Improving Assessment of Drug Safety Through Proteomics: Early Detection and Mechanistic Characterization of the Unforeseen Harmful Effects of Torcetrapib

Stephen A Williams, Ashwin C Murthy, Robert K DeLisle, Craig Hyde, Anders Malarstig, Rachel Ostroff, Sophie J Weiss, Mark R Segal, Peter Ganz, Stephen A Williams, Ashwin C Murthy, Robert K DeLisle, Craig Hyde, Anders Malarstig, Rachel Ostroff, Sophie J Weiss, Mark R Segal, Peter Ganz

Abstract

Background: Early detection of adverse effects of novel therapies and understanding of their mechanisms could improve the safety and efficiency of drug development. We have retrospectively applied large-scale proteomics to blood samples from ILLUMINATE (Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events), a trial of torcetrapib (a cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibitor), that involved 15 067 participants at high cardiovascular risk. ILLUMINATE was terminated at a median of 550 days because of significant absolute increases of 1.2% in cardiovascular events and 0.4% in mortality with torcetrapib. The aims of our analysis were to determine whether a proteomic analysis might reveal biological mechanisms responsible for these harmful effects and whether harmful effects of torcetrapib could have been detected early in the ILLUMINATE trial with proteomics.

Methods: A nested case-control analysis of paired plasma samples at baseline and at 3 months was performed in 249 participants assigned to torcetrapib plus atorvastatin and 223 participants assigned to atorvastatin only. Within each treatment arm, cases with events were matched to controls 1:1. Main outcomes were a survey of 1129 proteins for discovery of biological pathways altered by torcetrapib and a 9-protein risk score validated to predict myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or death.

Results: Plasma concentrations of 200 proteins changed significantly with torcetrapib. Their pathway analysis revealed unexpected and widespread changes in immune and inflammatory functions, as well as changes in endocrine systems, including in aldosterone function and glycemic control. At baseline, 9-protein risk scores were similar in the 2 treatment arms and higher in participants with subsequent events. At 3 months, the absolute 9-protein derived risk increased in the torcetrapib plus atorvastatin arm compared with the atorvastatin-only arm by 1.08% (P=0.0004). Thirty-seven proteins changed in the direction of increased risk of 49 proteins previously associated with cardiovascular and mortality risk.

Conclusions: Heretofore unknown effects of torcetrapib were revealed in immune and inflammatory functions. A protein-based risk score predicted harm from torcetrapib within just 3 months. A protein-based risk assessment embedded within a large proteomic survey may prove to be useful in the evaluation of therapies to prevent harm to patients.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00134264.

Keywords: aptamers; biomarkers; peptides; precision medicine; prescription drugs; proteins; proteomics.

© 2017 The Authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of samples, study participants, and analytic processes for the evaluation of torcetrapib.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proteins significantly altered by torcetrapib associated with aldosterone synthesis or function. Nodes represent gene symbol name, corresponding to protein measured. Degree of intensity of the node color (red) indicates degree of significance of the false discovery rate P value. Dashed lines correspond to the implicated function of the given proteins according to the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis knowledge bank. Node shapes denote cytokine (□), growth factor (□), and other (○). ANGPT2 indicates angiopoietin-2; BMP6, bone morphometric protein 6; DKK3, Dickkopf-related protein 3; NPPB, natriuretic peptide B; POMC, pro-opiomelanocortin; PYY, peptide YY; and TGFB1, transforming growth factor-β1. *Given protein was represented in the modified aptamer assay more than once.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proteins significantly altered by torcetrapib associated with insulin sensitivity or pancreatic β-cell function. Nodes represent gene symbol name, corresponding to protein measured. Degree of intensity of the node color (red) indicates degree of significance of false discovery rate P value. Dashed lines correspond to the implicated function of the given proteins according to the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis knowledge bank. Node shapes denote cytokine (□), growth factor (□), kinase (▽), peptidase (), transmembrane receptor (), transporter (), and other (○). ADIPO1 indicates adiponectin; C1Q, and collagen domain containing; APOE, apolipoprotein E, FSTL3, follistatin-like 3; GHR, growth hormone receptor; MAPK8, mitogen-activated protein kinase-8; MMP2, matrix metalloproteinase-2; PRKCQ, protein kinase Cθ type; TGFB1, transforming growth factor-β1; and TNSFSF12, tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 12. *Given protein was represented in the modified aptamer assay more than once.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Within-participant changes in 9-protein risk score, baseline to 3 months. A, Percent change in risk (3 months minus baseline) by treatment group. B, Percent change in risk (3 months minus baseline) by treatment group and event status. Legend to bar charts: Bar height extends to the median change in risk, and the whiskers represent the 95% confidence interval about the median. Labels at the top of each bar are the median risk change. P values on the sides of the bars are from testing with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test the null hypothesis that the risk change is distributed symmetrically with a median of zero. P values in brackets are from testing with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test the null hypothesis of equal medians for the 2 populations. A indicates atorvastatin; and T, torcetrapib.

References

    1. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, Grundy SM, Kastelein JJ, Komajda M, Lopez-Sendon J, Mosca L, Tardif JC, Waters DD, Shear CL, Revkin JH, Buhr KA, Fisher MR, Tall AR, Brewer B ILLUMINATE Investigators. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2109–2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706628.
    1. Tall AR, Yvan-Charvet L, Wang N. The failure of torcetrapib: was it the molecule or the mechanism? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:257–260. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000256728.60226.77.
    1. Berenson A. End of drug trial is a big loser for Pfizer. New York Times. 2006 . Accessed November 28, 2016.
    1. Everett BM, Smith RJ, Hiatt WR. Reducing LDL with PCSK9 inhibitors: the clinical benefit of lipid drugs. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1588–1591. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508120.
    1. Vickers KC, Remaley AT. HDL and cholesterol: life after the divorce? J Lipid Res. 2014;55:4–12. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R035964.
    1. Robb MA, McInnes PM, Califf RM. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: developing common terminology and definitions. JAMA. 2016;315:1107–1108. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2240.
    1. Brody E, Gold L, Mehan M, Ostroff R, Rohloff J, Walker J, Zichi D. Life’s simple measures: unlocking the proteome. J Mol Biol. 2012;422:595–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.06.021.
    1. Ganz P, Heidecker B, Hveem K, Jonasson C, Kato S, Segal MR, Sterling DG, Williams SA. Development and validation of a protein-based risk score for cardiovascular outcomes among patients with stable coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2016;315:2532–2541. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5951.
    1. Lindsey ML, Mayr M, Gomes AV, Delles C, Arrell DK, Murphy AM, Lange RA, Costello CE, Jin YF, Laskowitz DT, Sam F, Terzic A, Van Eyk J, Srinivas PR American Heart Association Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Hypertension, and Stroke Council. Transformative impact of proteomics on cardiovascular health and disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132:852–872. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000226.
    1. Sabatine MS. Using aptamer-based technology to probe the plasma proteome for cardiovascular disease prediction. JAMA. 2016;315:2525–2526. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6110.
    1. Gold L, Ayers D, Bertino J, Bock C, Bock A, Brody EN, Carter J, Dalby AB, Eaton BE, Fitzwater T, Flather D, Forbes A, Foreman T, Fowler C, Gawande B, Goss M, Gunn M, Gupta S, Halladay D, Heil J, Heilig J, Hicke B, Husar G, Janjic N, Jarvis T, Jennings S, Katilius E, Keeney TR, Kim N, Koch TH, Kraemer S, Kroiss L, Le N, Levine D, Lindsey W, Lollo B, Mayfield W, Mehan M, Mehler R, Nelson SK, Nelson M, Nieuwlandt D, Nikrad M, Ochsner U, Ostroff RM, Otis M, Parker T, Pietrasiewicz S, Resnicow DI, Rohloff J, Sanders G, Sattin S, Schneider D, Singer B, Stanton M, Sterkel A, Stewart A, Stratford S, Vaught JD, Vrkljan M, Walker JJ, Watrobka M, Waugh S, Weiss A, Wilcox SK, Wolfson A, Wolk SK, Zhang C, Zichi D. Aptamer-based multiplexed proteomic technology for biomarker discovery. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015004.
    1. Ngo D, Sinha S, Shen D, Kuhn EW, Keyes MJ, Shi X, Benson MD, O’Sullivan JF, Keshishian H, Farrell LA, Fifer MA, Vasan RS, Sabatine MS, Larson MG, Carr SA, Wang TJ, Gerszten RE. Aptamer-based proteomic profiling reveals novel candidate biomarkers and pathways in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2016;134:270–285. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021803.
    1. Gramolini A, Lau E, Liu PP. Identifying low-abundance biomarkers: aptamer-based proteomics potentially enables more sensitive detection in cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2016;134:286–289. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022940.
    1. Ganna A, Reilly M, de Faire U, Pedersen N, Magnusson P, Ingelsson E. Risk prediction measures for case-cohort and nested case-control designs: an application to cardiovascular disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:715–724. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr374.
    1. Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008;29(suppl 1):S49–S52.
    1. Ansari AR, Bradley RA. Rank-sum tests for dispersions. Ann Math Statist. 1960;31:1174–1189.
    1. D’Agostino RB, Russell MW, Huse DM, Ellison RC, Silbershatz H, Wilson PW, Hartz SC. Primary and subsequent coronary risk appraisal: new results from the Framingham study. Am Heart J. 2000;139(pt 1):272–281.
    1. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, Coresh J, Levey AS CKD-EPI Investigators. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114248.
    1. Barter PJ, Rye KA, Tardif JC, Waters DD, Boekholdt SM, Breazna A, Kastelein JJ. Effect of torcetrapib on glucose, insulin, and hemoglobin A1c in subjects in the Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events (ILLUMINATE) trial. Circulation. 2011;124:555–562. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.018259.
    1. Wiviott SD. ILLUMINATE sheds more light. Circulation. 2011;124:536–537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043323.
    1. Waxman HA. The lessons of Vioxx: drug safety and sales. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2576–2578. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058136.
    1. Mukherjee D, Nissen SE, Topol EJ. Risk of cardiovascular events associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors. JAMA. 2001;286:954–959.
    1. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–2471. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072761.
    1. Thanassoulis G, O’Donnell CJ. Mendelian randomization: nature’s randomized trial in the post-genome era. JAMA. 2009;301:2386–2388. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.812.
    1. Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375.
    1. Libby P, Hansson GK. Inflammation and immunity in diseases of the arterial tree: players and layers. Circ Res. 2015;116:307–311. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.301313.
    1. Smith JD. Dysfunctional HDL as a diagnostic and therapeutic target. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:151–155. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179226.
    1. Chapman MJ, Le Goff W, Guerin M, Kontush A. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: at the heart of the action of lipid-modulating therapy with statins, fibrates, niacin, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:149–164. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp399.
    1. Lin H, Lee E, Hestir K, Leo C, Huang M, Bosch E, Halenbeck R, Wu G, Zhou A, Behrens D, Hollenbaugh D, Linnemann T, Qin M, Wong J, Chu K, Doberstein SK, Williams LT. Discovery of a cytokine and its receptor by functional screening of the extracellular proteome. Science. 2008;320:807–811. doi: 10.1126/science.1154370.
    1. Amgalan D, Pekson R, Kitsis RN. Troponin release following brief myocardial ischemia: apoptosis versus necrosis. J Am Coll Cardiol Basic Trans Science. 2017;2:118–121.
    1. Hickman PE, Potter JM, Aroney C, Koerbin G, Southcott E, Wu AH, Roberts MS. Cardiac troponin may be released by ischemia alone, without necrosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2010;411:318–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.12.009.
    1. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM, Jr, Kastelein JJ, Koenig W, Libby P, Lorenzatti AJ, Macfadyen JG, Nordestgaard BG, Shepherd J, Willerson JT, Glynn RJ JUPITER Trial Study Group. Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60447-5.
    1. Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, Wiviott SD, Blazing MA, Shui A, Rifai N, Califf RM, Braunwald E. Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein during follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Aggrastat-to-Zocor Trial. Circulation. 2006;114:281–288. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628909.
    1. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela WJ, Tsai J, Orazem J, Magorien RD, O’Shaughnessy C, Ganz P Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) Investigators. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:29–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042000.
    1. Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) Investigators. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:20–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042378.
    1. Bohula EA, Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, Zhou J, Murphy SA, White JA, Tershakovec AM, Blazing MA, Braunwald E. Achievement of dual low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein targets more frequent with the addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin and associated with better outcomes in IMPROVE-IT. Circulation. 2015;132:1224–1233. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018381.
    1. LaRosa JC, Grundy SM, Waters DD, Shear C, Barter P, Fruchart JC, Gotto AM, Greten H, Kastelein JJ, Shepherd J, Wenger NK Treating to New Targets (TNT) Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1425–1435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050461.
    1. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Abt M, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, Brumm J, Chaitman BR, Holme IM, Kallend D, Leiter LA, Leitersdorf E, McMurray JJ, Mundl H, Nicholls SJ, Shah PK, Tardif JC, Wright RS dal-OUTCOMES Investigators. Effects of dalcetrapib in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2089–2099. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206797.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera