster, S H Zahm, C J McDonnell, C F Lynch, M Pennybacker, N Rothman, M Dosemeci, A E Bond, A Blair, M C Alavanja, D P Sandler, S B McMaster, S H Zahm, C J McDonnell, C F Lynch, M Pennybacker, N Rothman, M Dosemeci, A E Bond, A Blair

Abstract

The Agricultural Health Study, a large prospective cohort study has been initiated in North Carolina and Iowa. The objectives of this study are to: 1) identify and quantify cancer risks among men, women, whites, and minorities associated with direct exposure to pesticides and other agricultural agents; 2) evaluate noncancer health risks including neurotoxicity reproductive effects, immunologic effects, nonmalignant respiratory disease, kidney disease, and growth and development among children; 3) evaluate disease risks among spouses and children of farmers that may arise from direct contact with pesticides and agricultural chemicals used in the home lawns and gardens, and from indirect contact, such as spray drift, laundering work clothes, or contaminated food or water; 4) assess current and past occupational and nonoccupational agricultural exposures using periodic interviews and environmental and biologic monitoring; 5) study the relationship between agricultural exposures, biomarkers of exposure, biologic effect, and genetic susceptibility factors relevant to carcinogenesis; and 6) identify and quantify cancer and other disease risks associated with lifestyle factors such as diet, cooking practices, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption, and hair dye use. In the first year of a 3-year enrollment period, 26,235 people have been enrolled in the study, including 19,776 registered pesticide applicators and 6,459 spouses of registered farmer applicators. It is estimated that when the total cohort is assembled in 1997 it will include approximately 75,000 adult study subjects. Farmers, the largest group of registered pesticide applicators comprise 77% of the target population enrolled in the study. This experience compares favorably with enrollment rates of previous prospective studies.

References

    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Dec 16;84(24):1866-74
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992 Aug;18(4):209-15
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Feb 1;137(3):270-80
    1. J Occup Med. 1993 Jun;35(6):557-61
    1. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Jan;26(1):47-59
    1. Cancer Causes Control. 1994 Jul;5(4):310-8
    1. J Occup Med. 1994 Nov;36(11):1247-50
    1. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995 Feb;4(1):81-90
    1. Neuroepidemiology. 1992;11(4-6):267-76
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1971 Dec;128(6):920-8
    1. Pestic Monit J. 1974 Dec;8(3):209-12
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Sep;59(3):851-3
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981 Jun;66(6):1191-308
    1. Med J Aust. 1982 Mar 20;1(6):253-6
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Aug;69(2):333-7
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1985 Dec;11(6):397-407
    1. Arch Environ Health. 1987 Jul-Aug;42(4):204-12
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1988;14(2):167-76
    1. Arch Environ Health. 1989 Mar-Apr;44(2):94-101
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):146-51
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1989 Nov;46(11):809-14
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Apr 4;82(7):575-82
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 May 16;82(10):840-8
    1. Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(2):133-48
    1. Occup Med. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):335-54
    1. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1992;126:1-85

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera