Phase IV, open-label, randomized study of low-dose recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone protocols for ovulation induction

Gamal I Serour, Mohamed Aboulghar, Awatef Al Bahar, Jean-Noel Hugues, Khaled Esmat, Gamal I Serour, Mohamed Aboulghar, Awatef Al Bahar, Jean-Noel Hugues, Khaled Esmat

Abstract

Background: This Phase IV, open-label, multicentre, randomized study (MEnTOR) compared two low-dose recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) protocols for ovulation induction.

Methods: This study was conducted in six Middle Eastern countries between March 2009 and March 2011. Eligible women (18-37 years), with World Health Organization Group II anovulatory infertility, were randomized to receive r-hFSH (starting daily dose: 75 IU) as a chronic low-dose (CLD) (37.5 IU dose increase on Day 14) or low-dose (LD) (37.5 IU dose increase on Day 7) protocol if no follicles were ≥ 10 mm. The maximum r-hFSH daily dose permitted was 225 IU/day. The total length of ovarian stimulation could not exceed 35 days, unless ultrasound assessment suggested imminent follicular growth and maturation. Patients underwent only one treatment cycle. Primary endpoint: incidence of mono-follicular development. Secondary endpoints included: stimulation duration and rates of bi-follicular development; human chorionic gonadotrophin administration rate; clinical pregnancy; and cycle cancellation (owing to inadequate response). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The primary efficacy analysis was performed using data from all patients who received at least one dose of correct study medication, had at least one efficacy assessment, and no protocol violations at treatment start (CLD group, n=122; LD group, n=125).

Results: Mono-follicular development rates (primary endpoint) were similar in both groups (CLD: 56.6% [69/122] versus LD: 55.2% [69/125], p=0.93; primary efficacy analysis population). Similarly, there were no significant differences between groups in bi-follicular development, clinical pregnancy or cycle cancellation (inadequate response) rates. In patients who received human chorionic gonadotrophin injections, the mean duration of stimulation was 13.7 days in the CLD group and 12.9 days in the LD group. Clinical pregnancy rates for those patients who received an hCG injection were similar in both groups (CLD: 20.2% [19/94] versus LD: 19.8% [18/91], p=0.94; primary efficacy analysis population). Most AEs were mild in severity. Only one case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was reported (mild; CLD group).

Conclusions: Efficacy and safety outcomes were similar for the two protocols.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081626.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment protocols. aWhen the leading follicle reached ≥17 mm and no more than two follicles had reached >14 mm, a single dose of hCG was injected to trigger ovulation. bDuration of ovarian stimulation could not exceed 35 days, unless ultrasound assessment suggested imminent follicular growth and maturation. The maximum permitted daily dose of r-hFSH was 225 IU. Ovarian response was monitored by TVUS every 7 days until a follicle of ≥10 mm was observed, and then scheduled according to local practice. hCG = human chorionic gonadotrophin; IU, international units; r-hFSH = recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone; TVUS, trans-vaginal ultrasound.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient disposition. Patients were considered to have had an under-response if there was failure to develop at least one follicle of 10–12 mm in diameter after 35 days of r-hFSH stimulation. Patients were considered to have had an over-response if they developed more than three follicles of >14 mm in diameter and/or their E2 levels were >900 pg/mL after 35 days of r-hFSH stimulation. AFC = antral follicle count; BMI = body mass index; CLD = chronic low-dose; E2 = oestradiol; hCG = human chorionic gonadotrophin; LD = low-dose; PP = per-protocol; PRL = prolactin; r-hFSH = recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone.

References

    1. Hamilton-Fairley D, Taylor A. Anovulation. Br Med J. 2003;327:546–549. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.546.
    1. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EA, Valkenburg O, Laven JS, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC. PCOS according to the Rotterdam consensus criteria: change in prevalence among WHO-II anovulation and association with metabolic factors. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:1210–1217. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01008.x.
    1. Eijkemans MJ, Polinder S, Mulders AG, Laven JS, Habbema JD, Fauser BC. Individualized cost-effective conventional ovulation induction treatment in normogonadotrophic anovulatory infertility (WHO group 2) Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2830–2837. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei164.
    1. van Santbrink EJ, Fauser BC. Ovulation induction in normogonadotropic anovulation (PCOS) Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;20:261–270. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2006.03.002.
    1. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Mono-ovulatory cycles: a key goal in profertility programmes. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:263–274. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg020.
    1. Hugues JN, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Avril C, Bulwa S, Herve F, Uzan M. Sequential step-up and step-down dose regimen: an alternative method for ovulation induction with follicle-stimulating hormone in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2581–2584. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019173.
    1. Hedon B, Hugues JN, Emperaire JC, Chabaud JJ, Barbereau D, Boujenah A, Howles CM, Truong F. A comparative prospective study of a chronic low dose versus a conventional ovulation stimulation regimen using recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone in anovulatory infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2688–2692. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2688.
    1. Homburg R, Howles CM. Low-dose FSH therapy for anovulatory infertility associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: rationale, results, reflections and refinements. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5:493–499. doi: 10.1093/humupd/5.5.493.
    1. Hugues JN, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Howles CM, Amram M, Angelini A, Balen A, Barbereau D, Birkhauser M, Boujenah A, De LV. et al.The use of a decremental dose regimen in patients treated with a chronic low-dose step-up protocol for WHO Group II anovulation: a prospective randomized multicentre study. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2817–2822. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del265.
    1. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1856–1864. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1856.
    1. Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Rocha IA, Martins WP. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology and prevention. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:121–128. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9387-6.
    1. Brown JB. Pituitary control of ovarian function–concepts derived from gonadotrophin therapy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978;18:46–54.
    1. Schoemaker J, van Weissenbruch MM, Scheele F, van der Meer M. The FSH threshold concept in clinical ovulation induction. Baillière’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;7:297–308. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3552(05)80132-4.
    1. Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, Faessen GH, Bouchard P, Giudice LC, Fauser BC. Prediction of the individual follicle-stimulating hormone threshold for gonadotropin induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic anovulatory infertility: an approach to increase safety and efficiency. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:83–90.
    1. Nyboe Andersen A, Balen A, Platteau P, Devroey P, Helmgaard L, Arce JC. Predicting the FSH threshold dose in women with WHO Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or conceive on clomiphene citrate. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1424–1430. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den089.
    1. Howles CM, Alam V, Tredway D, Homburg R, Warne DW. Factors related to successful ovulation induction in patients with WHO group II anovulatory infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.017.
    1. Bruna-Catalan I, Menabrito M. Ovulation induction with minimal dose of follitropin alfa: a case series study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:142. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-142.
    1. Bassett RM, Driebergen R. Continued improvements in the quality and consistency of follitropin alfa, recombinant human FSH. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:169–177. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60937-6.
    1. Hugues JN, Barlow DH, Rosenwaks Z, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Robson S, Pidoux L, Loumaye E. Improvement in consistency of response to ovarian stimulation with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone resulting from a new method for calibrating the therapeutic preparation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:185–190. doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61709-9.
    1. The management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RCOG Guideline Number 5. .
    1. Yeko T, Pasqualini SR, Alam V, Tredway D. Cumulative ovulation and pregnancy rates according to recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) dosing: comparison of a new formulation of follitropin alfa in vials versus the standard formulation of follitropin alfa in ampules. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:S119.
    1. Fauser BC, Diedrich K, Devroey P. Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:1–14.
    1. Mulders AG, Laven JS, Eijkemans MJ, Hughes EG, Fauser BC. Patient predictors for outcome of gonadotrophin ovulation induction in women with normogonadotrophic anovulatory infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:429–449. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg035.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera