Progression of Myopia in School-Aged Children After COVID-19 Home Confinement

Jiaxing Wang, Ying Li, David C Musch, Nan Wei, Xiaoli Qi, Gang Ding, Xue Li, Jing Li, Linlin Song, Ying Zhang, Yuxian Ning, Xiaoyu Zeng, Ning Hua, Shuo Li, Xuehan Qian, Jiaxing Wang, Ying Li, David C Musch, Nan Wei, Xiaoli Qi, Gang Ding, Xue Li, Jing Li, Linlin Song, Ying Zhang, Yuxian Ning, Xiaoyu Zeng, Ning Hua, Shuo Li, Xuehan Qian

Abstract

Importance: Time spent in outdoor activities has decreased owing to home confinement for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Concerns have been raised about whether home confinement may have worsened the burden of myopia owing to substantially decreased time spent outdoors and increased screen time at home.

Objective: To investigate the refractive changes and prevalence of myopia in school-aged children during the COVID-19 home confinement.

Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cross-sectional study using school-based photoscreenings in 123 535 children aged 6 to 13 years from 10 elementary schools in Feicheng, China, was conducted. The study was performed during 6 consecutive years (2015-2020). Data were analyzed in July 2020.

Exposures: Noncycloplegic photorefraction was examined using a photoscreener device.

Main outcomes and measures: The spherical equivalent refraction was recorded for each child and the prevalence of myopia for each age group during each year was calculated. The mean spherical equivalent refraction and prevalence of myopia were compared between 2020 (after home confinement) and the previous 5 years for each age group.

Results: Of the 123 535 children included in the study, 64 335 (52.1%) were boys. A total of 194 904 test results (389 808 eyes) were included in the analysis. A substantial myopic shift (approximately -0.3 diopters [D]) was found in the 2020 school-based photoscreenings compared with previous years (2015-2019) for younger children aged 6 (-0.32 D), 7 (-0.28 D), and 8 (-0.29 D) years. The prevalence of myopia in the 2020 photoscreenings was higher than the highest prevalence of myopia within 2015-2019 for children aged 6 (21.5% vs 5.7%), 7 (26.2% vs 16.2%), and 8 (37.2% vs 27.7%) years. The differences in spherical equivalent refraction and the prevalence of myopia between 2020 and previous years were minimal in children aged 9 to 13 years.

Conclusions and relevance: Home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be associated with a significant myopic shift for children aged 6 to 8 years according to 2020 school-based photoscreenings. However, numerous limitations warrant caution in the interpretation of these associations, including use of noncycloplegic refractions and lack of orthokeratology history or ocular biometry data. Younger children's refractive status may be more sensitive to environmental changes than older ages, given the younger children are in a critical period for the development of myopia.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) Distribution…
Figure 1.. Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) Distribution in Primary School Students Aged 6 to 13 Years
The number of eyes per year with certain SER is plotted at 6 consecutive years for different age groups (6-13 years). The vertical line in each distribution represents the mean. At age 6 to 8 years, the crest as well as the mean (vertical line) in 2020 were shifted to the left compared with previous years, indicating a myopic shift of SER in 2020. For children aged 9 to 13 years, no clear myopic shift was observed across the 6 years.
Figure 2.. Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER)…
Figure 2.. Mean Spherical Equivalent Refraction (SER) for Primary School Students Aged 6 to 13 Years During the 6 Years of Screenings
Substantial decreases of SER in 2020 were noted for children aged 6 to 8 years compared with previous years. Overall, girls tended to be more myopic than boys at the same age, while the right eye tended to be more myopic than the left eye. Whiskers indicate SEM.
Figure 3.. Prevalence of Refractive Error for…
Figure 3.. Prevalence of Refractive Error for Primary School Students Aged 6 to 13 Years During the 6 Years of Screenings
The prevalence of mild myopia increased in 2020 compared with previous years in children aged 6 to 8 years. Mild myopia: −3 diopters (D)  −0.5 D.

References

    1. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1739-1748. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4
    1. Holden B, Mariotti S, Kocur I, et al. The impact of myopia and high myopia: report of the Joint WHO–Brien Holden Vision Institute, Global Scientific Meeting on Myopia. 2015.
    1. He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, et al. . Effect of time spent outdoors at school on the development of myopia among children in China: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(11):1142-1148. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10803
    1. Lingham G, Mackey DA, Lucas R, Yazar S. How does spending time outdoors protect against myopia? a review. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(5):593-599. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314675
    1. Wen L, Cao Y, Cheng Q, et al. . Objectively measured near work, outdoor exposure and myopia in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(11):1542-1547. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315258
    1. Wang G, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zhang J, Jiang F. Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395(10228):945-947. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30547-X
    1. Sumitha M, Sanjay S, Kemmanu V, Bhanumathi MR, Shetty R. Will COVID-19 pandemic–associated lockdown increase myopia in Indian children? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(7):1496. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1443_20
    1. Pellegrini M, Bernabei F, Scorcia V, Giannaccare G. May home confinement during the COVID-19 outbreak worsen the global burden of myopia? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(9):2069-2070. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04728-2
    1. Navel V, Beze S, Dutheil F. COVID-19, sweat, tears… and myopia? Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(4):555. doi:10.1111/cxo.13086
    1. World Medical Association . World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
    1. Wang J, Li Y, Zhao Z, et al. . School-based epidemiology study of myopia in Tianjin, China. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(9):2213-2222. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01400-w
    1. Qian X, Li Y, Ding G, et al. . Compared performance of Spot and SW800 photoscreeners on Chinese children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(4):517-522. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311885
    1. Wang J, Ding G, Li Y, et al. . Refractive status and amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(5):1530-1536. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3387-7
    1. Sivasubramanian H, Ee G, Srinivasaiah MG, De SD, Sing AM. “Not Always a Baker’s Cyst”— an unusual presentation of a central voluminous postero-medial meniscal cyst. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:424-428. doi:10.2174/1874325001206010424
    1. Ee G, Lehming N. How the ubiquitin proteasome system regulates the regulators of transcription. Transcription. 2012;3(5):235-239. doi:10.4161/trns.21249
    1. Zhang X, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang B. Diagnostic test accuracy of Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners in detecting amblyogenic risk factors in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019;39(4):260-271. doi:10.1111/opo.12628
    1. Srinivasan G, Russo D, Taylor C, Guarino A, Tattersall P, Moore B. Validity of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting vision disorders in children 6 months to 36 months of age. J AAPOS. 2019;23(5):278.e1-278.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.06.008
    1. Dikkaya F, Erdur SK. Comparison of the PlusOptix S09 and Spot Vision photorefractor to cycloretinoscopy. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(8):1671-1678. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-1026-8
    1. Mu Y, Bi H, Ekure E, et al. . Performance of Spot photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese pre-school and school age children attending an eye clinic. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149561. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149561
    1. Yakar K. Clinical performance of the Spot Vision Photo Screener before and after induction of cycloplegia in children. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:5329121.
    1. Panda L, Barik U, Nayak S, et al. . Performance of photoscreener in detection of refractive error in all age groups and amblyopia risk factors in children in a tribal district of Odisha: the Tribal Odisha Eye Disease Study (TOES) # 3. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018;7(3):12. doi:10.1167/tvst.7.3.12
    1. Lin M, Lucas HC Jr, Shmueli G. Too big to fail: large samples and the P value problem. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24(4):1-12. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0480
    1. VanderVeen DK, Kraker RT, Pineles SL, et al. . Use of orthokeratology for the prevention of myopic progression in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(4):623-636. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.026
    1. Willis JR, Vitale S, Morse L, et al. . The prevalence of myopic choroidal neovascularization in the United States: analysis of the IRIS data registry and NHANES. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(8):1771-1782. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.04.021
    1. Bar Dayan Y, Levin A, Morad Y, et al. . The changing prevalence of myopia in young adults: a 13-year series of population-based prevalence surveys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(8):2760-2765. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0260
    1. Hyman L, Gwiazda J, Hussein M, et al. . Relationship of age, sex, and ethnicity with myopia progression and axial elongation in the correction of myopia evaluation trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):977-987. doi:10.1001/archopht.123.7.977
    1. Sanz Diez P, Yang LH, Lu MX, Wahl S, Ohlendorf A. Growth curves of myopia-related parameters to clinically monitor the refractive development in Chinese schoolchildren. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):1045-1053. doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04290-6
    1. Vision NRCUCo . Analysis of the Prevalence Literature. Myopia: Prevalence and Progression. National Academies Press; 1989.
    1. Gong JF, Xie HL, Mao XJ, et al. . Relevant factors of estrogen changes of myopia in adolescent females. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128(5):659-663. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.151669
    1. Afsari S, Rose KA, Gole GA, et al. . Prevalence of anisometropia and its association with refractive error and amblyopia in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(9):1095-1099. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302637
    1. Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Read SA, Carney LG. Myopic anisometropia: ocular characteristics and aetiological considerations. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97(4):291-307. doi:10.1111/cxo.12171
    1. Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, Hsia WW, Hsu WM. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(8):2856-2860. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0878
    1. Jiang F, Chen Z, Bi H, et al. . Association between ocular sensory dominance and refractive error asymmetry. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136222
    1. Mansour AM, Sbeity ZM, Kassak KM. Hand dominance, eye laterality and refraction. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81(1):82-83. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00028_5.x
    1. Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Oshika T. Influence of ocular wavefront aberrations on axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):93-100. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.042
    1. Zadnik K, Manny RE, Yu JA, et al. ; Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Ethnicity and Refractive Error (CLEERE) Study Group . Ocular component data in schoolchildren as a function of age and gender. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(3):226-236. doi:10.1097/00006324-200303000-00012
    1. Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Vingerling JR, et al. . Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(3):301-309. doi:10.1111/aos.13603
    1. Harrington SC, O’Dwyer V. Ocular biometry, refraction and time spent outdoors during daylight in Irish schoolchildren. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(2):167-176. doi:10.1111/cxo.12929

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera