The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: a literature review on restorativeness

Rita Berto, Rita Berto

Abstract

Physical settings can play a role in coping with stress; in particular experimental research has found strong evidence between exposure to natural environments and recovery from physiological stress and mental fatigue, giving support to both Stress Recovery Theory and Attention Restoration Theory. In fact, exposure to natural environments protects people against the impact of environmental stressors and offer physiological, emotional and attention restoration more so than urban environments. Natural places that allow the renewal of personal adaptive resources to meet the demands of everyday life are called restorative environments. Natural environments elicit greater calming responses than urban environments, and in relation to their vision there is a general reduction of physiological symptoms of stress. Exposure to natural scenes mediates the negative effects of stress reducing the negative mood state and above all enhancing positive emotions. Moreover, one can recover the decrease of cognitive performance associated with stress, especially reflected in attention tasks, through the salutary effect of viewing nature. Giving the many benefits of contact with nature, plans for urban environments should attend to restorativeness.

References

    1. Evans G., Cohen S. Environmental Stress. In: Stokols D., Altman I., editors. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. Wiley; New York, NY, USA: 1987. pp. 571–610.
    1. Yerkes R.M., Dodson J.D. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 1908;18:459–482. doi: 10.1002/cne.920180503.
    1. Hartig T., Evans G., Jamner L.D., Davis D.S., Garling T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3.
    1. Ulrich R.S., Simons R.F., Losito B.D., Fiorito E., Miles M.A., Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 1991;11:201–230. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
    1. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1989.
    1. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward and integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 1995;15:169–182. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
    1. Knopf R.C. Human Behaviour, Cognition and Affect in the Natural Environment. In: Stokols D., Altman I., editors. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. Wiley; New York, NY, USA: 1987. pp. 783–825.
    1. Kaplan S., Berman M.G. Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010;5:43–57. doi: 10.1177/1745691609356784.
    1. Berlyne D.E. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century Crofts; New York, NY, USA: 1971.
    1. Meharabian A., Russel J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 1974.
    1. Wohlwill J.F. Human responses to levels of environmental stimulation. Hum. Ecol. 1974;2:127–147. doi: 10.1007/BF01558117.
    1. Cohen S. Environmental Load and the Allocation of Attention. In: Baum A., Valins S., editors. Advances in Environmental Research. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1978.
    1. Ulrich R.S. Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. In: Altman I., Wohlwill J.F., editors. Behavior and the Natural Environment. Plenum; New York, NY, USA: 1983. pp. 85–125.
    1. Appleton J. The Experience of Landscape. Wiley; New York, NY, USA: 1975.
    1. Orians G.H. An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach to Landscape Aesthetics. In: Penning-Rowsell E.C., Lowenthal D., editors. Meaning and Values in Landscape. Allen & Unwin; Wales, UK: 1986. pp. 3–25.
    1. Lepore S., Evans G.W., Palsane M.N. Social hassles and psychological health in the context of chronic crowding. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1991;32:357–367. doi: 10.2307/2137103.
    1. Van den Berg A.E., Koole S.L., van der Wulp N.Y. Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:135–146. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1.
    1. Hidalgo M.C., Berto R., Galindo M.P., Getrevi A. Identifying attractive and unattractive urban places: Categories, restorativeness and aesthetic attributes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano. 2006;7:115–133.
    1. Laumann K., Garling T., Stormark K.M. Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:125–134. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00110-X.
    1. Peron E., Berto R., Purcell A.T. Restorativeness, preference and the perceived naturalness of places. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano. 2002;3:19–34.
    1. Purcell A.T., Peron E., Berto R. Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environ. Behav. 2001;33:93–106.
    1. Staats H., Kieviet A., Hartig T. Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:147–157. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00112-3.
    1. Berto R. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore the attentional capacity. J. Environ. Psychol. 2005;25:249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001.
    1. Berto R., Massaccesi S., Pasini M. Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan’s fascination hypothesis. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008;28:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.004.
    1. Hartig T., Kaiser F.G., Bowler P.A. Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. [(accessed on 14 October 2014)]. Available online: .
    1. Hartig T., Korpela K., Evans G.W., Gärling T. A measure of restorative quality of environments. Scand. Hous. Plan. Res. 1997;14:175–194. doi: 10.1080/02815739708730435.
    1. Herzog T., Black A.M., Fountaine K.A., Knotts D.J. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 1997;12:115–127. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80064-7.
    1. Herzog T.R., Colleen P., Maguire M., Nebel B. Assessing the restorative components of the environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:159–170. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00113-5.
    1. Parsons R. The potential influences on environmental perception on human health. J. Environ. Psychol. 1991;11:1–23. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80002-7.
    1. Berto R. The Attentional Vantage Offered by Perceiving Fascinating Patterns in the Environment. In: Daniels J.A., editor. Advances in Environmental Research. Volume 6. Nova Science Publishers; New York, NY, USA: 2011. pp. 503–516.
    1. Berto R., Baroni M.R., Zainaghi A., Bettella S. An exploratory study of the effect of high and low fascination environments on attentional fatigue. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010;30:494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.002.
    1. Herzog T.R., Kutzli G.E. Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings. Environ. Behav. 2002;34:819–835. doi: 10.1177/001391602237250.
    1. Van den Berg A.E., Ter Heijne M. Fear versus fascination: Emotional responses to natural threats. J. Environ. Psychol. 2005;25:261–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.004.
    1. Kaplan S., Bardwell L.V., Slakter D.B. The museum as a restorative environment. Environ. Behav. 1993;25:725–742. doi: 10.1177/0013916593256004.
    1. Oullette P., Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The monastery as a restorative environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2005;25:175–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.06.001.
    1. Abdulkarim D., Nasar J.L. Are livable elements also restorative? J. Environ. Psychol. 2014;38:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.003.
    1. Scopelliti M., Giuliani M.V. Choosing restorative environments across lifespan: A matter of place experience. J. Environ. Psychol. 2004;24:423–437. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.002.
    1. Kaplan S., Kaplan R. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. Ulrich’s; Ann Arbor, MI, USA: 1981.
    1. Karmanov D., Hamel R. Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008;86:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004.
    1. Zuckerman M. Development of a situation-specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1977;45:513–523. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.45.4.513.
    1. Ulrich R.S. Visual landscape and psychological well-being. Landsc. Res. 1979;4:17–23. doi: 10.1080/01426397908705892.
    1. Lohr I., Pearson-Mims C.H. Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environ. Behav. 2006;38:667–688. doi: 10.1177/0013916506287355.
    1. Coss R.G. Evolutionary persistence of memory-like processes. Concepts Neurosci. 1991;2:129–168.
    1. Ulrich R.S. Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes. In: Kellert S.A., Wilson E.O., editors. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1993.
    1. Korpela M.K., Hartig T. Restorative qualities of favorite places. J. Environ. Psychol. 1996;16:221–233. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1996.0018.
    1. Ulrich R.S. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science. 1984;224:420–421. doi: 10.1126/science.6143402.
    1. Diette G.B., Lechtzin E., Haponik E., Devrotes A., Rubin H.R. Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy. Chest. 2003;123:941–948. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.3.941.
    1. Miller A.C., Hickman L.C., Lemasters G.K. A distraction technique for control of burn pain. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 1992;13:576–580. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199209000-00012.
    1. Heerwagen J.H. Affective functioning, light, hunger and room brightness preferences. Environ. Behav. 1990;22:608–635. doi: 10.1177/0013916590225003.
    1. Moore E.O. A prison environment’s effect on health care service demands. J. Environ. Syst. 1981;11:17–34. doi: 10.2190/KM50-WH2K-K2D1-DM69.
    1. West J.M. Landscape Views and Stress Response in Prison Environments. University of Washington; Seattle, DC, USA: 1986.
    1. Strife S., Downey L. Childhood development and access to nature. A new direction for environmental inequality research. Organ. Environ. 2009;22:99–122.
    1. Leather P., Pyrgas M., Beale D., Lawrence C. Windows in the Workplace Sunlight, View, and Occupational Stress. Environ. Behav. 1998;30:739–762. doi: 10.1177/001391659803000601.
    1. Wells N.M. At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environ. Behav. 2000;32:775–795. doi: 10.1177/00139160021972793.
    1. Berman M.G., Jonides J., Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol. Sci. 2008;19:1207–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.
    1. Felsten G. Where to take a study break on a collage campus: An attention restoration perspective. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009;29:160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.006.
    1. Tennessen C.M., Cimprich B. Views to nature: Effects on attention. J. Environ. Psychol. 1995;15:77–85. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90016-0.
    1. Hartig T., Mang M., Evans G. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ. Behav. 1991;23:3–26. doi: 10.1177/0013916591231001.
    1. Taylor A.F., Kuo F.E. Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. J. Atten. Disord. 2009;12:402–409.
    1. James W. The Briefer Course. Holt; New York, NY, USA: 1892.
    1. Hartig T., Korpela K., Evans G.W., Gärling T. Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Göteb. Psychol. Rep. 1996;26:1–64.
    1. Hartig T., Evans G.W. Psychological Foundations of Nature Experience. In: Garling T., Golledge R.G., editors. Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches. Vol. 96. North Holland; Amsterdam, The Netherland: 1993. pp. 427–457.
    1. Kaplan R. The role of nature in the context of workplace. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1993;26:193–201. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90016-7.
    1. Kaplan R., Kaplan S., Ryan R.L. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature. Island Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1998.
    1. Van den Berg A.E., Maass J., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P. Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010;70:1203–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002.
    1. Maass J., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P., De Vries S., Spreeuwenberg P. Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2006;60:587–592. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
    1. Hartig T. Restorative Environments. In: Spielberger C., editor. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology. Volume 3. Academy Press; San Diego, CA, USA: 2004. pp. 273–279.
    1. Gatchel R.J., Baum A., Krantz D.S. An Introduction to Health Psychology. McGraw-Hill; New York, NY, USA: 1989.
    1. Chalquist C. A look at the ecotherapy research evidence. Ecopsychology. 2009;1:64–74. doi: 10.1089/eco.2009.0003.
    1. Bishop B.P. Nature for Mental Health and Social Inclusion. Disabil. Stud. Q. 2013;33:1–17.
    1. Parr H. Mental health, nature work, and social inclusion. Environ. Plan. D. 2007;25:537–561. doi: 10.1068/d67j.
    1. Söderback I., Söderstrom M., Schälander E. Horticultural therapy: The ‘healing garden’ and gardening in rehabilitation measures of Danderyd Hospital Rehabilitation Clinic, Sweden. Pediatr. Rehabil. 2004;7:245–260.
    1. Kahn P.H., Jr., Severson R.L., Ruckert J.H. The human relation with nature and technological nature. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2009;18:37–42.
    1. Mayer F.S., Frantz C.M., Bruehlman-Senecal E., Dolliver K. Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environ. Behav. 2009;41:607–643.
    1. De Kort Y.A.W., Meijnders A.L., Sponselee A.A.G., Ijsselsteijn W.A. What’s wrong with virtual trees? Restoring stress in a mediated environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2006;26:309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.001.
    1. Valtchanov D., Barton K.R., Ellard C. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2010;13:503–512. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0308.
    1. Villani D., Riva F., Riva G. New Technologies for relaxation: The role of presence. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007;14:260–274. doi: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.3.260.
    1. Wadeson R.W., Mason J.W., Hamburg D.A., Handlon J.H. Plasma and Urinary 17-OHCS Responses to Motion Pictures. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 1963;9:146–156. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1963.01720140042006.
    1. Ulrich R.S. Natural versus Urban Scenes Some Psychological Effects. Environ. Behav. 1981;13:523–556. doi: 10.1177/0013916581135001.
    1. Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 1998;10:230–231.
    1. Nakamura R., Fujii E. Studies of the characteristics of the electroencephalogram when observing potted plants: Pelargonium hortorum “Sprinter red” and begonia evansiana. Tech. Bull. Fac. Horticult. Chiba Univ. 1990;43:177–183.
    1. Nakamura R., Fujii E. A comparative study of the characteristics of the electroencephalogram when observing a hedge and a concrete block fence. J. Jpn. Inst. Landsc. Archit. 1992;55:139–144. doi: 10.5632/jila1934.55.5_139.
    1. Hunter M.D., Eickhoff S.B., Pheasant R.J., Douglas M.J., Watts G.R., Farrow T.F., Hyland D., Kang J., Wilkinson I.D., Horoshenkov K.V., et al. The state of tranquility: Subjective perception is shaped by contextual modulation of auditory connectivity. Neuroimage. 2010;53:611–618. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.053.
    1. Kim T.H., Jeong G.W., Baek H.S., Kim G.W., Sundaram T., Kang H.K., Lee S.W., Kim H.J., Song J.K. Human brain activation in response to visual stimulation with rural and urban scenery pictures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Sci. Total Environ. 2010;408:2600–2607. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.025.
    1. Taylor A.F., Kuo F.E., Sullivan W.C. Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. J. Environ. Psychol. 2002;22:49–63. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0241.
    1. Kuo F.E., Sullivan W.C. Aggression and violence in the inner city: Impacts of environment via mental fatigue. Environ. Behav. 2001;33:543–571. doi: 10.1177/00139160121973124.
    1. Kuo F.E., Sullivan W.C., Coley R.L., Brunson L. Fertile Ground for Community: Inner-City Neighborhood Common Spaces. Am. J. Community Psychol. 1998;26:823–851. doi: 10.1023/A:1022294028903.
    1. Parsons R., Tassinary L.G., Ulrich R.S., Hebl M.R., Grossman-Alexander M. View from the road. J. Environ. Psychol. 1998;18:113–140. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1998.0086.
    1. Cackowski J.M., Nasar J.L. The Restorative Effects of Roadside Vegetation Implications for Automobile Driver Anger and Frustration. Environ. Behav. 2003;35:736–751. doi: 10.1177/0013916503256267.
    1. Bodin M., Hartig T. Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2003;4:141–153. doi: 10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00038-3.
    1. Norling J.C., Sibthorp J., Ruddell E. Perceived Restorativeness for Activities Scale (PRAS): Development and Validation. J. Phys. Act. Health. 2008;5:184–195.
    1. Lehto X.Y. Assessing the Perceived Restorative Qualities of Vacation Destinations. J. Travel Res. 2013;52:325–339. doi: 10.1177/0047287512461567.
    1. Hipp J.A., Ogunseitan O.A. Effect of environmental conditions on perceived psychological restorativeness of coastal parks. J. Environ. Psychol. 2011;31:421–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.008.
    1. Pals R., Steg L., Siero F.W., van der Zee K.I. Development of the PRCQ: A measure of perceived restorative characteristics of zoo attractions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009;29:441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.005.
    1. Peschardt K.K., Stigsdotter U.K. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013;112:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013.
    1. Korpela K., Ylén M., Tyrväinen L., Silvennoinen H. Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favourite places. Health Place. 2008;14:636–652. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.008.
    1. Han K.-T. A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2003;64:209–232. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00241-4.
    1. Pasini M., Berto R., Scopelliti M., Carrus G. Measuring the restorative qualities of the environment: Contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the Perceived Restorativeness Scale. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata. 2009;257:3–11.
    1. Hernandez B., Hidalgo C., Berto R., Peron E. The role of familiarity on the restorative value of a place: Research on a Spanish sample. IAPS Bull. 2001;18:22–24.
    1. Berto R. Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents. Int. J. Psychol. 2007;42:331–341. doi: 10.1080/00207590601000590.
    1. Bagot K.L. Perceive restorative components: A scale for children. Child. Youth Environ. 2004;14:107–129.
    1. Berto R., Pasini M., Barbiero G. Biofilia sperimentale Il contatto con l’ambiente naturale aumenta al percezione del suo valore rigenerativo da parte dei bambini e migliora la loro capacità attentiva. Culture della Sostenibilità. 2012;10:161–184. (In Italian)
    1. Pasini M., Berto R., Brondino M., Hall R., Ortner C. How to measure the restorative qualities of places: The PRS-11. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014 in press.
    1. Jorgensen A., Hitchmough J., Calvert T. Woodland spaces and edges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002;60:135–150. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00052-X.
    1. Jorgensen A., Anthopoulou A. Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands–Does age make a difference? Urban For. Urban Green. 2007;6:267–278. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.004.
    1. Rishbeth C. Ethnic Minority Groups and the Design of Public Open Space: An Inclusive Landscape? Landsc. Res. 2001;26:351–366.
    1. Tveit M.S. Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. J. Environ. Manag. 2009;90:2882–2888. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021.
    1. Grahn P., Stigsdotter U.A. Landscape planning and stress. Urban For. Urban Green. 2003;2:1–18. doi: 10.1078/1618-8667-00019.
    1. Joye Y. Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2007;11:305–328. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305.
    1. Van den Berg A., Hartig T., Staats H. Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. J. Soc. Issues. 2007;63:79–96. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x.
    1. Helson H. Adaptation Level Theory. Harper and Row; New York, NY, USA: 1964.
    1. Kohn I., Wohlwill J.F. The environment as experienced by the immigrant: An adaptation level view. Represent. Res. Soc. Sci. 1973;4:135–164.
    1. Shoemaker C.A., Relf P.D., Lohr V.I. Social science methodologies for studying individuals’ responses in human issues in horticultural research. HortTechnology. 2000;10:87–93.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera