Unexpected consequences: women's experiences of a self-hypnosis intervention to help with pain relief during labour

Kenneth Finlayson, Soo Downe, Susan Hinder, Helen Carr, Helen Spiby, Peter Whorwell, Kenneth Finlayson, Soo Downe, Susan Hinder, Helen Carr, Helen Spiby, Peter Whorwell

Abstract

Background: Self-hypnosis is becoming increasingly popular as a means of labour pain management. Previous studies have produced mixed results. There are very few data on women's views and experiences of using hypnosis in this context. As part of a randomized controlled trial of self-hypnosis for intra-partum pain relief (the SHIP Trial) we conducted qualitative interviews with women randomized to the intervention arm to explore their views and experiences of using self-hypnosis during labour and birth.

Methods: Participants were randomly selected from the intervention arm of the study, which consisted of two antenatal self-hypnosis training sessions and a supporting CD that women were encouraged to listen to daily from 32 weeks gestation until the birth of their baby. Those who consented were interviewed in their own homes 8-12 weeks after birth. Following transcription, the interviews were analysed iteratively and emerging concepts were discussed amongst the authors to generate organizing themes. These were then used to develop a principal organizing metaphor or global theme, in a process known as thematic networks analysis.

Results: Of the 343 women in the intervention group, 48 were invited to interview, and 16 were interviewed over a 12 month period from February 2012 to January 2013. Coding of the data and subsequent analysis revealed a global theme of 'unexpected consequences', supported by 5 organising themes, 'calmness in a climate of fear', 'from sceptic to believer', 'finding my space', 'delays and disappointments' and 'personal preferences'. Most respondents reported positive experiences of self-hypnosis and highlighted feelings of calmness, confidence and empowerment. They found the intervention to be beneficial and used a range of novel strategies to personalize their self-hypnosis practice. Occasionally women reported feeling frustrated or disappointed when their relaxed state was misinterpreted by midwives on admission or when their labour and birth experiences did not match their expectations.

Conclusion: The women in this study generally appreciated antenatal self-hypnosis training and found it to be beneficial during labour and birth. The state of focused relaxation experienced by women using the technique needs to be recognized by providers if the intervention is to be implemented into the maternity service.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of organising themes and global theme

References

    1. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3(Issue 3):CD009234.
    1. Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(Suppl. 1):S16–24. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(02)70179-8.
    1. Madden KL, Turnbull D, Cyna AM, Adelson P, Wilkinson C. Pain relief for childbirth: The preferences of pregnant women, midwives and obstetricians. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.12.002.
    1. Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson R. More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Med. 2008;14:6–7.
    1. Garthus-Niegel S, Knoph C, von Soest T, Nielsen CS, Eberhard-Gran M. The role of labor pain and overall birth experience in the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms: a longitudinal cohort study. Birth. 2014;41(1):108–15. doi: 10.1111/birt.12093.
    1. Stefanidou M, Sola C, Kouvelas E, Del Cerro M, Triarhou LC. Cajal’s brief experimentation with hypnotic suggestion. J Hist Neurosci. 2007;16:351–61. doi: 10.1080/09647040600653915.
    1. Mehl-Madrona LE. Hypnosis to facilitate uncomplicated birth. Am J Clin Hypn. 2004;46(4):299–312. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2004.10403614.
    1. Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM, Crowther CA. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006; Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003521. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003521.pub2.
    1. Landolt AS, Milling LS. The efficacy of hypnosis as an intervention for labor and delivery pain: A comprehensive methodological review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31:1022–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.06.002.
    1. Werner A, Uldbjerg N, Zachariae R, Rosen G, Nohr EA. Self-hypnosis for coping with labour pain: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2012;120(3):346–53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12087.
    1. Cyna AM, Crowther CA, Robinson JS, Andrew MI, Antoniou G, Baghurst P. Hypnosis antenatal training for childbirth: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2013;120(10):1248–59. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12320.
    1. Werner A, Uldbjerg N, Zachariae R, Nohr EA. Effect of self-hypnosis on duration of labor and maternal and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(7):816–23. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12141.
    1. Downe S, Finlayson K, Melvin C, Spiby H, Ali S, Diggle P, Gyte G, Hinder S, Miller V, Slade P, Trepel D, Weeks A, Whorwell P, Williamson M. Self-Hypnosis for Intrapartum Pain management (SHIP) in pregnant nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness. BJOG 2015; DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13433
    1. Wainer N, HypnoBirthing A radical change on our perspective of pain in childbirth. Midwife Today Int Midwife. 2000;55:36–8.
    1. Eng YH, Cyna AM. A comparison of midwives’ knowledge of, and attitudes to, hypnosis in hospitals with and without a hypnotherapy service. Aust J Clin Exp Hypnosis. 2006;34(1):17–26.
    1. Werner A, Uldbjerg N, Zachariae R, Wu CS, Nohr EA. Antenatal hypnosis training and childbirth experience: a randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2013;40(4):272–80. doi: 10.1111/birt.12071.
    1. Abbasi M, Ghazi F, Barlow-Harrison A, Sheikhvatan M, Mohammadyari F. The effect of hypnosis on pain relief during labor and childbirth in Iranian pregnant women. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009;57(2):174–83. doi: 10.1080/00207140802665435.
    1. Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1:385–405. doi: 10.1177/146879410100100307.
    1. Svensson J, Barclay L, Cooke M. The concerns and interests of expectant and new parents: assessing learning needs. J Perinat Educ. 2006;15(4):18–27. doi: 10.1624/105812406X151385.
    1. Nolan ML. Information giving and education in pregnancy: a review of qualitative studies. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(4):21–30. doi: 10.1624/105812409X474681.
    1. Dick-Read G. Childbirth without Fear: The Principles and Practice of Natural Childbirth 2nd Ed. London: Pinter & Martin; 2013.
    1. Andersson L, Sundström-Poromaa I, Wulff M, Aström M, Bixo M. Implications of antenatal depression and anxiety for obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):467–76. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000135277.04565.e9.
    1. Hall WA, Stoll K, Hutton EK, Brown H. A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women. BMC Pregnanc Childbirth. 2012;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-78.
    1. Adams S, Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A. Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: a study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2012;119:1238–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03433.x.
    1. Haines HM, Rubertsson C, Pallant JF, Hildingsson I. The influence of women’s fear, attitudes and beliefs of childbirth on mode and experience of birth. BMC Pregnanc Childbirth. 2012;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-55.
    1. Mairs DAE. Hypnosis and pain in childbirth. Contemp Hypn. 1995;12(2):111–8.
    1. Nyman V, Downe S, Berg M. Waiting for permission to enter the labour ward world: first time parents’ experiences of the first encounter on a labour ward. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2011;2(3):129–34. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2011.05.004.
    1. Hawe P, Shiel A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how ‘out of control’ can a randomised controlled trial be? Br Med J. 2004;328(7455):1561–3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561.
    1. Treweek S, Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials. 2009; 10(37). doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-37
    1. Guthrie K, Taylor DJ, Defriend D. Maternal hypnosis induced by husbands during labour. J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 1984;5(2):93–5. doi: 10.3109/01443618409109124.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera