Developing a primary care-based stroke model: the prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers

Jenni Murray, John Young, Anne Forster, Robert Ashworth, Jenni Murray, John Young, Anne Forster, Robert Ashworth

Abstract

Background: Over the last two decades, the need for a longer-term perspective to stroke management has become increasingly recognised. This paper reports a component of a larger project aimed at developing a systematic, primary care-based service for stroke aftercare.

Aim: To identify the types and prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by stroke patients and their carers in the United Kingdom (UK).

Method: Systematically identified quantitative surveys reporting the prevalence of long-term stroke-related problems were reviewed and the findings extracted and interpreted against a patient and carer defined classification system, identified during an earlier review of the qualitative stroke literature.

Results: Twenty-seven UK surveys, including approximately 6000 patients and 3000 carers, and two literature reviews were identified by the search methods. Most of the problem areas identified in the qualitative stroke literature review were reported in the quantitative surveys and an additional two problems were identified (falls and sexual problems). The prevalence of problems in each of the areas was as follows: 19% to 62% for emotional problems; 18% to 46% for social problems; 13% to 77% for service issues; 18% to 88% for poor communication; 33% to 100% for transfer of care; and 10% to 73% for other areas.

Conclusion: This review confirms the findings and recommendations from earlier work about the need for a longer-term holistic approach to the rehabilitation of stroke patients and support for carers. Having established the nature and frequency of the main problems experienced by stroke patients and their carers, the appropriate evidence-based interventions need to be identified and consolidated into a stroke service, facilitated by a robust patient-assessment process.

References

    1. Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1223-9
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(6):711-25
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Aug;14(4):381-92
    1. Disabil Rehabil. 2000 Jul 20;22(11):490-4
    1. Stroke. 2001 Jan;32(1):122-7
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):787-8
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Feb;53(487):137-42
    1. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1982 Apr;16(2):100-4
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Aug 16;293(6544):418-20
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Jun;40(2):161-5
    1. Int Disabil Stud. 1987;9(3):103-5
    1. Age Ageing. 1991 Sep;20(5):337-44
    1. Health Trends. 1991-1992;23(4):161-2
    1. Stroke. 1993 Apr;24(4):536-8
    1. Age Ageing. 1994 Jul;23(4):293-8
    1. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1273-7
    1. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):83-6
    1. Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 Sep;35 ( Pt 3):369-79
    1. Stroke. 1997 Mar;28(3):507-12
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Dec;47(425):787-93
    1. Stroke. 1998 Sep;29(9):1867-72
    1. Disabil Rehabil. 1998 Dec;20(12):457-63
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Jun;14(3):279-87

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera