Impact of lesion complexity on peri-procedural adverse events and the benefit of potent intravenous platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibition after percutaneous coronary intervention: core laboratory analysis from 10 854 patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial

Gregg W Stone, Philippe Généreux, Robert A Harrington, Harvey D White, C Michael Gibson, P Gabriel Steg, Christian W Hamm, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Matthew J Price, Jayne Prats, Efthymios N Deliargyris, Deepak L Bhatt, Gregg W Stone, Philippe Généreux, Robert A Harrington, Harvey D White, C Michael Gibson, P Gabriel Steg, Christian W Hamm, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Matthew J Price, Jayne Prats, Efthymios N Deliargyris, Deepak L Bhatt

Abstract

Aims: In the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial, the potent, rapidly acting, intravenous platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist cangrelor reduced the 48-h incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or ischaemia-driven revascularization) compared with a loading dose of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to determine whether the efficacy of cangrelor during PCI varies in patients with simple vs. complex target lesion coronary anatomy.

Methods and results: Blinded angiographic core laboratory analysis was completed in 10 854 of 10 942 (99.2%) randomized patients in CHAMPION PHOENIX (13 418 target lesions). Outcomes were analysed according to the number of angiographic PCI target lesion high-risk features (HRF) present (bifurcation, left main, thrombus, angulated, tortuous, eccentric, calcified, long, or multi-lesion treatment). The number of patients with 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 HRFs was 1817 (16.7%), 3442 (31.7%), 2901 (26.7%), and 2694 (24.8%), respectively. The 48-h MACE rate in clopidogrel-treated patients increased progressively with lesion complexity (from 3.3% to 4.4% to 6.9% to 8.7%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Cangrelor reduced the 48-h rate of MACE by 21% {4.7% vs. 5.9%, odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (95% CI)] 0.79 (0.67, 0.93), P = 0.006} compared with clopidogrel, an effect which was consistent regardless of PCI lesion complexity (Pinteraction = 0.66) and presentation with stable ischaemic heart disease (SIHD) or an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). By multivariable analysis, the number of high-risk PCI characteristics [OR (95% CI) 1.68 (1.20, 2.36), 2.78 (2.00, 3.87), and 3.23 (2.33, 4.48) for 1, 2, and 3 HRFs compared with 0 HRFs, all P < 0.0001] and treatment with cangrelor vs. clopidogrel [OR (95% CI) 0.78 (0.66, 0.92), P = 0.004] were independent predictors of the primary 48-h MACE endpoint. Major bleeding rates were unrelated to lesion complexity and were not increased by cangrelor.

Conclusion: Peri-procedural MACE after PCI is strongly dependent on the number of treated high-risk target lesion features. Compared with a loading dose of clopidogrel, cangrelor reduced MACE occurring within 48 h after PCI in patients with SIHD and ACS regardless of baseline lesion complexity. The absolute benefit:risk profile for cangrelor will therefore be greatest during PCI in patients with complex coronary anatomy.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01156571.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of the number of high-risk target lesion features treated per patient. The mean number of high-risk features per patient was 1.8 ± 1.4 [median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) = 2 (1, 2); range 0–11 per patient]. Note: Each treated lesion has no more than nine high-risk features. For patients with more than one treated lesion, the total number of high-risk features is summed for each lesion. Thus, an individual patient with multiple treated lesions may have >9 high-risk features. HRF, high-risk feature.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Presence (proportion) of qualifying high-risk features in 10 854 patients and in 13 418 lesions. Note: Each lesion has no more than nine high-risk features. For patients with more than one treated lesion, the total number of high-risk features is summed for each lesion. Thus, an individual patient with multiple treated lesions may have >9 high-risk features. Analysis by quantitative and qualitative coronary angiography performed at an independent blinded core laboratory. NA, not applicable.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Major adverse cardiovascular event rates at 48 h according to the number of high risk features. The 95% confidence intervals for each rate estimate appear in parentheses. HRF, high-risk features; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Major adverse cardiovascular events at 48 h following randomization to cangrelor vs. clopidogrel according to the number of treated high-risk target lesion features. (A) All patients. The P-value for the trend relating the number of treated high-risk lesion features to the 48-h rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was <0.0001 for both the clopidogrel-treated and cangrelor-treated groups, and the reduction with cangrelor was consistent regardless of target lesion complexity. (B) Further stratified by clinical syndrome acuity at the time of presentation. The reduction in peri-procedural adverse events with cangrelor compared with clopidogrel was consistent regardless of target lesion complexity and clinical presentation. Limit lines for each rate estimate represent 95% confidence intervals. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; HRF, high-risk features; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; SIHD, stable ischaemic heart disease.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis at 48 h following randomization to cangrelor vs. clopidogrel according to the number of treated high-risk target lesion features. (A) Myocardial infarction, all patients; (B) Myocardial infarction, further stratified by clinical syndrome acuity at the time of presentation. (C) Stent thrombosis, all patients; (D) stent thrombosis, further stratified by clinical syndrome acuity at the time of presentation. Limit lines for each rate estimate represent 95% confidence intervals. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; HRF, high-risk features; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; SIHD, stable ischaemic heart disease.

References

    1. Cohen M, Ferguson JJ.. Re-evaluating risk factors for periprocedural complications during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: who may benefit from more intensive antiplatelet therapy? Curr Opin Cardiol 2009;24:88–94.
    1. Lindsey JB, Marso SP, Pencina M, Stolker JM, Kennedy KF, Rihal C, Barsness G, Piana RN, Goldberg SL, Cutlip DE, Kleiman NS, Cohen DJ;. EVENT Registry Investigators. Prognostic impact of periprocedural bleeding and myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention in unselected patients: results from the EVENT (evaluation of drug-eluting stents and ischemic events) registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1074–1082.
    1. Park D-W, Kim Y-H, Yun S-C, Ahn J-M, Lee J-Y, Kim W-J, Kang S-J, Lee S-W, Lee CW, Park S-W, Park S-J.. Impact of the angiographic mechanisms underlying periprocedural myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1105–1110.
    1. Porto I, Di Vito L, Burzotta F, Niccoli G, Trani C, Leone AM, Biasucci LM, Vergallo R, Limbruno U, Crea F.. Predictors of periprocedural (type IVa) myocardial infarction, as assessed by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:89–96.
    1. Babu GG, Walker JM, Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ.. Peri-procedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention: an important target for cardioprotection. Eur Heart J 2011;32:23–31.
    1. Moussa ID, Klein LW, Shah B, Mehran R, Mack MJ, Brilakis ES, Reilly JP, Zoghbi G, Holper E, Stone GW.. Consideration of a new definition of clinically relevant myocardial infarction after coronary revascularization: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1563–1570.
    1. McEntegart MB, Kirtane AJ, Cristea E, Brener S, Mehran R, Fahy M, Moses JW, Stone GW.. Intraprocedural thrombotic events during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes are associated with adverse outcomes. Analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1745–1751.
    1. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT, Fry ETA, DeLago A, Wilmer C, Topol EJ.. Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:2411–2420.
    1. Widimsky P, Motovská Z, Simek S, Kala P, Pudil R, Holm F, Petr R, Bílková D, Skalická H, Kuchynka P, Poloczek M, Miklík R, Maly M, Aschermann M; PRAGUE-8 Trial Investigators. Clopidogrel pre-treatment in stable angina: for all patients >6 h before elective coronary angiography or only for angiographically selected patients a few minutes before PCI? A randomized multicentre trial PRAGUE-8. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1495–1503.
    1. Montalescot G, Bolognese L, Dudek D, Goldstein P, Hamm C, Tanguay JF, ten Berg JM, Miller DL, Costigan TM, Goedicke J, Silvain J, Angioli P, Legutko J, Niethammer M, Motovska Z, Jakubowski JA, Cayla G, Visconti LO, Vicaut E, Widimsky P; ACCOAST Investigators. Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2013;369:999–1010.
    1. Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, Gibson CM, Steg PG, Hamm CW, Price MJ, Leonardi S, Gallup D, Bramucci E, Radke PW, Widimský P, Tousek F, Tauth J, Spriggs D, McLaurin BT, Angiolillo DJ, Généreux P, Liu T, Prats J, Todd M, Skerjanec S, White HD, Harrington RA; CHAMPION PHOENIX Investigators. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1303–1313.
    1. Leonardi S, Mahaffey KW, White HD, Gibson CM, Stone GW, Steg GW, Hamm CW, Price MJ, Todd M, Dietrich M, Gallup D, Liu T, Skerjanec S, Harrington RA, Bhatt DL.. Rationale and design of the Cangrelor versus standard therapy to acHieve optimal Management of Platelet InhibitiON PHOENIX trial. Am Heart J 2012;163:768–776.
    1. Généreux P, Stone GW, Harrington RA, Gibson CM, Steg PG, Brener SJ, Angiolillo DJ, Price MJ, Prats J, Lasalle L, Liu T, Todd M, Skerjanec S, Hamm CW, Mahaffey KW, White HD, Bhatt DL; CHAMPION PHOENIX Investigators. Impact of intraprocedural stent thrombosis during percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the CHAMPION PHOENIX Trial (Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:619–629.
    1. Ellis SG, Guetta V, Miller D, Whitlow PL, Topol EJ.. Relation between lesion characteristics and risk with percutaneous intervention in the stent and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa era: an analysis of results from 10,907 lesions and proposal for new classification scheme. Circulation 1999;100:1971–1976.
    1. Abtan J, Steg PG, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, Gibson CM, Hamm CW, Price MJ, Abnousi F, Prats J, Deliargyris EN, White HD, Harrington RA, Bhatt DL; CHAMPION PHOENIX Investigators. Efficacy and safety of cangrelor in preventing periprocedural complications in patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the CHAMPION PHOENIX Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:1905–1913.
    1. Brodie BR, Garg A, Stuckey TD, Kirtane AJ, Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Rinaldi MJ, Neumann FJ, Metzger DC, Mehran R, Parvataneni R, Stone GW.. Fixed and modifiable correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis from a large all-comers registry: insights from ADAPT-DES. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002568..
    1. Fokkema ML, James SK, Albertsson P, Aasa M, Åkerblom A, Calais F, Eriksson P, Jensen J, Schersten F, de Smet BJ, Sjögren I, Tornvall P, Lagerqvist B.. Outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for different indications: long-term results from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). EuroIntervention 2016;12:303–311.
    1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet J-P, Costa F, Jeppsson A, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Kolh P, Mauri L, Montalescot G, Neumann F-J, Petricevic M, Roffi M, Steg PG, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Levine GN, Badimon L, Vranckx P, Agewall S, Andreotti F, Antman E, Barbato E, Bassand J-P, Bugiardini R, Cikirikcioglu M, Cuisset T, De Bonis M, Delgado V, Fitzsimons D, Gaemperli O, Galiè N, Gilard M, Hamm CW, Ibanez B, Iung B, James S, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Leclercq C, Lettino M, Lip G, Piepoli MF, Pierard L, Schwerzmann M, Sechtem U, Simpson IA, Uva MS, Stabile E, Storey RF, Tendera M, Van de Werf F, Verheugt F, Aboyans V, Windecker S, Aboyans V, Agewall S, Barbato E, Bueno H, Coca A, Collet J-P, Coman IM, Dean V, Delgado V, Fitzsimons D, Gaemperli O, Hindricks G, Iung B, Jüni P, Katus HA, Knuuti J, Lancellotti P, Leclercq C, McDonagh T, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Richter DJ, Roffi M, Shlyakhto E, Simpson IA, Zamorano JL, Windecker S, Aboyans V, Agewall S, Barbato E, Bueno H, Coca A, Collet J-P, Coman IM, Dean V, Delgado V, Fitzsimons D, Gaemperli O, Hindricks G, Iung B, Jüni P, Katus HA, Knuuti J, Lancellotti P, Leclercq C, McDonagh T, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Richter DJ, Roffi M, Shlyakhto E, Simpson IA, Zamorano JL, Roithinger FX, Aliyev F, Stelmashok V, Desmet W, Postadzhiyan A, Georghiou GP, Motovska Z, Grove EL, Marandi T, Kiviniemi T, Kedev S, Gilard M, Massberg S, Alexopoulos D, Kiss RG, Gudmundsdottir IJ, McFadden EP, Lev E, De Luca L, Sugraliyev A, Haliti E, Mirrakhimov E, Latkovskis G, Petrauskiene B, Huijnen S, Magri CJ, Cherradi R, Ten Berg JM, Eritsland J, Budaj A, Aguiar CT, Duplyakov D, Zavatta M, Antonijevic NM, Motovska Z, Fras Z, Montoliu AT, Varenhorst C, Tsakiris D, Addad F, Aydogdu S, Parkhomenko A, Kinnaird T;. ESC Scientific Document Group; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG); ESC National Cardiac Societies . 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018;39:213–260.
    1. Harskamp RE, Hoedemaker N, Newby LK, Woudstra P, Grundeken MJ, Beijk MA, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG, Mehta RH, de Winter RJ.. Procedural and clinical outcomes after use of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab for saphenous vein graft interventions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2016;17:19–23.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera