Assessment of a 3050/3200 nm fiber laser system for ablative fractional laser treatments in dermatology

Michael Wang-Evers, Alyre J Blazon-Brown, Linh Ha-Wissel, Valeriya Arkhipova, Dilip Paithankar, Ilya V Yaroslavsky, Gregory Altshuler, Dieter Manstein, Michael Wang-Evers, Alyre J Blazon-Brown, Linh Ha-Wissel, Valeriya Arkhipova, Dilip Paithankar, Ilya V Yaroslavsky, Gregory Altshuler, Dieter Manstein

Abstract

Background and objectives: Mid-infrared (IR) ablative fractional laser treatments are highly efficacious for improving the appearance of a variety of dermatological conditions such as photo-aged skin. However, articulated arms are necessary to transmit the mid-IR light to the skin, which restricts practicality and clinical use. Here, we have assessed and characterized a novel fiber laser-pumped difference frequency generation (DFG) system that generates ablative fractional lesions and compared it to clinically and commercially available thulium fiber, Erbium:YAG (Er:YAG), and CO2 lasers.

Materials and methods: An investigational 20 W, 3050/3200 nm fiber laser pumped DFG system with a focused spot size of 91 µm was used to generate microscopic ablation arrays in ex vivo human skin. Several pulse energies (10-70 mJ) and pulse durations (2-14 ms) were applied and lesion dimensions were assessed histologically using nitro-blue tetrazolium chloride stain. Ablation depths and coagulative thermal damage zones were analyzed across three additional laser systems.

Results: The investigational DFG system-generated deep (>2 mm depth) and narrow (<100 µm diameter) ablative lesions surrounded by thermal coagulative zones of at least 20 µm thickness compared to 13, 40, and 320 µm by the Er:YAG, CO2 , and Thulium laser, respectively.

Conclusion: The DFG system is a small footprint device that offers a flexible fiber delivery system for ablative fractional laser treatments, thereby overcoming the requirement of an articulated arm in current commercially available ablative lasers. The depth and width of the ablated microcolumns and the extent of surrounding coagulation can be controlled; this concept can be used to design new treatment procedures for specific indications. Clinical improvements and safety are not the subject of this study and need to be explored with in vivo clinical studies.

Keywords: difference frequency generation; fiber delivery; fractional ablation; fractional laser.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2022 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Photograph of the prototype ablative fractional fiber laser pumped DFG system. The small footprint base unit has output wavelengths of 1030 and 1560 nm, which are fiber delivered to a scanner handpiece. The scanner handpiece contains DFG crystals that convert the laser light wavelength to 3050 and 3200 nm (ratio of 2:1). DFG, difference frequency generation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Two‐stage conversion setup scheme. Each stage consists of a periodically poled lithium niobate crystal that generates light with an output frequency that is the difference between the two input frequencies according to the DFG process. Image adapted from Gulyashko et al. DFG, difference frequency generation; Er, erbium; Yb, ytterbium.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Blow‐off, steady‐state, and Hibst models to fit the ablation depth versus radiant exposure curves of the Er:YAG (2940 nm), fiber laser‐pumped DFG (3050/3200 nm), CO2 (10600 nm), and Thulium (1940 nm) laser in ex vivo human tissue. The Hibst model (with the extra adjustable parameter γ) results in a better fit for every wavelength compared to the blow‐off and steady‐state model. DFG, difference frequency generation; Er, erbium.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Horizontal histology sections of ex vivo human skin treated with (A) Thulium, (B) Er:YAG, (C) fiber laser pumped DFG, and (D) CO2 laser stained with NBTC. For corresponding vertical histology sections below (E–H) laser parameters were chosen to generate 1‐mm‐deep ablated fractional lesions. The horizontal sections show clear differences in the size of the coagulation zone. The Thulium laser parameters are 108 µm spot size, 854 mJ pulse energy, 7 ms pulse width, and 1940 nm wavelength. The Er:YAG laser parameters are 250 µm spot size, 50 mJ pulse energy, 0.25 ms pulse width, and 2940 nm wavelength. The fiber laser‐pumped DFG parameters are 91 µm spot size, 20 mJ pulse energy, 4 ms pulse width, and 3050/3200 nm wavelength. The CO2 laser parameters are 120 µm spot size, 40 mJ pulse energy, 1 ms pulse width, and 10600 nm wavelength. DFG, difference frequency generation; Er, erbium; NBTC, nitro‐blue tetrazolium chloride.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The graph shows the effect of the pulse train duration on the ablation depth and coagulation zone thickness in ex vivo human tissue using the fiber laser‐pumped DFG. The energy per pulse stays constant at 10 mJ (radiant exposure of 154 J/cm2) for the pulse train duration of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 ms. DFG, difference frequency generation.

References

    1. Anderson R, Parrish J. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220(4596):524–7.
    1. Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(5):416–32.
    1. Kourbaj G, Bielfeldt S, Seise M, Wilhelm K‐P. Measurement of dermal water content by confocal RAMAN spectroscopy to investigate intrinsic aging and photoaging of human skin in vivo. Skin Res Technol. 2021;27(3):404–13.
    1. Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34(5):426–38.
    1. You H‐J, Kim D‐W, Yoon E‐S, Park S‐H. Comparison of four different lasers for acne scars: resurfacing and fractional lasers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(4):e87–95.
    1. Dierickx CC, Khatri KA, Tannous ZS, Childs JJ, Cohen RH, Erofeev A, et al. Micro‐fractional ablative skin resurfacing with two novel erbium laser systems. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40(2):113–23.
    1. Bodendorf MO, Grunewald S, Wetzig T, Simon JC, Paasch U. Fractional laser skin therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009;7(4):301–8.
    1. Waibel JS, Gianatasio C, Rudnick A. Randomized, controlled early intervention of dynamic mode fractional ablative CO2 laser on acute burn injuries for prevention of pathological scarring. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52(2):117–24.
    1. Wong CSM, Chan MWM, Shek SYN, Yeung CK, Chan HHL. Fractional 1064 nm picosecond laser in treatment of melasma and skin rejuvenation in Asians, A prospective study. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53(8):1032–42.
    1. Passeron T, Genedy R, Salah L, Fusade T, Kositratna G, Laubach HJ, et al. Laser treatment of hyperpigmented lesions: position statement of the European Society of Laser in Dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33(6):987–1005.
    1. Casper MJ, Glahn J, Evers M, Schulz‐Hildebrandt H, Kositratna G, Birngruber R, et al. Capillary refill—the key to assessing dermal capillary capacity and pathology in optical coherence tomography angiography. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52(7):653–8.
    1. Shokrollahi K, Raymond E, Murison MSC. Lasers: principles and surgical applications. J Surg. 2004;2(1):28–34.
    1. Humbach O, Fabian H, Grzesik U, Haken U, Heitmann W. Analysis of OH absorption bands in synthetic silica. J Non‐Cryst Solids. 1996;203:19–26.
    1. Verdaasdonk RM, Swol CFPv. Laser light delivery systems for medical applications. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42(5):869–94.
    1. de Araújo MA, Silva R, de Lima E, Pereira DP, de Oliveira PC. Measurement of Gaussian laser beam radius using the knife‐edge technique: improvement on data analysis. Appl Opt. 2009;48(2):393–6.
    1. Gulyashko AS, Larionov IA, Tyrtyshnyy VA. Optimization of the efficient single pass two‐stage DFG of Er and Yb fiber lasers radiation into mid‐infrared region. Paper presented at 2019 Conference on Lasers and Electro‐Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe‐EQEC); 2019 Jun 23–27.
    1. Pandey AR, Powers PE, Haus JW. Experimental performance of a two‐stage periodically poled lithium niobate parametric amplifier. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 2008;44(3):203–8.
    1. Chung J‐H, Koh W‐S, Youn J‐l. Histological responses of port wine stains in brown skin after 578 nm copper vapor laser treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;18(4):358–66.
    1. Valvano JW. Tissue thermal properties and perfusion. In: Welch AJ, Van Gemert MJC, editors. Optical‐thermal response of laser‐irradiated tissue. Boston: Springer US; 1995. p. 445–48.
    1. Walsh JT, Cummings JP. Effect of the dynamic optical properties of water on midinfrared laser ablation. Lasers Surg Med. 1994;15(3):295–305.
    1. Shin HC, Prager R, Gomersall H, Kingsbury N, Treece G, Gee A. Estimation of average speed of sound using deconvolution of medical ultrasound data. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(4):623–36.
    1. Vogel A, Venugopalan V. Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. Chem Rev. 2003;103(2):577–644.
    1. Verdier‐Sévrain S, Bonté F. Skin hydration: a review on its molecular mechanisms. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6(2):75–82.
    1. Walsh JT Jr., Deutsch TF. Pulsed CO2 laser tissue ablation: Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med. 1988;8(3):264–75.
    1. Jansen ED, Leeuwen TGv, Motamedi M, Borst C, Welch AJ. Partial vaporization model for pulsed mid‐infrared laser ablation of water. J Appl Phys. 1995;78(1):564–71.
    1. Evers M, Ha L, Casper M, Welford D, Kositratna G, Birngruber R, et al. Assessment of skin lesions produced by focused, tunable, mid‐infrared chalcogenide laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med. 2018;50(9):961–72.
    1. Ha L, Jaspan M, Welford D, Evers M, Kositratna G, Casper MJ, et al. First assessment of a carbon monoxide laser and a thulium fiber laser for fractional ablation of skin. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52(8):788–98.
    1. Hibst R. Technik, Wirkungsweise und medizinische Anwendungen von Holmium‐und Erbium‐Lasern. Fortschritte der Lasermedizin: Ecomed‐Verlag‐Ges; 1997.
    1. Lukac M, Vizintin Z, Kazic M, Sult T. Novel fractional treatments with VSP erbium YAG aesthetic lasers. J Laser Health Academy. 2008;2008(6):1–12.
    1. Choi JE, Oh GN, Kim JY, Seo SH, Ahn HH, Kye YC. Ablative fractional laser treatment for hypertrophic scars: comparison between Er:YAG and CO2 fractional lasers. J Dermatol Treat. 2014;25(4):299–303.
    1. Preissig J, Hamilton K, Markus R. Current laser resurfacing technologies: a review that delves beneath the surface. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26(03):109–16.
    1. Avram MR, M AM, Friedman PM. Laser and light source treatments for the skin. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Limited; 2014.
    1. Grunewald S, Bodendorf M, Illes M, Kendler M, Simon JC, Paasch U. In vivo wound healing and dermal matrix remodelling in response to fractional CO2 laser intervention: Clinicopathological correlation in non‐facial skin. Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27(8):811–8.
    1. Ciocon DH, Hussain M, Goldberg DJ. High‐fluence and high‐density treatment of perioral rhytides using a new, fractionated 2,790‐nm ablative erbium‐doped yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37(6):776–81.
    1. Ross EV, Swann M, Soon S, Izadpanah A, Barnette D, Davenport S. Full‐face treatments with the 2790‐nm erbium:YSGG laser system. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009;8(3):248–52.
    1. Chen KH, Tam KW, Chen IF, Huang SK, Tzeng PC, Wang HJ, et al. A systematic review of comparative studies of CO(2) and erbium:YAG lasers in resurfacing facial rhytides (wrinkles). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19(4):199–204.
    1. Wenande E, Anderson RR, Haedersdal M. Fundamentals of fractional laser‐assisted drug delivery: an in‐depth guide to experimental methodology and data interpretation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;153:169–84.
    1. Skorczakowski M, Swiderski J, Pichola W, Nyga P, Zajac A, Maciejewska M, et al. Mid‐infrared Q‐switched Er:YAG laser for medical applications. Laser Phys Lett. 2010;7(7):498–504.
    1. Kositratna G, Hibert ML, Jaspan M, Welford D, Manstein D. Effects of deviation from focal plane on lesion geometry for ablative fractional photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2016;48(5):555–61.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera