Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium

D Ford, D F Easton, M Stratton, S Narod, D Goldgar, P Devilee, D T Bishop, B Weber, G Lenoir, J Chang-Claude, H Sobol, M D Teare, J Struewing, A Arason, S Scherneck, J Peto, T R Rebbeck, P Tonin, S Neuhausen, R Barkardottir, J Eyfjord, H Lynch, B A Ponder, S A Gayther, M Zelada-Hedman, D Ford, D F Easton, M Stratton, S Narod, D Goldgar, P Devilee, D T Bishop, B Weber, G Lenoir, J Chang-Claude, H Sobol, M D Teare, J Struewing, A Arason, S Scherneck, J Peto, T R Rebbeck, P Tonin, S Neuhausen, R Barkardottir, J Eyfjord, H Lynch, B A Ponder, S A Gayther, M Zelada-Hedman

Abstract

The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to inherited breast cancer was assessed by linkage and mutation analysis in 237 families, each with at least four cases of breast cancer, collected by the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Families were included without regard to the occurrence of ovarian or other cancers. Overall, disease was linked to BRCA1 in an estimated 52% of families, to BRCA2 in 32% of families, and to neither gene in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-28%), suggesting other predisposition genes. The majority (81%) of the breast-ovarian cancer families were due to BRCA1, with most others (14%) due to BRCA2. Conversely, the majority of families with male and female breast cancer were due to BRCA2 (76%). The largest proportion (67%) of families due to other genes was found in families with four or five cases of female breast cancer only. These estimates were not substantially affected either by changing the assumed penetrance model for BRCA1 or by including or excluding BRCA1 mutation data. Among those families with disease due to BRCA1 that were tested by one of the standard screening methods, mutations were detected in the coding sequence or splice sites in an estimated 63% (95% CI 51%-77%). The estimated sensitivity was identical for direct sequencing and other techniques. The penetrance of BRCA2 was estimated by maximizing the LOD score in BRCA2-mutation families, over all possible penetrance functions. The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer reached 28% (95% CI 9%-44%) by age 50 years and 84% (95% CI 43%-95%) by age 70 years. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 0.4% (95% CI 0%-1%) by age 50 years and 27% (95% CI 0%-47%) by age 70 years. The lifetime risk of breast cancer appears similar to the risk in BRCA1 carriers, but there was some suggestion of a lower risk in BRCA2 carriers <50 years of age.

References

    1. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan;15(1):87-90
    1. Nat Genet. 1996 May;13(1):120-2
    1. Oncogene. 1997 Feb 13;14(6):741-3
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Mar;60(3):486-95
    1. N Engl J Med. 1997 May 15;336(20):1401-8
    1. Nat Genet. 1997 May;16(1):64-7
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May;60(5):1021-30
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May;60(5):1031-40
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May;60(5):1041-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May;60(5):1068-78
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jul;61(1):120-8
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Mar;58(3):451-6
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3443-6
    1. Science. 1990 Dec 21;250(4988):1684-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Feb;48(2):232-42
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Jun;50(6):1235-42
    1. BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):855-7
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Apr;52(4):678-701
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Apr;52(4):718-22
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Jul;53(1):252-63
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 1;90(21):10325-9
    1. Lancet. 1994 Mar 19;343(8899):692-5
    1. Nat Genet. 1994 May;7(1):103-7
    1. Science. 1994 Sep 30;265(5181):2088-90
    1. Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2 Spec No):246-339
    1. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):66-71
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):15-7
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):254-64
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):265-71
    1. Oncogene. 1995 Mar 2;10(5):1023-6
    1. Nat Genet. 1995 Jun;10(2):208-12
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Oct;57(4):957-8
    1. Nat Genet. 1995 Dec;11(4):428-33
    1. Nature. 1995 Dec 21-28;378(6559):789-92
    1. Nat Genet. 1996 Mar;12(3):298-302
    1. Nat Genet. 1996 Mar;12(3):333-7
    1. Nat Genet. 1997 Jan;15(1):103-5

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera