A matched pair cluster randomized implementation trail to measure the effectiveness of an intervention package aiming to decrease perinatal mortality and increase institution-based obstetric care among indigenous women in Guatemala: study protocol

Edgar Kestler, Dilys Walker, Anabelle Bonvecchio, Sandra Sáenz de Tejada, Allan Donner, Edgar Kestler, Dilys Walker, Anabelle Bonvecchio, Sandra Sáenz de Tejada, Allan Donner

Abstract

Background: Maternal and perinatal mortality continue to be a high priority problem on the health agendas of less developed countries. Despite the progress made in the last decade to quantify the magnitude of maternal mortality, few interventions have been implemented with the intent to measure impact directly on maternal or perinatal deaths. The success of interventions implemented in less developed countries to reduce mortality has been questioned, in terms of the tendency to maintain a clinical perspective with a focus on purely medical care separate from community-based approaches that take cultural and social aspects of maternal and perinatal deaths into account. Our innovative approach utilizes both the clinical and community perspectives; moreover, our study will report the weight that each of these components may have had on reducing perinatal mortality and increasing institution-based deliveries.

Methods/design: A matched pair cluster-randomized trial will be conducted in clinics in four rural indigenous districts with the highest maternal mortality ratios in Guatemala. The individual clinic will serve as the unit of randomization, with 15 matched pairs of control and intervention clinics composing the final sample. Three interventions will be implemented in indigenous, rural and poor populations: a simulation training program for emergency obstetric and perinatal care, increased participation of the professional midwife in strengthening the link between traditional birth attendants (TBA) and the formal health care system, and a social marketing campaign to promote institution-based deliveries. No external intervention is planned for control clinics, although enhanced monitoring, surveillance and data collection will occur throughout the study in all clinics throughout the four districts. All obstetric events occurring in any of the participating health facilities and districts during the 18 months implementation period will be included in the analysis, controlling for the cluster design. Our main outcome measures will be the change in perinatal mortality and in the proportion of institution-based deliveries.

Discussion: A unique feature of this protocol is that we are not proposing an individual intervention, but rather a package of interventions, which is designed to address the complexities and realities of maternal and perinatal mortality in developing countries. To date, many other countries, has focused its efforts to decrease maternal mortality indirectly by improving infrastructure and data collection systems rather than on implementing specific interventions to directly improve outcomes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov,http://NCT01653626.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of perinatal intervention package trial phases.

References

    1. Hogan MC, Foreman KJ, Naghavi M, Ahn SY, Wang M, Makela SM, Lopez AD, Lozano R, Murray CJ. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millenium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1609–1623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60518-1.
    1. World Health Organization. Maternal Mortality in 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. (Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and the World Bank).
    1. Mesoamerican Health Initiative. Strategic Assessment of Maternal, Neonatal and Reproductive Health in Mesoamerica: Current Situations and Trends. Cuernavaca, Mexico: National Institute of Public Health of Mexico/Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation/California Institute of Public Health; 2009. pp. 12–18.
    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2009. New York: United Nations; 2009.
    1. Campbell OM, Graham WJ. Lancet Maternal Survival Series Steering Group. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284–1299. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.
    1. Koblinsky MA, Campbell O, Heichelheim J. Organizing delivery care: what works for safe motherhood? Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(5):399–406.
    1. The World Bank. Guatemala Maternal and Infant Health and Nutrition. (World Bank Project Database P077756). .
    1. Victora CG, Rubens CE. GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (4 of 7): delivery of interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S4.
    1. Padmanathan, Indra, Jerker Liljestrand JO, Martins M, Lalini, Rajapaksa, Craig Lissner, de Silva A, Swarna S, Prabha Joginder S. Investing in Maternal Health: Learning from Malaysia and Sri Lanka. Washington, D.C: World Bank; 2003. (Health, Nutrition, and Population Series, Human Development Network).
    1. Segeplan/MSPAS. Estudio Nacional de Mortalidad Materna 2007. Guatemala; 2011. p. 118.
    1. Maine D. Safe Motherhood Programs: Options and Issues. New York: Columbia University Center for Population and Family Health; 1991.
    1. Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman L, Fry D, Lobis S. The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;88:181–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.026.
    1. Haddad B, Sibai B. Expectant Management in pregnancies with severe Pre-eclampsia. Sem Perinatol. 2009;33(3):143–151. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.002.
    1. Bahl R, Qazi S, Darmstadt GL, Martines J. Why is continuum of care from home to health facilities essential to improve perinatal survival? Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(6):477–485. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.001.
    1. Ministry of Health and Social Assistance (Guatemala), University of Valle (Guatemala) and Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guatemala Reproductive Health Survey 2008–2009. Atlanta: United States: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); 2010.
    1. Lassi ZS, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11 CD007754.
    1. Hinojosa S. Vectors of contention in highland maya midwifery. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:637–651. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.011.
    1. Foster J, Anderson A, Houston J, Maya D. A report of a midwifery model for training traditional midwives in Guatemala. Midwifery. 2004;20:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.01.004.
    1. Goldman N, Glei D. Evaluation of midwifery (TBAs) care: results from a survey in rural Guatemala. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:685–700. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00065-5.
    1. Glei D, Goldman N, Rodriguez G. Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: Does obstetrical need matter? Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:2447–2463.
    1. Jonathan N. Remaking the Guatemalan midwife: Health care reform and midwifery training programs in highland Guatemala. Medical Anthropology. 2008;27(4):353–382. doi: 10.1080/01459740802427679.
    1. Nyamtema AS, Urassa DP, van Roosmalen J. Maternal health interventions in resource limited countries: a systematic review of packages, impacts and factors for change. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-30.
    1. Osrin D, Prost A. Perinatal interventions and survival in resource-poor settings: which work, which don’t, which have the jury out? Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:1039–1046. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.179366.
    1. Haws R, Thomas AL, Bhutta ZA, Darmstadt GL. Impact of packaged interventions on neonatal health: a review of the evidence. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22(4):193–215. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czm009.
    1. Church BC. Behavior Change Interventions for Safe Motherhood: Common Problems. USAID/JHPIEGO: Unique Solutions; 2004.
    1. Schooley J, Mundt C, Wagner P, Fullerton J, O’Donnell M. Factors influencing health care-seeking behaviours among Mayan women in Guatemala. Midwifery. 2009;25(4):411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.011.
    1. Hurtado E, The MotherCare/Guatemala Project. Overview of IEC Strategies and Lessons Learned. Guatemala City. New York: USAID/John Snow, Inc./MotherCare Proyecto de Salud Materna Perinatal; 1999. .
    1. Overcoming Cultural Barriers and Improving Health Care for Guatemala’s Underserved: USAID/Calidad en Salud Project. 2010. .
    1. Pasha O, Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S, Goudar SS, Althabe F, Patel A, Esamai F, Garces A, Chomba E. Communities, birth attendants and health facilities: a continuum of emergency maternal and newborn care (the Global Network’s EmONC trial) BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-82.
    1. Lee AC, Lawn JE, Cousens S, Kumar V, Osrin D, Bhutta ZA, Wall SN, Nandakumar AK, Syed U, Darmstadt GL. Linking families and facilities for care at birth: What works to avert intrapartum-related deaths? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107(Suppl 1):S65–S88.
    1. Walker DM, Cohen SR, Estrada F, Monterroso ME, Jenny A, Fritz J, Fahey JO. PRONTO training for obstetric and neonatal emergencies in Mexico. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;116(2):128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.021.
    1. Davenport A. In: Essential Midwifery Practice: Expertise Leadership and Collaborative Working. Downe S, Byrom S, Simpson L, editor. Oxford, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. What is a skilled birth attendant? Insights from South America; pp. 135–152.
    1. Grier S, Bryant CA. Social marketing in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:319–339. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610.
    1. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Barnes MD, McKenzie JF. Positioning social marketing as a planning process for health education. AJHS. 2003;18(2/3):75–81.
    1. Rothschild ML. Using social marketing to manage population health performance. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(5):A96.
    1. Sibley L, Sipe TA, Koblinsky M. Does traditional birth attendant training improve referral of women with obstetric complications? A review of the evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1757–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.009.
    1. World Health Organization. Working with Individuals, Families and Communities to Improve Maternal and Newborn Health. Geneva: World Health Organization Department of Making Pregnancy Safer; 2010.
    1. Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. WHO working group on maternal mortality and morbidity classifications. Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007.
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. New York: Wiley; 2000. Section 6.3.3.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera