A Multicenter Study of the Antiviral Efficacy of Entecavir Monotherapy Compared to Lamivudine Monotherapy in Children with Nucleos(t)ide-naïve Chronic Hepatitis B

Kyung Jae Lee, Byung Ho Choe, Jae Young Choe, Ju Young Kim, In Sook Jeong, Ju Whi Kim, Hye Ran Yang, Ju Yuong Chang, Kyung Mo Kim, Jin Soo Moon, Jae Sung Ko, Kyung Jae Lee, Byung Ho Choe, Jae Young Choe, Ju Young Kim, In Sook Jeong, Ju Whi Kim, Hye Ran Yang, Ju Yuong Chang, Kyung Mo Kim, Jin Soo Moon, Jae Sung Ko

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and lamivudine (LAM) therapy in children with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had not received nucleoside analogue treatment.

Methods: In this multicenter, retrospective study, we included pediatric CHB patients younger than 20 years who received ETV or LAM treatment for at least 12 months and had no concomitant diseases. All of the patients were followed up every 1 to 3 months. At each visit, the patients underwent clinical evaluation and biochemical testing.

Results: Eight (53.3%), 14 (93.3%), and 2 (15.4%) of the ETV-treated patients achieved virologic suppression, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, respectively, at 1 year. In the ETV group, the cumulative rate of virologic suppression at 3 years was 91.7%, which was significantly higher than that in the LAM group (P < 0.001). The mean duration of treatment before virologic suppression was shorter in the ETV group than in the LAM group (P = 0.040). The cumulative rate of seroconversion in the ETV group at 3 years was 39.4%, which was not significantly different from that in the LAM group (P = 0.439). The ETV group showed lower cumulate rates of virologic breakthrough (33.3% at 6 years) and genotypic mutation than the LAM group (P = 0.033 and P = 0.011, respectively).

Conclusion: ETV is superior to LAM in pediatric CHB treatment because of its higher virologic suppression rate and lower cumulative rates of virologic breakthrough and genotypic mutation.

Keywords: Children; Chronic Hepatitis B; Entecavir; Lamivudine.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

© 2018 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Longitudinal changes in log10 HBV DNA titers. Mean HBV DNA levels through 24 months of treatment in the ETV and LAM groups. HBV = hepatitis B virus, ETV = entecavir, LAM = lamivudine.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cumulative rates of virologic suppression, HBeAg seroconversion, virologic breakthrough, and genotypic mutation. (A) The cumulative virologic suppression rate is statistically higher in the ETV group compared to the LAM group (P < 0.001). (B) The cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rates are not significantly different between the ETV group and the LAM group (P = 0.439). (C) The cumulative virologic breakthrough rate is significantly higher in the LAM group than that in the ETV group (P = 0.033). HBeAg = hepatitis B e antigen, ETV = entecavir, LAM = lamivudine.

References

    1. McMahon BJ. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2009;49(5) Suppl:S45–S55.
    1. Della Corte C, Nobili V, Comparcola D, Cainelli F, Vento S. Management of chronic hepatitis B in children: an unresolved issue. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(5):912–919.
    1. Chang MH, Chen TH, Hsu HM, Wu TC, Kong MS, Liang DC, et al. Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma by universal vaccination against hepatitis B virus: the effect and problems. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(21):7953–7957.
    1. Chen HL, Lin LH, Hu FC, Lee JT, Lin WT, Yang YJ, et al. Effects of maternal screening and universal immunization to prevent mother-to-infant transmission of HBV. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(4):773–781.e2.
    1. Hong SJ, Park HJ, Chu MA, Choi BS, Choe BH. The rate of conversion from immune-tolerant phase to early immune-clearance phase in children with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2014;17(1):41–46.
    1. Kasırga E. Lamivudine resistance in children with chronic hepatitis B. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(6):896–902.
    1. Shah U, Kelly D, Chang MH, Fujisawa T, Heller S, González-Peralta RP, et al. Management of chronic hepatitis B in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;48(4):399–404.
    1. Jonas MM, Block JM, Haber BA, Karpen SJ, London WT, Murray KF, et al. Treatment of children with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: patient selection and therapeutic options. Hepatology. 2010;52(6):2192–2205.
    1. Sokal EM, Paganelli M, Wirth S, Socha P, Vajro P, Lacaille F, et al. Management of chronic hepatitis B in childhood: ESPGHAN clinical practice guidelines: consensus of an expert panel on behalf of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Hepatol. 2013;59(4):814–829.
    1. Hong SJ, Kim YH, Choe BH, Park HJ, Tak WY, Kweon YO. Current role of Lamivudine regarding therapeutic response and resistance in children with chronic hepatitis B. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2013;16(2):80–88.
    1. Vajro P, Veropalumbo C, Maddaluno S, Salerno M, Parenti G, Pignata C. Treatment of children with chronic viral hepatitis: what is available and what is in store. World J Pediatr. 2013;9(3):212–220.
    1. Jonas MM, Kelly D, Pollack H, Mizerski J, Sorbel J, Frederick D, et al. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of adefovir dipivoxil in children and adolescents (age 2 to <18 years) with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2008;47(6):1863–1871.
    1. Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, Gadano A, Sollano J, Chao YC, et al. A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(10):1001–1010.
    1. Jonas MM, Chang MH, Sokal E, Schwarz KB, Kelly D, Kim KM, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of entecavir versus placebo in children with hepatitis B envelope antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2016;63(2):377–387.
    1. Chang KC, Wu JF, Hsu HY, Chen HL, Ni YH, Chang MH. Entecavir treatment in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Pediatr Neonatol. 2016;57(5):390–395.
    1. Pawłowska M, Domagalski K, Smok B, Rajewski P, Wietlicka-Piszcz M, Halota W, et al. Continuous up to 4 years entecavir treatment of HBV-infected adolescents - a longitudinal study in real life. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163691.
    1. Saadah OI, Sindi HH, Bin-Talib Y, Al-Harthi S, Al-Mughales J. Entecavir treatment of children 2–16 years of age with chronic hepatitis B infection. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2012;13(2):41–44.
    1. Pawłowska M, Halota W, Smukalska E, Woźniakowska-Gęsicka T, Kupś J. HBV DNA suppression during entecavir treatment in previously treated children with chronic hepatitis B. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(4):571–574.
    1. Luo J, Li X, Wu Y, Lin G, Pang Y, Zhang X, et al. Efficacy of entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in nucleos(t)ide-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in real life. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10(4):427–433.
    1. Sokal EM, Kelly DA, Mizerski J, Badia IB, Areias JA, Schwarz KB, et al. Long-term lamivudine therapy for children with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2006;43(2):225–232.
    1. Jonas MM, Mizerski J, Badia IB, Areias JA, Schwarz KB, Little NR, et al. Clinical trial of lamivudine in children with chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(22):1706–1713.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera