Epacadostat Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Phase I Results From a Multicenter, Open-Label Phase I/II Trial (ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037)

Tara C Mitchell, Omid Hamid, David C Smith, Todd M Bauer, Jeffrey S Wasser, Anthony J Olszanski, Jason J Luke, Ani S Balmanoukian, Emmett V Schmidt, Yufan Zhao, Xiaohua Gong, Janet Maleski, Lance Leopold, Thomas F Gajewski, Tara C Mitchell, Omid Hamid, David C Smith, Todd M Bauer, Jeffrey S Wasser, Anthony J Olszanski, Jason J Luke, Ani S Balmanoukian, Emmett V Schmidt, Yufan Zhao, Xiaohua Gong, Janet Maleski, Lance Leopold, Thomas F Gajewski

Abstract

Purpose: Tumors may evade immunosurveillance through upregulation of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme. Epacadostat is a potent and highly selective IDO1 enzyme inhibitor. The open-label phase I/II ECHO-202/KEYNOTE-037 trial evaluated epacadostat plus pembrolizumab, a programmed death protein 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Phase I results on maximum tolerated dose, safety, tolerability, preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics are reported.

Patients and methods: Patients received escalating doses of oral epacadostat (25, 50, 100, or 300 mg) twice per day plus intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 200 mg every 3 weeks. During the safety expansion, patients received epacadostat (50, 100, or 300 mg) twice per day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks.

Results: Sixty-two patients were enrolled and received one or more doses of study treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab was not reached. Fifty-two patients (84%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with fatigue (36%), rash (36%), arthralgia (24%), pruritus (23%), and nausea (21%) occurring in ≥ 20%. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 24% of patients. Seven patients (11%) discontinued study treatment because of TRAEs. No TRAEs led to death. Epacadostat 100 mg twice per day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II evaluation. Objective responses (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) occurred in 12 (55%) of 22 patients with melanoma and in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The pharmacokinetics of epacadostat and pembrolizumab and antidrug antibody rate were comparable to historical controls for monotherapies.

Conclusion: Epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab generally was well tolerated and had encouraging antitumor activity in multiple advanced solid tumors.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram of the study design and patient disposition. (*) Patients who completed treatment either received 2 years of combination therapy or received ≥ 6 months of combination treatment and achieved a complete response with two or more doses of pembrolizumab administered beyond the date of initial complete response. Three patients with melanoma met the latter criteria for early stopping of treatment (50 mg twice per day, two patients; 100 mg twice per day, one patient).
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Pharmacokinetic-predicted time-averaged inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibition for individual patients by epacadostat dose.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Change from baseline in target lesions. (A) Best percentage change from baseline in target lesions by tumor type in all patients. (B) to (D) Percentage change from baseline in target lesions over time in patients with (B) melanoma, (C) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and (D) renal cell cancer (RCC). EA, endometrial adenocarcinoma; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer; UC, urothelial carcinoma. (*) Progressive disease per RECIST version 1.1. (†) Partial response per RECIST version 1.1.

References

    1. Abril-Rodriguez G, Ribas A: SnapShot: Immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell 31:848-848.e1, 2017.
    1. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. : Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 363:711-723, 2010
    1. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. : Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 373:23-34, 2015
    1. Hodi FS, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. : Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1558-1568, 2016
    1. Hellmann MD, Rizvi NA, Goldman JW, et al. : Nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 012): Results of an open-label, phase 1, multicohort study. Lancet Oncol 18:31-41, 2017
    1. Munn DH, Mellor AL: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tumor-induced tolerance. J Clin Invest 117:1147-1154, 2007
    1. Prendergast GC, Mondal A, Dey S, et al. : Inflammatory reprogramming with IDO1 inhibitors: Turning immunologically unresponsive ‘cold’ tumors ‘hot’. Trends Cancer 4:38-58, 2018
    1. Théate I, van Baren N, Pilotte L, et al. : Extensive profiling of the expression of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 protein in normal and tumoral human tissues. Cancer Immunol Res 3:161-172, 2015
    1. Zhao Q, Kuang DM, Wu Y, et al. : Activated CD69+ T cells foster immune privilege by regulating IDO expression in tumor-associated macrophages. J Immunol 188:1117-1124, 2012
    1. Holmgaard RB, Zamarin D, Li Y, et al. : Tumor-expressed IDO recruits and activates MDSCs in a Treg-dependent manner. Cell Reports 13:412-424, 2015
    1. Wang XF, Wang HS, Wang H, et al. : The role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) in immune tolerance: Focus on macrophage polarization of THP-1 cells. Cell Immunol 289:42-48, 2014
    1. Ino K, Yoshida N, Kajiyama H, et al. : Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a novel prognostic indicator for endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer 95:1555-1561, 2006
    1. Okamoto A, Nikaido T, Ochiai K, et al. : Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase serves as a marker of poor prognosis in gene expression profiles of serous ovarian cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 11:6030-6039, 2005
    1. Liu X, Shin N, Koblish HK, et al. : Selective inhibition of IDO1 effectively regulates mediators of antitumor immunity. Blood 115:3520-3530, 2010
    1. Spranger S, Koblish HK, Horton B, et al. : Mechanism of tumor rejection with doublets of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or IDO blockade involves restored IL-2 production and proliferation of CD8(+) T cells directly within the tumor microenvironment. J Immunother Cancer 2:3, 2014
    1. Beatty GL, O’Dwyer PJ, Clark J, et al. : First-in-human phase I study of the oral inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 epacadostat (INCB024360) in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 23:3269-3276, 2017
    1. Kristeleit R, Davidenko I, Shirinkin V, et al. : A randomised, open-label, phase 2 study of the IDO1 inhibitor epacadostat (INCB024360) versus tamoxifen as therapy for biochemically recurrent (CA-125 relapse)-only epithelial ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube cancer. Gynecol Oncol 146:484-490, 2017
    1. Gibney GT, Hamid O, Lutzky J, et al. : Updated results from a phase 1/2 study of epacadostat (INCB024360) in combination with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 51:S106-S107, 2015
    1. Spranger S, Spaapen RM, Zha Y, et al. : Up-regulation of PD-L1, IDO, and T(regs) in the melanoma tumor microenvironment is driven by CD8(+) T cells. Sci Transl Med 5:200ra116, 2013
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. : New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228-247, 2009
    1. Shi JG, Bowman KJ, Chen X, et al. : Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of epacadostat in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Pharmacol 57:720-729, 2017
    1. Li H, Yu J, Liu C, et al. : Time dependent pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor and its correlation with best overall response. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 44:403-414, 2017
    1. Koblish HK, Hansbury MJ, Bowman KJ, et al. : Hydroxyamidine inhibitors of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase potently suppress systemic tryptophan catabolism and the growth of IDO-expressing tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 9:489-498, 2010
    1. Keytruda (pembrolizumab) [full prescribing information]. Whitehouse Station, NJ, Merck & Co, 2017.
    1. Long GV, Atkinson V, Cebon JS, et al. : Standard-dose pembrolizumab in combination with reduced-dose ipilimumab for patients with advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-029): An open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 18:1202-1210, 2017
    1. Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. : Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 372:2521-2532, 2015
    1. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. : Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1823-1833, 2016
    1. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. : Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 373:1803-1813, 2015
    1. Long GV, Dummer R, Hami O, et al: Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab alone in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Results of the phase 3 ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252 study. J Clin Oncol 36, (suppl; abstr 108), 2018.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera