Ultrasound-assisted peripheral venous access in young children: a randomized controlled trial and pilot feasibility study

Aaron E Bair, John S Rose, Cheryl W Vance, Emily Andrada-Brown, Nathan Kuppermann, Aaron E Bair, John S Rose, Cheryl W Vance, Emily Andrada-Brown, Nathan Kuppermann

Abstract

Objectives: Intravenous (IV) access in children treated in the emergency department (ED) is frequently required and often difficult to obtain. While it has been shown that ultrasound can be useful in adults for both central and peripheral venous access, research regarding children has been limited. We sought to determine if the use of a static ultrasound technique could, a) allow clinicians to visualize peripheral veins and b) improve success rates of peripheral venous cannulation in young children in the ED.

Methods: We performed a randomized clinical trial of children < 7 years in an academic pediatric ED who required IV access and who had failed the first IV attempt. We randomized patients to either continued standard IV attempts or ultrasound-assisted attempts. Clinicians involved in the study received one hour of training in ultrasound localization of peripheral veins. In the ultrasound group, vein localization was performed by an ED physician who marked the skin overlying the target vessel. Intravenous cannulation attempts were then immediately performed by a pediatric ED nurse who relied on the skin mark for vessel location. We allowed for technique cross-over after two failed IV attempts. We recorded success rate and location of access attempts. We compared group success rates using differences in 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: We enrolled 44 children over a one-year period. The median age of enrollees was 9.5 months. We visualized peripheral veins in all patients in the ultrasound group (n=23) and in those who crossed over to ultrasound after failed standard technique attempts (n= 8). Venipuncture was successful on the first attempt in the ultrasound group in 13/23 (57%, CI, 35% to 77%), versus 12/21 (57%, CI, 34% to 78%) in the standard group, difference between groups 0.6% (95% CI -30% to 29%). First attempt cannulation success in the ultrasound group was 8/23 (35%, CI, 16% to 57%), versus 6/21 (29%, CI, 11% to 52%) in the standard group, difference between groups 6% (95% CI -21% to 34%).

Conclusion: Ultrasound allows physicians to visualize peripheral veins of young children in the ED. We were unable to demonstrate, however, a clinically important benefit to a static ultrasound aided vein cannulation technique performed by clinicians with limited ultrasound training over standard technique after one failed IV attempt in an academic pediatric ED.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomization scheme
Figure 2
Figure 2
The static “ no touch” technique. Note the thick ridge of acoustic gel between the transducer and the patient’s skin. The thick layer of gel improves vessel visualization and ensures that the target vein will not be inadvertently compressed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ultrasound image of target vessel
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diagram of patient flow through the trial

References

    1. Brunette DD, Fischer R. Intravascular access in pediatric cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 1988;6:577–579.
    1. Rossetti V, et al. Difficulty and delay in intravenous access in pediatric arrests. Ann Emerg Med. 1984;13:406.
    1. Lozon MM. Pediatric Vascular Access and Blood Sampling Techniques. In: Roberts J, Hedges J, editors. Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2004. pp. 357–383.
    1. Hudson PA, Rose JS. Real-time ultrasound guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15:79–82.
    1. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation. 1993;87:1557–1562.
    1. Rothschild J. Ultrasound Guidance of Central Vein Catheterization. AHRQ. 2001. [Accessed October 2003]. Available at: .
    1. Abboud PA, Kendall JK. Ultrasound guidance for vascular access. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004;22:749–773.
    1. Costantino TG, et al. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46:456–461.
    1. Brannam L, Blaivas M, Lyon M, Flake M. Emergency nurses’ utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1361–1363.
    1. Keyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, Simon BC, Christy D. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;34:711–714.
    1. Schnadower D, Lin S, Perera P, Smerling A, Dayan P. A pilot study of ultrasound analysis before pediatric peripheral vein cannulation attempt. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:483–485.
    1. Goren A, Laufer J, Yativ N, Kuint J, Ben Ackon M, Rubinshtein M, Paret G, Augarten A. Transillumination of the palm for venipuncture in infants. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17:130–131.
    1. Atalay H, et al. The use of transillumination for peripheral venous access in paediatric anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiology. 2005;22:317–318.
    1. Vaksmann G, et al. Nitroglycerine ointment as aid to venous cannulation in children. J Pediatr. 1987;111:89–91.
    1. Maynard EC, Oh W. Topical nitroglycerin ointment as an aid to insertion of peripheral venous catheters in neonates. J Pediatr. 1989;114:474–476.
    1. Lenhardt R, et al. Local warming and insertion of peripheral venous cannulas: single blinded prospective randomised controlled trial and single blinded randomised crossover trial. BMJ. 2002;325:409–410.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera