Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension study

Won Park, Dae Hyun Yoo, Pedro Miranda, Marek Brzosko, Piotr Wiland, Sergio Gutierrez-Ureña, Helena Mikazane, Yeon-Ah Lee, Svitlana Smiyan, Mie-Jin Lim, Vladimir Kadinov, Carlos Abud-Mendoza, HoUng Kim, Sang Joon Lee, YunJu Bae, SuYeon Kim, Jürgen Braun, Won Park, Dae Hyun Yoo, Pedro Miranda, Marek Brzosko, Piotr Wiland, Sergio Gutierrez-Ureña, Helena Mikazane, Yeon-Ah Lee, Svitlana Smiyan, Mie-Jin Lim, Vladimir Kadinov, Carlos Abud-Mendoza, HoUng Kim, Sang Joon Lee, YunJu Bae, SuYeon Kim, Jürgen Braun

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from infliximab reference product (RP) to its biosimilar or maintaining biosimilar treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: This open-label extension study recruited patients with AS who completed a 54-week, randomised controlled study comparing CT-P13 with RP (PLANETAS). CT-P13 (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 8 weeks from week 62 to week 102. Efficacy end points included the proportion of patients achieving Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20. Antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were measured using an electrochemiluminescent method. Data were analysed for patients treated with CT-P13 in the main PLANETAS study and the extension (maintenance group) and those who were switched to CT-P13 during the extension study (switch group).

Results: Overall, 174 (82.9%) of 210 patients who completed the first 54 weeks of PLANETAS and agreed to participate in the extension were enrolled. Among these, 88 were maintained on CT-P13 and 86 were switched to CT-P13 from RP. In these maintenance and switch groups, respectively, ASAS20 response rates at week 102 were 80.7% and 76.9%. ASAS40 and ASAS partial remission were also similar between groups. ADA positivity rates were comparable (week 102: 23.3% vs 27.4%). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation during the extension study in 3 (3.3%) and 4 (4.8%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions: This is the first study to show that switching from RP to its biosimilar CT-P13 is possible without negative effects on safety or efficacy in patients with AS. In the maintenance group, CT-P13 was effective and well tolerated over 2 years of treatment.

Trial registration number: NCT01571206; Results.

Keywords: Ankylosing Spondylitis; Anti-TNF; DMARDs (biologic); Treatment.

Conflict of interest statement

DHY and WP: Consultation for Celltrion. MB has received research grants from Celltrion, personal fees from lectures for Roche, Abbvie, MSD, Pfizer, Egis, UCB outside the submitted work; JB has received honoraria for talks, advisory boards, paid consultancies or grants for studies from Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Janssen, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB. HUK, SJL, YJB and SYK are full-time employees of Celltrion. Otherwise, none declared.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition during the PLANETAS extension study. All patients who enrolled in the extension study (n=88 and n=86 in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively) were included in the ITT population. *One patient randomly assigned to RP received at least one dose of CT-P13 unintentionally. ITT, intent-to-treat; RP, reference product.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Additional efficacy end points assessed in the PLANETAS extension study. Mean (SD) BASDAI (A), BASFI (B), BASMI (C) and ASDAS-CRP (D) scores in maintenance* (n=88) and switch** (n=86) groups during the main study and the extension study (efficacy population). *Patients treated with CT-P13 during the 54 weeks of the main study and the 48-week extension study. **Patients treated with RP during the 54 weeks of the main study and then switched to CT-P13 during the 48-week extension study. ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index; CRP, C reactive protein; RP, reference product.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Additional efficacy end points assessed in the PLANETAS extension study. Mean (SD) BASDAI (A), BASFI (B), BASMI (C) and ASDAS-CRP (D) scores in maintenance* (n=88) and switch** (n=86) groups during the main study and the extension study (efficacy population). *Patients treated with CT-P13 during the 54 weeks of the main study and the 48-week extension study. **Patients treated with RP during the 54 weeks of the main study and then switched to CT-P13 during the 48-week extension study. ASDAS, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score; BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index; BASFI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index; BASMI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index; CRP, C reactive protein; RP, reference product.

References

    1. WHO, World Health Organization. Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Geneva, 19 to 23 October 2009. Guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) 2009. (accessed 19 Feb 2015).
    1. European Medicines Agency. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on Similar Biological Medicine Products (CHMP/437/04 Rev 1). 23 October 2014. (accessed 2 Jul 2015).
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. Guidance for Industry. April 2015. (accessed 2 Jul 2015).
    1. Feagan BG, Choquette D, Ghosh S, et al. . The challenge of indication extrapolation for infliximab biosimilars. Biologicals 2014;42:177–83. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2014.05.005
    1. Jung SK, Lee KH, Jeon JW, et al. . Physicochemical characterization of Remsima. mAbs 2014;6:1163–77. 10.4161/mabs.32221
    1. Park W, Hrycaj P, Jeka S, et al. . A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1605–12. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203091
    1. Park W, Yoo DH, Jaworski J, et al. . Comparable long-term efficacy, as assessed by patient-reported outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics, of CT-P13 and reference infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 54-week results from the randomized, parallel-group PLANETAS study. Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:25 10.1186/s13075-016-0930-4
    1. Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. . A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1613–20. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203090
    1. Yoo DH, Racewicz A, Brzezicki J, et al. . A phase III randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with reference infliximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: 54-week results from the PLANETRA study. Arthritis Res Ther 2016;18:82.
    1. Ebbers HC, Crow SA, Vulto AG, et al. . Interchangeability, immunogenicity and biosimilars. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:1186–90. 10.1038/nbt.2438
    1. Tóthfalusi L, Endrényi L, Chow SC. Statistical and regulatory considerations in assessments of interchangeability of biological drug products. Eur J Health Econ 2014;15(Suppl.1):S5–11. 10.1007/s10198-014-0589-1
    1. Yoo DH, Prodanovic N, Jaworski J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of CT-P13 (biosimilar infliximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 and continuing CT-P13 in the PLANETRA extension study. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:355–63..
    1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. . Long-term efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: an open, observational, extension study of a three-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2224–33. 10.1002/art.11104
    1. van der Heijde D, Dijkmans B, Geusens P, et al. . Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT). Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:582–91. 10.1002/art.20852
    1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. . Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 2002;359:1187–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08215-6
    1. Braun J, Deodhar A, Dijkmans B, et al. . Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over a two-year period. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1270–8. 10.1002/art.24001
    1. Maini RN, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, et al. . Sustained improvement over two years in physical function, structural damage, and signs and symptoms among patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab and methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1051–65. 10.1002/art.20159
    1. Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, et al. . Two year maintenance of efficacy and safety of infliximab in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:229–34. 10.1136/ard.2004.025130
    1. Breban M, Ravaud P, Claudepierre P, et al. . Maintenance of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: results of a one-year randomized controlled trial comparing systematic versus on-demand treatment. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:88–97. 10.1002/art.23167
    1. Inman RD, Maksymowych WP, Group CS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low dose infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1203–10. 10.3899/jrheum.091042
    1. Temekonidis TI, Alamanos Y, Nikas SN, et al. . Infliximab therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: an open label 12 month study. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:1218–20. 10.1136/ard.2003.014258
    1. Gossec L, Le Henanff A, Breban M, et al. . Continuation of treatment with infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-yr open follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:859–62. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel015
    1. Plasencia C, Pascual-Salcedo D, Nuño L, et al. . Influence of immunogenicity on the efficacy of longterm treatment of spondyloarthritis with infliximab. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71:1955–60. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200828
    1. Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al. . Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 2003;348:601–8. 10.1056/NEJMoa020888
    1. Davis-Ajami ML, Wu J, Downton K, et al. . Epoetin zeta in the management of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease, differential pharmacology and clinical utility. Biologics 2014;8:155–67. 10.2147/BTT.S27578
    1. Flodmark CE, Lilja K, Woehling H, et al. . Switching from originator to biosimilar human growth hormone using dialogue teamwork: single-center experience from Sweden. Biol Ther 2013;3:35–43. 10.1007/s13554-013-0011-z
    1. Haag-Weber M, Vetter A, Thyroff-Friesinger U, et al. . Therapeutic equivalence, long-term efficacy and safety of HX575 in the treatment of anemia in chronic renal failure patients receiving hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol 2009;72:380–90.
    1. Lubenau H, Bias P, Maly AK, et al. . Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of new biosimilar filgrastim XM02 equivalent to marketed filgrastim Neupogen: single-blind, randomized, crossover trial. BioDrugs 2009;23:43–51. 10.2165/00063030-200923010-00005
    1. Verpoort K, Möhler TM. A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in a community oncology centre. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2012;4:289–93. 10.1177/1758834012461330
    1. Więcek A, Ahmed I, Scigalla P, et al. . Switching epoetin alfa and epoetin zeta in patients with renal anemia on dialysis: Posthoc analysis. Adv Ther 2010;27:941–52. 10.1007/s12325-010-0080-z
    1. Wizemann V, Rutkowski B, Baldamus C, et al. . Comparison of the therapeutic effects of epoetin zeta to epoetin alfa in the maintenance phase of renal anaemia treatment. Curr Med Res Opin 2008;24:625–37. 10.1185/030079908X273264

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera