Increasing use of immunization information systems for routine vaccinations in independent community pharmacies: A randomized controlled trial

Tessa J Hastings, David Ha, Brent I Fox, Jingjing Qian, Joni Lakin, Salisa C Westrick, Tessa J Hastings, David Ha, Brent I Fox, Jingjing Qian, Joni Lakin, Salisa C Westrick

Abstract

Background: Only 60% of adults nationwide and just 36.8% of adults in Alabama have immunization data recorded in an Immunization Information System (IIS). The objective of this study, which took place before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, was to evaluate the impact of an IIS training program on pharmacists' IIS enrollment, participation, awareness, knowledge, intention, and attitudes.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2019 among Alabama pharmacists (N = 41) practicing in independently owned pharmacies and providing vaccination services but whose pharmacy was not enrolled in Alabama's IIS (Immunization Patient Registry with Integrated Technology [ImmPRINT]). Intervention pharmacists were offered a 2-hour IIS training program, including an online continuing pharmacy education article, demonstration videos, implementation guide, and informational flyer. Control pharmacies received the informational flyer only. Pharmacy-level outcomes, including enrollment and participation, were obtained from ImmPRINT administrative records. Pharmacist-level outcomes, including awareness, knowledge, intention, and attitudes, were self-reported using baseline, 1-month, and 3-month surveys. Two-way mixed analysis of variance, chi-square, and independent t tests were used to analyze differences in outcomes between and within groups.

Results: Enrollment in ImmPRINT was significantly greater among intervention pharmacists' pharmacies (P = 0.035). In particular, 59.1% of intervention pharmacies compared with 26.3% of control pharmacies were enrolled in ImmPRINT at 3 months. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in terms of participation in ImmPRINT. Intervention pharmacists' awareness of IIS was significantly greater than control pharmacists (P = 0.028) at 1 month (postintervention). Furthermore, the IIS training program significantly improved intervention pharmacists' knowledge (P = 0.030) and attitudes (P = 0.016) toward IIS over 3 months compared with the control group.

Conclusions: This pharmacist-centered training program focused on practical strategies to integrate IIS into pharmacy workflow. Results show that pharmacists' enrollment, awareness, knowledge, and attitudes significantly improved as a result of this training. As pharmacists become more involved in immunization efforts, particularly in response to COVID-19, awareness of and participation in responsible immunization documentation are critical.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03796585.

Copyright © 2022 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study CONSORT flow diagram. Abbreviation used: CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; ImmPRINT, Immunization Patient Registry with Integrated Technology.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in awareness, knowledge, and intention over time by group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in attitudes over time by group.

References

    1. National Vaccine Advisory Committee NVAC statement of support regarding efforts to better implement IIS-to-IIS Data Exchange across jurisdictions: approved by the national vaccine advisory committee on February 10, 2015. Public Health Rep. 2015;130(4):332–335.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Immunization information systems (IIS) Available at:
    1. Hong K., Zhou F., Tsai Y., et al. Decline in receipt of vaccines by medicare beneficiaries during the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(7):245–249.
    1. Patel Murthy B., Zell E., Kirtland K., et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on administration of selected routine childhood and adolescent vaccinations - 10 U.S. Jurisdictions, March-September 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(23):840–845.
    1. Westrick S.C., Patterson B.J., Kader M.S., Rashid S., Buck P.O., Rothholz M.C. National survey of pharmacy-based immunization services. Vaccine. 2018;36(37):5657–5664.
    1. Hastings T., Fox B., Westrick S. Pharmacy students' awareness of and attitudes toward immunization information systems. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016;12(4):e16.
    1. American Immunization Registry Association . American Immunization Registry Association; Washington, DC: 2015. Survey of Immunization Reporting to Immunization Information Systems by Major U.S. Pharmacies: A Summary of the Methods, Successes and Challenges of Pharmacy-IIS Interfaces.
    1. Hastings T.J., Zhao Y., Fox B., et al. Immunization registry implementation in community pharmacy: a qualitative study using the consolidated framework for implementation research [APhA Abstract 511] J Am Pharm Assoc. 2019;59(4):e248.
    1. Hastings T., Ha D., Qian J., Fox B., Westrick S. Development and evaluation of an immunization information system training program using a participatory design approach [AACP 2019 Abstract 126] Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(5):1073.
    1. Hastings T.J., Ha D., Fox B.I., Qian J., Lakin J., Westrick S.C. Assessing barriers and increasing use of immunization information systems in independent community pharmacies: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020;16(7):987–992.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Progress in Immunization Information Systems — United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(49):1005–1008.
    1. Alabama Rural Health Association Alabama Rural Health Association's definition of rural. Available at:
    1. Deyo R.A., Irvine J.M., Hallvik S.E., et al. Leading a horse to water: facilitating registration and use of a prescription drug monitoring program. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(9):782–787.
    1. Hulley S.B., Cummings S.R., Browner W.S., Grady D.G., Newman T.B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA: 2013. Designing Clinical Research.
    1. Gheewala P.A., Peterson G.M., Zaidi S.T.R., Bereznicki L., Jose M.D., Castelino R.L. A web-based training program to support chronic kidney disease screening by community pharmacists. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(5):1080–1086.
    1. Dalkey N.C. Rand Corporation; Santa Monica, CA: 1969. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion.
    1. Ajzen I. Constructing a TpB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. Available at:
    1. Damschroder L.J., Aron D.C., Keith R.E., Kirsh S.R., Alexander J.A., Lowery J.C. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
    1. Gustafson D.H., Sainfort F., Eichler M., Adams L., Bisognano M., Steudel H. Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(2):751–776.
    1. Atkinson N.L. Developing a questionnaire to measure perceived attributes of eHealth innovations. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(6):612–621.
    1. Moore G.C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2(3):192–222.
    1. Peltier J.W., Schibrowsky J.A., Zhao Y. Understanding the antecedents to the adoption of CRM technology by small retailers: entrepreneurs vs owner-managers. Int Small Bus J. 2009;27(3):307–336.
    1. Venkatesh V., Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204.
    1. Chang S.E., Pan Y.-H.V. Exploring factors influencing mobile users’ intention to adopt multimedia messaging service. Behav Inf Technol. 2011;30(5):659–672.
    1. IBM Corp [IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows]. Version 22.0. IBM Corp; Armonk, NY: 2013.
    1. Dempsey A.F., Zimet G.D. Interventions to improve adolescent vaccination: what may work and what still needs to be tested. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(6 Suppl 4):S445–S454.
    1. Rodriguez S.A., Mullen P.D., Lopez D.M., Savas L.S., Fernández M.E. Factors associated with adolescent HPV vaccination in the U.S.: a systematic review of reviews and multilevel framework to inform intervention development. Prev Med. 2020;131:105968.
    1. Brenan M. Nurses again outpace other professions for honesty, ethics. Gallup. Available at:
    1. Westrick S.C. Forward and backward transitions in pharmacy-based immunization services. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010;6(1):18–31.
    1. Westrick S.C., Breland M.L. Sustainability of pharmacy-based innovations: the case of in-house immunization services. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2009;49(4):500–508.
    1. Westrick S.C., Mount J.K. Impact of perceived innovation characteristics on adoption of pharmacy-based in-house immunization services. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17(1):39–46.
    1. Patel A.R., Breck A.B., Law M.R. The impact of pharmacy-based immunization services on the likelihood of immunization in the United States. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2018;58(5):505–514.e2.
    1. Cartmell K.B., Young-Pierce J., McGue S., et al. Barriers, facilitators, and potential strategies for increasing HPV vaccination: a statewide assessment to inform action. Papillomavirus Res. 2018;5:21–31.
    1. Vanderpool R.C., Stradtman L.R., Brandt H.M. Policy opportunities to increase HPV vaccination in rural communities. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7–8):1527–1532.
    1. Health and Human Services HHS expands access to childhood vaccines during COVID-19 pandemic. Available at:
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention The federal retail pharmacy program for COVID-19 vaccination. Available at:
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC COVID-19 vaccination program provider requirements and support. Available at:
    1. Johnston K., Alley L., Novak K., Haverly S., Irwin A., Hartung D. Pharmacists’ attitudes, knowledge, utilization, and outcomes involving prescription drug monitoring programs: a brief scoping review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2018;58(5):568–576.
    1. Hailemariam M., Bustos T., Montgomery B., Barajas R., Evans L.B., Drahota A. Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):57.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vaccination coverage among adults in the United States, National Health Interview Survey. 2016. Available at:
    1. Groom H., Hopkins D.P., Pabst L.J., et al. Immunization information systems to increase vaccination rates: a community guide systematic review. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;21(3):227–248.
    1. Bacci J.L., Hansen R., Ree C., Reynolds M.J., Stergachis A., Odegard P.S. The effects of vaccination forecasts and value-based payment on adult immunizations by community pharmacists. Vaccine. 2019;37(1):152–159.
    1. Engstrom K., Sill D.N., Schauer S., Malinowski M., Martin E., Hayney M.S. Timeliness of data entry in Wisconsin Immunization Registry by Wisconsin pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2020;60(4):618–623.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2019 IISAR data participation rates. Available at:
    1. Martin D.W., Lowery N.E., Brand B., Gold R., Horlick G. Immunization information systems: a decade of progress in law and policy. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;21(3):296–303.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera