Amblyopia treatment of adults with dichoptic training using the virtual reality oculus rift head mounted display: preliminary results

Peter Žiak, Anders Holm, Juraj Halička, Peter Mojžiš, David P Piñero, Peter Žiak, Anders Holm, Juraj Halička, Peter Mojžiš, David P Piñero

Abstract

Background: The gold standard treatments in amblyopia are penalizing therapies, such as patching or blurring vision with atropine that are aimed at forcing the use of the amblyopic eye. However, in the last years, new therapies are being developed and validated, such as dichoptic visual training, aimed at stimulating the amblyopic eye and eliminating the interocular supression.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of dichoptic visual training using a virtual reality head mounted display in a sample of anisometropic amblyopic adults and to evaluate the potential usefulness of this option of treatment.

Methods: A total of 17 subjects (10 men, 7 women) with a mean age of 31.2 years (range, 17-69 year) and anisometropic amblyopia were enrolled. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and stereoacuity (Stereo Randot graded circle test) changes were evaluated after 8 sessions (40 min per session) of dichoptic training with the computer game Diplopia Game (Vivid Vision) run in the Oculus Rift OC DK2 virtual reality head mounted display (Oculus VR).

Results: Mean BCVA in amblyopic eye improved significantly from a logMAR value of 0.58 ± 0.35 before training to a post-training value of 0.43 ± 0.38 (p < 0.01). Forty-seven percent of the participants achieved BCVA of 20/40 or better after the training as compared to 30% before the training. Mean stereoacuity changed from a value of 263.3 ± 135.1 before dichoptic training to a value of 176.7 ± 152.4 s of arc after training (p < 0.01). A total of 8 patients (47.1%) before dichoptic treatment had unmeasurable stereoacuity while this only occurred in 2 patients (11.8%) after training.

Conclusions: Dichoptic training using a virtual reality head mounted display seems to be an effective option of treatment in adults with anisometropic amblyopia. Future clinical trials are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence.

Trial registration: Trial ID: ISRCTN62086471 . Date registered: 13/06/2017. Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Amblyopia; Dichoptic training; Oculus rift; Stereopsis; Virtual reality.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants in this study provided consent to participate. The parents or guardians provided consent for participants under the age of 18.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committe of Jessenius Medical School, Commenius University in Martin (date of approval: 08/03/2016; reference number: EK 1795/2016)

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Oculus Rift DK2 setup. On the LCD screen what patient sees inside head mounted display is shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of the dichoptic training game seen through the oculus rift head mounted display in virtual reality. The amblyopic eye views the left half of the display in which the patient sees the correct color of the gates in order to flight spaceship throught the blue gates. Spaceship is seen only with the dominant eye, the right part of the figure
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with the treatment for each patient evaluated
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of best corrected visual acuity data in the analyzed sample before and after visual traning
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Change in stereoacuity with the treatment for each patient evaluated
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Distribution of stereoacuity data in the analyzed sample before and after visual traning

References

    1. Holmes JM, Clarke MP. Amblyopia. Lancet. 2006;367(9519):1343–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4.
    1. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol. 1965;28:1029–1040.
    1. Wu C, Hunter DG. Amblyopia: diagnostic and therapeutic options. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.060.
    1. Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I, Study Team ALSPAC. Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:988–993. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.8.988.
    1. Loudon SE, Simonsz HJ. The history of the treatment of amblyopia. Strabismus. 2005;13:93–106. doi: 10.1080/09273970590949818.
    1. Holmes JM, Lazar EL, Melia BM, Astle WF, Dagi LR, Donahue SP, Frazier MG, Hertle RW, Repka MX, Quinn GE, Weise KK. Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129:1451–1457. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.179.
    1. Vereecken EP, Brabant P. Prognosis for vision in amblyopia after the loss of the good eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:220–224. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030170019.
    1. El Mallah MK, Chakravarthy U, Hart PM. Amblyopia: is visual loss permanent? Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:952–956. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.9.952.
    1. Rahi JS, Logan S, Cortina-Borja M, Timms C, Russel-Eggit I, Taylor D. Prediction of improved vision in the amblyopic eye after visual loss in the non-amblyopic eye. Lancet. 2002;360(9333):621–622. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09775-1.
    1. Restani L, Cerri C, Pietrasanta M, Gianfranceschi L, Maffei L, Caleo M. Functional masking of deprived eye responses by callosal input during ocular dominance plasticity. Neuron. 2009;64:707–718. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.019.
    1. Li J, Thompson B, Deng D, Chan L.Y.L, Yu M, Hess RF. Dichoptic training enables the adult amblyopic brain to learn. Curr Biol 2013; 23: 308–309.
    1. Li RW, Ngo C, Nguyen J, Levi DM. Video-game play induces plasticity in the visual system of adults with amblyopia. PLoS Biol. 2011;9(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001135.
    1. Cotter SA. Pediatric eye disease investigator group, Edwards AR, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, Birch EE, Donahue SP, Everett DF, Felius J, Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Melia M, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI. Weise KK Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive correction Ophthalmology. 2006;113:895–903.
    1. Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group., Edwards AR, Cotter SA, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, Birch EE, Donahue SP, Everett DF, Felius J, Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Melia M, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Weise KK. A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 904–912.
    1. Birch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;33:67–84. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.11.001.
    1. Stewart CE, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Moseley MJ, Cooperative M. Modeling dose-response in amblyopia: toward a child-specific treatment plan. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2589–2594. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1243.
    1. Li SL, Reynaud A, Hess RF, Wang YZ, Jost RM, Morale SE, De La Cruz A, Dao L, Stager D, Jr, Birch EE. Dichoptic movie viewing treats childhood amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2015;19:401–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.08.003.
    1. Tan DT, Fong A. Efficacy of neural vision therapy to enhance contrast sensitivity function and visual acuity in low myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:570–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.052.
    1. Verma A, Singh D. Active vision therapy for pseudophakic amblyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:1089–1094. doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80086-7.
    1. Spiegel DP, Li J, Hess RF, Byblow WD, Deng D, Yu M, Thompson B. Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances recovery of stereopsis in adults with amblyopia. Neurotherapeutics. 2013;10:831–839. doi: 10.1007/s13311-013-0200-y.
    1. Levi DM, Li RW. Improving the performance of the amblyopic visual system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 2009;364(1515):399–407. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0203.
    1. Brown HDH, Woodall RL, Kitching RE, Baseler HA, Morland AB. Using magnetic resonance imaging to assess visual deficits: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2016;36:240–265. doi: 10.1111/opo.12293.
    1. Hess RF, Thompson B, Black JM. An iPod treatment of amblyopia: an updated binocular approach. Optometry. 2012;83:87–94.
    1. Goodman LK, Black JM, Phillips G, Hess RF, Thompson B. Excitatory binocular interactions in two cases of alternating strabismus. J AAPOS. 2011;15:345–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.03.017.
    1. To L. Thompson B, Blum JE. A game platform for treatment of amblyopia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011;19:280–289. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2115255.
    1. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B. Restoration of binocular vision in amblyopia. Strabismus. 2011;19:110–118. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2011.600418.
    1. Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B. A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010;28:793–802.
    1. Fulvio J, Wang M, Rokers B. Head tracking in virtual reality displays reduces the misperception of 3D motion. J Vis. 2015;15:1180. doi: 10.1167/15.12.1180.
    1. Bavelier D, Green SC, Pouget A, Schrater P. Brain plasticity through the life span:learning to learn and action video games. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2002;35:39–46.
    1. Li RW, Provost A, Levi DM. Extended perceptual learning results in substantial recovery of positional acuity and visual acuity in juvenile amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5046–5051. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0324.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera