Comparison of postural control in unilateral stance between healthy controls and lumbar discectomy patients with and without pain

Katie Bouche, Veerle Stevens, Dirk Cambier, Jacques Caemaert, Lieven Danneels, Katie Bouche, Veerle Stevens, Dirk Cambier, Jacques Caemaert, Lieven Danneels

Abstract

Main problem: Previous studies have demonstrated that sciatica patients have poorer postural control than healthy controls and that postural control remains unchanged 3 months after lumbar discectomy in sciatica patients. The aims of the current study were to investigate whether static balance control recovers in pain-free discectomy patients long-term after lumbar discectomy. Next is to determine whether static balance responses of asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients differed from each other and from healthy controls. In addition, the influence of the extent of disc resection (unilateral/bilateral removal) and the side of operation on static balance control were investigated.

Methods: Fifteen pain-free lumbar discectomy patients, 23 lumbar discectomy patients with residual pain and 72 controls performed unilateral stance tasks with eyes open and eyes closed on a force plate were taken up for the investigation. Three repetitions of a 10 s unilateral stance test were performed on each leg. Postural sway was determined. Patients were divided into three age groups.

Results: In the eyes open condition, there was no significant difference between postural sway of pain-free lumbar discectomy patients and controls (P=0.68), whereas balance of patients with pain was significantly worse than in controls (P=0.003). In the eyes closed condition, the sway in both groups of lumbar discectomy patients was significantly worse than in controls (pain-free P=0.009/painful P<0.001). No significant differences were found in postural sway between patients with unilateral and bilateral disc resection. In unilateral stance on the leg of the operated side, centre of gravity sway was not significantly different in the eyes open condition compared to the eyes closed condition, whereas in stance on the leg of the non-operated side, postural sway was significantly lower in the eyes open condition compared to the eyes closed condition. In both conditions, postural sway in the age group of 50-65 years was significantly higher than in the age groups of 30-39 years (eyes open P=0.005; eyes closed P<0.001) and 40-49 years (eyes open P=0.002; eyes closed P=0.006). There was no significant difference between the age group of 30-39 years and the age group of 40-49 years (P=0.51).

Conclusion: As for long-term following lumbar discectomy, there is no complete recovery of postural control. Patients seem to develop visual compensation mechanisms for underlying sensory-motor deficits, which are, however, sufficient in case of pain relief only. Further study is needed to determine the cause of the balance disturbances in lumbar discectomy patients.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
COG sway in eyes open condition in controls, pain-free discectomy patients and painful discectomy patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
COG sway in eyes closed condition in controls, pain-free discectomy patients and painful discectomy patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
COG sway in eyes open condition in the age groups of 30–39, 40–49 and 50–65 years
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
COG sway in eyes closed condition in the age groups of 30–39, 40–49 and 50–65 years
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
COG sway in eyes open condition in controls, unilateral discectomy patients and bilateral discectomy patients
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
COG sway in eyes closed condition in controls, unilateral discectomy patients and bilateral discectomy patients
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
COG sway in stance on the leg of the operated side vs. stance on the leg of the non-operated side in eyes open and eyes closed conditions

References

    1. Abramovitz JM, Neff SR. Lumbar disc surgery: Results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery. 1991;29:301–308. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199108000-00027.
    1. Atlas J, Chang Y, Kammann E, et al. Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82:4–14.
    1. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Chang YC, et al. Surgical and non-surgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation. Five-year outcomes from the Maine. Spine. 2001;26:1179–1187. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200105150-00017.
    1. Byl NN, Sinnott PL. in balance and body sway in middle-aged adults with healthy backs compacted with subjects low-back dysfunction. Spine. 1991;16(3):325–330.
    1. Cooper RG, Jayson MIV. Radiographic demonstration of paraspinal muscle waisting in patients with chronic low back pain. Br J Rheumatol. 1992;31:389–394.
    1. Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Canmbier DC, et al. JCT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:266–272. doi: 10.1007/s005860000190.
    1. Davis RA. A long-term analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:415–421.
    1. Dvorak J, Guachat MH, Valach L. The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 4–17 years follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine. 1988;13:1418–422.
    1. Findlay GF, Hall B, Musa BS, et al. A ten-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine. 1998;23:1168–1171. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199805150-00019.
    1. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine. 1999;24(10):1023–1028. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199905150-00017.
    1. Gibson JMA, Grant IC Waddell G (2002) Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4 2002. Oxford: Update Software
    1. Hageman PA, Leibowitz JM, Banks D. Age and gender effects on postural control measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:961–964. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80075-1.
    1. Horak FB, Shupert CL, Marka A. A comparison of postural dyscontrol in the elderly. A review. Neurobiol Aging. 1989;10:727–738. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(89)90010-9.
    1. Leinonen V, Kankaanpaa M, Luukkonen M, et al. Disc herniation-related back pain impairs feed-forward control of paraspinal muscles. Spine. 2001;26(16):367–372. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200108150-00014.
    1. Leinonen V, Kankaanppää M, Luukkonen M, et al. Lumbar paraspinal muscle function, perception of lumbar position, and postural control in disc herniation-related back pain. Spine. 2003;28(8):842–848. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200304150-00019.
    1. Loupasis GA, Stanos K, Katonis PG, et al. Seven-to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine. 1999;24:2313–2317. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199911150-00005.
    1. Luoto Spine. 1998;23:2081. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199810010-00008.
    1. Mientjes MI, Frank JS. Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1999;14(10):710–716.
    1. Mok NW, Brauer SG, Hodges PW, et al. Hip strategy for balance control in quiet standing is reduced in people with low back pain. Spine. 2004;29(6):E107–E112. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000115134.97854.C9.
    1. Naylor A. The late results for laminectomy for lumbar disc prolapse: a review after ten to twenty-five years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 1974;56:17–29.
    1. Nies N, Sinnott PL. Variations in balance and body sway in middle-aged adults. Subjects with healthy backs compared with subjects with low-back dysfunction. Spine. 1991;16(3):325–330.
    1. Operators manual. Neurocom Balance Master, version 6.1.Neurocom International, Inc., 1998
    1. Panjabi J Spinal Disord. 1992;5:383.
    1. Parkola R, Rytokoski U, Kormano M. Magnetic Resonance imaging of the dsics and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine. 1993;18:830–836.
    1. Radebold A, Andrea MD, Cholewicki J, et al. muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2000;25(8):947–954. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00009.
    1. Radebold A, Cholewicki J, Polzhofer GK, Greene HS. Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain. Spine. 2001;26(7):724–730. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104010-00004.
    1. Regind H, Lykkegaard JJ, Bliddal H. Postural sway in normal subjects aged 20–70 years. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2003;23:171–176. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-097X.2003.00492.x.
    1. Runge CF, Shupert CL, Horak B, et al. Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture. 1999;10(2):161–167. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(99)00032-6.
    1. Schoppink LEM, Tulder MW, Koes BW, et al. Reliability and validity of the Dutch Adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 1996;76:268–27.
    1. Severeijns R, Hout MA, Vlaeyen JW, et al. Pain catastrophizing and general health status in a large Dutch community sample. Pain. 2002;99(1–2):367–376. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00219-1.
    1. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine. 1993;5:575–581.
    1. Teasdale N, Stelmach GE, Breunig A. Postural sway characteristics of the elderly under normal and altered visual and support surface conditions. J Gerontol. 1991;46(6):238–244.
    1. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. A follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine. 2001;26:652–657.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera