Multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial of camrelizumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Jun Liu, Yang Yang, Zhichao Liu, Xiaolong Fu, Xiaoyue Cai, Hongxuan Li, Li Zhu, Yan Shen, Hong Zhang, Yifeng Sun, Hezhong Chen, Bentong Yu, Renquan Zhang, Jinchen Shao, Ming Zhang, Zhigang Li, Jun Liu, Yang Yang, Zhichao Liu, Xiaolong Fu, Xiaoyue Cai, Hongxuan Li, Li Zhu, Yan Shen, Hong Zhang, Yifeng Sun, Hezhong Chen, Bentong Yu, Renquan Zhang, Jinchen Shao, Ming Zhang, Zhigang Li

Abstract

Background: Camrelizumab and chemotherapy demonstrated durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile as first-line treatment in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy, using pathologically complete response (pCR) as primary endpoint, in the treatment for locally advanced ESCC.

Methods: Patients with locally advanced but resectable thoracic ESCC, staged as T1b-4a, N2-3 (≥3 stations), and M0 or M1 lymph node metastasis (confined to the supraclavicular lymph nodes) were enrolled. Eligible patients received intravenous camrelizumab (200 mg, day 1) plus nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin (area under curve of 5 mg/mL/min, day 1) of each 21-days cycle, for two cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint is pCR rate in the per-protocol population. Safety was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population that was treated with at least one dose of camrelizumab.

Results: From November 20, 2019 to December 22, 2020, 60 patients were enrolled. 55 (91.7%) patients completed the full two-cycle treatment successfully. 51 patients underwent surgery and R0 resection was achieved in 50 (98.0%) patients. pCR (ypT0N0) was identified in 20 (39.2%) patients and 5 (9.8%) patients had complete response of the primary tumor but residual disease in lymph nodes alone (ypT0N+). 58 patients (96.7%) had any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with the most common being leukocytopenia (86.7%). 34 patients (56.7%) had adverse events of grade 3 or worse, and one patient (1.7%) occurred a grade 5 adverse event. There was no in-hospital and postoperative 30-day as well as 90-day mortality.

Conclusions: The robust antitumor activity of camrelizumab and chemotherapy was confirmed and demonstrated without unexpected safety signals. Our findings established camrelizumab and chemotherapy as a promising neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced ESCC.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900026240.

Keywords: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Combined Modality Therapy; Immunotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Waterfall plot of pathological tumor regression in the per-protocol population (n=51). Each bar represents one patient. The upper column shows clinical characteristics and radiological responses. CPS, Combined Positive Score; LLD, lesion longest diameter; LN, lymph node; SDL, short diameter of the largest; TPS, Tumor Proportion Score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation of radiological response and pathological tumor regression. (A) Pathological regression was marginally correlated with radiological response by RECIST assessment (p=0.046). (B) LLD reduction was positively correlated with SUVmax reduction of primary tumor (p=0.005). (C) LLD reduction was not correlated with SDL reduction (p=0.750). (D) LLD reduction was positively correlated with pathological tumor regression (p

Figure 3

Case of radiological responses after…

Figure 3

Case of radiological responses after neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy. CT and PET-CT images…

Figure 3
Case of radiological responses after neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy. CT and PET-CT images before (upper row) and after (lower row) neoadjuvant treatment of patient 57 were compared. This shows the radiological images of a 67-year-old man with a stage III ESCC before neoadjuvant treatment. CT and PET-CT shows significant shrinkage and SUVmax reduction for the primary tumor and suspected lymph nodes, respectively. This patient achieved pathological regression of 95% for esophageal lesion with no residual lymph node metastasis according to surgical specimen. ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Figure 4

Association between biomarkers and pathological…

Figure 4

Association between biomarkers and pathological regression. (A–D) PD-L1 scores and relationship to pathological…

Figure 4
Association between biomarkers and pathological regression. (A–D) PD-L1 scores and relationship to pathological regression. (E) Comparison of TMB between the PCR and non-pCR groups. (F) Distribution of TMB and the percentage of residual viable tumor cells. The dashed black line indicates the linear regression line. CPS, Combined Positive Score; PCR, pathologically complete response; TMB, tumor mutational burden; TPS, Tumor Proportion Score; TRG, tumor regression grade.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Case of radiological responses after neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy. CT and PET-CT images before (upper row) and after (lower row) neoadjuvant treatment of patient 57 were compared. This shows the radiological images of a 67-year-old man with a stage III ESCC before neoadjuvant treatment. CT and PET-CT shows significant shrinkage and SUVmax reduction for the primary tumor and suspected lymph nodes, respectively. This patient achieved pathological regression of 95% for esophageal lesion with no residual lymph node metastasis according to surgical specimen. ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; RLN, recurrent laryngeal nerve.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between biomarkers and pathological regression. (A–D) PD-L1 scores and relationship to pathological regression. (E) Comparison of TMB between the PCR and non-pCR groups. (F) Distribution of TMB and the percentage of residual viable tumor cells. The dashed black line indicates the linear regression line. CPS, Combined Positive Score; PCR, pathologically complete response; TMB, tumor mutational burden; TPS, Tumor Proportion Score; TRG, tumor regression grade.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492
    1. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. . Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019;17:855–83. 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033
    1. Liu S, Wen J, Yang H, et al. . Recurrence patterns after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery alone in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from the multicenter phase III trial NEOCRTEC5010. Eur J Cancer 2020;138:113–21. 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.002
    1. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (cross): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1090–8. 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6
    1. Huang J, Xu B, Mo H, et al. . Safety, activity, and biomarkers of SHR-1210, an anti-PD-1 antibody, for patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:1296–304. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2439
    1. Huang J, Xu J, Chen Y, et al. . Camrelizumab versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (escort): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:832–42. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30110-8
    1. Luo H, Lu J, Bai Y, et al. . Effect of Camrelizumab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the ESCORT-1st randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326:916–25. 10.1001/jama.2021.12836
    1. Chau I, Doki Y, Ajani JA, et al. . Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) or NIVO plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EscC): first results of the CheckMate 648 study. JCO 2021;39:LBA4001–LBA. 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.LBA4001
    1. Kato K, Sun J-M, Shah MA, et al. . LBA8_PR pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer: the phase 3 KEYNOTE-590 study. Annals of Oncology 2020;31:S1192–3. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2298
    1. Park SY, Hong MH, Kim HR, et al. . The feasibility and safety of radical esophagectomy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:6426–34. 10.21037/jtd-20-1088
    1. Li C, Zhao S, Zheng Y, et al. . Preoperative pembrolizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (PALACE-1). Eur J Cancer 2021;144:232–41. 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.039
    1. van den Ende T, de Clercq NC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with Atezolizumab for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: a single-arm phase II feasibility trial (perfect). Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:3351–9. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4443
    1. Mu L, Song Y, Zhao K, et al. . SHR-1316, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicentre, phase 2 study. Thorac Cancer 2021;12:1373–81. 10.1111/1759-7714.13913
    1. Sjoquist KM, Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, et al. . Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:681–92. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5
    1. Rice TW, Gress DM, Patil DT, et al. . Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction-Major changes in the American joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:304–17. 10.3322/caac.21399
    1. Japan Esophageal Society . Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edition: Part I. Esophagus 2017;14:1–36. 10.1007/s10388-016-0551-7
    1. Li B, Li B, Jiang H, et al. . The value of enhanced CT scanning for predicting lymph node metastasis along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:1632. 10.21037/atm-20-4991
    1. Chirieac LR, Swisher SG, Ajani JA, et al. . Posttherapy pathologic stage predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiation. Cancer 2005;103:1347–55. 10.1002/cncr.20916
    1. Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, et al. . International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: esophagectomy complications consensus group (ECCG). Ann Surg 2015;262:286–94. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001098
    1. Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA, et al. . Validity and reliability of the US National cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol 2015;1:1051–9. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639
    1. Dako . Pd-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx interpretation Manual–Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EscC), 2020. Available:
    1. FDA . Summary of safety and effectiveness data (SSED). Available:
    1. Yang H, Liu H, Chen Y, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): a phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2796–803. 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483
    1. van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, et al. . Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074–84. 10.1056/NEJMoa1112088
    1. Mariette C, Dahan L, Mornex F, et al. . Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage I and II esophageal cancer: final analysis of randomized controlled phase III trial FFCD 9901. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2416–22. 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6532
    1. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, et al. . Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1191–203. 10.1056/NEJMoa2032125
    1. Lu Z, Zou J, Li S, et al. . Epigenetic therapy inhibits metastases by disrupting premetastatic niches. Nature 2020;579:284–90. 10.1038/s41586-020-2054-x
    1. Rozeman EA, Menzies AM, van Akkooi ACJ, et al. . Identification of the optimal combination dosing schedule of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma (OpACIN-neo): a multicentre, phase 2, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:948–60. 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30151-2
    1. Menzies AM, Amaria RN, Rozeman EA, et al. . Pathological response and survival with neoadjuvant therapy in melanoma: a pooled analysis from the International neoadjuvant melanoma Consortium (INMC). Nat Med 2021;27:301–9. 10.1038/s41591-020-01188-3
    1. Zhao L, Xing W, Yang Y, et al. . The sequence of chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody influence the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer: a phase II study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2021;39:4051. 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4051
    1. Wang Z. Neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and apatinib for locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EscC): a single-arm, open-label, phase Ib study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2021;39:4047. 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4047
    1. Ajani JA. Optimizing docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with cancer of the gastric and gastroesophageal junction: evolution of the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimen. Cancer 2008;113:945–55. 10.1002/cncr.23661
    1. Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A, et al. . Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). radiation therapy Oncology Group. JAMA 1999;281:1623–-7. 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623
    1. Walsh TN, Noonan N, Hollywood D, et al. . A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 1996;335:462–7. 10.1056/NEJM199608153350702
    1. Haisley KR, Hart KD, Nabavizadeh N, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil is associated with increased pathologic complete response and improved survival compared to carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1–7. 10.1093/dote/dox015
    1. Blom RLGM, Sosef MN, Nap M, et al. . Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens in patients with potentially curable esophageal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2014;27:380–7. 10.1111/dote.12110
    1. Arbour KC, Mezquita L, Long N, et al. . Impact of baseline steroids on efficacy of programmed cell death-1 and programmed Death-Ligand 1 blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:2872–8. 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.0006
    1. Bai X, Hu J, Betof Warner A, et al. . Early use of high-dose glucocorticoid for the management of irAE is associated with poorer survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:5993–6000. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1283
    1. Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. . Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2040–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865
    1. Li J, Liu J, Li Z, et al. . Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (NIC-ESCC2019): a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:4028. 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4028
    1. Yang Y, Li B, Yi J. Robot-Assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann Surg 2022;275:646–53. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005023

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera