Patient-reported impact of myasthenia gravis in the real world: findings from a digital observational survey-based study (MyRealWorld MG)

Sonia Berrih-Aknin, Jacqueline Palace, Andreas Meisel, Kristl G Claeys, Srikanth Muppidi, Francesco Saccà, Fatemeh Amini, Mark Larkin, Casey Quinn, Jon Beauchamp, Glenn Philips, Femke De Ruyck, Joyce Ramirez, Sandra Paci, Sonia Berrih-Aknin, Jacqueline Palace, Andreas Meisel, Kristl G Claeys, Srikanth Muppidi, Francesco Saccà, Fatemeh Amini, Mark Larkin, Casey Quinn, Jon Beauchamp, Glenn Philips, Femke De Ruyck, Joyce Ramirez, Sandra Paci

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the impact of myasthenia gravis (MG) - in terms of treatments, side effects, comorbidities, psychological health and work or study- in the real world from a patient perspective.

Design and participants: This is a prospective, observational, digital, longitudinal study. Adults diagnosed with MG residing in the USA, Japan, Germany, the UK, Italy, Spain or Canada were eligible to participate in the study. There were no other exclusion criteria. Participants used a bespoke smartphone application to confirm eligibility, provide consent and enter data about their MG into a profile, a tracker to record MG-related events and a series of patient-reported outcome instruments. 1693 participants completed at least 1 survey and were included in this analysis.

Results: Results are presented as a percentage of respondents to each survey question. The study population was largely female (69% of 1586 respondents), with an average age of 49.9 years (SD 14.8). In the previous 12 months, 83.7% of 1412 respondents confirmed that they had received one or more routine treatments for MG, and 67.1% of 255 respondents confirmed that they had experienced a side effect in the previous month. Commonly experienced comorbidities reported by 966 respondents were thyroid problems, hypertension and anxiety, experienced by 37.5%, 31.4% and 28.0% of respondents, respectively.According to 889 respondents to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale survey, 52.7% and 43.2% had a score indicative of at least mild anxiety and mild depression, respectively. Of 257 respondents, 33.0% reported experiencing a work or study impact in the past month.

Conclusions: This analysis of baseline characteristics of the MyRealWorld MG study population indicates that, despite current treatments, patients experience notable burden. Further scheduled analyses will develop a longitudinal picture of MG burden.

Trial registration number: NCT04176211.

Keywords: adult neurology; neurology; neuromuscular disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The principal investigator, ML is CEO and owner of Vitaccess, which has been commissioned by argenx BV to carry out the study. FA and CQ are employees of Vitaccess. JB, GP, FDR, JR and SP are employees of argenx BV, the sponsor of the study. SB-A is a consultant and receives honoraria from argenx BV for this study. AM has received speaker honoraria, consulting fees or financial research support from Alexion, argenx BV, Grifols, Hormosan Pharma, Janssen, Octapharma and UCB. He serves as Chairman of the medical advisory board of the German Myasthenia Gravis Society. KGC has received advisory board honoraria, speaker fees and funding for research from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, CSL Behring and Sanofi-Genzyme, and travel reimbursement from Sanofi-Genzyme. KGC holds the Emil von Behring Chair in Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disorders, sponsored by CSL Behring. FS has received public-speaking honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Teva Pharmaceuticals, and served on advisory boards for Almirall, argenx BV, AveXis, Biogen, Forward Pharma, Lexeo Therapeutics, Merck, Novartis, Novatek Pharmaceuticals, Pomona, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Routine treatment regimens in the 12 months prior to study registration (% of 1412 responding participants—note that participants could select more than one treatment). AChEI, acetylcholinesterase inhibitor; NSISTs, non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rescue treatment regimens in the 12 months prior to study registration (% of 1376 responding participants—note that participants could select more than one treatment). IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; PLEX, plasma exchange.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Symptoms attributed to side effects in the 30 days prior to study registration (% of 171 responding participants—note that participants could select more than one symptom).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comorbid conditions reported at study registration (% of 1495 responding participants—note that participants could select more than one condition). COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

References

    1. Jayam Trouth A, Dabi A, Solieman N, et al. . Myasthenia gravis: a review. Autoimmune Dis 2012;2012:874680. 10.1155/2012/874680
    1. Gilhus NE, Tzartos S, Evoli A, et al. . Myasthenia gravis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019;5:30. 10.1038/s41572-019-0079-y
    1. Conti-Fine BM, Milani M, Kaminski HJ. Myasthenia gravis: past, present, and future. J Clin Invest 2006;116:2843–54. 10.1172/JCI29894
    1. Bhanushali MJ, Wuu J, Benatar M. Treatment of ocular symptoms in myasthenia gravis. Neurology 2008;71:1335–41. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000327669.75695.38
    1. Kupersmith MJ, Ying G. Ocular motor dysfunction and ptosis in ocular myasthenia gravis: effects of treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1330–4. 10.1136/bjo.2004.063404
    1. Braz NFT, Rocha NP, Vieira ÉLM, et al. . Muscle strength and psychiatric symptoms influence health-related quality of life in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Clin Neurosci 2018;50:41–4. 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.011
    1. Raggi A, Leonardi M, Antozzi C, et al. . Concordance between severity of disease, disability and health-related quality of life in myasthenia gravis. Neurol Sci 2010;31:41–5. 10.1007/s10072-009-0167-y
    1. Boldingh MI, Dekker L, Maniaol AH, et al. . An up-date on health-related quality of life in myasthenia gravis -results from population based cohorts. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015;13:115. 10.1186/s12955-015-0298-1
    1. Utsugisawa K, Suzuki S, Nagane Y, et al. . Health-Related quality-of-life and treatment targets in myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2014;50:493–500. 10.1002/mus.24213
    1. Law N, Davio K, Blunck M, et al. . The lived experience of myasthenia gravis: a patient-led analysis. Neurol Ther 2021;10:1103–25. 10.1007/s40120-021-00285-w
    1. Slade A, Isa F, Kyte D, et al. . Patient reported outcome measures in rare diseases: a narrative review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018;13:61. 10.1186/s13023-018-0810-x
    1. Schieppati A, Henter J-I, Daina E, et al. . Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet 2008;371:2039–41. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60872-7
    1. Wu J, Wang C, Toh S, et al. . Use of real-world evidence in regulatory decisions for rare diseases in the United states-current status and future directions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2020;29:1213–8. 10.1002/pds.4962
    1. Berrih-Aknin S, Claeys KG, Law N, et al. . Patient-reportedimpact of myasthenia gravis in the real world: protocol for a digital observational study (myrealworld Mg). BMJ Open 2021;11:e048198. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048198
    1. Muppidi S, Wolfe GI, Conaway M, et al. . MG-ADL: still a relevant outcome measure. Muscle Nerve 2011;44:727–31. 10.1002/mus.22140
    1. Wolfe GI, Herbelin L, Nations SP, et al. . Myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile. Neurology 1999;52:1487. 10.1212/WNL.52.7.1487
    1. Burns TM, Conaway MR, Cutter GR, et al. . Less is more, or almost as much: a 15-item quality-of-life instrument for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2008;38:957–63. 10.1002/mus.21053
    1. Burns TM, Sadjadi R, Utsugisawa K, et al. . International Clinimetric evaluation of the MG-QOL15, resulting in slight revision and subsequent validation of the MG-qol15r. Muscle Nerve 2016;54:1015–22. 10.1002/mus.25198
    1. Johnston M, Pollard B, Hennessey P. Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations. J Psychosom Res 2000;48:579–84. 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00102-1
    1. Mantegazza R, Bonanno S, Camera G, et al. . Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2011;7:151–60. 10.2147/NDT.S8915
    1. Menon D, Barnett C, Bril V. Novel treatments in myasthenia gravis. Front Neurol 2020;11:538. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00538
    1. Sathasivam S. Steroids and immunosuppressant drugs in myasthenia gravis. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2008;4:317–27. 10.1038/ncpneuro0810
    1. Gilhus NE, Owe JF, Hoff JM, et al. . Myasthenia gravis: a review of available treatment approaches. Autoimmune Diseases 2011;2011:1–6. 10.4061/2011/847393
    1. Mehndiratta MM, Pandey S, Kuntzer T, et al. . Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2014. 10.1002/14651858.CD006986.pub3
    1. Bacci ED, Coyne KS, Poon J-L, et al. . Understanding side effects of therapy for myasthenia gravis and their impact on daily life. BMC Neurol 2019;19:335. 10.1186/s12883-019-1573-2
    1. Schneider-Gold C, Hagenacker T, Melzer N, et al. . Understanding the burden of refractory myasthenia gravis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2019;12:1756286419832242. 10.1177/1756286419832242
    1. Tanovska N, Novotni G, Sazdova-Burneska S, et al. . Myasthenia gravis and associated diseases. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018;6:472–8. 10.3889/oamjms.2018.110
    1. Laakso SM, Myllynen C, Strbian D, et al. . Comorbidities worsen the prognosis of generalized myasthenia gravis post-thymectomy. J Neurol Sci 2021;427:S0022-510X(21)00243-4. 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117549
    1. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020;16:223–37. 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2
    1. Law C, Flaherty CV, Bandyopadhyay S. A review of psychiatric comorbidity in myasthenia gravis. Cureus 2020;12:e9184. 10.7759/cureus.9184
    1. World Health Organization . Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017. Available:
    1. Chu H-T, Tseng C-C, Liang C-S, et al. . Risk of depressive disorders following myasthenia gravis: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. Front Psychiatry 2019;10:481. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00481
    1. Kotan VO, Kotan Z, Birgül A, et al. . Psychopathology, psychosocial factors and quality of life in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Sci 2016;33:482–93.
    1. Köhler W. Psychosocial aspects in patients with myasthenia gravis. J Neurol 2007;254:II90–2. 10.1007/s00415-007-2022-5
    1. Leonardi M, Guido D, Quintas R, et al. . Factors related to unemployment in Europe. A cross-sectional study from the courage survey in Finland, Poland and Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15:722. 10.3390/ijerph15040722
    1. Paul RH, Cohen RA, Goldstein JM, et al. . Fatigue and its impact on patients with myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:1402–6. 10.1002/1097-4598(200009)23:9<1402::aid-mus11>;2-b
    1. Amin S, Aung M, Gandhi FR, et al. . Myasthenia gravis and its association with thyroid diseases. Cureus 2020;12:e10248. 10.7759/cureus.10248

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera