Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-063): A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in Asian patients

Hyun Cheol Chung, Yoon-Koo Kang, Zhendong Chen, Yuxian Bai, Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak, Byoung Yong Shim, Young Lee Park, Dong-Hoe Koo, Jianwei Lu, Jianming Xu, Hong Jae Chon, Li-Yuan Bai, Shan Zeng, Ying Yuan, Yen-Yang Chen, Kangsheng Gu, Wen Yan Zhong, Shu Kuang, Chie-Schin Shih, Shu-Kui Qin, Hyun Cheol Chung, Yoon-Koo Kang, Zhendong Chen, Yuxian Bai, Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak, Byoung Yong Shim, Young Lee Park, Dong-Hoe Koo, Jianwei Lu, Jianming Xu, Hong Jae Chon, Li-Yuan Bai, Shan Zeng, Ying Yuan, Yen-Yang Chen, Kangsheng Gu, Wen Yan Zhong, Shu Kuang, Chie-Schin Shih, Shu-Kui Qin

Abstract

Background: KEYNOTE-063 (NCT03019588) investigated pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel as second-line therapy in Asian patients with advanced programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive (combined positive score ≥1) gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer.

Methods: This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 36 medical centers in China (mainland), Malaysia, South Korea, and Taiwan. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 200 mg of pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤2 years or 80 mg/m2 of paclitaxel intravenously every week. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 and safety.

Results: Between February 16, 2017, and March 12, 2018, 94 patients were randomly assigned (47 pembrolizumab/47 paclitaxel) after screening; enrollment was stopped on March 12, 2018, based on the results of the global KEYNOTE-061 study, and patients were followed until the last patient's last visit. Median OS was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-10 months) with pembrolizumab versus 8 months (95% CI, 5-11 months) with paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.63-1.54). Median PFS was 2 months (95% CI, 1-3 months) with pembrolizumab versus 4 months (95% CI, 3-6 months) with paclitaxel (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.04-2.52). ORR was 13% for pembrolizumab versus 19% for paclitaxel. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in 28 pembrolizumab-treated patients (60%) and 42 paclitaxel-treated patients (96%); grades 3 to 5 events occurred in 5 patients (11%) and 28 patients (64%), respectively.

Conclusions: Definitive conclusions about the efficacy of second-line pembrolizumab in Asian patients with advanced PD-L1-positive gastric/GEJ cancer are limited because of insufficient power, but pembrolizumab was well tolerated in this patient population. Efficacy followed a trend similar to that observed in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-061 trial.

Keywords: Asia; chemotherapy; gastric cancer; gastroesophageal junction cancer; pembrolizumab; programmed death 1.

Conflict of interest statement

Hyun Cheol Chung reports grants (for research to institution) from Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb/Ono, Eli Lilly, GSK, Incyte, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, Merck‐Serono, Taiho, and Zymework; honoraria from Eli Lilly and Merck‐Serono; and consultancy fees from Amgen, BeiGene, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gloria, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, Merck‐Serono, Quintiles, Taiho, and Zymeworks. Yoon‐Koo Kang reports advisory fees from ALX Oncology, Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Daehwa, Macrogenics, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, Novartis, Surface Oncology, and Zymeworks. Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak reports honoraria for lectures from Amgen Malaysia, DKSH Malaysia, Eisai Malaysia, Eli Lilly Malaysia, Ipsen Malaysia, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, Merck Serono Malaysia, Pfizer Malaysia, and Roche Malaysia; travel grants from Amgen Malaysia, Celgene Malaysia, Eisai Malaysia, Eli Lilly Malaysia, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, and Roche Malaysia; and is an advisory board member for Celgene Malaysia, Eli Lilly Malaysia, Eisai Malaysia, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey. Wen Yan Zhong is an employee of MSD China, Beijing, China. Shu Kuang is an employee of MSD China, Beijing, China. Chie‐Schin Shih is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey and a stockholder of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.

© 2021 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. aIntended enrollment for KEYNOTE‐063 was 360 but was halted at 94 because pembrolizumab did not significantly prolong overall survival over paclitaxel in the KEYNOTE‐061 study (NCT02370498). bThere was no maximum number of doses of paclitaxel. ITT indicates intention‐to‐treat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan‐Meier estimates of overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan‐Meier estimates of progression‐free survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan‐Meier estimates of duration of response.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394‐424.
    1. Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: global trends, risk factors and prevention. Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14:26‐38.
    1. Wang FH, Shen L, Li J, et al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Cancer Commun. 2019;39:10.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): Gastric cancer (version 4.2020). Published December 23, 2020. Accessed April 23, 2021.
    1. Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel . Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an evidence‐based, multi‐disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer. 2019;19:1‐48.
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1‐21.
    1. Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, et al. First‐line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro‐esophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomized, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398:27‐40.
    1. Boku N, Ryu MH, Oh DY, et al. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer: ATTRACTION‐4 (ONO‐4538‐37) study [abstract]. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:S1192.
    1. Takashima A, Iizumi S, Boku N. Survival after failure of first‐line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients: differences between Japan and the rest of the world. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47:583‐589.
    1. Carter GC, Kaltenboeck A, Ivanova J, et al. Real‐world treatment patterns among patients with advanced gastric cancer in South Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2017;49:578‐587.
    1. Choi IS, Choi M, Lee JH, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving third‐line chemotherapy: a population‐based outcomes study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198544.
    1. Smyth EC, Moehler M. Late‐line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: today and tomorrow. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919867522.
    1. Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro‐esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double‐blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1224‐1235.
    1. Gill S, Shah A, Le N, et al. Asian ethnicity‐related differences in gastric cancer presentation and outcome among patients treated at a Canadian cancer center. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:2070‐2076.
    1. Jin H, Pinheiro PS, Callahan KE, et al. Examining the gastric cancer survival gap between Asians and Whites in the United States. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:573‐582.
    1. Sawaki A, Yamada Y, Yamaguchi K, et al. Regional differences in advanced gastric cancer: exploratory analyses of the AVAGAST placebo arm. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:429‐438.
    1. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE‐059 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e180013.
    1. KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) injection, for intravenous use. 10/2021. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.: Whitehouse Station, NJ; 2021.
    1. Merck & Co., Inc. Merck provides update on KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab) indication in third‐line gastric cancer in the US. Kenilworth, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc.; 2021.
    1. Shitara K, Ozguroglu M, Bang YJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro‐esophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE‐061): a randomized, open‐label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392:123‐133.
    1. Fuchs CS, Özgüroğlu M, Bang YJ, et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated patients with PD‐L1–positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC): update from the phase III KEYNOTE‐061 trial [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4503.
    1. Fuchs CS, Özgüroğlu M, Bang YJ, et al. The association of molecular biomarkers with efficacy of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel in patients with gastric cancer (GC) from KEYNOTE‐061 [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4512.
    1. Shitara K, Özgüroğlu M, Bang YJ, et al. The association of tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB) using the Foundation Medicine genomic platform with efficacy of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel in patients (pts) with gastric cancer (GC) from KEYNOTE‐061 [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:4537.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera