Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

FOCUS Trial Collaboration

Abstract

Background: Results of small trials indicate that fluoxetine might improve functional outcomes after stroke. The FOCUS trial aimed to provide a precise estimate of these effects.

Methods: FOCUS was a pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done at 103 hospitals in the UK. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, had a clinical stroke diagnosis, were enrolled and randomly assigned between 2 days and 15 days after onset, and had focal neurological deficits. Patients were randomly allocated fluoxetine 20 mg or matching placebo orally once daily for 6 months via a web-based system by use of a minimisation algorithm. The primary outcome was functional status, measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), at 6 months. Patients, carers, health-care staff, and the trial team were masked to treatment allocation. Functional status was assessed at 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. Patients were analysed according to their treatment allocation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN83290762.

Findings: Between Sept 10, 2012, and March 31, 2017, 3127 patients were recruited. 1564 patients were allocated fluoxetine and 1563 allocated placebo. mRS data at 6 months were available for 1553 (99·3%) patients in each treatment group. The distribution across mRS categories at 6 months was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (common odds ratio adjusted for minimisation variables 0·951 [95% CI 0·839-1·079]; p=0·439). Patients allocated fluoxetine were less likely than those allocated placebo to develop new depression by 6 months (210 [13·43%] patients vs 269 [17·21%]; difference 3·78% [95% CI 1·26-6·30]; p=0·0033), but they had more bone fractures (45 [2·88%] vs 23 [1·47%]; difference 1·41% [95% CI 0·38-2·43]; p=0·0070). There were no significant differences in any other event at 6 or 12 months.

Interpretation: Fluoxetine 20 mg given daily for 6 months after acute stroke does not seem to improve functional outcomes. Although the treatment reduced the occurrence of depression, it increased the frequency of bone fractures. These results do not support the routine use of fluoxetine either for the prevention of post-stroke depression or to promote recovery of function.

Funding: UK Stroke Association and NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile mRS=modified Rankin Scale. *1544 inpatients with discharge form; 20 recruited as outpatients. †1536 inpatients with discharge form; 27 recruited as outpatients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary outcome of disability on the modified Rankin Scale at 6 months by treatment group Ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) adjusted with logistic regression for the variables included in our minimisation algorithm. 1553 patients had mRS data available in each group; 11 patients in the fluoxetine group and ten in the placebo group had missing mRS data. Common odds ratio 0·951 (95% CI 0·839–1·079), p=0·439; adjusted for baseline variables.

References

    1. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1545–1602.
    1. Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:123–130.
    1. Mead GE, Hsieh CF, Lee R. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11 CD009286.
    1. Schambra H, O'Dell MW. Should this patient with ischemic stroke receive fluoxetine? PM R. 2015;7:1294–1299.
    1. Mead G, Hackett ML, Lundstrom E, Murray V, Hankey GJ, Dennis M. The FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: a study protocol for three multicentre randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2015;16:369.
    1. Graham C, Lewis S, Forbes J. The FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: statistical and health economic analysis plan for the trials and for the individual patient data meta-analysis. Trials. 2017;18:627.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005;330:843.
    1. Bruno A, Shah N, Lin C. Improving modified Rankin scale assessment with a simplified questionnaire. Stroke. 2010;41:1048–1050.
    1. Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute stroke: development and validation of new models. Stroke. 2002;33:1041–1047.
    1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587.
    1. White R, Bradnam V. 2nd edn. Pharmaceutical Press; London: 2010. Handbook of drug administration via enteral feeding tubes.
    1. Bruno A, Akinwuntan AE, Lin C. Simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire: reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life. Stroke. 2011;42:2276–2279.
    1. Dennis M, Mead G, Doubal F, Graham C. Determining the modified Rankin score after stroke by postal and telephone questionnaires. Stroke. 2012;43:851–853.
    1. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0: evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–2140.
    1. Duncan PW, Bode R, Min Lai S, Perera S, Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators Rasch analysis of a new stroke specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950–963.
    1. Duncan P, Reker D, Horner R. Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke specific outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:493–505.
    1. Duncan P, Reker D, Kwon S. Measuring stroke impact with the stroke impact scale: telephone versus mail administration in veterans with stroke. Med Care. 2005;43:507–515.
    1. Kwon S, Duncan P, Studenski S, Perera S, Lai SM, Reker D. Measuring stroke impact with SIS: construct validity of SIS telephone administration. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:367–376.
    1. Hoeymans N, Garssen AA, Westert GP, Verhaak PF. Measuring mental health of the Dutch population: a comparison of the GHQ-12 and the MHI-5. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:23.
    1. McCabe CJ, Thomas KJ, Brazier JE, Coleman P. Measuring the mental health status of a population: a comparison of the GHQ-12 and the SF-36 (MHI-5) Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169:516–521.
    1. Mead GE, Lynch J, Greig CA, Young A, Lewis SJ, Sharpe M. Evaluation of fatigue scales in stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:2090–2095.
    1. Mead GE, Graham C, Dorman P, on behalf of UK Collaborators of IST Fatigue after stroke: baseline predictors and influence on survival. Analysis of data from UK Patients Recruited in the International Stroke Trial. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16988.
    1. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–1736.
    1. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis MS, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991;337:1521–1526.
    1. Adams HP, Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of ORG 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24:35–41.
    1. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:439–445.
    1. Bray B D, Cloud GC, James MA. Weekly variation in health-care quality by day and time of admission: a nationwide, registry-based, prospective cohort study of acute stroke care. Lancet. 2016;388:170–177.
    1. NHS National Services Scotland Scottish Stroke Improvement Programme. 2017 report.
    1. Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Caso V. Under-representation of women in stroke randomized controlled trials: inadvertent selection bias leading to suboptimal conclusions. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2017;10:241–244.
    1. Salter KL, Foley NC, Zhu L, Jutai JW, Teasell RW. Prevention of poststroke depression: does prophylactic pharmacotherapy work? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:1243–1251.
    1. Wadhwa R, Kumar M, Talegaonkar S, Vohora D. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bone health: a review of clinical studies and plausible mechanisms. Osteoporosis Sarcopenia. 2017;3:75–81.
    1. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Antidepressant adherence: are patients taking their medications? Innov Clin Neurosci. 2012;9:41–46.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera