Clinical and virological efficacy of etravirine plus two active Nucleos(t)ide analogs in an heterogeneous HIV-infected population

Luis F López-Cortés, Pompeyo Viciana, José A Girón-González, Alberto Romero-Palacios, Manuel Márquez-Solero, Maria A Martinez-Perez, Miguel A López-Ruz, Javier de la Torre-Lima, Francisco Téllez-Pérez, Marcial Delgado-Fernández, Milagros Garcia-Lázaro, Fernando Lozano, Mohamed O Mohamed-Balghata, Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Luis F López-Cortés, Pompeyo Viciana, José A Girón-González, Alberto Romero-Palacios, Manuel Márquez-Solero, Maria A Martinez-Perez, Miguel A López-Ruz, Javier de la Torre-Lima, Francisco Téllez-Pérez, Marcial Delgado-Fernández, Milagros Garcia-Lázaro, Fernando Lozano, Mohamed O Mohamed-Balghata, Sociedad Andaluza de Enfermedades Infecciosas

Abstract

Etravirine (ETV) is recommended in combination with a boosted protease inhibitor plus an optimized background regimen for salvage therapy, but there is limited experience with its use in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This multicenter study aimed to assess the efficacy of this combination in two scenarios: group A) subjects without virologic failure on or no experience with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) switched due to adverse events and group B) subjects switched after a virologic failure on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimen. The primary endpoint was efficacy at 52 weeks analysed by intention-to-treat. Virologic failure was defined as the inability to suppress plasma HIV-RNA to <50 copies/mL after 24 weeks on treatment, or a confirmed viral load >200 copies/mL in patients who had previously achieved a viral suppression or had an undetectable viral load at inclusion. Two hundred eighty seven patients were included. Treatment efficacy rates in group A and B were 88.0% (CI95, 83.9-92.1%) and 77.4% (CI95, 65.0-89.7%), respectively; the rates reached 97.2% (CI95, 95.1-99.3%) and 90.5% (CI95, 81.7-99.3), by on-treatment analysis. The once-a-day ETV treatment was as effective as the twice daily dosing regimen. Grade 1-2 adverse events were observed motivating a treatment switch in 4.2% of the subjects. In conclusion, ETV (once- or twice daily) plus two analogs is a suitable, well-tolerated combination both as a switching strategy and after failure with first generation NNRTIs, ensuring full drug activity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01437241.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following conflicts: The authors have not conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. However, Luis F. López-Cortés, Pompeyo Viciana, José A. Girón-González, Manuel Márquez-Solero, Javier de la Torre-Lima, Marcial Delgado-Fernández, and Fernando Lozano have received honoraria for speaking at symposia organized on behalf of Abbott laboratories (Spain), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smithkline, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag España, Merck Sharp & Dohme España, Roche Pharma SA, and ViiV Healthcare. Also, they have received unrestricted funds for research from Abbott Laboratories (Spain), Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo Smithkline, Roche Pharma S.A., and ViiV Healthcare.

Figures

Figure 1. Patient disposition.
Figure 1. Patient disposition.
ETV: etravirine. NRTIs, nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. Group A: subjects without virologic failure on or no experience with non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors switched due to adverse effects. Group B: subjects switched after a virological failure on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-based regimen.
Figure 2. Proportion of patients with increased…
Figure 2. Proportion of patients with increased aminotransferases levels at any time-point throughout the follow-up.
Figure 3. Change in lipid plasma levels…
Figure 3. Change in lipid plasma levels (mg/dL) throughout the follow-up.
A: patients with normal baseline values. B: patients with abnormal baseline values on previous NNRTIs- or PI/rtv-based regimens. CT: total cholesterol. HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. TG: triglycerides.

References

    1. Andries K, Azijn H, Thielemans T, Ludovici D, Kukla M, et al. (2004) TMC125, a novel next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor active against nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 48: 4680–4686.
    1. Gazzard BG, Pozniak AL, Rosenbaum W, Yeni GP, Staszewski S, et al. (2003) An open-label assessment of TMC 125 - a new, next-generation NNRTI, for 7 days in HIV-1 infected individuals with NNRTI resistance. AIDS. 17: F49–54.
    1. Gruzdev B, Rakhmanova A, Doubovskaya E, Yakovlev A, Peeters M, et al. (2009) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TMC125 as 7-day monotherapy in antiretroviral naive, HIV-1 infected subjects. AIDS (17) 2487–2494.
    1. Katlama C, Haubrich R, Lalezari J, Lazzarin A, Madruga JV, et al. (2009) Efficacy and safety of Etravirine in treatment-experienced, HIV-1 patients: pooled 48 week analysis of two randomized, controlled trials. AIDS. 23: 2289–2300.
    1. Katlama C, Clotet B, Mills A, Trottier B, Molina JM, et al. (2010) Efficacy and safety of Etravirine at week 96 in treatment-experienced HIV type-1-infected patients in the DUET-1 and DUET-2 trials. Antivir Ther. 15: 1045–1052.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Intelence. Product information. 2011. Available: . Accessed 2013 Feb.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Intelence. Full prescribing information. 2011. Available: . Accessed 2013 Feb.
    1. Ruxrungtham K, Pedro RJ, Latiff GH, Conradie F, Domingo P, et al. (2008) Impact of reverse transcriptase resistance on the efficacy of TMC125 (Etravirine) with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in protease inhibitor-naive, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients: study TMC125-C227. HIV Med. 9: 883–896.
    1. Boffito M, Jackson A, Lamorde M, Back D, Watson V, et al. (2009) Pharmacokinetics and safety of Etravirine administered once or twice daily after 2 weeks treatment with efavirenz in healthy volunteers. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 52: 222–227.
    1. DeJesus E, Lalezari JP, Osiyemi OO, Ruane PJ, Ryan R, et al. (2010) Pharmacokinetics of once-daily Etravirine without and with once-daily darunavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive HIV type-1-infected adults. Antivir Ther. 15: 711–720.
    1. Gutierrez-Valencia A, Martin-Pena R, Torres-Cornejo A, Ruiz-Valderas R, Castillo-Ferrando JR, et al. (2012) Intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of 400 mg of Etravirine once daily versus 200 mg of Etravirine twice daily in HIV-infected patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 67: 681–684.
    1. Croxtall JD (2012) Etravirine: a review of its use in the management of treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection. Drugs. 72: 847–869.
    1. Kakuda TN, Scholler-Gyure M, Hoetelmans RM (2011) Pharmacokinetic interactions between Etravirine and non-antiretroviral drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet. 50: 25–39.
    1. Scholler-Gyure M, Kakuda TN, Raoof A, De SG, Hoetelmans RM (2009) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Etravirine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 48: 561–574.
    1. van Heeswijk RP, Beumont M, Kauffman RS, Garg V (2013) Review of drug interactions with telaprevir and antiretrovirals. Antivir Ther. 18: 553–560.
    1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents (2013) Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available: . Accessed 2013 Feb 12.
    1. Gazzard B, Duvivier C, Zagler C, Castagna A, Hill A, et al. (2011) Phase 2 double-blind, randomised trial of Etravirine versus efavirenz in treatment-naive patients: 48 week results. AIDS. 25: 2249–2258.
    1. Waters L, Fisher M, Winston A, Higgs C, Hadley W, et al. (2011) A phase IV, double-blind, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study to assess the feasibility of switching individuals receiving efavirenz with continuing central nervous system adverse events to Etravirine. AIDS. 25: 65–71.
    1. Casado JL, de Los Santos I, Del Palacio M, García-Fraile L, Pérez-Elías MJ, et al. (2013) Lipid-lowering effect and efficacy after switching to Etravirine in HIV-infected patients with intolerance to suppressive HAART. HIV Clin Trials. 14: 1–9.
    1. Estebanez M, Stella-Ascariz N, Ruiz-Carrascoso G, Zamora FX, García-Bujalance S, et al. (2013) Is Etravirine and two nucleosides an option for HIV with an isolated K103N mutation?. AIDS. 27: 141–144.
    1. HIV Drug Resistance Database. Standford University (2013) Available at: .
    1. Vingerhoets J, Tambuyzer L, Azijn H, Hoogstoel A, Nijs S, et al. (2010) Resistance profile of etravirine: combined analysis of baseline genotypic and phenotypic data from the randomized, controlled Phase III clinical studies. AIDS. 24: 503–514.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera