Environments and situations as correlates of eating and drinking among women living with obesity and urban poverty

Daniel O Clark, NiCole R Keith, Susan Ofner, Jason Hackett, Ruohong Li, Neeta Agarwal, Wanzhu Tu, Daniel O Clark, NiCole R Keith, Susan Ofner, Jason Hackett, Ruohong Li, Neeta Agarwal, Wanzhu Tu

Abstract

Objective: One path to improving weight management may be to lessen the self-control burden of physical activity and healthier food choices. Opportunities to lessen the self-control burden might be uncovered by assessing the spatiotemporal experiences of individuals in daily context. This report aims to describe the time, place, and social context of eating and drinking and 6-month weight change among 209 midlife women (n = 113 African-American) with obesity receiving safety-net primary care.

Methods: Participants completed baseline and 6-month weight measures, observations and interviews regarding obesogenic cues in the home environment, and up to 12 ecological momentary assessments (EMA) per day for 30 days inquiring about location, social context, and eating and drinking.

Results: Home was the most common location (62%) at times of EMA notifications. Participants reported "yes" to eating or drinking at the time of nearly one in three (31.1% ± 13.2%) EMA notifications. Regarding social situations, being alone was significantly associated with less frequent eating and drinking (OR = 0.75) unless at work in which case being alone was significantly associated with a greater frequency of eating or drinking (OR = 1.43). At work, eating was most common late at night, whereas at home eating was most frequent in the afternoon and evening hours. However, eating and drinking frequency was not associated with 6-month weight change.

Conclusions: Home and work locations, time of day, and whether alone may be important dimensions to consider in the pursuit of more effective weight loss interventions. Opportunities to personalize weight management interventions, whether digital or human, and lessen in-the-moment self-control burden might lie in identifying times and locations most associated with caloric consumption.

Clinical trial registration: NCT03083964 in clinicaltrials.gov.

Keywords: environmental factors; food; obesity; weight loss; women.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

© 2021 The Authors. Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Reported eating or drinking by location and hours of the day

References

    1. Swinburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791‐846. doi:10.1016/s0140‐6736(18)32822‐8
    1. Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007–2008 to 2015–2016. JAMA. 2018;319(16):1723‐1725. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.3060
    1. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Cradock AL, et al. Projected U.S. state‐level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(25):2440‐2450. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1909301
    1. Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Butryn ML. Lifestyle modification approaches for the treatment of obesity in adults. Am Psychol. 2020;75(2):235‐251. doi:10.1037/amp0000517
    1. Gunstad J, Sanborn V, Hawkins M. Cognitive dysfunction is a risk factor for overeating and obesity. Am Psychol. 2020;75(2):219‐234. doi:10.1037/amp0000585
    1. Fitzpatrick SL, Brooks N, Bray B, Stevens VJ. Adherence to behavioral recommendations for weight loss and associated psychosocial factors among African American adults. J Behav Med. 2020;43(5):859‐864. doi:10.1007/s10865‐019‐00108‐2
    1. Woodruff RC, Schauer GL, Addison AR, Gehlot A, Kegler MC. Barriers to weight loss among community health center patients: qualitative insights from primary care providers. BMC Obes. 2016;3:43. doi:10.1186/s40608‐016‐0123‐3
    1. Spring B, Champion KE, Acabchuk R, Hennessy EA. Self‐regulatory behaviour change techniques in interventions to promote healthy eating, physical activity, or weight loss: a meta‐review. Health Psychol Rev. 2020:1‐32. doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1721310
    1. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Hong PS, Tsai AG. Behavioral treatment of obesity in patients encountered in primary care settings: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1779‐1791. doi10.1001/jama.2014.14173
    1. USPST Force . Curry SJ, Krist AH, et al. Behavioral weight loss interventions to prevent obesity‐related morbidity and mortality in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1163‐1171. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13022
    1. Butryn ML, Martinelli MK, Remmert JE, et al. Executive functioning as a predictor of weight loss and physical activity outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2019;53(10):909‐917. doi:10.1093/abm/kaz001
    1. Hofmann W, Adriaanse M, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. Dieting and the self‐control of eating in everyday environments: an experience sampling study. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19(3):523‐539. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12053
    1. Fogg B. Tiny Habits: The Small Changes that Change Everything. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2020.
    1. Yancey AK, Cole BL, Brown R, et al. A cross‐sectional prevalence study of ethnically targeted and general audience outdoor obesity‐related advertising. Milbank Q. 2009;87(1):155‐184. doi:10.1111/j.1468‐0009.2009.00551.x
    1. Shields GS, Moons WG, Slavich GM. Better executive function under stress mitigates the effects of recent life stress exposure on health in young adults. Stress. 2017;20(1):75‐102. doi:10.1080/10253890.2017.1286322
    1. Shields GS, Sazma MA, Yonelinas AP. The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: a meta‐analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;68:651‐668. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038
    1. Chiu HL, Chan PT, Kao CC, et al. Effectiveness of executive function training on mental set shifting, working memory and inhibition in healthy older adults: a double‐blind randomized controlled trials. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(5):1099‐1113. doi:10.1111/jan.13519
    1. Drewnowski A, Buszkiewicz J, Aggarwal A, Rose C, Gupta S, Bradshaw A. Obesity and the built environment: a reappraisal. Obesity. 2020;28(1):22‐30. doi:10.1002/oby.22672
    1. Clark DO, Srinivas P, Bodke K, Keith N, Hood S, Tu W. Addressing people and place microenvironments in weight loss disparities (APP‐Me): design of a randomized controlled trial testing timely messages for weight loss behavior in low income Black and White Women. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;67:74‐80. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.006
    1. Clark D, Chrysler L, Perkins A, et al. Screening, referral, and participation in a weight management program implemented in five CHCs. J Health Care Poor Underserv. 2010;21(2):617‐628. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0319
    1. Srinivas P, Bodke K, Ofner S, Keith NR, Tu W, Clark DO. Context‐sensitive ecological momentary assessment: application of user‐centered design for improving user satisfaction and engagement during self‐report. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(4):e10894. doi:10.2196/10894
    1. Bureau USC . QuickFacts. 2019. Accessed September 17, 2020.
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire‐2: validity of a two‐item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;41(11):1284‐1292. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Lowe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(5):317‐325.
    1. Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(6):514‐522. doi:10.1370/afm.405
    1. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1‐32.
    1. Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science. 2004;306(5702):1776‐1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572
    1. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K. Contextual Design: A Customer‐Centered Approach to Systems Designs (Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies). Morgan Kaufmann; 1997.
    1. Buxton B. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann; 2010.
    1. Nielsen J. Iterative user‐interface design. Computer. 1993;26(11):32‐41.
    1. Rogers Y, Sharp H, Preece J. Interaction Design: Beyond Human‐Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
    1. Snyder C. Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann; 2003.
    1. Ghosh Roy P, Jones KK, Martyn‐Nemeth P, Zenk SN. Contextual correlates of energy‐dense snack food and sweetened beverage intake across the day in African American women: an application of ecological momentary assessment. Appetite. 2019;132:73‐81. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.018
    1. Kahleova H, Lloren JI, Mashchak A, Hill M, Fraser GE. Meal frequency and timing are associated with changes in body mass index in Adventist Health Study 2. J Nutr. 2017;147(9):1722‐1728. doi:10.3945/jn.116.244749
    1. Forman EM, Goldstein SP, Zhang F, et al. OnTrack: development and feasibility of a smartphone app designed to predict and prevent dietary lapses. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(2):236‐245. doi:10.1093/tbm/iby016
    1. Goldstein SP, Thomas JG, Foster GD, et al. Refining an algorithm‐powered just‐in‐time adaptive weight control intervention: a randomized controlled trial evaluating model performance and behavioral outcomes. Health Inf J. 2020:26(4):2315‐2331. doi:10.1177/1460458220902330
    1. Schembre SM, Liao Y, O'Connor SG, et al. Mobile ecological momentary diet assessment methods for behavioral research: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018:6(11):e11170. doi:10.2196/11170
    1. Alcantara C, Diaz SV, Cosenzo LG, Loucks EB, Penedo FJ, Williams NJ. Social determinants as moderators of the effectiveness of health behavior change interventions: scientific gaps and opportunities. Health Psychol Rev. 2020;14(1):132‐144. doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1718527
    1. Cradock KA, ÓLaighin G, Finucane FM, et al. Diet behavior change techniques in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1800‐1810. doi:10.2337/dc17‐0462
    1. Keith NR, Hemmerlein KA, Clark DO. Weight loss attitudes and social forces in urban poor Black and White women. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(1):34‐42. doi:10.5993/AJHB.39.1.4
    1. Berkman ET. The neuroscience of goals and behavior change. Consult Psychol J. 2018;70(1):28‐44. doi:10.1037/cpb0000094

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera