Plasticity and Spontaneous Activity Pulses in Disused Human Brain Circuits

Dillan J Newbold, Timothy O Laumann, Catherine R Hoyt, Jacqueline M Hampton, David F Montez, Ryan V Raut, Mario Ortega, Anish Mitra, Ashley N Nielsen, Derek B Miller, Babatunde Adeyemo, Annie L Nguyen, Kristen M Scheidter, Aaron B Tanenbaum, Andrew N Van, Scott Marek, Bradley L Schlaggar, Alexandre R Carter, Deanna J Greene, Evan M Gordon, Marcus E Raichle, Steven E Petersen, Abraham Z Snyder, Nico U F Dosenbach, Dillan J Newbold, Timothy O Laumann, Catherine R Hoyt, Jacqueline M Hampton, David F Montez, Ryan V Raut, Mario Ortega, Anish Mitra, Ashley N Nielsen, Derek B Miller, Babatunde Adeyemo, Annie L Nguyen, Kristen M Scheidter, Aaron B Tanenbaum, Andrew N Van, Scott Marek, Bradley L Schlaggar, Alexandre R Carter, Deanna J Greene, Evan M Gordon, Marcus E Raichle, Steven E Petersen, Abraham Z Snyder, Nico U F Dosenbach

Abstract

To induce brain plasticity in humans, we casted the dominant upper extremity for 2 weeks and tracked changes in functional connectivity using daily 30-min scans of resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). Casting caused cortical and cerebellar regions controlling the disused extremity to functionally disconnect from the rest of the somatomotor system, while internal connectivity within the disused sub-circuit was maintained. Functional disconnection was evident within 48 h, progressed throughout the cast period, and reversed after cast removal. During the cast period, large, spontaneous pulses of activity propagated through the disused somatomotor sub-circuit. The adult brain seems to rely on regular use to maintain its functional architecture. Disuse-driven spontaneous activity pulses may help preserve functionally disconnected sub-circuits.

Keywords: ALFF; amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations; cerebellum; disuse; fMRI; functional connectivity; plasticity; primary motor cortex; resting state; spontaneous activity; supplementary motor area.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration Of Interests The authors declare the following competing financial interest: N.U.F.D. is co-founder of NOUS Imaging.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.. Casting caused disuse and reduced…
Figure 1.. Casting caused disuse and reduced strength of the dominant upper extremity.
(A) Experimental design for an example participant (Omar; all participants Figure S1). (B) Casts covered the entire dominant upper extremity. Cast colors are used in subsequent figures to identify participants: pink (Nico), yellow (Ashley), green (Omar). (C) Daily accelerometry data from both wrists, plotted as use ratios (R/L use counts). Use count = seconds each day when RMS acceleration > 0.16 m/s2. Daily use counts for each wrist shown in Figure S1. (D) Grip strength before and after casting (***P < 0.001). Error bars indicate s.e.m. across three repeated measurements.
Figure 2.. Disused somatomotor cortex became functionally…
Figure 2.. Disused somatomotor cortex became functionally uncoupled from opposite hemisphere.
(A) Seed maps showing functional connectivity (FC) of each voxel with the left primary somatomotor cortex (L-SM1ue) during scans acquired before, during and after casting (Pre, Cast, Post) in an example participant (Ashley). The L-SM1ue region of interest (ROI) was defined using task functional MRI. (B) Daily time course of FC between L-SM1ue and R-SM1ue for each participant. Δr values are based on a time-varying exponential decay model (black lines, dr⁄dt = α(r∞ − r); Nico: P = 0.002, Ashley: P < 0.001, Omar: P<0.001). (C and D) Daily time course of FC in lower extremity (C) and face (D) regions of the left and right somatomotor cortex.
Figure 3.. Disused somatomotor cortex dissociated from…
Figure 3.. Disused somatomotor cortex dissociated from the remainder of the somatomotor system.
(A) Regions of interest (ROIs) in the lower extremity (green), upper extremity (cyan/blue) and face (orange) subdivisions of the somatomotor system for each participant. ROIs were selected using a functional connectivity gradient-based approach (Gordon et al., 2017). (B) Spring-embedded graph representation of the somatomotor system before, during and after casting. The disused region (L-SM1ue) separated from the remainder of the somatomotor cortex during the cast period but remained internally connected. (C) Modularity quantifies the degree of dissociation between L-SM1ue and the rest of the somatomotor cortex. All participants showed increased modularity during the cast period. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4.. Disused somatomotor cortex (L-SM1 ue…
Figure 4.. Disused somatomotor cortex (L-SM1ue) showed increased amplitude of low- frequency fluctuations (ALFF).
(A) Top: ALFF in resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) signals recorded from L-SM1ue on each day of the experiment. All participants showed significantly increased L-SM1ue ALFF during the cast period, relative to the pre period (Nico: +22%, P < 0.01; Ashley: +81%, P < 0.001; Omar: +36%, P < 0.001). Bottom: Amplitude spectra of L-SM1ue rs-fMRI signals. (B) ALFF in R-SM1ue. Only participant Ashley showed significantly increased R-SM1ue ALFF during the cast period. (C) ALFF in lower-extremity somatomotor cortex (L-SM1le; negative control). No participants showed significant changes during the cast period. (D) ALFF in face somatomotor cortex (L-SM1face; negative control). No participants showed significant changes during the cast period.
Figure 5.. Disuse pulses in somatomotor cortex.
Figure 5.. Disuse pulses in somatomotor cortex.
(A) Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) signals from left and right primary somatomotor cortex (L-SM1ue and R-SM1ue) before, during and after casting in an example participant (Ashley; all participants Figure S3). During the cast period, large pulses occur in L-SM1ue (see inset at top-right). Data for first five minutes of scan 21 are unavailable (gray bar). (B) Recordings of 144 disuse pulses detected in an example participant (Ashley). (C) Number of pulses detected during each day of the experiment. All participants showed significantly more pulses per session during the cast period than during the pre period. (Nico: P = 0.002; Ashley: P < 0.001; Omar: P < 0.001)
Figure 6.. Disuse pulses propagate through the…
Figure 6.. Disuse pulses propagate through the disused somatomotor sub-circuit.
(A) Whole- brain analysis of variance (ANOVA) of disuse pulses in an example participant (Ashley; all participants shown in Figure S4). In addition to L-SM1ue, pulses also occur in left supplementary motor area (L-SMAue) and right cerebellum (R-Cblmue). (B) Example pulse in L-SMAue, L-SM1ue and R-Cblmue. Note the temporal offset of peaks in each region. (C) Time delays (relative to L-SM1ue) of all pulses in each region for an example participant (Ashley; all participant Figure S4). Blue lines indicate median delay ± s.e.m. in each region. Pulses occurred first in L-SMAue, then L-SM1ue, and finally in R-Cblmue. Pulse times were determined by parabolic interpolation of cross-correlations with the mean pulse time series. **P<0.01. ***P<0.001.

References

    1. Ackman JB, Burbridge TJ, and Crair MC (2012). Retinal waves coordinate patterned activity throughout the developing visual system. Nature 490, 219–225.
    1. Barch DM, Burgess GC, Harms MP, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL, Corbetta M, Glasser MF, Curtiss S, Dixit S, Feldt C, et al. (2013). Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. Neuroimage 80, 169–189.
    1. Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, and Liu TT (2007). A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 37, 90–101.
    1. Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, and Hyde JS (1995). Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34, 537–541.
    1. Bullmore E, and Sporns O (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10, 186–198.
    1. Buzsaki G (2015). Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning. Hippocampus 25, 1073–1188.
    1. Buzsáki G (2019). The brain from inside out. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press; ).
    1. Carter AR, Patel KR, Astafiev SV, Snyder AZ, Rengachary J, Strube MJ, Pope A, Shimony JS, Lang CE, Shulman GL, and Corbetta M (2012). Upstream dysfunction of somatomotor functional connectivity after corticospinal damage in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26, 7–19.
    1. Clare S, Humberstone M, Hykin J, Blumhardt LD, Bowtell R, and Morris P (1999). Detecting activations in event-related fMRI using analysis of variance. Magn Reson Med 42, 1117–1122.
    1. Dosenbach NU, Fair DA, Cohen AL, Schlaggar BL, and Petersen SE (2008). A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends Cogn Sci 12, 99–105.
    1. Dosenbach NU, Nardos B, Cohen AL, Fair DA, Power JD, Church JA, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Vogel AC, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, et al. (2010). Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science 329, 1358–1361.
    1. Dosenbach NUF, Koller JM, Earl EA, Miranda-Dominguez O, Klein RL, Van AN, Snyder AZ, Nagel BJ, Nigg JT, Nguyen AL, et al. (2017). Real-time motion analytics during brain MRI improve data quality and reduce costs. Neuroimage 161, 80–93.
    1. Fair DA, Miranda-Dominguez O, Snyder AZ, Perrone A, Earl EA, Van AN, Koller JM, Feczko E, Tisdall MD, van der Kouwe A, et al. (2020). Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates. Neuroimage 208, 116400.
    1. Fischl B (2012). FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781.
    1. Gainey MA, Aman JW, and Feldman DE (2018). Rapid Disinhibition by Adjustment of PV Intrinsic Excitability during Whisker Map Plasticity in Mouse S1. J Neurosci 38, 4749–4761.
    1. Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW, Newbold DJ, Greene DJ, Berg JJ, Ortega M, Hoyt-Drazen C, Gratton C, Sun H, et al. (2017). Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains. Neuron 95, 791–807 e797.
    1. Gratton C, Koller JM, Shannon W, Greene DJ, Maiti B, Snyder AZ, Petersen SE, Perlmutter JS, and Campbell MC (2019). Emergent Functional Network Effects in Parkinson Disease. Cereb Cortex 29, 2509–2523.
    1. Gratton C, Laumann TO, Nielsen AN, Greene DJ, Gordon EM, Gilmore AW, Nelson SM, Coalson RS, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, et al. (2018). Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation. Neuron 98, 439–452 e435.
    1. Grayson DS, Bliss-Moreau E, Machado CJ, Bennett J, Shen K, Grant KA, Fair DA, and Amaral DG (2016). The Rhesus Monkey Connectome Predicts Disrupted Functional Networks Resulting from Pharmacogenetic Inactivation of the Amygdala. Neuron 91, 453–466.
    1. Grayson DS, and Fair DA (2017). Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: A guide to the neuroimaging literature. Neuroimage 160, 15–31.
    1. Greene DJ, Marek S, Gordon EM, Siegel JS, Gratton C, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW, Berg JJ, Nguyen AL, Dierker D, et al. (2020). Integrative and Network-Specific Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Defined in Individuals. Neuron 105, 742–758 e746.
    1. Guerra-Carrillo B, Mackey AP, and Bunge SA (2014). Resting-state fMRI: a window into human brain plasticity. Neuroscientist 20, 522–533.
    1. Harmelech T, and Malach R (2013). Neurocognitive biases and the patterns of spontaneous correlations in the human cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 17, 606–615.
    1. Hoyt CR, Van AN, Ortega M, Koller JM, Everett EA, Nguyen AL, Lang CE, Schlaggar BL, and Dosenbach NUF (2019). Detection of Pediatric Upper Extremity Motor Activity and Deficits With Accelerometry. JAMA Netw Open 2, e192970.
    1. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, and Smith SM (2012). Fsl. Neuroimage 62, 782–790.
    1. Katz LC, and Shatz CJ (1996). Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274, 1133–1138.
    1. Khazipov R, Sirota A, Leinekugel X, Holmes GL, Ben-Ari Y, and Buzsaki G (2004). Early motor activity drives spindle bursts in the developing somatosensory cortex. Nature 432, 758–761.
    1. Klinzing JG, Niethard N, and Born J (2019). Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep. Nat Neurosci 22, 1598–1610.
    1. Kraft AW, Mitra A, Bauer AQ, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME, Culver JP, and Lee JM (2017). Visual experience sculpts whole-cortex spontaneous infraslow activity patterns through an Arc- dependent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E9952–E9961.
    1. Lancaster J, Glass TG, Lankipalli BR, Downs H, Mayberg H, and Fox PT (1995). A modality- independent approach to spatial normalization of tomographic images of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp 3, 209–223.
    1. Laumann TO, Gordon EM, Adeyemo B, Snyder AZ, Joo SJ, Chen MY, Gilmore AW, McDermott KB, Nelson SM, Dosenbach NU, et al. (2015). Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain. Neuron 87, 657–670.
    1. Laumann TO, Snyder AZ, Mitra A, Gordon EM, Gratton C, Adeyemo B, Gilmore AW, Nelson SM, Berg JJ, Greene DJ, et al. (2017). On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations. Cereb Cortex 27, 4719–4732.
    1. Lewis CM, Baldassarre A, Committeri G, Romani GL, and Corbetta M (2009). Learning sculpts the spontaneous activity of the resting human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 17558–17563.
    1. Liepert J, Storch P, Fritsch A, and Weiller C (2000). Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 111, 671–676.
    1. Lindquist MA, Meng Loh J, Atlas LY, and Wager TD (2009). Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling. Neuroimage 45, S187–198.
    1. Makin TR, Scholz J, Filippini N, Henderson Slater D, Tracey I, and Johansen-Berg H (2013). Phantom pain is associated with preserved structure and function in the former hand area. Nat Commun 4, 1570.
    1. Marcus DS, Harwell J, Olsen T, Hodge M, Glasser MF, Prior F, Jenkinson M, Laumann T, Curtiss SW, and Van Essen DC (2011). Informatics and data mining tools and strategies for the human connectome project. Front Neuroinform 5, 4.
    1. Marek S, Siegel JS, Gordon EM, Raut RV, Gratton C, Newbold DJ, Ortega M, Laumann TO, Adeyemo B, Miller DB, et al. (2018). Spatial and Temporal Organization of the Individual Human Cerebellum. Neuron 100, 977–993 e977.
    1. Merzenich MM, Kaas JH, Wall J, Nelson RJ, Sur M, and Felleman D (1983). Topographic reorganization of somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 in adult monkeys following restricted deafferentation. Neuroscience 8, 33–55.
    1. Milliken GW, Plautz EJ, and Nudo RJ (2013). Distal forelimb representations in primary motor cortex are redistributed after forelimb restriction: a longitudinal study in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 109, 1268–1282.
    1. Mitra A, Snyder AZ, Hacker CD, and Raichle ME (2014). Lag structure in resting-state fMRI. J Neurophysiol 111, 2374–2391.
    1. Murphy TH, and Corbett D (2009). Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10, 861–872.
    1. Newman ME (2004). Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 70, 056131.
    1. Nielsen AN, Gratton C, Church JA, Dosenbach NUF, Black KJ, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL, and Greene DJ (2020). Atypical Functional Connectivity in Tourette Syndrome Differs Between Children and Adults. Biol Psychiatry 87, 164–173.
    1. Nielsen AN, Greene DJ, Gratton C, Dosenbach NUF, Petersen SE, and Schlaggar BL (2019). Evaluating the Prediction of Brain Maturity From Functional Connectivity After Motion Artifact Denoising. Cereb Cortex 29, 2455–2469.
    1. Oldfield RC (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9, 97–113.
    1. Pawela CP, Biswal BB, Hudetz AG, Li R, Jones SR, Cho YR, Matloub HS, and Hyde JS (2010). Interhemispheric neuroplasticity following limb deafferentation detected by resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Neuroimage 49, 2467–2478.
    1. Power JD (2017). A simple but useful way to assess fMRI scan qualities. Neuroimage 154, 150–158.
    1. Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, and Petersen SE (2012). Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59, 2142–2154.
    1. Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Barnes KA, Church JA, Vogel AC, Laumann TO, Miezin FM, Schlaggar BL, and Petersen SE (2011). Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72, 665–678.
    1. Raichle ME (2006). Neuroscience. The brain’s dark energy. Science 314, 1249–1250.
    1. Raut RV, Mitra A, Marek S, Ortega M, Snyder AZ, Tanenbaum A, Laumann TO, Dosenbach NUF, and Raichle ME (2020). Organization of Propagated Intrinsic Brain Activity in Individual Humans. Cereb Cortex 30, 1716–1734.
    1. Raut RV, Mitra A, Snyder AZ, and Raichle ME (2019). On time delay estimation and sampling error in resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 194, 211–227.
    1. Reynolds JN, Hyland BI, and Wickens JR (2001). A cellular mechanism of reward-related learning. Nature 413, 67–70.
    1. Rosenthal ZP, Raut RV, Yan P, Koko D, Kraft AW, Czerniewski L, Acland B, Mitra A, Snyder LH, Bauer AQ, et al. (2020). Local perturbations of cortical excitability propagate differentially through large-scale functional networks. Cereb Cortex 30, 3352–3369.
    1. Rosvall M, and Bergstrom CT (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 1118–1123.
    1. Shannon BJ, Dosenbach RA, Su Y, Vlassenko AG, Larson-Prior LJ, Nolan TS, Snyder AZ, and Raichle ME (2013). Morning-evening variation in human brain metabolism and memory circuits. J Neurophysiol 109, 1444–1456.
    1. Shannon BJ, Vaishnavi SN, Vlassenko AG, Shimony JS, Rutlin J, and Raichle ME (2016). Brain aerobic glycolysis and motor adaptation learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, E3782–3791.
    1. Siegel JS, Seitzman BA, Ramsey LE, Ortega M, Gordon EM, Dosenbach NUF, Petersen SE, Shulman GL, and Corbetta M (2018). Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery. Cortex 101, 44–59.
    1. Smyser CD, Inder TE, Shimony JS, Hill JE, Degnan AJ, Snyder AZ, and Neil JJ (2010). Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. Cereb Cortex 20, 2852–2862.
    1. Sylvester CM, Yu Q, Srivastava AB, Marek S, Zheng A, Alexopoulos D, Smyser CD, Shimony JS, Ortega M, Dierker DL, et al. (2020). Individual-specific functional connectivity of the amygdala: A substrate for precision psychiatry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 3808–3818.
    1. Talairach J, and Tournoux P (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain : 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging (Stuttgart; New York: Georg Thieme; ).
    1. Tiffin J, and Asher EJ (1948). The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol 32, 234–247.
    1. Tolonen M, Palva JM, Andersson S, and Vanhatalo S (2007). Development of the spontaneous activity transients and ongoing cortical activity in human preterm babies. Neuroscience 145, 997–1006.
    1. Toyoizumi T, Miyamoto H, Yazaki-Sugiyama Y, Atapour N, Hensch TK, and Miller KD (2013). A theory of the transition to critical period plasticity: inhibition selectively suppresses spontaneous activity. Neuron 80, 51–63.
    1. van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, van Woerden R, and Seelen HA (2011). Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92, 1437–1442.
    1. Wellman CL, Arnold LL, Garman EE, and Garraghty PE (2002). Acute reductions in GABAA receptor binding in layer IV of adult primate somatosensory cortex after peripheral nerve injury. Brain Res 954, 68–72.
    1. Wenger E, Kuhn S, Verrel J, Martensson J, Bodammer NC, Lindenberger U, and Lovden M (2017). Repeated Structural Imaging Reveals Nonlinear Progression of Experience-Dependent Volume Changes in Human Motor Cortex. Cereb Cortex 27, 2911–2925.
    1. Wiesel TN, and Hubel DH (1965). Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol 28, 1029–1040.
    1. Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, Roffman JL, Smoller JW, Zollei L, Polimeni JR, et al. (2011). The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 106, 1125–1165.
    1. Zang YF, He Y, Zhu CZ, Cao QJ, Sui MQ, Liang M, Tian LX, Jiang TZ, and Wang YF (2007). Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Dev 29, 83–91.
    1. Zhang Y, Brady M, and Smith S (2001). Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20, 45–57.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera