Impact of seasonality on recruitment, retention, adherence, and outcomes in a web-based smoking cessation intervention: randomized controlled trial

Amanda L Graham, Sarah Cha, Nathan K Cobb, Ye Fang, Raymond S Niaura, Aaron Mushro, Amanda L Graham, Sarah Cha, Nathan K Cobb, Ye Fang, Raymond S Niaura, Aaron Mushro

Abstract

Background: Seasonal variations in smoking and quitting behaviors have been documented, with many smokers seeking cessation assistance around the start of the New Year. What remains unknown is whether smokers who are recruited to cessation treatment trials during the New Year are as motivated to quit, or as likely to enroll in a research trial, adhere to a research protocol, and benefit from a cessation intervention compared to those who are recruited during other times of the year.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether smokers recruited during the New Year period differ on measures of motivation and desire to quit, recruitment and retention rates, website utilization rates, and short-term cessation outcomes compared to smokers recruited at other times.

Methods: Participants were current smokers who had registered on a free Web-based cessation program (BecomeAnEX.org) and were invited to participate in a clinical trial. The New Year period was defined according to a clear peak and drop in the proportion of visitors who registered on the site, spanning a 15-day period from December 26, 2012 to January 9, 2013. Two other 15-day recruitment periods during summer (July 18, 2012 to August 1, 2012) and fall (November 7, 2012 to November 21, 2012) were selected for comparison. Data were examined from 3 sources: (1) a Web-based clinical trials management system that automated the recruitment and enrollment process, (2) self-report assessments at baseline and 3 months postrandomization, and (3) online tracking software that recorded website utilization during the first 3 months of the trial.

Results: Visitors to BecomeAnEX during the New Year period were more likely to register on the site than smokers who visited during summer or fall (conversion rates: 7.4%, 4.6%, 4.9%, respectively; P<.001), but there were no differences in rates of study acceptance, consent, randomization, 3-month follow-up survey completion, or cessation between the 3 periods. New Year participants were older, more educated, more likely to be employed full time, and more likely to have a relationship partner compared with participants recruited at other times during the year, but did not differ on measures of motivation and desire to quit.

Conclusions: Smokers visiting a Web-based cessation program during the New Year period were more likely to register for treatment and differ on several demographic variables, but showed similar patterns of treatment engagement, retention, follow-up, and short-term cessation outcomes compared with participants who visited the site during other periods of the year. These results allay scientific concerns about recruiting participants during this time frame and are reassuring for researchers conducting Web-based cessation trials.

Keywords: Internet; research subject recruitment; seasonal variation; smoking cessation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: A Graham, S Cha, Y Fang, R Niaura, and A Mushro are employees of Legacy, a nonprofit public health foundation that runs BecomeAnEX.org, an online tobacco cessation intervention. N Cobb is an employee of MeYou Health LLC, whose parent company’s product line includes an online tobacco cessation intervention.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Use of search term “quit smoking” in Google search engine queries relative to the total number of Google searches between June 2007 and June 2013 in the United States as reported in Google Trends.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Quitting smoking among adults--United States, 2001-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Nov 11;60(44):1513–9.
    1. Legacy. 2013. Jan 8, [2013-08-16]. New Poll Finds Millions of Smokers Nationwide Resolving to Quit in the New Year .
    1. Norcross JC, Mrykalo MS, Blagys MD. Auld lang syne: success predictors, change processes, and self-reported outcomes of New Year's resolvers and nonresolvers. J Clin Psychol. 2002 Apr;58(4):397–405.
    1. Norcross JC, Ratzin AC, Payne D. Ringing in the new year: the change processes and reported outcomes of resolutions. Addict Behav. 1989;14(2):205–12.
    1. Norcross JC, Vangarelli DJ. The resolution solution: longitudinal examination of New Year's change attempts. J Subst Abuse. 1988;1(2):127–34.
    1. Walsh RA, Paul CL. New Year quit smoking resolutions. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Apr;26(2):181.
    1. Chandra S, Chaloupka FJ. Seasonality in cigarette sales: patterns and implications for tobacco control. Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):105–7.
    1. Momperousse D, Delnevo CD, Lewis MJ. Exploring the seasonality of cigarette-smoking behaviour. Tob Control. 2007 Feb;16(1):69–70. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018135.
    1. Chandra S, Gitchell JG, Shiffman S. Seasonality in sales of nicotine replacement therapies: patterns and implications for tobacco control. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 May;13(5):395–8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq258.
    1. Delnevo CN, Foulds J, Vorbach U, Kazimir E. Seasonal variations in stage of change among Quitline clients. Tob Control. 2006 Feb;15(1):70–1. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013847.
    1. Google. [2013-10-26]. Trends
    1. Graham AL, Cha S, Papandonatos GD, Cobb NK, Mushro A, Fang Y, Niaura RS, Abrams DB. Improving adherence to web-based cessation programs: a randomized controlled trial study protocol. Trials. 2013;14:48. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-48.
    1. Fiore M, Jaen CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz N, Curry SJ. Clinical Practice Guideline: Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2008. [2013-10-31]. .
    1. Richardson A, Graham AL, Cobb N, Xiao H, Mushro A, Abrams D, Vallone D. Engagement promotes abstinence in a web-based cessation intervention: cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2277.
    1. McCausland JK, Curry LE, Mushro A, Carothers S, Xiao H, Vallone DM. Cases in Public Health Communication & Marketing. 2011. [2013-08-16]. Promoting a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention: Implications for Practice .
    1. Adobe. 2012. [2013-08-16]. Adobe Analytics: Marketing reports and analytics .
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerström tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119–27.
    1. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992 Sep;47(9):1102–14.
    1. Cohen S, Hoberman HM. Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. J Appl Social Psychol. 1983 Apr;13(2):99–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb02325.x.
    1. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD. Reliability of internet- versus telephone-administered questionnaires in a diverse sample of smokers. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.987.
    1. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Baskin-Sommers A, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Internet- vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S49–57.
    1. Ayers JW, Althouse BM, Allem JP, Rosenquist JN, Ford DE. Seasonality in seeking mental health information on Google. Am J Prev Med. 2013 May;44(5):520–5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.012.
    1. Graham AL, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Characteristics of smokers reached and recruited to an internet smoking cessation trial: a case of denominators. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S43–8.
    1. Graham AL, Milner P, Saul JE, Pfaff L. Online advertising as a public health and recruitment tool: comparison of different media campaigns to increase demand for smoking cessation interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1001.
    1. Heffner JL, Wyszynski CM, Comstock B, Mercer LD, Bricker J. Overcoming recruitment challenges of web-based interventions for tobacco use: the case of web-based acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2013 Oct;38(10):2473–6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.05.004.
    1. Koo M, Skinner H. Challenges of internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e6.
    1. McClure JB, Greene SM, Wiese C, Johnson KE, Alexander G, Strecher V. Interest in an online smoking cessation program and effective recruitment strategies: results from Project Quit. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e14.
    1. Ramo DE, Hall SM, Prochaska JJ. Reaching young adult smokers through the internet: comparison of three recruitment mechanisms. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):768–75. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq086.
    1. Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1878.
    1. Sadasivam RS, Cutrona SL, Volz E, Rao SR, Houston TK. Web-based peer-driven chain referrals for smoking cessation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:357–61.
    1. Sadasivam RS, Kinney RL, Delaughter K, Rao SR, Williams JH, Coley HL, Ray MN, Gilbert GH, Allison JJ, Ford DE, Houston TK, National Dental PBRN Group. QUIT-PRIMO Collaborative Group Who participates in Web-assisted tobacco interventions? The QUIT-PRIMO and National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Hi-Quit studies. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e77. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2385.
    1. Gordon JS, Akers L, Severson HH, Danaher BG, Boles SM. Successful participant recruitment strategies for an online smokeless tobacco cessation program. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S35–41.
    1. Mathieu E, McGeechan K, Barratt A, Herbert R. Internet-based randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 May 1;20(3):568–76. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001175.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera