An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis

Daniel R Murphy, Traber D Giardina, Tyler Satterly, Dean F Sittig, Hardeep Singh, Daniel R Murphy, Traber D Giardina, Tyler Satterly, Dean F Sittig, Hardeep Singh

Abstract

Importance: Managing messages in the electronic health record (EHR) inbox consumes substantial amounts of physician time. Certain factors associated with inbox management, such as poor usability and excessive and unnecessary inbox messages, have been associated with physician burnout. Additionally, inbox design, usability, and workflows are associated with physicians' situational awareness (ie, perception, comprehension, and projection of clinical status) and efficiency of processing EHR inbox messages. Understanding factors associated with inbox usability could improve future EHR inbox designs and workflows, thus reducing risk of burnout while improving patient safety.

Objective: To determine barriers, facilitators, and suggestions associated with EHR inbox-related usability.

Design, setting, and participants: This qualitative study included cognitive walkthroughs of EHR inbox management with 25 physicians (17 primary care physicians and 8 specialists) at 6 large health care organizations using 4 different EHR systems between May 6, 2015, and September 19, 2016. While processing EHR inbox messages, participants identified facilitators and barriers associated with EHR inbox situational awareness and processing efficiency and potential interventions to address such barriers. A qualitative analysis was performed on transcribed recordings using an inductive thematic approach with an 8-dimension sociotechnical model as a theoretical lens from May 6, 2015, to August 15, 2019.

Results: The cognitive walkthroughs identified 60 barriers, 32 facilitators, and 28 suggestions for improving the EHR inbox. Emergent data fit within 5 major themes: message processing complexity, inbox interface design, cognitive load, team communication, and inbox message content. Within these themes, similar barriers were identified across sites, such as poor usability due the high numbers of clicks needed to accomplish actions. In certain instances, an identified facilitator at one site provided the exact solution needed to address a barrier identified at another site.

Conclusions and relevance: This qualitative study found that usability of the EHR inbox is often suboptimal and variable across sites, suggesting lack of shared best practices related to information management. Implementation of optimized design features and workflows will require EHR developers and health care organizations to collectively share this responsibility. Development of regional or national consortia to support collaborative sharing and implementation of EHR system best practices across EHR developers and health care organizations could also improve safety and efficiency and reduce physician burnout.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Sittig reported receiving grants from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System and National Library of Medicine during the conduct of the study. Dr Singh reported receiving grants from the VA during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. Associations of Themes Identified With Sociotechnical…
Figure.. Associations of Themes Identified With Sociotechnical Dimensions, Situational Awareness, Efficiency, Burnout, Quality, and Safety

References

    1. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, et al. . Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):-. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199
    1. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, Thanh NX, Jacobs P. How does burnout affect physician productivity: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:325. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-325
    1. Halbesleben JRB, Rathert C. Linking physician burnout and patient outcomes: exploring the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;33(1):29-39. doi:10.1097/01.HMR.0000304493.87898.72
    1. Anagnostopoulos F, Liolios E, Persefonis G, Slater J, Kafetsios K, Niakas D. Physician burnout and patient satisfaction with consultation in primary health care settings: evidence of relationships from a one-with-many design. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2012;19(4):401-410. doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9278-8
    1. Gregory ME, Russo E, Singh H. Electronic health record alert-related workload as a predictor of burnout in primary care providers. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(3):686-697. doi:10.4338/ACI-2017-01-RA-0003
    1. Ratanawongsa N, Roter D, Beach MC, et al. . Physician burnout and patient-physician communication during primary care encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1581-1588. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0702-1
    1. Cutrona SL, Fouayzi H, Burns L, et al. . Primary care providers’ opening of time-sensitive alerts sent to commercial electronic health record InBaskets. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(11):1210-1219. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4146-3
    1. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, Trojanowski L, Rea M. The relationship between resident burnout and safety-related and acceptability-related quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):195. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1040-y
    1. Edwards ST, Helfrich CD, Grembowski D, et al. . Task delegation and burnout trade-offs among primary care providers and nurses in Veterans Affairs Patient Aligned Care Teams (VA PACTs). J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(1):83-93. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170083
    1. Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1714-1721. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61424-0
    1. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, et al. . Impact of an electronic health record on oncologists’ clinic time. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:1083-1083.
    1. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, et al. . Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38(3):176-188. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009
    1. Arndt BG, Beasley JW, Watkinson MD, et al. . Tethered to the EHR: primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Ann Fam Med. 2017;15(5):419-426. doi:10.1370/afm.2121
    1. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. . Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(11):753-760. doi:10.7326/M16-0961
    1. Murphy DR, Meyer AN, Russo E, Sittig DF, Wei L, Singh H. The burden of inbox notifications in commercial electronic health records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(4):559-560. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0209
    1. Murphy DR, Reis B, Sittig DF, Singh H. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012;125(2):209.e1-209.e7. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.029
    1. Murphy DR, Reis B, Kadiyala H, et al. . Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(3):283-285. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.740
    1. Tai-Seale M, Dillon EC, Yang Y, et al. . Physicians’ well-being linked to in-basket messages generated by algorithms in electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(7):1073-1078. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05509
    1. Mazur LM, Mosaly PR, Moore C, Marks L. Association of the usability of electronic health records with cognitive workload and performance levels among physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(4):e191709. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1709
    1. Khairat S, Coleman C, Newlin T, et al. . A mixed-methods evaluation framework for electronic health records usability studies. J Biomed Inform. 2019;94:103175. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103175
    1. Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, et al. ; American Medical Informatics Association . Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e2-e8. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458
    1. Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, et al. . Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(1):71-77. doi:10.1197/jamia.M3200
    1. Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, et al. . Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11(1):22. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-22
    1. Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Sittig DF. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(8):702-704. doi:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.61
    1. Endsley MR. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 1995;37(1):32-64. doi:10.1518/001872095779049543
    1. Singh H, Petersen LA, Thomas EJ. Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(3):159-164. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016444
    1. Singh H, Giardina TD, Petersen LA, et al. . Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):30-38. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000310
    1. Polson PG, Lewis C, Rieman J, Wharton C. Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. Int J Man Mach Stud. 1992;36(5):741-773. doi:10.1016/0020-7373(92)90039-N
    1. Jacobsen NE, John BE. Two case studies in using cognitive walkthrough for interface evaluation. . Accessed August 20, 2019.
    1. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(s3)(suppl 3):i68-i74. doi:10.1136/qshc.2010.042085
    1. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398-405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    1. Collier R. Rethinking EHR interfaces to reduce click fatigue and physician burnout. CMAJ. 2018;190(33):E994-E995. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-5644
    1. Guo U, Chen L, Mehta PH. Electronic health record innovations: helping physicians—one less click at a time. Health Inf Manag. 2017;46(3):140-144.
    1. Helfrich CD, Simonetti JA, Clinton WL, et al. . The Association of Team-specific workload and staffing with odds of burnout among VA primary care team members. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(7):760-766. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4011-4
    1. Murphy DR, Satterly T, Giardina TD, Sittig DF, Singh H. Practicing clinicians’ recommendations to reduce burden from the electronic health record inbox: a mixed-methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-05112-5
    1. Nielsen J. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics In: CHI ‘94 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM Press; 1994:152-158.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera