'A bridge over troubled water': a case report

Domenico D'Amario, Michela Cammarano, Rossella Quarta, Fabio Casamassima, Attilio Restivo, Massimiliano Bianco, Vincenzo Palmieri, Paolo Zeppilli, Domenico D'Amario, Michela Cammarano, Rossella Quarta, Fabio Casamassima, Attilio Restivo, Massimiliano Bianco, Vincenzo Palmieri, Paolo Zeppilli

Abstract

Background: Myocardial bridge (MB) is the most common inborn coronary artery variant, in which a portion of myocardium overlies a major epicardial coronary artery segment. Myocardial bridge has been for long considered a benign condition, although it has been shown to cause effort-related ischaemia.

Case summary: We present the case of a 17-year-old female patient experiencing chest pain during physical activity. Since her symptoms became unbearable, electrocardiogram and echocardiography were performed together with a coronary computed tomography scan, revealing an MB on proximal-mid left anterior descending artery. In order to unequivocally unmask the ischaemic burden lent by MB, the patient underwent coronary angiography and physiological invasive test: instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were calculated, both at baseline and after dobutamine infusion (5 µg/kg/min). At baseline, iFR value was borderline (= 0.89), whereas after dobutamine infusion and increase in the heart rate, the patient suffered chest pain. This symptom was associated with a decrease in the iFR value up to 0.77. Consistently, when FFR was performed, a value of 0.92 was observed at baseline, while after inotrope infusion the FFR reached the haemodynamic significance (= 0.79). Therefore, a medical treatment with bisoprolol was started.

Discussion: Our clinical case shows the importance of a comprehensive non-invasive and invasive assessment of MB in young patients experiencing chest pain, with significant limitation in the daily life. The coronary functional indexes allow to detect the presence of MB-derived ischaemia, thus guiding the decision to undertake a medical/surgical therapy.

Keywords: Case report; Chest pain; Functional intracoronary assessment; Ischaemic heart disease; Myocardial bridge.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline electrocardiogram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Twenty-four-hour electrocardiogram monitoring.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Transthoracic echocardiogram: normal origins of coronary arteries (A), normal size of atrial and ventricular chambers (B), normal systolic and diastolic functions (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cardiopulmonary exercise test: baseline electrocardiogram recording (A), peak event electrocardiogram recording (B) and VO2 trend (C).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Coronary computed tomography scan showing the tunnelled arterial segment (A and B), compared with coronary angiography documenting the milking effect (C and D).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Functional intracoronary evaluation: At baseline, instantaneous wave-free ratio value was 0.89 (A), reaching 0.82 after 5 min of dobutamine infusion (B) and 0.77 after 9 min at hyperaemic flow (C). Similarly, fractional flow reserve after dobutamine and atropine infusion acquired haemodynamic significance (= 0.79) (D). At the end, an instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback was performed and instantaneous wave-free ratio value was 0.53 (E).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8010337/bin/ytab109f8.jpg
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8010337/bin/ytab109f7.jpg

References

    1. Ciçek D, Kalay N, Müderrisoğlu H.. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and 4-year follow-up of patients with isolated myocardial bridge: a retrospective, single-center, epidemiologic, coronary arteriographic follow-up study in southern Turkey. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2011;12:25–28.
    1. Corban MT, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P, Rasoul-Arzrumly E, McDaniel M, Mekonnen G. et al. Myocardial bridging: contemporary understanding of pathophysiology with implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2346–2355.
    1. Pelliccia A, Adami PE, Quattrini F, Squeo MR, Caselli S, Verdile L. et al. Are Olympic athletes free from cardiovascular disease? Systematic investigation in 2352 participants from Athens 2004 to Sochi 2014. Br J Sports Med 2017;51:238–243.
    1. Forsdahl SH, Rogers IS, Schnittger I, Tanaka S, Kimura T, Pargaonkar VS. et al. Myocardial bridges on coronary computed tomography angiography-correlation with intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve. Circ J 2017;81:1894–1900.
    1. Wang Y, Lv B, Chen J, Zhang Y, Luo F, Lu N. et al. Intramural coronary arterial course is associated with coronary arterial stenosis and prognosis of major cardiac events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013;33:439–444.
    1. Kim JW, Park CG, Suh SY, Choi CU, Kim EJ, Rha SW. et al. Comparison of frequency of coronary spasm in Korean patients with versus without myocardial bridging. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1083–1086.
    1. Porto I, D'Amario D, Paraggio L, Crea F.. Coronary stenosis as an innocent bystander in acute coronary syndrome. Circ J 2016;80:535–537.
    1. Ishikawa Y, Akasaka Y, Suzuki K, Fujiwara M, Ogawa T, Yamazaki K. et al. Anatomic properties of myocardial bridge predisposing to myocardial infarction. Circulation 2009;120:376–383.
    1. Wu S, Liu W, Zhou Y.. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the presence of myocardial bridge causing myocardial infarction: an insight into mechanism. Int J Cardiol 2016;206:77–78.
    1. Tarantini G, Migliore F, Cademartiri F, Fraccaro C, Iliceto S.. Left anterior descending artery myocardial bridging: a clinical approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2887–2899.
    1. Gould KL, Johnson NP.. Myocardial bridges: lessons in clinical coronary pathophysiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:705–709.
    1. Maseri A, Chierchia S.. Coronary artery spasm: demonstration, definition, diagnosis, and consequences. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1982;25:169–192.
    1. Tarantini G, Barioli A, Nai Fovino L, Fraccaro C, Masiero G, Iliceto S. et al. Unmasking myocardial bridge-related ischemia by intracoronary functional evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:e006247.
    1. Zhou F, Tang CX, Schoepf UJ, Tesche C, Bauer MJ, Jacobs BE. et al. Fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA may have a prognostic role in myocardial bridging. Eur Radiol 2019;29:3017–3026.
    1. Schwarz ER, Klues HG, Vom Dahl J, Klein I, Krebs W, Hanrath P.. Functional, angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow characteristics in symptomatic patients with myocardial bridging: effect of short-term intravenous beta-blocker medication. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:1637–1645.
    1. Tsujita K, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Doi H, Kubo T, Castellanos C. et al. Impact of myocardial bridge on clinical outcome after coronary stent placement. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:1344–1348.
    1. Attaran S, Moscarelli M, Athanasiou T, Anderson J.. Is coronary artery bypass grafting an acceptable alternative to myotomy for the treatment of myocardial bridging? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:347–349.
    1. Boyd JH, Pargaonkar VS, Scoville DH, Rogers IS, Kimura T, Tanaka S. et al. Surgical unroofing of hemodynamically significant left anterior descending myocardial bridges. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:1443–1450.
    1. Thompson PD, Myerburg RJ, Levine BD, Udelson JE, Kovacs RJ.. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 8: coronary artery disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:2406–2411.
    1. Pelliccia A, Sharma S, Gati S, Bäck M, Börjesson M, Caselli S. et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2021;42:17–96.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera