Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in South and South-East Asian women

Vivek Verma, Ramesh K Vishwakarma, Dilip C Nath, Hafiz T A Khan, Ram Prakash, Omer Abid, Vivek Verma, Ramesh K Vishwakarma, Dilip C Nath, Hafiz T A Khan, Ram Prakash, Omer Abid

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section is considered a relatively preferable and safe method of delivery as compared to normal delivery. Since the last decade, its prevalence has increased in both developed and developing countries. In the context of developing countries viz., South Asia (the highest populated region) and South-East Asia (the third-highest populated region), where a significant proportion of home deliveries were reported,however, the preference for, caesarean delivery and its associated factors are not well understood.

Objective: To study the caesarean delivery in the South and South-East Asian countries and to determine the factors associated with the preference for caesarean delivery.

Methodology: Demographic and Health Survey Data on from ever-married women of nine developing countries of South and South-East Asia viz., Vietnam, India, Maldives, Timor-Leste, Nepal, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Cambodia have been considered. Both bivariate and binary logistic regression models were used to estimate the propensity of a woman undergoing for caesarean delivery and to assess the influence of maternal socioeconomic characteristics towards the preference for caesarean delivery.

Results: Obtained results have shown an inclination of caesarean delivery among urban than rural women and are quite conspicuous, but is found to be underestimated mostly among rural women. Caesarean delivery in general is mostly predisposed among women whose baby sizes are either very large or smaller than average, have a higher level of education and place of delivery is private medical institutions. The logistic regression also revealed the influence of maternal socioeconomic characteristics towards the preference for caesarean delivery. Based on nine South and South-East Asian countries an overall C-section prevalence of 13%, but based on institutional births its increase to 19%. The forest plot demonstrated that a significant inclination of C-section among urban than rural regions. In Meta-Analysis, very high and significant heterogeneity among countries is observed, but confirms that in terms of prevalence of C-section all of the countries follow independent pattern.

Conclusion: Study of seven urban and four rural regions of nine South and South- East Asian countries showed, a significant inclination towards the caesarean delivery above the more recent outdated WHO recommended an optimal range of 10-15%and are associated maternal socioeconomic characteristics. In order to control unwanted caesarean delivery, the government needs to develop better healthcare infrastructure and along with more antenatal care related schemes to reduce the risks associated with increased caesarean delivery.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have read the journal's policy and the authors of this study have the following competing interests: RP is a paid employee of Eurofins Limited (https://www.eurofins.com/agroscience-services/about-us/latest-news/eurofins-scientific-to-acquire-advinus-therapeutics/). There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Caesarean rate based on mothers’…
Fig 1. Caesarean rate based on mothers’ age-interval in South and South-East Asian countries.
Fig 2. Caesarean rate based on birth…
Fig 2. Caesarean rate based on birth order of the child in South and South-East Asian countries.
Fig 3. Caesarean rate based on size…
Fig 3. Caesarean rate based on size of the delivered child in South and South-East Asian countries.
Fig 4. Caesarean rate based on mothers’…
Fig 4. Caesarean rate based on mothers’ qualification in South and South-East Asian countries.
Fig 5. Caesarean rate based on mothers’…
Fig 5. Caesarean rate based on mothers’ place of residence in South and South-East Asian countries.
Fig 6. Caesarean rate based on choice…
Fig 6. Caesarean rate based on choice of institution in South and South-East.
Fig 7. Sub-group meta- analysis on association…
Fig 7. Sub-group meta- analysis on association of urban and rural caesarean rate based on both institutional and non-institutional births.
Fig 8. Sub-group meta- analysis on association…
Fig 8. Sub-group meta- analysis on association of urban and rural caesarean rate based on institutional births.

References

    1. Leone Tiziana, Sabu S. Padmadas, and Zoë Matthews. "Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries." Social science & medicine 67, no. 8 (2008): 1236–1246.
    1. Chavan Niranjan. "Caesarean Delivery" In Labour Room Emergencies, pp. 297–303. Springer, Singapore, 2020.
    1. Betran Ana Pilar, Maria Regina Torloni, Jun Zhang, Jiangfeng Ye, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, et al. "What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies." Reproductive health 12, no. 1 (2015): 57.
    1. Osterman Michelle JK, and Joyce A. Martin. "National Vital Statistics Reports." National Vital Statistics Reports 63, no. 1 (2014).
    1. Anderson Geoffrey M. "Making sense of rising caesarean section rates: Time to change our goals." BMJ: British Medical Journal 329, no. 7468 (2004): 696 10.1136/bmj.329.7468.696
    1. Lauer Jeremy A., Ana P. Betrán, Mario Merialdi, and Daniel Wojdyla. "Determinants of caesarean section rates in developed countries: supply, demand and opportunities for control." World health report 29 (2010): 1–22.
    1. Cohen W. R. "Does maternal age affect pregnancy outcome?." BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &Gynaecology 121, no. 3 (2014): 252–254.
    1. Kenny Louise C., Tina Lavender, Roseanne McNamee, Sinéad M. O’Neill, Tracey Mills, and Ali S. Khashan. "Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort." PloS one 8, no. 2 (2013): e56583 10.1371/journal.pone.0056583
    1. Althabe Fernando, Claudio Sosa, José M. Belizán, Luz Gibbons, Frederique Jacquerioz, and Eduardo Bergel. "Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low‐, medium‐, and high‐income countries: an ecological study." Birth 33, no. 4 (2006): 270–277.
    1. Robson Michael, Lucia Hartigan, and Martina Murphy. "Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate." Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics &gynaecology 27, no. 2 (2013): 297–308.
    1. Wagner Marsden. "Choosing caesarean section." The Lancet 356, no. 9242 (2000): 1677–1680.
    1. Thomas J., and Paranjothy S. "Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report." (2001).
    1. Villar José, Eliette Valladares, Daniel Wojdyla, Nelly Zavaleta, Guillermo Carroli, Alejandro Velazco, et al. "Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America." The Lancet 367, no. 9525 (2006): 1819–1829.
    1. Hall Marion H., and Susan Bewley. "Maternal mortality and mode of delivery." The Lancet 354, no. 9180 (1999): 776.
    1. World Health Organization. "Appropriate technology for birth." Lancet 2 (1985): 436–437.
    1. Kolås Toril, Ola D. Saugstad, Anne K. Daltveit, Stein T. Nilsen, and PålØian. "Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes." American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 195, no. 6 (2006): 1538–1543. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.005
    1. Tita Alan TN, Mark B. Landon, Catherine Y. Spong, Yinglei Lai, Kenneth J. Leveno, Michael W. Varner, et al. "Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes." New England Journal of Medicine 360, no. 2 (2009): 111–120. 10.1056/NEJMoa0803267
    1. Scott James R., and Porter T. Flint. "Cesarean delivery." Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology, (2008): 491–503.
    1. Ye Jiangfeng, Ana Pilar Betrán, Miguel Guerrero Vela, Joäo Paulo Souza, and Jun Zhang. "Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery." Birth 41, no. 3 (2014): 237–244. 10.1111/birt.12104
    1. Gupta Indrani, and Pradeep Guin. "Communicable diseases in the South-East Asia Region of the World Health Organization: towards a more effective response." Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88 (2010): 199–205. 10.2471/BLT.09.065540
    1. Lawn Joy E., Simon Cousens, Jelka Zupan, and Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. "4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?." The Lancet 365, no. 9462 (2005): 891–900.
    1. Ten Hoope‐Bender P., Jerker Liljestrand, and MacDonagh S. "Human resources and access to maternal health care." International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 94, no. 3 (2006): 226–233.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera