Use of 'omics for endometrial timing: the cycle moves on

John D Aplin, Adam Stevens, John D Aplin, Adam Stevens

Abstract

For some years, the prospect of precise and personalized timing of the endometrial cycle for optimal embryo replacement has been held out as a potential solution to low implantation rates. It is envisaged that a receptive state can be defined and reached at a predictable time, and embryo replacement performed in synchrony. In the last century, morphological changes characteristic of the mid secretory phase were defined in precisely timed cycles in women of proven fertility, but when deviations from this standardized schedule occur, their significance for implantation has remained uncertain. 'Omics technologies have been widely advocated for staging the endometrial cycle and defining a set of biochemical requirements for implantation, but after two decades of research, improvements to pregnancy rates have not followed, and there is a striking lack of agreement regarding the molecular characterization of the receptive state. Some of the rationale underlying these problems is now emerging with the application of higher-level computational and biological methodology. Here, we consider the challenges of defining an endometrial phenotype that can support implantation and continuing pregnancy. Receptivity may be an emergent trait depending on contributions from multiple proteins that have low pathway connectivity. We recommend that authors choose language which rigorously avoids the implication that protocols for molecular staging of the mid secretory phase inherently identify a state of receptivity to the implanting blastocyst.

Keywords: ART; ERA; embryo implantation; embryo transfer; endometrium; genomics; proteomics; receptivity; transcriptomics; window.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

References

    1. Altmae S, Esteban FJ, Stavreus-Evers A, Simon C, Giudice L, Lessey BA, Horcajadas JA, Macklon NS, D'Hooghe T, Campoy C. et al. Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of ‘omics’ data: focus on human endometrium. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:12–28.
    1. Altmae S, Koel M, Vosa U, Adler P, Suhorutsenko M, Laisk-Podar T, Kukushkina V, Saare M, Velthut-Meikas A, Krjutskov K. et al. Meta-signature of human endometrial receptivity: a meta-analysis and validation study of transcriptomic biomarkers. Sci Rep 2017;7:10077.
    1. Aplin JD, Myers JE, Timms K, Westwood M.. Tracking placental development in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2020;16:479–494.
    1. Aplin JD, Ruane PT.. Embryo-epithelium interactions during implantation at a glance. J Cell Sci 2017;130:15–22.
    1. Ben Rafael Z. Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) test: an unproven technology. Hum Reprod Open 2021;2021:hoab010.
    1. Bergh PA, Navot D.. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril 1992;58:537–542.
    1. Boyle EA, Li YI, Pritchard JK.. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 2017;169:1177–1186.
    1. Brar AK, Handwerger S, Kessler CA, Aronow BJ.. Gene induction and categorical reprogramming during in vitro human endometrial fibroblast decidualization. Physiol Genomics 2001;7:135–148.
    1. Brighton PJ, Maruyama Y, Fishwick K, Vrljicak P, Tewary S, Fujihara R, Muter J, Lucas ES, Yamada T, Woods L. et al. Clearance of senescent decidual cells by uterine natural killer cells in cycling human endometrium. Elife 2017;6:e31274.
    1. Cleary B, Cong L, Cheung A, Lander ES, Regev A.. Efficient generation of transcriptomic profiles by random composite measurements. Cell 2017;171:1424–1436.e18.
    1. Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, Diamond MP, Carson SA, Legro RS, McGovern PG, Schlaff WD, Carr BR, Steinkampf MP. et al.; NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril 2004;82:1264–1272.
    1. Creus M, Ordi J, Fabregues F, Casamitjana R, Ferrer B, Coll E, Vanrell JA, Balasch J.. alphavbeta3 integrin expression and pinopod formation in normal and out-of-phase endometria of fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2279–2286.
    1. Diaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martinez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alama P, Pellicer A, Simon C.. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril 2011;95:50–60, 60.e1–15.
    1. Diaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Bosch N, Martinez-Conejero JA, Alama P, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Simon C.. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2013;99:508–517.
    1. Diaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Sebastian-Leon P, Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Simon C.. Window of implantation transcriptomic stratification reveals different endometrial subsignatures associated with live birth and biochemical pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2017;108:703–710.e3.
    1. Diaz-Gimeno P, Sebastian-Leon P, Sanchez-Reyes JM, Spath K, Aleman A, Vidal C, Devesa-Peiro A, Labarta E, Sanchez-Ribas I, Ferrando M. et al. Identifying and optimizing human endometrial gene expression signatures for endometrial dating. Hum Reprod 2022;37:284–296.
    1. Dockery P, Burke MJ.. The fine structure of the mature human endometrium. In: JD Aplin, AJ Fazleabas, SR Glasser, LC Giuduce (eds). The Endometrium: Molecular, Cellular and Clinical Perspectives. London, UK: Informa Healthcare, 2008, 46–65.
    1. Enciso M, Aizpurua J, Rodríguez-Estrada B, Jurado I, Ferrández-Rives M, Rodríguez E, Pérez-Larrea E, Climent AB, Marron K, Sarasa J.. The precise determination of the window of implantation significantly improves ART outcomes. Sci Rep 2021;11:13420.
    1. Enciso M, Carrascosa JP, Sarasa J, Martinez-Ortiz PA, Munne S, Horcajadas JA, Aizpurua J.. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod 2018;33:220–228.
    1. Evans GE, Phillipson GTM, Sykes PH, McNoe LA, Print CG, Evans JJ.. Does the endometrial gene expression of fertile women vary within and between cycles? Hum Reprod 2018;33:452–463.
    1. Evans J, Hutchison J, Salamonsen LA, Greening DW.. Proteomic insights into endometrial receptivity and embryo-endometrial epithelium interaction for implantation reveal critical determinants of fertility. Proteomics 2020;20:e1900250.
    1. Franasiak JM, Alecsandru D, Forman EJ, Gemmell LC, Goldberg JM, Llarena N, Margolis C, Laven J, Shoenmakers S, Seli E.. A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2021;116:1436–1448.
    1. Fung JN, Girling JE, Lukowski SW, Sapkota Y, Wallace L, Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Henders AK, Healey M, Rogers PAW, Powell JE. et al. The genetic regulation of transcription in human endometrial tissue. Hum Reprod 2017;32:893–904.
    1. Garcia-Alonso L, Handfield LF, Roberts K, Nikolakopoulou K, Fernando RC, Gardner L, Woodhams B, Arutyunyan A, Polanski K, Hoo R. et al. Mapping the temporal and spatial dynamics of the human endometrium in vivo and in vitro. Nat Genet 2021a;53:1698–1711.
    1. Garcia-Alonso L, Handfield LF, Roberts K, Nikolakopoulou K, Fernando RC, Gardner L, Woodhams B, Arutyunyan A, Polanski K, Hoo R. et al. Mapping the temporal and spatial dynamics of the human endometrium in vivo and in vitro. bioRxiv2021b;doi:10.1101/2021.01.02.425073.
    1. Germeyer A, Savaris RF, Jauckus J, Lessey B.. Endometrial beta3 integrin profile reflects endometrial receptivity defects in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:53.
    1. Giacomini E, Scotti GM, Vanni VS, Lazarevic D, Makieva S, Privitera L, Signorelli S, Cantone L, Bollati V, Murdica V. et al. Global transcriptomic changes occur in uterine fluid-derived extracellular vesicles during the endometrial window for embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 2021;36:2249–2274.
    1. Giudice LC, Talbi S, Hamilton A.. Trascriptomics. JD Aplin, AJ Fazleabas, SR Glasser, L Giudice (eds). The Endometrium: Molecular, Cellular and Clinical Perspetives. London, UK: Informa Healthcare, 2008.
    1. Goldstein DB. Common genetic variation and human traits. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1696–1698.
    1. Haouzi D, Dechaud H, Assou S, Monzo C, de Vos J, Hamamah S.. Transcriptome analysis reveals dialogues between human trophectoderm and endometrial cells during the implantation period. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1440–1449.
    1. Haouzi D, Entezami F, Torre A, Innocenti C, Antoine Y, Mauries C, Vincens C, Bringer-Deutsch S, Gala A, Ferrieres-Hoa A. et al. Customized frozen embryo transfer after identification of the receptivity window with a transcriptomic approach improves the implantation and live birth rates in patients with repeated implantation failure. Reprod Sci 2021;28:69–78.
    1. He JP, Zhao M, Zhang WQ, Huang MY, Zhu C, Cheng HZ, Liu JL.. Identification of gene expression changes associated with uterine receptivity in mice. Front Physiol 2019;10:125.
    1. Heng S, Samarajeewa N, Aberkane A, Essahib W, Van de Velde H, Scelwyn M, Hull ML, Vollenhoven B, Rombauts LJ, Nie G.. Podocalyxin inhibits human embryo implantation in vitro and luminal podocalyxin in putative receptive endometrium is associated with implantation failure in fertility treatment. Fertil Steril 2021;116:1391–1401.
    1. Horcajadas JA, Riesewijk A, Martin J, Cervero A, Mosselman S, Pellicer A, Simon C.. Global gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity. J Reprod Immunol 2004;63:41–49.
    1. Kagawa H, Javali A, Khoei HH, Sommer TM, Sestini G, Novatchkova M, Scholte op Reimer Y, Castel G, Bruneau A, Maenhoudt N. et al. Human blastoids model blastocyst development and implantation. Nature 2022;601:600–605.
    1. Kasvandik S, Saarma M, Kaart T, Rooda I, Velthut-Meikas A, Ehrenberg A, Gemzell K, Lalitkumar PG, Salumets A, Peters M.. Uterine fluid proteins for minimally invasive assessment of endometrial receptivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020;105:dgz019.
    1. Kong CS, Ordonez AA, Turner S, Tremaine T, Muter J, Lucas ES, Salisbury E, Vassena R, Tiscornia G, Fouladi-Nashta AA. et al. Embryo biosensing by uterine natural killer cells determines endometrial fate decisions at implantation. FASEB J 2021;35:e21336.
    1. La Manno G, Soldatov R, Zeisel A, Braun E, Hochgerner H, Petukhov V, Lidschreiber K, Kastriti ME, Lonnerberg P, Furlan A. et al. RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 2018;560:494–498.
    1. Laisk T, Kukuskina V, Palmer D, Laber S, Chen CY, Ferreira T, Rahmioglu N, Zondervan K, Becker C, Smoller JW. et al. Large-scale meta-analysis highlights the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in the genetic regulation of menstrual cycle length. Hum Mol Genet 2018;27:4323–4332.
    1. Li TC, Rogers AW, Dockery P, Lenton EA, Cooke ID.. A new method of histologic dating of human endometrium in the luteal phase. Fertil Steril 1988;50:52–60.
    1. Lu T, Forgetta V, Wu H, Perry JRB, Ong KK, Greenwood CMT, Timpson NJ, Manousaki D, Richards JB.. A polygenic risk score to predict future adult short stature among children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021;106:1918–1928.
    1. Lucas ES, Vrljicak P, Muter J, Diniz-da-Costa MM, Brighton PJ, Kong CS, Lipecki J, Fishwick KJ, Odendaal J, Ewington LJ. et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with a pro-senescent decidual response during the peri-implantation window. Commun Biol 2020;3:37.
    1. Lipecki J, Mitchell AE, Muter J, Lucas ES, Makwana K, Fishwish K, Odendaal J, Hawkes A, Vrljicak P, Brosens JJ. et al. EndoTime: non-categorial timing estimates for luteal endometrium. Hum Reprod 2022;37:deac006.
    1. Macklon NS, Brosens JJ.. The human endometrium as a sensor of embryo quality. Biol Reprod 2014;91:98.
    1. Neves AR, Devesa M, Martinez F, Garcia-Martinez S, Rodriguez I, Polyzos NP, Coroleu B.. What is the clinical impact of the endometrial receptivity array in PGT-A and oocyte donation cycles? J Assist Reprod Genet 2019;36:1901–1908.
    1. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J.. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;122:262–263.
    1. Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat Med 2021;27:1876–1884.
    1. Popovici RM, Kao LC, Giudice LC.. Discovery of new inducible genes in in vitro decidualized human endometrial stromal cells using microarray technology. Endocrinology 2000;141:3510–3513.
    1. Psychoyos A. Hormonal control of ovoimplantation. Vitam Horm 1973;31:201–256.
    1. Quenby S, Vince G, Farquharson R, Aplin J.. Recurrent miscarriage: a defect in nature's quality control? Hum Reprod 2002;17:1959–1963.
    1. Rawlings TM, Makwana K, Taylor DM, Mole MA, Fishwick KJ, Tryfonos M, Odendaal J, Hawkes A, Zernicka-Goetz M, Hartshorne GM. et al. Modelling the impact of decidual senescence on embryo implantation in human endometrial assembloids. Elife 2021;10:e69603.
    1. Riestenberg C, Kroener L, Quinn M, Ching K, Ambartsumyan G.. Routine endometrial receptivity array in first embryo transfer cycles does not improve live birth rate. Fertil Steril 2021;115:1001–1006.
    1. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P, Gómez E, Fernández-Sánchez M, Carranza F, Carrera J, Vilella F, Pellicer A, Simón C.. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2013;100:818–824.
    1. Salamonsen LA, Hutchison JC, Gargett CE.. Cyclical endometrial repair and regeneration. Development 2021;148:dev199577.
    1. Scott RT Jr. Endometrial receptivity screening in the general assisted reproductive technology population. Fertil Steril 2021;115:895–896.
    1. Sebastian-Leon P, Devesa-Peiro A, Aleman A, Parraga-Leo A, Arnau V, Pellicer A, Diaz-Gimeno P.. Transcriptional changes through menstrual cycle reveal a global transcriptional derepression underlying the molecular mechanism involved in the window of implantation. Mol Hum Reprod 2021;27:gaab027.
    1. Singh H, Aplin JD.. Endometrial apical glycoproteomic analysis reveals roles for cadherin 6, desmoglein-2 and plexin b2 in epithelial integrity. Mol Hum Reprod 2015;21:81–94.
    1. Stevens A, Perchard R, Garner T, Clayton P, Murray P.. Pharmacogenomics applied to recombinant human growth hormone responses in children with short stature. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2021;22:135–143.
    1. Suhorutshenko M, Kukushkina V, Velthut-Meikas A, Altmäe S, Peters M, Mägi R, Krjutškov K, Koel M, Codoñer FM, Martinez-Blanch JF. et al. Endometrial receptivity revisited: endometrial transcriptome adjusted for tissue cellular heterogeneity. Hum Reprod 2018;33:2074–2086.
    1. Teklenburg G, Salker M, Molokhia M, Lavery S, Trew G, Aojanepong T, Mardon HJ, Lokugamage AU, Rai R, Landles C. et al. Natural selection of human embryos: decidualizing endometrial stromal cells serve as sensors of embryo quality upon implantation. PLoS One 2010;5:e10258.
    1. Tewary S, Lucas ES, Fujihara R, Kimani PK, Polanco A, Brighton PJ, Muter J, Fishwick KJ, Da Costa M, Ewington LJ. et al. Impact of sitagliptin on endometrial mesenchymal stem-like progenitor cells: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility trial. EBioMedicine 2020;51:102597–102597.
    1. Wang L, Lv S, Mao W, Pei M, Yang X.. Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility. Gynecol Endocrinol 2020;36:917–921.
    1. Wang W, Vilella F, Alama P, Moreno I, Mignardi M, Isakova A, Pan W, Simon C, Quake SR.. Single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Nat Med 2020;26:1644–1653.
    1. Yanagida A, Spindlow D, Nichols J, Dattani A, Smith A, Guo G.. Naive stem cell blastocyst model captures human embryo lineage segregation. Cell Stem Cell 2021;28:1016–1022.e4.
    1. Yang Y, Zhu QY, Liu JL.. Deciphering mouse uterine receptivity for embryo implantation at single-cell resolution. Cell Prolif 2021;54:e13128.
    1. Yu L, Wei Y, Duan J, Schmitz DA, Sakurai M, Wang L, Wang K, Zhao S, Hon GC, Wu J.. Blastocyst-like structures generated from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2021;591:620–626.
    1. Zhou W, Menkhorst E, Dimitriadis E.. Jagged1 regulates endometrial receptivity in both humans and mice. FASEB J 2021;35:e21784.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera