Therapy adjustments in people with type 1 diabetes with impaired hypoglycemia awareness on multiple daily injections using real-time continuous glucose monitoring: a mechanistic analysis of the HypoDE study

Delia Waldenmaier, Guido Freckmann, Stefan Pleus, Norbert Hermanns, Dominic Ehrmann, Lutz Heinemann, Cornelia Haug, Delia Waldenmaier, Guido Freckmann, Stefan Pleus, Norbert Hermanns, Dominic Ehrmann, Lutz Heinemann, Cornelia Haug

Abstract

Introduction: Studies have shown beneficial effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) usage on clinical outcomes. The objective of this analysis was to identify which therapy adjustments were made by people with type 1 diabetes with impaired hypoglycemia awareness during rtCGM usage enabling reductions in the number of low glucose events observed in the HypoDE (Hypoglycemia in Deutschland) study.

Research design and methods: In the multicenter randomized controlled trial in people with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections with impaired hypoglycemia awareness, participants recorded their diabetes therapy in 7-day logbooks at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. They used rtCGM or self-monitoring of blood glucose for therapy adjustments. This mechanistic analysis looked at changes in various aspects of therapy.

Results: Logbooks were completed by 70 participants in the rtCGM group and 65 participants in the control group. Participants in the rtCGM group kept their total carbohydrate consumption, daily insulin doses and distribution constant during the study. However, they reported an increased intake of rescue carbohydrates (0.8±0.6 (mean±SD) vs 1.0±0.8 intake/day; baseline-adjusted between-group difference 0.3 intake (0.1-0.5), p=0.031). The glucose threshold at which rescue carbohydrate intake was initiated was elevated from 71±13 mg/dL (3.9±0.7 mmol/L) to 79±14 mg/dL (4.4±0.8 mmol/L) (adjusted between-group difference +7.6 mg/dL (2.4-12.8) (+0.4 mmol/L (0.1-0.7)); p=0.005) in the rtCGM group. Regression analysis showed that follow-up low glucose events were associated with group allocation (p<0.001), low glucose events at baseline (p=0.016) and rescue threshold (p=0.001).

Conclusions: No major adjustments in insulin therapy were made by study participants with impaired hypoglycemia awareness; however, they were more active in preventing hypoglycemia by taking rescue carbohydrates earlier and more often.

Trial registration number: NCT02671968.

Keywords: diet; hypoglycemia; insulin.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DW reports grants paid to employer from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study. GF reports grants from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Abbott, Novo Nordisk and Ypsomed; grants and personal fees from Roche Diabetes Care and Sanofi; grants from AgaMatrix, Beurer, Dexcom, A Menarini Diagnostics, i-SENS, LifeScan, Metronom, Pharmasens, Profusa, Sensile, outside the submitted work. SP reports grants paid to employer from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study. LH reports grants from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from A Menarini Diagnostics, Becton Dickinson, Lifecare and Roche Diabetes Care, outside the submitted work. LH owns shares of Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung, Neuss, Germany and ProSciento, San Diego, USA. NH reports grants and personal fees from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study; grants from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Berlin Chemie, Ypsomed, and Roche Diabetes Care, outside the submitted work. DE reports grants paid to employer and personal fees from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Berlin-Chemie, Roche Diabetes Care, Abbott Diabetes Care, and Medtronic outside the submitted work. CH reports grants paid to employer from Dexcom, during the conduct of the study.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Corresponding glucose values at times of rescue carbohydrate intake during baseline and follow-up phase. rtCGM, real-time continuous glucose monitoring.

References

    1. American Diabetes Association . 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43:S77–88. 10.2337/dc20-S007
    1. Rodbard D. Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of recent studies demonstrating improved glycemic outcomes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017;19:S-25–37. 10.1089/dia.2017.0035
    1. Ly TT, Nicholas JA, Retterath A, et al. . Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013;310:1240–7. 10.1001/jama.2013.277818
    1. van Beers CAJ, DeVries JH, Kleijer SJ, et al. . Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (in control): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2016;4:893–902. 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30193-0
    1. Little SA, Speight J, Leelarathna L, et al. . Sustained reduction in severe hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycemia: two-year follow-up in the HypoCOMPaSS randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2018;41:dc172682–7. 10.2337/dc17-2682
    1. Heinemann L, Freckmann G, Ehrmann D, et al. . Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018;391:1367–77. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30297-6
    1. Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B, et al. . The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2012;55:3155–62. 10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9
    1. Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, et al. . Continuous glucose monitoring vs conventional therapy for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections: the gold randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:379–87. 10.1001/jama.2016.19976
    1. Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, et al. . Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the diamond randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:371–-8. 10.1001/jama.2016.19975
    1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group . Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the juvenile diabetes research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial. Diabetes Care 2010;33:17–22. 10.2337/dc09-1502
    1. Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, et al. . Reduced awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM. A prospective study of hypoglycemic frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care 1995;18:517–22. 10.2337/diacare.18.4.517
    1. Heinemann L, Deiss D, Hermanns N, et al. . HypoDE: Research Design and Methods of a Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Impact of Real-Time CGM Usage on the Frequency of CGM Glucose Values <55 mg/dl in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Problematic Hypoglycemia Treated With Multiple Daily Injections. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015;9:651–62. 10.1177/1932296815575999
    1. Pettus J, Edelman SV. Recommendations for using real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) data for insulin adjustments in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:138–47. 10.1177/1932296816663747
    1. Ziegler R, von Sengbusch S, Kröger J, et al. . Therapy adjustments based on trend Arrows using continuous glucose monitoring systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2019;13:763–73. 10.1177/1932296818822539
    1. Aleppo G, Laffel LM, Ahmann AJ, et al. . A practical approach to using trend Arrows on the Dexcom G5 CGM system for the management of adults with diabetes. J Endocr Soc 2017;1:1445–60. 10.1210/js.2017-00388
    1. Kröger J, Reichel A, Siegmund T, et al. . Clinical recommendations for the use of the ambulatory glucose profile in diabetes care. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020;14:1932296819883032. 10.1177/1932296819883032
    1. Pettus J, Price DA, Edelman SV. How patients with type 1 diabetes translate continuous glucose monitoring data into diabetes management decisions. Endocr Pract 2015;21:613–20. 10.4158/EP14520.OR
    1. Vloemans AF, van Beers CAJ, de Wit M, et al. . Keeping safe. continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in persons with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia: a qualitative study. Diabet Med 2017;34:1470–6. 10.1111/dme.13429
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. . State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:66–72. 10.1089/dia.2018.0384

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera