Adapting Helping Babies Breathe into a Virtual Curriculum: Methods, Results, and Lessons Learned

Celia Sobelman, Kristen Richard, Patricia McQuilkin, Nisha Fahey, Celia Sobelman, Kristen Richard, Patricia McQuilkin, Nisha Fahey

Abstract

Introduction. The Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) curriculum is an established, effective method to combat neonatal mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted in-person HBB training sessions worldwide, portending deficits in the dissemination of this important intervention. Methods. A pilot study to compare in-person versus virtual HBB training among US-based pediatric and family medicine residents. Two HBB master trainers condensed the curriculum into an abbreviated course that was offered to 14 learners in-person (n = 6) and virtually via Zoom (n = 8). A standardized 10-item survey was administered before and after the session to measure reported self-efficacy of critical elements of HBB. Difference of difference analysis was performed to detect differences in post vs pre-training results among the 2 groups using STATA MP 15. Results. All learners showed improvement in preparedness, assessment, and skills subcomponents of self-efficacy with no notable differences based on the type of learning medium. At baseline, in-person learners had a 7-point higher self-efficacy score (69.7) in comparison to virtual learners (62.8; P = .26). After training, the confidence score improved significantly; by 14.3 units for in-person learners (P = .01) and 12.9 for virtual learners (P = .04). There was no statistically significant difference in improvement between the 2 groups (P = .67). Furthermore, all learners passed the post-training knowledge assessment. Discussion. Virtual learning of HBB may be an alternative option in the setting of resource and travel limitations. Future work needs to assess possible differences in attainment of assessment skills and retention of the HBB curriculum among virtual learners.

Keywords: global health; medical education; neonatal care; newborn care; virtual learning.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

© The Author(s) 2021.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Planned room configuration diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Average pre- and post-course confidence survey responses by item.

References

    1. World Health Organization, Causes of Childhood Mortality. World Health Organization, 2019. Accessed December 2020.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Helping Babies Survive, 2016. Accessed December 2020.
    1. Msemo et al. (2013). Newborn Mortality and Fresh Stillbirth Rates in Tanzania After Helping Babies Breathe Training. Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, 131(2).
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics: Helping Babies Survive Course Archive; Itasca, IL. Accessed December 2020.
    1. Yeates P, Moult A, Lefroy J, Walsh-House J, Clews L, McKinley R, Fuller R. Understanding and developing procedures for video-based assessment in medical education. Taylor & Francis, 2020. Accessed December 2020. . Published August 2020.
    1. Jones-Bamman C, Niermeyer S, McConnell K, Thomas JF, Olson C. Teaching Helping Babies Breathe via Telehealth: A New Application in Rural Guatemala. Biomed Hub. 2019;4(3):1-6. doi:10.1159/000502934. Published 2019. Accessed February 2021.
    1. Professional Certificate Course in Helping Babies Breathe. INMED. Accessed December 2020.
    1. Draiko CV, Yamarat K, Panza A, Draleru J. Knowledge, skills and competency retention among health workers one year after completing helping babies breathe training in South Sudan. The Pan African Medical Journal. . Published July 5, 2019. Accessed December 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera