The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol

Caroline Free, Gemma Phillips, Lambert Felix, Leandro Galli, Vikram Patel, Philip Edwards, Caroline Free, Gemma Phillips, Lambert Felix, Leandro Galli, Vikram Patel, Philip Edwards

Abstract

Background: The application of mobile computing and communication technology is rapidly expanding in the fields of health care and public health. This systematic review will summarise the evidence for the effectiveness of mobile technology interventions for improving health and health service outcomes (M-health) around the world.

Findings: To be included in the review interventions must aim to improve or promote health or health service use and quality, employing any mobile computing and communication technology. This includes: (1) interventions designed to improve diagnosis, investigation, treatment, monitoring and management of disease; (2) interventions to deliver treatment or disease management programmes to patients, health promotion interventions, and interventions designed to improve treatment compliance; and (3) interventions to improve health care processes e.g. appointment attendance, result notification, vaccination reminders.A comprehensive, electronic search strategy will be used to identify controlled studies, published since 1990, and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Global Health, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, or the UK NHS Health Technology Assessment database. The search strategy will include terms (and synonyms) for the following mobile electronic devices (MEDs) and a range of compatible media: mobile phone; personal digital assistant (PDA); handheld computer (e.g. tablet PC); PDA phone (e.g. BlackBerry, Palm Pilot); Smartphone; enterprise digital assistant; portable media player (i.e. MP3 or MP4 player); handheld video game console. No terms for health or health service outcomes will be included, to ensure that all applications of mobile technology in public health and health services are identified. Bibliographies of primary studies and review articles meeting the inclusion criteria will be searched manually to identify further eligible studies. Data on objective and self-reported outcomes and study quality will be independently extracted by two review authors. Where there are sufficient numbers of similar interventions, we will calculate and report pooled risk ratios or standardised mean differences using meta-analysis.

Discussion: This systematic review will provide recommendations on the use of mobile computing and communication technology in health care and public health and will guide future work on intervention development and primary research in this field.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual framework for mobile electronic device intervention classification.

References

    1. Blaya JA, Fraser HS, Holt B. E-health technologies show promise in developing countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:244–251. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0894.
    1. Lindquist AM, Johansson PE, Petersson GI, Saveman B-I, Nilsson GC. The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2008;10:e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1038.
    1. Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text Messaging as a Tool for Behavior Change in Disease Prevention and Management. Epidemiol Rev. 2010.
    1. Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD. Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009. pp. 165–173.
    1. Heron KE, Smyth JM. Ecological momentary interventions: Incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15:1–39. doi: 10.1348/135910709X466063.
    1. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health. 2009;15:231–240.
    1. Leach-Lemens C. Using mobile phones in HIV care and prevention. HIV & AIDS Treatment in Practice. 2009;137:7.
    1. Burton C, Weller D, Sharpe M. Are electronic diaries useful for symptoms research? A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2007;62:553–561. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.12.022.
    1. Dale O, Hagen KB. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.04.005.
    1. Lane SJ, Heddle NM, Arnold E, Walker I. A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making. 2006;6:23.
    1. Berlin A, Sorani M, Sim I. A taxonomic description of computer-based clinical decision support systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2006;39:656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.003.
    1. Holubar S, Harvey-Banchik L. A review of the use of handheld computers in medical nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22:428–435. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022004428.
    1. Kho A, Henderson LE, Dressler DD, Kripalani S. Use of handheld computers in medical education. A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2006;21:531–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00444.x.
    1. Curioso WH, Mechael PN. Enhancing 'M-health' with south-to-south collaborations. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:264–267. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1057.
    1. Consulting VW. mHealth for Development: The Opportunity of Mobile Technology for Healthcare in the Developing World. Washington D.C. and Berkshire, UK; 2009.
    1. Mechael PN, Batavia H, Kaonga N, Searle S, Kwan A, Fu L, Ossman J. Barriers and Gaps Affecting mHealth in Low and Middle Income Countries: Policy White Paper. Center for Global Health and Economic Development, Earth Institute, Columbia University; 2010.
    1. ITU. Mobile overtakes fixed: Implications for policy and regulation. ITU International Telecommunications Union; 2003.
    1. Orbicom-ITU. From the digital divide to digital opportunities: measuring infostates for development. Canada; 2005.
    1. Banks K, Burge R. Mobile Phones: An Appropriate Tool for Conservation and Development? Cambridge, UK; 2004.
    1. Hamilton J. Are main lines and mobile phones substitutes or complements? Evidence from Africa. Telecommunications Policy. 2003;27:109–133. doi: 10.1016/S0308-5961(02)00089-7.
    1. Donner J. Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World: A Review of the Literature. Information Society. 2008;24:140–159. doi: 10.1080/01972240802019970.
    1. Car J, Gurol-Urganci I, de Jongh T, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at scheduled healthcare appointments. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008.
    1. de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging telemedicine for facilitating self management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008.
    1. Gurol-Urganci I, de Jongh T, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008.
    1. Upadhyay N, Kokalj Kokot M, Kokalj Kokot M, Car J, Svab I. Mobile phone messaging - a telemedicine for people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007.
    1. Vodopivec-Jamsek V, de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Atun R, Car J. Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008.
    1. Whittaker R, Borland R, Bullen C, Lin Ruey B, McRobbie H, Rodgers A. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009.
    1. Lim MS, Hocking JS, Hellard ME, Aitken CK. SMS STI: a review of the uses of mobile phone text messaging in sexual health. Int J STD AIDS. 2008;19:287–290. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007264.
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
    1. World Bank Country and Lending Groups.
    1. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX; 2009.
    1. Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG. Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3:iii–92.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera