Usability of a continuous oxygen saturation device for home telemonitoring

Francesco Bonometti, Palmira Bernocchi, Andrea Vitali, Anna Savoldelli, Caterina Rizzi, Simonetta Scalvini, Francesco Bonometti, Palmira Bernocchi, Andrea Vitali, Anna Savoldelli, Caterina Rizzi, Simonetta Scalvini

Abstract

Background: The emergency for the COVID-19 pandemic has led to greater use of home telemonitoring devices. The aim of this study was to assess the usability of continuous home-monitoring care with an oxygen saturation device on post-COVID-19 patients.

Method: The system consists of a digital continuous pulse oximeter and a smartphone with an App, which were provided to patients. A survey composed of a standard Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, and a satisfaction questionnaire was exploited to conduct a usability and feasibility analysis of the service.

Results: A total of 29 patients (17.2% female) with a mean age of 65 ± 11.5 years were enrolled: 20 patients were smartphone users (69%) with a mean age of 60.2 ± 9.5 years, and 9 patients (31%) did not own a smartphone (mean age 76.8 ± 5.9). The monitoring period was 1 month: a total of 444 recordings were conducted, 15 recordings per patient averagely. In total, 82% of the recordings performed did not require any intervention, while 18% led to the production of a report and subsequent intervention by a nurse who verified, together with the specialist, the need to intervene (i.e. the patient accessed the clinic for medical control and/or modification of oxygen therapy). A total of 17 patients compiled a usability questionnaire. The service was perceived as useful and well-structured, although it often required caregiver support.

Conclusions: Using continuous home-monitoring care with an oxygen saturation device seems feasible and useful for patients who could be followed at home avoiding going back to the hospital every time a trend oximetry is needed. Further improvements in connections, data flow processes, and simplifications, based on patients' feedback, are needed to scale up the service.

Keywords: COVID-19; Telemonitoring; digital oximeter; usability; wearable sensors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

© The Author(s) 2023.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The figure illustrates the workflow of the continuous oxygen saturation telemonitoring device. The device records and sends oximetry data to a smartphone through a Bluetooth connection. The data is sent via a data connection to a web platform and uploaded to the patient's electronic medical record. The nurse can check the information, generate a graphical report, and share it with other healthcare professionals if needed.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The figure shows the categories utilized to define and evaluate the seven parameters using the PSSUQ and satisfaction questionnaire. Panel a consists of 15 PSSUQ items that assess system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality, while item 16 allows to calculate the overall score. Panel b has 12 satisfaction questionnaire questions describing pulse oximeter use, accessibility, ease of use, and new functionalities. Question 13 refers to the duration of device usage.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The figure shows two typical measured O2 profiles and reports produced in the patient's personal health record.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The figure represents, on the left side, the duration of telemonitoring device usage reported by the patients and, on the right side, the number of patients who sought assistance from a caregiver.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The figure shows the percentage scores reached by parameters derived from the PSSUQ (a) and the satisfaction questionnaire (b) categories. The total score (c) indicates the average value of the seven parameters.

References

    1. World Health Organisation. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard [Available from: (last accessed September 2022 2. Characteristics of COVID-19 patients dying in Italy. Report based on available data on October 5th, 2021. Istituto Superiore di Sanità. ).
    1. Characteristics of COVID-19 patients dying in Italy. Report based on available data on October 5th, 2021. Istituto Superiore di Sanità. ().
    1. Tabacof L, Wood J, Mohammadi N, et al. Remote patient monitoring identifies the need for triage in patients with acute COVID-19 infection. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28: 495–500.
    1. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al.; for the COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the lombardy region, Italy. JAMA 2020; 323: 1574–1581.
    1. Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. COVID-19 and health care's digital revolution. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 82.
    1. Quer G, et al. Wearable sensor data and self-reported symptoms for COVID-19 detection. Nat Med 2020; 27: 1–5.
    1. Joshi M, Ashrafian H, Aufegger L, et al. Wearable sensors to improve detection of patient deterioration. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16: 145–154. [Medline:30580650].
    1. Buekers J, Theunis J, De Boever P, et al. Wearable finger pulse oximetry for continuous oxygen saturation measurements during daily home routines of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) over one week: observational study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7: e12866. PMID: 31199331; PMCID: PMC6594211.
    1. Downey CL, Chapman S, Randell R, et al. The impact of continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in hospitals: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud 2018; 84: 19–27. Epub 2018 Apr 21. PMID: 29729558.
    1. Scalvini S, Bernocchi P, Zanelli E, et al.; Maugeri Centre for Telehealth and Telecare (MCTT). Maugeri centre for telehealth and telecare: a real-life integrated experience in chronic patients. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24: 500–507. Epub 2017 May 24. PMID: 28537509.
    1. Bernocchi P, Bonometti F, Serlini M, et al. Telehealth and telecare: a real-life integrated experience in the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2022; 28: 720–727.
    1. Broekhuis M, van Velsen L, Peute L, et al. Conceptualizing usability for the eHealth context: content analysis of usability problems of eHealth applications. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5: e18198. URL: .
    1. Lewis JR. IBM Computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Human Comput Interact. 1995;7:57–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar].
    1. Savoldelli A, Vitali A, Remuzzi Aet al. et al. Improving the user experience of televisits and telemonitoring for heart failure patients in less than 6 months: a methodological approach. Int J Med Inform 2022; 161: 104717. Epub 2022 Feb 19. PMID: 35259670.
    1. Nissen L, Lindhardt T. A qualitative study of COPD-patients’experience of a telemedicine intervention. IJMI 2017; 107: 11–17.
    1. Gorst SL, Armitage CJ, Brownsell Set al. et al. Home telehealth uptake and continued use among heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a systematic review. Ann Behav Med 2014; 48: 323–336.
    1. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. JMed Internet Res 2005; 7: 1–9.
    1. Lesselroth B, Monkman H, Adams K, et al. User experience theories, models, and frameworks: a focused review of the healthcare literature. Stud Health Technol Inform 2020; 270: 1076–1080.
    1. Wang T, Giunti G, Melles Met al. et al. Digital patient experience: umbrella systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24: e37952.
    1. Walker RC, Tong A, Howard Ket al. et al. Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform 2019; 124: 78–85.
    1. De La Cruz Monroy MF, Mosahebi A. The use of smartphone applications (apps) for enhancing communication with surgical patients: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 2019; 26: 244–259.
    1. Greenhalgh T, A'Court C, Shaw S. Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth - a hermeneutic systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017; 17: 56.
    1. Brunton L, Bower P, Sanders C. The contradictions of telehealth user experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0139561.
    1. Hsiao K-L. What drives smartwatch adoption intention? Comparing apple and non-apple watches. Libr Hi Tech 2017; 35: 186–206. 10.1108/LHT-09-2016-0105 .
    1. Beukenhorst AL, Howells K, Cook L, et al. Engagement and participant experiences with consumer smartwatches for health research: longitudinal, observational feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8: e14368.
    1. Mehraeen E, SeyedAlinaghi S, Heydari M, et al. Telemedicine technologies and applications in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Health Informatics J 2023; 29: 14604582231167431.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera