Placental MRI: Effect of maternal position and uterine contractions on placental BOLD MRI measurements

Esra Abaci Turk, S Mazdak Abulnaga, Jie Luo, Jeffrey N Stout, Henry A Feldman, Ata Turk, Borjan Gagoski, Lawrence L Wald, Elfar Adalsteinsson, Drucilla J Roberts, Carolina Bibbo, Julian N Robinson, Polina Golland, P Ellen Grant, William H Barth Jr, Esra Abaci Turk, S Mazdak Abulnaga, Jie Luo, Jeffrey N Stout, Henry A Feldman, Ata Turk, Borjan Gagoski, Lawrence L Wald, Elfar Adalsteinsson, Drucilla J Roberts, Carolina Bibbo, Julian N Robinson, Polina Golland, P Ellen Grant, William H Barth Jr

Abstract

Introduction: Before using blood-oxygen-level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD MRI) during maternal hyperoxia as a method to detect individual placental dysfunction, it is necessary to understand spatiotemporal variations that represent normal placental function. We investigated the effect of maternal position and Braxton-Hicks contractions on estimates obtained from BOLD MRI of the placenta during maternal hyperoxia.

Methods: For 24 uncomplicated singleton pregnancies (gestational age 27-36 weeks), two separate BOLD MRI datasets were acquired, one in the supine and one in the left lateral maternal position. The maternal oxygenation was adjusted as 5 min of room air (21% O2), followed by 5 min of 100% FiO2. After datasets were corrected for signal non-uniformities and motion, global and regional BOLD signal changes in R2* and voxel-wise Time-To-Plateau (TTP) in the placenta were measured. The overall placental and uterine volume changes were determined across time to detect contractions.

Results: In mothers without contractions, increases in global placental R2* in the supine position were larger compared to the left lateral position with maternal hyperoxia. Maternal position did not alter global TTP but did result in regional changes in TTP. 57% of the subjects had Braxton-Hicks contractions and 58% of these had global placental R2* decreases during the contraction.

Conclusion: Both maternal position and Braxton-Hicks contractions significantly affect global and regional changes in placental R2* and regional TTP. This suggests that both factors must be taken into account in analyses when comparing placental BOLD signals over time within and between individuals.

Keywords: BOLD MRI; Braxton-Hicks contraction; Maternal hyperoxia; Maternal position; Placental MRI.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Change of normalized R2* with time in the supine (black) and the left lateral (red) positions for each subject. The vertical dotted line represented the time 100% FiO2 was initiated. Left column: left lateral position first. Right column: supine position first. S = subject, GA = gestational age, w = weeks. Plots were ordered according to the gestational age increasing from top to bottom.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Coronal views selected as the center slice for placental normalized R2* image after placenta flattening for each subject and histograms in both maternal positions for whole placenta during normoxia and hyperoxia. Left column: left lateral position first. Right column: supine position first. Images were ordered according to the gestational age increasing from top to bottom.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Coronal views showing the center slice for TTP maps after placenta flattening for each subject and histograms of TTP values in both maternal positions for whole placenta. Left column: left lateral position first. Right column: supine position first. Images were ordered according to the gestational age increasing from top to bottom.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Effect of Braxton-Hicks Contractions on change of normalized R2*, placental and uterine volume with time in Supine and Left Lateral Positions. The vertical dotted line represented the time 100% FiO2 was initiated. Top row: left lateral position first. Other three rows: supine position first. S = subject, GA = gestational age, w = weeks. Images were ordered according to the gestational age increasing from left to right. The regions in which simultaneous drops in uterine volume and placenta volume were observed were indicated as a marker of uterine contractions with a blue box.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
BOLD images acquired at t1 and t2 demonstrating the change in the signal during contraction and time activity curves generated for whole placenta (red) compared to the region with a dominant BOLD signal decrease during the contraction (blue).

References

    1. Wedegärtner U, Tchirikov M, Schäfer S, Priest AN, Kooijman H, Adam G, Schröder HJ, Functional MR imaging: comparison of BOLD signal intensity changes in fetal organs with fetal and maternal oxyhemoglobin saturation during hypoxia in sheep, Radiology. 238 (2006) 872–880.
    1. Sørensen A, Sinding M, Peters DA, Petersen A, Frøkjær JB, Christiansen OB, Uldbjerg N, Placental oxygen transport estimated by the hyperoxic placental BOLD MRI response, Physiol Rep. 3 (2015). 10.14814/phy2.12582.
    1. Sørensen A, Pedersen M, Tietze A, Ottosen L, Duus L, Uldbjerg N, BOLD MRI in sheep fetuses: a non-invasive method for measuring changes in tissue oxygenation, Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 34 (2009) 687–692.
    1. Sørensen A, Peters D, Fründ E, Lingman G, Christiansen O, Uldbjerg N, Changes in human placental oxygenation during maternal hyperoxia estimated by blood oxygen level- dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD MRI), Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol 42 (2013) 310–314.
    1. Aimot-Macron S, Salomon LJ, Deloison B, Thiam R, Cuenod CA, Clement O, Siauve N, In vivo MRI assessment of placental and foetal oxygenation changes in a rat model of growth restriction using blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance imaging, Eur. Radiol 23 (2013) 1335–1342.
    1. Luo J, Abaci Turk E, Bibbo C, Gagoski B, Roberts DJ, Vangel M, Tempany- Afdhal CM, Barnewolt C, Estroff J, Palanisamy A, Barth WH, Zera C, Malpica N, Golland P, Adalsteinsson E, Robinson JN, Grant PE, In Vivo Quantification of Placental Insufficiency by BOLD MRI: A Human Study, Sci. Rep 7 (2017) 3713.
    1. Huen I, Morris DM, Wright C, Parker GJM, Sibley CP, Johnstone ED, Naish JH, R1 and R2* changes in the human placenta in response to maternal oxygen challenge, Magn. Reson. Med 70 (2013) 1427–1433.
    1. Abaci Turk E, Stout JN, Ha C, Luo J, Gagoski B, Yetisir F, Golland P, Wald LL, Adalsteinsson E, Robinson JN, Roberts DJ, Barth WH Jr, Grant PE, Placental MRI: Developing Accurate Quantitative Measures of Oxygenation, Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28 (2019) 285.
    1. Sørensen A, Hutter J, Seed M, Grant PE, Gowland P, T2* weighted placental MRI: basic research tool or an emerging clinical test of placental dysfunction?, Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol (2019). 10.1002/uog.20855.
    1. Chalouhi GE, Salomon LJ, BOLD-MRI to explore the oxygenation of fetal organs and of the placenta, BJOG. 121 (2014) 1595.
    1. Siauve N, Chalouhi GE, Deloison B, Alison M, Clement O, Ville Y, Salomon LJ, Functional imaging of the human placenta with magnetic resonance, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 213 (2015) S103–14.
    1. Ramsey EM, Corner GW Jr, Donner MW, Serial and cineradioangiographic visualization of maternal circulation in the primate (hemochorial) placenta, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 86 (1963) 213–225.
    1. Howard BK, Goodson JH, Mengert WF, Supine Hypotensive Syndrome in Late Pregnancy, Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1 (1953) 371.
    1. Schmitt D, The hypotensive syndrome in the supine position in late pregnancy, N. Engl. J. Med 259 (1958) 1219–1221.
    1. Lee AJ, Landau R, Aortocaval Compression Syndrome: Time to Revisit Certain Dogmas, Anesth. Analg 125 (2017) 1975–1985.
    1. Kinsella SM, Lohmann G, Supine hypotensive syndrome, Obstet. Gynecol. 83 (1994) 774–788.
    1. Oosterhof H, Dijkstra K, Aarnoudse JG, Uteroplacental Doppler velocimetry during Braxton Hicks’ contractions, Gynecol. Obstet. Invest 34 (1992) 155–158.
    1. Bower S, Campbell S, Vyas S, McGirr C, Braxton-Hicks contractions can alter uteroplacental perfusion, Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol 1 (1991) 46–49.
    1. Sinding M, Peters DA, Frøkjær JB, Christiansen OB, Uldbjerg N, Sørensen A, Reduced placental oxygenation during subclinical uterine contractions as assessed by BOLD MRI, Placenta. 39 (2016) 16–20.
    1. Gluud C, Gluud LL, Evidence based diagnostics, BMJ. 330 (2005) 724–726.
    1. Turk EA, Luo J, Gagoski B, Pascau J, Bibbo C, Robinson JN, Grant PE, Adalsteinsson E, Golland P, Malpica N, Spatiotemporal alignment of in utero BOLD-MRI series, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 46 (2017) 403–412.
    1. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, Gee JC, N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29 (2010) 1310–1320.
    1. Avants BB, Tustison N, Song G, Advanced normalization tools (ANTS), Insight J. 2 (2009) 1–35.
    1. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JPW, elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29 (2010) 196–205.
    1. Guyader J-M, Bernardin L, Douglas NHM, Poot DHJ, Niessen WJ, Klein S, Influence of image registration on apparent diffusion coefficient images computed from free-breathing diffusion MR images of the abdomen, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 42 (2015) 315–330. 10.1002/jmri.24792.
    1. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G, User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability, Neuroimage. 31 (2006) 1116–1128.
    1. Abulnaga SM, Turk EA, Bessmeltsev M, Grant PE, Solomon J, Golland P, Placental Flattening via Volumetric Parameterization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. (2019) 39–47. 10.1007/978-3-030-32251-9_5.
    1. Chung MK, Worsley KJ, Paus T, Cherif C, Collins DL, Giedd JN, Rapoport JL, Evans AC, A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry, Neuroimage. 14(2001)595–606.
    1. Severinghaus JW, Simple, accurate equations for human blood O2 dissociation computations, J. Appl. Physiol 46 (1979) 599–602.
    1. Awe RJ, Nicotra MB, Newsom TD, Viles R, Arterial oxygenation and alveolar-arterial gradients in term pregnancy, Obstet. Gynecol 53 (1979) 182–186.
    1. Spiropoulos K, Prodromaki E, Tsapanos V, Effect of body position on PaO2 and PaCO2 during pregnancy, Gynecol. Obstet. Invest 58 (2004) 22–25.
    1. Nørregaard O, Schultz P, Ostergaard A, Dahl R, Lung function and postural changes during pregnancy, Respir. Med 83 (1989) 467–470.
    1. Suonio S, Simpanen AL, Olkkonen H, Haring P, Effect of the left lateral recumbent position compared with the supine and upright positions on placental blood flow in normal late pregnancy, Ann. Clin. Res 8 (1976) 22–26.
    1. Kauppila A, Koskinen M, Puolokka J, Tuimala R, Kuikka J, Decreased Intervillous and Unchanged Myometrial Blood Flow in Supine Recumbency, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 1 (1981) 9 10.1097/00132582-198103000-00009.
    1. Jeffreys RM, Stepanchak W, Lopez B, Hardis J, Clapp JF 3rd, Uterine blood flow during supine rest and exercise after 28 weeks of gestation, BJOG. 113 (2006) 1239–1247.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera