Body weight management in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors

Hassan Shaikh, Peter Bradhurst, Li Xin Ma, Sim Yee Cindy Tan, Sam J Egger, Janette L Vardy, Hassan Shaikh, Peter Bradhurst, Li Xin Ma, Sim Yee Cindy Tan, Sam J Egger, Janette L Vardy

Abstract

Background: Studies suggest that overweight and obese breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of cancer recurrence and have higher all-cause mortality. Obesity has an impact on breast cancer survivor's quality of life (QOL) and increases the risk of longer-term morbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Many cancer guidelines recommend survivors maintain a healthy weight but there is a lack of evidence regarding which weight loss method to recommend.

Objectives: To assess the effects of different body weight loss approaches in breast cancer survivors who are overweight or obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2).

Search methods: We carried out a search in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's (CBCG's) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 6), MEDLINE (2012 to June 2019), Embase (2015 to June 2019), the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and Clinicaltrials.gov on 17 June 2019. We also searched Mainland Chinese academic literature databases (CNKI), VIP, Wan Fang Data and SinoMed on 25 June 2019. We screened references in relevant manuscripts.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and randomised cross-over trials evaluating body weight management for overweight and obese breast cancer survivors (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2). The aim of the intervention had to be weight loss.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently performed data extraction and assessed risk of bias for the included studies, and applied the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Dichotomous outcomes were analysed as proportions using the risk ratio (RR) as the measure of effect. Continuous data were analysed as means with the measure of effect being expressed as the mean differences (MDs) between treatment groups in change from baseline values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), when all studies reported exactly the same outcomes on the same scale. If similar outcomes were reported on different scales the standardised mean difference (SMD) was used as the measure of effect. Quality of life data and relevant biomarkers were extracted where available.

Main results: We included a total of 20 studies (containing 23 intervention-comparisons) and analysed 2028 randomised women. Participants in the experimental groups received weight loss interventions using the core element of dietary changes, either in isolation or in combination with other core elements such as 'diet and exercise', 'diet and psychosocial support' or 'diet, exercise and psychosocial support'. Participants in the controls groups either received usual care, written materials or placebo, or wait-list controls. The duration of interventions ranged from 0.5 months to 24 months. The duration of follow-up ranged from three months to 36 months. There were no time-to-event data available for overall survival, breast cancer recurrence and disease-free survival. There was a relatively small amount of data available for breast cancer recurrence (281 participants from 4 intervention-comparisons with 14 recurrence events; RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.68 to 5.60; low-quality evidence) and the analysis was likely underpowered. Overall, we found low-quality evidence that weight loss interventions for overweight and obese breast cancer survivors resulted in a reduction in body weight (MD: -2.25 kg, 95% CI: -3.19 to -1.3 kg; 21 intervention-comparisons; 1751 women), body mass index (BMI) (MD: -1.08 kg/m2, 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.56 kg/m2; 17 intervention-comparisons; 1353 women), and waist circumference (MD:-1.73 cm, 95% CI: -3.17 to -0.29 cm; 13 intervention-comparisons; 1193 women), and improved overall quality of life (SMD: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.29; 10 intervention-comparisons; 867 women). No increase was seen in adverse events for women in the intervention groups compared to controls (RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.17; 4 intervention-comparisons; 394 women; high-quality evidence). Subgroup analyses revealed that decreases in body weight, BMI and waist circumference were present in women regardless of their ethnicity and menopausal status. Multimodal weight loss interventions (which referred to 'diet, exercise and psychosocial support') appeared to result in greater reductions in body weight (MD: -2.88 kg, 95% CI: -3.98 to -1.77 kg; 13 intervention-comparisons; 1526 participants), BMI (MD: -1.44 kg/m2, 95% CI: -2.16 to -0.72 kg/m2; 11 studies; 1187 participants) and waist circumference (MD:-1.66 cm, 95% CI: -3.49 to -0.16 cm; 8 intervention-comparisons; 1021 participants) compared to dietary change alone, however the evidence was low quality.

Authors' conclusions: Weight loss interventions, particularly multimodal interventions (incorporating diet, exercise and psychosocial support), in overweight or obese breast cancer survivors appear to result in decreases in body weight, BMI and waist circumference and improvement in overall quality of life. There was no increase in adverse events. There is a lack of data to determine the impact of weight loss interventions on survival or breast cancer recurrence. This review is based on studies with marked heterogeneity regarding weight loss interventions. Due to the methods used in included studies, there was a high risk of bias regarding blinding of participants and assessors. Further research is required to determine the optimal weight loss intervention and assess the impact of weight loss on survival outcomes. Long-term follow-up in weight loss intervention studies is required to determine if weight changes are sustained beyond the intervention periods.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02750826.

Conflict of interest statement

HS: none known. PB: none known. LXM: none known. SYT: none known. JV: none known. SE: none known.

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Forest plot of comparison: 1 All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), outcome: 1.2 Change in body weight [kg].
4
4
Funnel plot 1: Change in body weight [kg]. Assessing publication bias and/or small‐study effects. Plot includes all intervention‐comparisons with extractable data for change in body weight. The plot does not show substantial asymmetry (Egger's test P value 0.40).
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), outcome: 1.3 Change in body mass index [kg/m2].
6
6
Funnel plot 2: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]. Assessing publication bias and/or small‐study effects. Plot includes all intervention‐comparisons with extractable data for change in body mass index. The plot does not show substantial asymmetry (Egger's test P value 0.13).
7
7
Forest plot of comparison: 1 All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), outcome: 1.4 Change in waist circumference [cm].
8
8
Funnel plot 3: Change in waist circumference [cm]. Assessing publication bias and/or small‐study effects. Plot includes all intervention‐comparisons with extractable data for change in waist circumference. The plot does not show substantial asymmetry (Egger's test P value 0.20).
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 1: Cancer recurrence
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 2: Change in body weight
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 3: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 4: Change in waist circumference
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 5: Adverse events
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 6: Change in quality of life ‐ overall scales
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 7: Change in quality of life ‐ physical subscales
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 8: Change in quality of life ‐ social subscales
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 9: Change in quality of life ‐ emotional subscales
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 10: Change in quality of life ‐ mental health subscales
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 11: Change in quality of life ‐ anxiety/depression subscales
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 12: Change in insulin
1.13. Analysis
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 13: Change in glucose
1.14. Analysis
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 14: Change in total cholesterol
1.15. Analysis
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 15: Change in HDL cholesterol
1.16. Analysis
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 16: Change in LDL cholesterol
1.17. Analysis
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 17: Change in triglycerides
1.18. Analysis
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1: All weight loss interventions vs controls (no subgrouping), Outcome 18: Change in leptin
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2: Subgrouped by Intervention type vs control type, Outcome 1: Change in body weight
2.2. Analysis
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2: Subgrouped by Intervention type vs control type, Outcome 2: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]
2.3. Analysis
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2: Subgrouped by Intervention type vs control type, Outcome 3: Change in waist circumference
3.1. Analysis
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3: Subgrouped by ethnicity, Outcome 1: Change in body weight
3.2. Analysis
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3: Subgrouped by ethnicity, Outcome 2: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]
3.3. Analysis
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3: Subgrouped by ethnicity, Outcome 3: Change in waist circumference
4.1. Analysis
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4: Subgrouped by menopausal status, Outcome 1: Change in body weight
4.2. Analysis
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4: Subgrouped by menopausal status, Outcome 2: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]
4.3. Analysis
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4: Subgrouped by menopausal status, Outcome 3: Change in waist circumference
5.1. Analysis
5.1. Analysis
Comparison 5: Subgrouped by duration of follow‐up (months), Outcome 1: Change in body weight
5.2. Analysis
5.2. Analysis
Comparison 5: Subgrouped by duration of follow‐up (months), Outcome 2: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]
5.3. Analysis
5.3. Analysis
Comparison 5: Subgrouped by duration of follow‐up (months), Outcome 3: Change in waist circumference
6.1. Analysis
6.1. Analysis
Comparison 6: Sensitivity analyses ‐ analyses 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 repeated but with fixed effect approach, Outcome 1: Change in body weight
6.2. Analysis
6.2. Analysis
Comparison 6: Sensitivity analyses ‐ analyses 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 repeated but with fixed effect approach, Outcome 2: Change in body mass index [kg/m2]
6.3. Analysis
6.3. Analysis
Comparison 6: Sensitivity analyses ‐ analyses 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 repeated but with fixed effect approach, Outcome 3: Change in waist circumference

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera