Derivation and performance of an end-of-life practice score aimed at interpreting worldwide treatment-limiting decisions in the critically ill

Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Su Chen, Joseph L Nates, Jacqueline M Kruser, Christiane Hartog, Andrej Michalsen, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Gavin M Joynt, Suzana Lobo, Alexander Avidan, Charles L Sprung, End-of-life Practice Score Study Group, Wesley Ely, Erwin J O Kompanje, Mervyn Mer, Charles Feldman, Victoria Metaxa, Myrick C Shinall, John Myburgh, Charikleia S Vrettou, Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Su Chen, Joseph L Nates, Jacqueline M Kruser, Christiane Hartog, Andrej Michalsen, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Gavin M Joynt, Suzana Lobo, Alexander Avidan, Charles L Sprung, End-of-life Practice Score Study Group, Wesley Ely, Erwin J O Kompanje, Mervyn Mer, Charles Feldman, Victoria Metaxa, Myrick C Shinall, John Myburgh, Charikleia S Vrettou

Abstract

Background: Limitations of life-sustaining interventions in intensive care units (ICUs) exhibit substantial changes over time, and large, contemporary variation across world regions. We sought to determine whether a weighted end-of-life practice score can explain a large, contemporary, worldwide variation in limitation decisions.

Methods: The 2015-2016 (Ethicus-2) vs. 1999-2000 (Ethicus-1) comparison study was a two-period, prospective observational study assessing the frequency of limitation decisions in 4952 patients from 22 European ICUs. The worldwide Ethicus-2 study was a single-period prospective observational study assessing the frequency of limitation decisions in 12,200 patients from 199 ICUs situated in 8 world regions. Binary end-of-life practice variable data (1 = presence; 0 = absence) were collected post hoc (comparison study, 22/22 ICUs, n = 4592; worldwide study, 186/199 ICUs, n = 11,574) for family meetings, daily deliberation for appropriate level of care, end-of-life discussions during weekly meetings, written triggers for limitations, written ICU end-of-life guidelines and protocols, palliative care and ethics consultations, ICU-staff taking communication or bioethics courses, and national end-of-life guidelines and legislation. Regarding the comparison study, generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis was used to determine associations between the 12 end-of-life practice variables and treatment limitations. The weighted end-of-life practice score was then calculated using GEE-derived coefficients of the end-of-life practice variables. Subsequently, the weighted end-of-life practice score was validated in GEE analysis using the worldwide study dataset.

Results: In comparison study GEE analyses, end-of-life discussions during weekly meetings [odds ratio (OR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.99], end-of-life guidelines [OR 0.52, (0.31-0.87)] and protocols [OR 15.08, (3.88-58.59)], palliative care consultations [OR 2.63, (1.23-5.60)] and end-of-life legislation [OR 3.24, 1.60-6.55)] were significantly associated with limitation decisions (all P < 0.05). In worldwide GEE analyses, the weighted end-of-life practice score was significantly associated with limitation decisions [OR 1.12 (1.03-1.22); P = 0.008].

Conclusions: Comparison study-derived, weighted end-of-life practice score partly explained the worldwide study's variation in treatment limitations. The most important components of the weighted end-of-life practice score were ICU end-of-life protocols, palliative care consultations, and country end-of-life legislation.

Keywords: End-of-life care; End-of-life practice score; Intensive care unit; Life-sustaining therapy; Medical ethics; Palliative care; ROC analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

There is no disclosure to be made by anyone of the authors regarding any conflict of interest.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the employed analytic methodology. ICU, intensive care unit; GEE, generalized estimating equations; EPV, end-of-life practice variable; ROC receiver operating characteristic, EPS end-of-life practice score, CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation. *The weighted EPS was determined by first multiplying the comparison study’s [4] GEE-derived EPV coefficients by the 0 or 1 response grades of the 12 EPVs from the worldwide dataset [5], and then by summing up the aforementioned products. †The EPS rescaling formula is presented in Table 1. ‡The original, unweighted EPS was calculated as the sum of the 0 or 1 response grades of the 12 EPVs from the worldwide dataset [5]; author consensus definitions of the EPVs are provided in Table 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic curve based on the comparison study’s [4] generalized estimating equations model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curves of the 4 generalized estimating equations models of the worldwide study [5]. ROC receiver operating characteristic, EPS end-of-life practice score, EPV end-of-life practice variable, AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval. A: Model with weighted and rescaled EPS (worldwide model 1); B: Model with EPVs (worldwide model 2); C: Reference model without EPVs or EPS (worldwide model 3); D: Model with original, unweighted EPS (worldwide model 4)

References

    1. Cook D, Rocker G. Dying with dignity in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2506–2514. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208795.
    1. Vincent JL, Marshall JC, Namendys-Silva SA, François B, Martin-Loeches I, Lipman J, et al; ICON investigators. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the intensive care over nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:380–6.
    1. Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, et al; Ethicus Study Group. End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA. 2003;290:790–7.
    1. Sprung CL, Ricou B, Hartog CS, Maia P, Mentzelopoulos SD, Weiss M, et al. Changes in end-of-life practices in European intensive care units from 1999 to 2016. JAMA. 2019;322:1692–1704. Erratum in: JAMA. 2019;322:1718.
    1. Avidan A, Sprung CL, Schefold JC, Ricou B, Hartog CS, Nates JL, et al; ETHICUS-2 Study Group. Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021: S2213-2600(21)00261-7.
    1. Ko DN, Blinderman CD. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (including artificial nutrition and hydration) In: Cherny N, Fallon M, Kaasa S, Portenoy RK, Currow DC, editors. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 323–334.
    1. Sjökvist P, Cook D, Berggren L, Guyatt G. A cross-cultural comparison of attitudes towards life support limitation in Sweden and Canada. Clin Intensive Care. 1998;9:81–85. doi: 10.3109/tcic.9.2.81.85.
    1. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1163–1167. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9801108.
    1. Vincent JL. Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1626–1633. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00042.
    1. Sprung CL, Carmel S, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Cohen SL, Maia P, et al; ETHICATT Study Group. Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:104–10.
    1. Van den Bulcke B, Piers R, Jensen HI, Malmgren J, Metaxa V, Reyners AK, et al. Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27:781–789. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007390.
    1. Sprung CL, Truog RD, Curtis JR, Joynt GM, Baras M, Michalsen A, et al. Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill. The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:855–66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0593CC.
    1. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, Danis M, White DB; American College of Critical Care Medicine; American Thoracic Society. Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:188–201.
    1. Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, Puntillo KA, Kross EK, Hart J, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:103–128. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002169.
    1. Downar J, Delaney JW, Hawryluck L, Kenny L. Guidelines for the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1003–1017. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4330-7.
    1. Joynt GM, Lipman J, Hartog C, Guidet B, Paruk F, Feldman C, et al. The Durban World Congress Ethics Round Table IV: health care professional end-of-life decision making. J Crit Care. 2015;30:224–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.011.
    1. Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations. Committee on Bioethics (DH-BIO) of the Council of Europe, 2014. . Accessed 1/9/2022.
    1. Mentzelopoulos SD, Couper K, Voorde PV, Druwé P, Blom M, Perkins GD, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions. Resuscitation. 2021;161:408–432. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017.
    1. Cox CE, Hua M, Casarett D. A measured dose of optimism for the evolution of ICU-based palliative care. JAMA. 2019;322:1655–1657. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12660.
    1. Fushiki T. Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation. Stat Comput. 2011;21:137–146. doi: 10.1007/s11222-009-9153-8.
    1. Yadav S, Shukla S. Analysis of k-fold cross-validation over hold-out validation on colossal datasets for quality classification. In: 2016 IEEE 6th international conference on advanced computing (IACC); 2016; p. 78–83.
    1. Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw. 2006;15:1. doi: 10.18637/jss.v015.i02.
    1. Aslakson R, Cheng J, Vollenweider D, Galusca D, Smith TJ, Pronovost PJ. Evidence-based palliative care in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of interventions. J Palliat Med. 2014;17:219–235. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0409.
    1. Khandelwal N, Kross EK, Engelberg RA, Coe NB, Long AC, Curtis JR. Estimating the effect of palliative care interventions and advance care planning on ICU utilization: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:1102–1111. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000852.
    1. Kyeremanteng K, Gagnon LP, Thavorn K, Heyland D, D'Egidio G. The impact of palliative care consultation in the ICU on length of stay: a systematic review and cost evaluation. J Intensive Care Med. 2018;33:346–353. doi: 10.1177/0885066616664329.
    1. Metaxa V, Anagnostou D, Vlachos S, Arulkumaran N, Bensemmane S, van Dusseldorp I, et al. Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1415–1425. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06544-6.
    1. Hope AA, Enilari OM, Chuang E, Nair R, Gong MN. Prehospital frailty and screening criteria for palliative care services in critically ill older adults: an observational cohort study. J Palliat Med. 2021;24:252–256. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0678.
    1. Hua MS, Li G, Blinderman CD, Wunsch H. Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across United States intensive care units using a trigger-based model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:428–436. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201307-1229OC.
    1. Nelson JE, Curtis JR, Mulkerin C, Campbell M, Lustbader DR, Mosenthal AC, et al; Improving Palliative Care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) Project Advisory Board. Choosing and using screening criteria for palliative care consultation in the ICU: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the ICU (IPAL-ICU) Advisory Board. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2318–27.
    1. Ford DW. Palliative care consultation needs in United States intensive care units. Another workforce shortage? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:383–4. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201401-0039ED.
    1. Lamas DJ, Owens RL, Bernacki RE, Block SD. Palliative care: a core competency for intensive care unit doctors. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:1569. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0467LE.
    1. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, Haas CE, Luce JM, Rubenfeld GD, et al; American Academy of Critical Care Medicine. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:953–63. Erratum in: Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1699.
    1. Woitha K, Garralda E, Martin-Moreno JM, Clark D, Centeno C. Ranking of palliative care development in the countries of the European Union. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2016;52:370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.008.
    1. Pivodic L, Pardon K, Van den Block L, Van Casteren V, Miccinesi G, Donker GA, et al; EURO IMPACT. Palliative care service use in four European countries: a cross-national retrospective study via representative networks of general practitioners. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e84440.
    1. Yamaguchi T, Kuriya M, Morita T, Agar M, Choi YS, Goh C, et al. Palliative care development in the Asia-Pacific region: an international survey from the Asia Pacific Hospice Palliative Care Network (APHN) BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7:23–31. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000588.
    1. Clark D, Wright M, Hunt J, Lynch T. Hospice and palliative care development in Africa: a multi-method review of services and experiences. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33:698–710. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.09.033.
    1. Garland A, Connors AF. Physicians' influence over decisions to forego life support. J Palliat Med. 2007;10:1298–1305. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0061.
    1. Calle MC, Pareja SL, Villa MM, Román-Calderón JP, Lemos M, Navarro S, et al. Interactions between intensive care and palliative care are influenced by training, professionals' perceptions and institutional barriers. J Palliat Care. 2020 doi: 10.1177/0825859720951361.
    1. Hua M, Halpern SD, Gabler NB, Wunsch H. Effect of ICU strain on timing of limitations in life-sustaining therapy and on death. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:987–994. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4240-8.
    1. Curtis JR, Nielsen EL, Treece PD, Downey L, Dotolo D, Shannon SE, et al. Effect of a quality-improvement intervention on end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:348–355. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-1004OC.
    1. Carson SS, Cox CE, Wallenstein S, Hanson LC, Danis M, Tulsky JA, et al. Effect of palliative care-led meetings for families of patients with chronic critical illness: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:51–62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8474.
    1. White DB, Angus DC, Shields AM, Buddadhumaruk P, Pidro C, Paner C, et al; PARTNER Investigators. A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2365–75.
    1. Ma J, Chi S, Buettner B, Pollard K, Muir M, Kolekar C, Al-Hammadi N, et al. Early palliative care consultation in the medical ICU: a cluster randomized crossover trial. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:1707–1715. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004016.
    1. Mularski RA, Curtis JR, Billings JA, Burt R, Byock I, Fuhrman C, et al. Proposed quality measures for palliative care in the critically ill: a consensus from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Workgroup. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(11 Suppl):S404–S411. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000242910.00801.53.
    1. Efstathiou N, Vanderspank-Wright B, Vandyk A, Al-Janabi M, Daham Z, Sarti A, et al. Terminal withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in adult intensive care units: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of perceptions, experiences and practices. Palliat Med. 2020;34:1140–1164. doi: 10.1177/0269216320935002.
    1. Michalsen A, Long AC, DeKeyser GF, White DB, Jensen HI, Metaxa V, et al. Interprofessional shared decision-making in the ICU: a systematic review and recommendations from an expert panel. Crit Care Med. 2019;47:1258–1266. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003870.
    1. Paruk F, Kissoon N, Hartog CS, Feldman C, Hodgson ER, Lipman J, et al. The Durban World Congress Ethics Round Table Conference Report: III. Withdrawing mechanical ventilation–the approach should be individualized. J Crit Care. 2014;29:902–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.022.
    1. Gerritsen RT, Koopmans M, Hofhuis JG, Curtis JR, Jensen HI, Zijlstra JG, et al. Comparing quality of dying and death perceived by family members and nurses for patients dying in US and Dutch ICUs. Chest. 2017;151:298–307. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.003.
    1. Phua J, Joynt GM, Nishimura M, Deng Y, Myatra SN, Chan YH, et al; ACME Study Investigators and the Asian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group. Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Asia. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:363–71. Erratum in: JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1248.
    1. Collier J, Kelsberg G, Safranek S. Clinical Inquiries: How well do POLST forms assure that patients get the end-of-life care they requested? J Fam Pract. 2018;67:249–251.
    1. Andorno R, Biller-Andorno N, Brauer S. Advance health care directives: towards a coordinated European policy? Eur J Health Law. 2009;16:207–227. doi: 10.1163/157180909X453053.
    1. Sulmasy DP. Italy's new advance directive law: when in Rome…. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:607–608. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0462.
    1. Ciliberti R, Gorini I, Gazzaniga V, De Stefano F, Gulino M. The Italian law on informed consent and advance directives: new rules of conduct for the autonomy of doctors and patients in end-of-life care. J Crit Care. 2018;48:178–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.039.
    1. Evans N, Bausewein C, Meñaca A, Andrew EV, Higginson IJ, Harding R, et al; project PRISMA. A critical review of advance directives in Germany: attitudes, use and healthcare professionals' compliance. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:277–88.
    1. Bolcato M, Feola A, Sanavio M, Amadasi A, Crenna S, Landi G, et al. The state of knowledge of young Italian medicolegal doctors on the law of provisions for informed consent and advance treatment directives: a multi-centric survey two years after the enactment of Law 219 of 2017. Acta Biomed. 2020;92:e2021005.
    1. Tolle SW, Teno JM. Lessons from Oregon in embracing complexity in end-of-life care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1078–1082. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1612511.
    1. Petrova M, Riley J, Abel J, Barclay S. Crash course in EPaCCS (Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems): 8 years of successes and failures in patient data sharing to learn from. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018;8:447–455. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001059.
    1. Park SY, Lee B, Seon JY, Oh IH. A national study of life-sustaining treatments in South Korea: what factors affect decision-making? Cancer Res Treat. 2021;53:593–600. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.803.
    1. Scheunemann LP, Ernecoff NC, Buddadhumaruk P, Carson SS, Hough CL, Curtis JR, et al. Clinician-family communication about patients' values and preferences in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:676–684. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027.
    1. Sengupta J, Chatterjee SC. Dying in intensive care units of India: commentaries on policies and position papers on palliative and end-of-life care. J Crit Care. 2017;39:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.017.
    1. Lilley EJ, Williams KJ, Schneider EB, Hammouda K, Salim A, Haider AH, et al. Intensity of treatment, end-of-life care, and mortality for older patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:998–1004. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001028.
    1. Wilkinson DJ, Truog RD. The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1128–1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2871-6.
    1. Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD, Dugan DO, Blustein J, Cranford R, et al. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290:1166–1172. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1166.
    1. Löfmark R, Nilstun T, Cartwright C, Fischer S, van der Heide A, Mortier F, et al; EURELD Consortium. Physicians' experiences with end-of-life decision-making: survey in 6 European countries and Australia. BMC Med. 2008;6:4.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera