Diffusion of an evidence-based smoking cessation intervention through Facebook: a randomised controlled trial study protocol

Nathan K Cobb, Megan A Jacobs, Jessie Saul, E Paul Wileyto, Amanda L Graham, Nathan K Cobb, Megan A Jacobs, Jessie Saul, E Paul Wileyto, Amanda L Graham

Abstract

Introduction: Online social networks represent a potential mechanism for the dissemination of health interventions including smoking cessation; however, which elements of an intervention determine diffusion between participants is unclear. Diffusion is frequently measured using R, the reproductive rate, which is determined by the duration of use (t), the 'contagiousness' of an intervention (β) and a participant's total contacts (z). We have developed a Facebook 'app' that allows us to enable or disable various components designed to impact the duration of use (expanded content, proactive contact), contagiousness (active and passive sharing) and number of contacts (use by non-smoker supporters). We hypothesised that these elements would be synergistic in their impact on R, while including non-smokers would induce a 'carrier' state allowing the app to bridge clusters of smokers.

Methods and analysis: This study is a fractional factorial, randomised control trial of the diffusion of a Facebook application for smoking cessation. Participants recruited through online advertising are randomised to 1 of 12 cells and serve as 'seed' users. All user interactions are tracked, including social interactions with friends. Individuals installing the application that can be traced back to a seed participant are deemed 'descendants' and form the outcome of interest. Analysis will be conducted using Poisson regression, with event count as the outcome and the number of seeds in the cell as the exposure.

Results: The results will be reported as a baseline R0 for the reference group, and incidence rate ratio for the remainder of predictors.

Ethics and dissemination: This study uses an abbreviated consent process designed to minimise barriers to adoption and was deemed to be minimal risk by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results will be disseminated through traditional academic literature as well as social media. If feasible, anonymised data and underlying source code are intended to be made available under an open source license.

Clinicaltrialsgov registration number: NCT01746472.

Keywords: Diffusion; Dissemination; Internet; RCT; Smoking Cessation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Facebook Timeline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Viral diffusion model.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Application Quit Date Wizard.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Application main screen.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Facebook data transfer consent screen.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61:889–94
    1. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS); 2008. 257 p.
    1. Cokkinides VE, Ward E, Jemal A, et al. Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. Am J Prev Med 2005;28:119–22
    1. Orleans CT. Increasing the demand for and use of effective smoking-cessation treatments reaping the full health benefits of tobacco-control science and policy gains—in our lifetime. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(Suppl 6):S340–8
    1. Shiffman S, Brockwell SE, Pillitteri JL, et al. Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States. Am J Prev Med 2008;34: 102–11
    1. Abrams DB, Orleans CT, Niaura RS, et al. Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care and matching model. Ann Behav Med 1996;18:290–304
    1. Who's online: Internet user demographics. Pew internet & American life project 19 May 2013: (accessed 3 Sep 2013).
    1. Fox S. Online health search 2006. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2006
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL. Characterizing Internet searchers of smoking cessation information. J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e17.
    1. Myung SK, McDonnell DD, Kazinets G, et al. Effects of web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:929–37
    1. Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction 2009;104:1792–804
    1. Chen YF, Madan J, Welton N, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess 2012;16:1–205, iii–v
    1. Civljak M, Stead LF, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(7):CD007078.
    1. Muñoz RF, Lenert LL, Delucchi K, et al. Toward evidence-based Internet interventions: a Spanish/English web site for international smoking cessation trials. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8:77–87
    1. Swartz LH, Noell JW, Schroeder SW, et al. A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tob Control 2006;15:7–12
    1. Strecher VJ, McClure JB, Alexander GL, et al. Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2008;34:373–81
    1. Graham AL, Cobb NK, Papandonatos GD, et al. A randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:46–53
    1. Bock BC, Graham AL, Sciamanna C, et al. Smoking cessation treatment on the Internet: content, quality, and usability. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:207–19
    1. Bock BC, Graham AL, Whiteley JA, et al. A review of web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs). J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e39.
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Abrams DB. Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. Am J Public Health 2010;100:1282–9
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e11.
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Bock BC, et al. Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system. Nicotine Tob Res 2005;7:207–16
    1. Duggan M, Brenner J. The demographics of social media Users. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2013, 14 p
    1. Rainie L, Smith A, Duggan M. Coming and going on Facebook. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2013, 7 p
    1. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2249–58
    1. Latkin C, Donnell D, Celentano DD, et al. Relationships between social norms, social network characteristics, and HIV risk behaviors in Thailand and the United States. Health Psychol 2009;28:323–9
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL. Health behavior interventions in the age of facebook. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:571–2
    1. Facebook's growth in the past year. Facebook media set. (2013). May 2013 (accessed 3 Sep 2013).
    1. The size of social networks: Primates on Facebook. The Economist 2009:13176775.
    1. Heffernan JM, Smith RJ, Wahl LM. Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio. J R Soc Interface 2005;2:281–93
    1. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med 2007;32(Suppl 5):S112–18
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet 2002;359:515–19
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors . Am Psychol 1992;47:1102–14
    1. Baker TB, Piper ME, McCarthy DE, et al. Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: implications for nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob Res 2007;9(Suppl 4):S555–70
    1. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Bock BC, et al. Internet-vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8(Suppl 1):S49.
    1. McCormick TH, Salganik MJ, Zheng T. How many people do you know?: efficiently estimating personal network size. J Am Stat Assoc 2010;105:59–70
    1. Hampton K, Goulet LS, Rainie L, et al. Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011
    1. Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 2006;311:854–6
    1. Watts DJ, Dodds PS. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J Consum Res 2007;34:441–58
    1. Kalyanam K, McIntyre S, Masonis JT. Adaptive experimentation in interactive marketing: the case of viral marketing at Plaxo. J Interact Mark 2007;21:72–85
    1. Ohm P. Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Rev 2010;57:1701
    1. Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Estimating peer effects on health in social networks: a response to Cohen-Cole and Fletcher; and Trogdon, Nonnemaker, and Pais. J Health Econ 2008;27:1400–5

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera