Efficacy and feasibility of Apatinib and S-1 as a novel oral induction therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an exploratory phase 2 open-label, single-arm trial

Wen Jiang, Rongrong Li, Lin Zhang, Shengjin Dou, Lulu Ye, Ziyang Shao, Sicheng Wu, Minjun Dong, Jiang Li, Guopei Zhu, Wen Jiang, Rongrong Li, Lin Zhang, Shengjin Dou, Lulu Ye, Ziyang Shao, Sicheng Wu, Minjun Dong, Jiang Li, Guopei Zhu

Abstract

Objectives: The current standard nonsurgical treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LA-HNSCC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with CRT has been explored in HNSCC patients and is an acceptable strategy. However, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) restricts its application. We conducted a clinical study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of a novel induction therapy with orally administered apatinib and S-1 in LA-HNSCC.

Materials and methods: This nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective clinical trial included patients with LA-HNSCCs. The eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC, with at least one radiographically measurable lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scan, age 18-75 years, and a diagnosis of stage III to IVb according to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC). Patients received induction therapy with apatinib and S-1 for three cycles (3 weeks/cycle). The primary endpoint of this study was the objective response rate (ORR) to induction therapy. The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs during induction treatment.

Results: From October 2017 to September 2020, 49 patients with LA-HNSCC were screened consecutively and 38 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range, 39-75). Thirty-three patients (86.8%) had stage IV disease according to the AJCC staging system. The ORR after induction therapy was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.2%-99.9%). the 3-year OS rate was 64.2% (95% CI: 46.0%-78.2%) and 3-year PFS was 57.1% (95% CI: 40.8%-73.6%). The most common AEs during induction therapy were hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, which were manageable.

Conclusion: Apatinib combined with S-1 as novel induction therapy for LA-HNSCC patients resulted in a higher-than-anticipated ORR and manageable adverse effects. With the associated safety profile and preferable oral administration route, apatinib combined with S-1 is an attractive exploratory induction regimen in outpatient settings. However, this regimen failed to show a survival benefit.

Clinical trial registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03267121, identifier NCT03267121.

Keywords: chemoradiotherapy; induction therapy; locally advanced head and neck cancer; oral agents for cancer; prospective and interventional study.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2023 Jiang, Li, Zhang, Dou, Ye, Shao, Wu, Dong, Li and Zhu.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram using Simon’s two-stage optimal design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Waterfall plot of maximum percent change in tumor size from baseline as measured by Response Evaluatiuon Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Kaplan-Meier curves showing progression-free survival. (B) Kaplan Meier showing overall survival. (C) Kaplan Meier curves showing progression-free survival of oropharyngeal patients with different p16 status. (D) Kaplan-Meier curves showing overall survival of oropharyngeal patients with different p16 status. Number at risk = number at risk in 12-months increments.

References

    1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, et al. . Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol (2017) 3:524–48. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
    1. Haddad RI, Posner M, Hitt R, Cohen EEW, Schulten J, Lefebvre J-L, et al. . Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: role, controversy, and future directions. Ann Oncol (2018) 29:1130–40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy102
    1. Iocca O, Farcomeni A, Di Rocco A, Di Maio P, Golusinski P, Pardiñas López S, et al. . Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of the currently available treatment options. Oral Oncol (2018) 80:40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.03.001
    1. Haddad R, O’Neill A, Rabinowits G, Tishler R, Khuri F, Adkins D, et al. . Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (sequential chemoradiotherapy) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer (PARADIGM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol (2013) 14:257–64. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70011-1
    1. Hitt R, Grau JJ, López-Pousa A, Berrocal A, García-Girón C, Irigoyen A, et al. . A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. Ann Oncol (2014) 25:216–25. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt461
    1. Geoffrois L, Sire C, Tuchais C, Bourhis JP, Babin E, Coutte A, et al. . Induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab radiotherapy is not superior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck carcinomas: results of the GORTEC 2007-02 phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol (2018) 36 (31):3077–83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2591
    1. Cohen EEW, Karrison TG, Kocherginsky M, Mueller J, Egan R, Huang CH, et al. . Phase III randomized trial of induction chemotherapy in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol (2014) 32:2735–43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.6309
    1. Posner MR, Hershock DM, Blajman CR, Mickiewicz E, Winquist E, Gorbounova V, et al. . Cisplatin and fluorouracil alone or with docetaxel in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med (2007) 357:1705–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070956
    1. Vermorken JB, Remenar E, van Herpen C, Gorlia T, Mesia R, Degardin M, et al. . Cisplatin, fluorouracil, and docetaxel in unresectable head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med (2007) 357:1695–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071028
    1. Karabajakian A, Gau M, Reverdy T, Neidhardt E-M, Fayette J. Induction chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a question of belief. Cancers (Basel) (2018) 11:E15. doi: 10.3390/cancers11010015
    1. Driessen CML, de Boer JP, Gelderblom H, Rasch CRN, de Jong MA, Verbist BM, et al. . Induction chemotherapy with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil followed by randomization to two cisplatin-based concomitant chemoradiotherapy schedules in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (CONDOR study) (Dutch head and neck society 08-01): a randomized phase II study. Eur J Cancer (2016) 52:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.024
    1. Vassilakopoulou M, Psyrri A, Argiris A. Targeting angiogenesis in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol (2015) 51:409–15. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.01.006
    1. Hsu H-W, Wall NR, Hsueh C-T, Kim S, Ferris RL, Chen C-S, et al. . Combination antiangiogenic therapy and radiation in head and neck cancers. Oral Oncol (2014) 50:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.003
    1. Tian S, Quan H, Xie C, Guo H, Lü F, Xu Y, et al. . YN968D1 is a novel and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase with potent activity in vitro and in vivo . Cancer Sci (2011) 102:1374–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01939.x
    1. Li J, Zhao X, Chen L, Guo H, Lv F, Jia K, et al. . Safety and pharmacokinetics of novel selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor YN968D1 in patients with advanced malignancies. BMC Cancer (2010) 10:529. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-529
    1. Maeda M, Yamashita T, Matsunobu T, Araki K, Tomifuji M, Shiotani A. Outpatient oral chemotherapy with s-1 for unresectable or distant metastatic head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res (2013) 33:3285–9.
    1. Micaily I, Johnson J, Argiris A. An update on angiogenesis targeting in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers Head Neck (2020) 5:5. doi: 10.1186/s41199-020-00051-9
    1. Meng M, Ye X, Yang X, Huang G, Wei Z, Ni Y, et al. . Apatinib and s-1 combination therapy for the treatment of advanced head and neck neoplasms: three case reports. J Cancer Res Ther (2019) 15:442–6. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_894_18
    1. Blumenschein GR, Glisson BS, Lu C, Sabichi AL, Ginsberg LE, Bartos CI, et al. . Final results of a phase II study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). J Clin Oncol (2012) 30:5592–2. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.5592
    1. Fury MG, Lee NY, Sherman E, Lisa D, Kelly K, Lipson B, et al. . A phase 2 study of bevacizumab with cisplatin plus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for stage III/IVB head and neck squamous cell cancer. Cancer (2012) 118:5008–14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27498
    1. Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Gooding WE, Branstetter BF, Zhong S, Raez LE, et al. . Phase II trial of pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29:1140–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.3591
    1. Williamson SK, Moon J, Huang CH, Guaglianone PP, LeBlanc M, Wolf GT, et al. . Phase II evaluation of sorafenib in advanced and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: southwest oncology group study S0420. J Clin Oncol (2010) 28:3330–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6834
    1. Argiris A, Li S, Savvides P, Ohr JP, Gilbert J, Levine MA, et al. . Phase III randomized trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol (2019) 37:3266–74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00555
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (2009) 45:228–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials (1989) 10:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9
    1. Ghi MG, Paccagnella A, Ferrari D, Foa P, Alterio D, Codecà C, et al. . Induction TPF followed by concomitant treatment versus concomitant treatment alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer. A phase II–III trial. Ann Oncol (2017) 28:2206–12. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx299
    1. de Oliveira TB, Marta GN, de Castro Junior G, Kowalski LP. Induction chemotherapy for advanced oral cavity cancer. Curr Oncol Rep (2021) 23:129. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01119-6
    1. Gau M, Karabajakian A, Reverdy T, Neidhardt E-M, Fayette J. Induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancers: results and controversies. Oral Oncol (2019) 95:164–9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.015
    1. Patil VM, Prabhash K, Noronha V, Joshi A, Muddu V, Dhumal S, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in very locally advanced technically unresectable oral cavity cancers. Oral Oncol (2014) 50:1000–4. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.07.015
    1. Gangopadhyay A, Bhatt S, Nandy K, Rai S, Rathod P, Puj KS. Survival impact of surgical resection in locally advanced T4b oral squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope (2021) 131:E2266–74. doi: 10.1002/lary.29394
    1. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, et al. . Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the united states. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29:4294–301. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596
    1. Tham T, Wotman M, Roche A, Kraus D, Costantino P. The prognostic effect of anatomic subsite in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol (2019) 40:567–72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.05.006
    1. Marklund L, Holzhauser S, de Flon C, Zupancic M, Landin D, Kolev A, et al. . Survival of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) in relation to TNM 8 – risk of incorrect downstaging of HPV-mediated non-tonsillar, non-base of tongue carcinomas. Eur J Cancer (2020) 139:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.003
    1. Billfalk-Kelly A, Yu E, Su J, O’Sullivan B, Waldron J, Ringash J, et al. . Radiologic extranodal extension portends worse outcome in cN+ TNM-8 stage I human papillomavirus-mediated oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2019) 104:1017–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.047
    1. Huang SH, O’Sullivan B, Su J, Bartlett E, Kim J, Waldron JN, et al. . Prognostic importance of radiologic extranodal extension in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma and its potential role in refining TNM-8 cN-classification. Radiother Oncol (2020) 144:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.011
    1. González Ferreira JA, Jaén Olasolo J, Azinovic I, Jeremic B. Effect of radiotherapy delay in overall treatment time on local control and survival in head and neck cancer: review of the literature. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother (2015) 20:328–39. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.05.010
    1. Lalami Y, Garcia C, Flamen P, Ameye L, Paesmans M, Awada A. Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) and correlating early fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT response to outcome in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer. Head Neck (2016) 38:347–54. doi: 10.1002/hed.23898
    1. Ju W, Xia R, Zhu D, Dou S, Zhu G, Dong M, et al. . A pilot study of neoadjuvant combination of anti-PD-1 camrelizumab and VEGFR2 inhibitor apatinib for locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun (2022) 13:5378. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33080-8
    1. Inuyama Y, Kida A, Tsukuda M, Kohno N, Satake B, S-1 Cooperative Study Group (Head and Neck Cancer Working Group) . Late phase II study of s-1 in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho (2001) 28:1381–90.
    1. Zhou L, Lin J, Wu G, Chen J, Huang X, Zhang S. Safety and feasibility of low-dose apatinib combined with s-1 as the second-line therapy or beyond in Chinese patients with pulmonary and hepatic metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Drug Des Devel Ther (2020) 14:1257–62. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S244102

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera