Health Coaching Reduces HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetic Patients From a Lower-Socioeconomic Status Community: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Noah Wayne, Daniel F Perez, David M Kaplan, Paul Ritvo, Noah Wayne, Daniel F Perez, David M Kaplan, Paul Ritvo

Abstract

Background: Adoptions of health behaviors are crucial for maintaining good health after type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) diagnoses. However, adherence to glucoregulating behaviors like regular exercise and balanced diet can be challenging, especially for people living in lower-socioeconomic status (SES) communities. Providing cost-effective interventions that improve self-management is important for improving quality of life and the sustainability of health care systems.

Objective: To evaluate a health coach intervention with and without the use of mobile phones to support health behavior change in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: In this noninferiority, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients from two primary care health centers in Toronto, Canada, with type 2 diabetes and a glycated hemoglobin/hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of ≥7.3% (56.3 mmol/mol) were randomized to receive 6 months of health coaching with or without mobile phone monitoring support. We hypothesized that both approaches would result in significant HbA1c reductions, although health coaching with mobile phone monitoring would result in significantly larger effects. Participants were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months (difference between and within groups). Other outcomes included weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), satisfaction with life, depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), positive and negative affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule [PANAS]), and quality of life (Short Form Health Survey-12 [SF-12]).

Results: A total of 138 patients were randomized and 7 were excluded for a substudy; of the remaining 131, 67 were allocated to the intervention group and 64 to the control group. Primary outcome data were available for 97 participants (74.0%). While both groups reduced their HbA1c levels, there were no significant between-group differences in change of HbA1c at 6 months using intention-to-treat (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) (P=.48) or per-protocol (P=.83) principles. However, the intervention group did achieve an accelerated HbA1c reduction, leading to a significant between-group difference at 3 months (P=.03). This difference was reduced at the 6-month follow-up as the control group continued to improve, achieving a reduction of 0.81% (8.9 mmol/mol) (P=.001) compared with a reduction of 0.84% (9.2 mmol/mol)(P=.001) in the intervention group. Intervention group participants also had significant decreases in weight (P=.006) and waist circumference (P=.01) while controls did not. Both groups reported improvements in mood, satisfaction with life, and quality of life.

Conclusions: Health coaching with and without access to mobile technology appeared to improve glucoregulation and mental health in a lower-SES, T2DM population. The accelerated improvement in the mobile phone group suggests the connectivity provided may more quickly improve adoption and adherence to health behaviors within a clinical diabetes management program. Overall, health coaching in primary care appears to lead to significant benefits for patients from lower-SES communities with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02036892; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02036892 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6b3cJYJOD).

Keywords: RCT; diabetes mellitus, type 2; health coaching; mHealth; randomized controlled trial; telehealth.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None Declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental design and timing of data collection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of blood glucose tracker on the Connected Wellness Platform from NexJ Systems, Inc.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screenshot of exercise tracker on the Connected Wellness Platform from NexJ Systems, Inc.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screenshot of food tracker on the Connected Wellness Platform from NexJ Systems, Inc.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Screenshot of mood tracker on the Connected Wellness Platform from NexJ Systems, Inc.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Flowchart of enrollment.
Figure 7
Figure 7
HbA1c levels for the control and intervention groups over time.

References

    1. Krishna S, Boren SA, Balas EA. Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Apr;15(3):231–240. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0099.
    1. Huffman M. Health coaching: a new and exciting technique to enhance patient self-management and improve outcomes. Home Healthc Nurse. 2007 Apr;25(4):271–274. doi: 10.1097/01.NHH.0000267287.84952.8f.
    1. Wayne N, Ritvo P. Smartphone-enabled health coach intervention for people with diabetes from a modest socioeconomic strata community: single-arm longitudinal feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e149. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3180.
    1. Moore JO, Marshall MA, Judge DC, Moss FH, Gilroy SJ, Crocker JB, Zusman RM. Technology-supported apprenticeship in the management of hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2014 Mar;21(3):110–122.
    1. Dinca-Panaitescu S, Dinca-Panaitescu M, Bryant T, Daiski I, Pilkington B, Raphael D. Diabetes prevalence and income: results of the Canadian Community Health Survey. Health Policy. 2011 Feb;99(2):116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.07.018.
    1. Saydah SH, Imperatore G, Beckles GL. Socioeconomic status and mortality: contribution of health care access and psychological distress among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):49–55. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1864.
    1. Booth GL, Creatore MI, Moineddin R, Gozdyra P, Weyman JT, Matheson FI, Glazier RH. Unwalkable neighborhoods, poverty, and the risk of diabetes among recent immigrants to Canada compared with long-term residents. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):302–308. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0777.
    1. Konttinen H, Sarlio-Lähteenkorva S, Silventoinen K, Männistö S, Haukkala A. Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities. Public Health Nutr. 2013 May;16(5):873–882. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012003540.
    1. Alter DA, Stukel T, Chong A, Henry D. Lesson from Canada's Universal Care: socially disadvantaged patients use more health services, still have poorer health. Health Affairs. 2011 Feb;30(2):274–283. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0669.
    1. Holmen H, Torbjørnsen A, Wahl AK, Jenum AK, Småstuen MC, Arsand E, Ribu L. A mobile health intervention for self-management and lifestyle change for persons with type 2 diabetes, part 2: one-year results from the Norwegian randomized controlled trial RENEWING HEALTH. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;2(4):e57. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3882.
    1. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada. 2013. [2015-06-26]. .
    1. Rocco A, Heuschmann PU, Schellinger PD, Köhrmann M, Diedler J, Sykora M, Nolte CH, Ringleb P, Hacke W, Jüttler E. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1 predicts risk for symptomatic hemorrhage after thrombolysis for acute stroke. Stroke. 2013 Aug;44(8):2134–2138. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.675918.
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405–412.
    1. Riddle MC, Ambrosius WT, Brillon DJ, Buse JB, Byington RP, Cohen RM, Goff DC, Malozowski S, Margolis KL, Probstfield JL, Schnall A, Seaquist ER, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Investigators Epidemiologic relationships between A1C and all-cause mortality during a median 3.4-year follow-up of glycemic treatment in the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 May;33(5):983–990. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1278.
    1. Krebs JD, Bell D, Hall R, Parry-Strong A, Docherty PD, Clarke K, Chase JG. Improvements in glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity with a low-carbohydrate diet in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Nutr. 2013;32(1):11–17. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2013.767630.
    1. Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Wasserman DH, Castaneda-Sceppa C, White RD. Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jun;29(6):1433–1438. doi: 10.2337/dc06-9910.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, Peters AL, Tsapas A, Wender R, Matthews DR. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1364–1379. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0413.
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Chou C, Nocon RS, Chin MH, Peek ME. Mobile phone diabetes project led to improved glycemic control and net savings for Chicago plan participants. Health Aff. 2014 Feb;33(2):265–272. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0589.
    1. Pludwinski S, Ahmad F, Wayne N, Ritvo P. Participant experiences in a smartphone-based health coaching intervention for type 2 diabetes: A qualitative inquiry. J Telemed Telecare. 2015 Jul 21;:1–7. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15595178.
    1. Eysenbach G. CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.
    1. NexJ Connected Wellness. [2015-08-25].
    1. Lenters-Westra E, Slingerland RJ. Six of eight hemoglobin A1c point-of-care instruments do not meet the general accepted analytical performance criteria. Clin Chem. 2010 Jan;56(1):44–52. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.130641.
    1. Willard-Grace R, DeVore D, Chen EH, Hessler D, Bodenheimer T, Thom DH. The effectiveness of medical assistant health coaching for low-income patients with uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia: protocol for a randomized controlled trial and baseline characteristics of the study population. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-27.
    1. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
    1. Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29.
    1. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004 Sep;43(Pt 3):245–265. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934.
    1. Cheak-Zamora NC, Wyrwich KW, McBride TD. Reliability and validity of the SF-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):727–735. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9483-1.
    1. Research Randomizer. [2015-08-25].
    1. CANSIM (database) Ottawa, ON: Income Statistics Division, Statistics Canada; 2013. Jun 26, Table 202-0808 - Low income measures by income source and household size, 2011 constant dollars, annual (dollars) .
    1. Alegría M, Bijl RV, Lin E, Walters EE, Kessler RC. Income differences in persons seeking outpatient treatment for mental disorders: a comparison of the United States with Ontario and The Netherlands. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;57(4):383–391.
    1. Steele LS, Glazier RH, Lin E. Inequity in mental health care under Canadian universal health coverage. Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Mar;57(3):317–324. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.317.
    1. Martinez-Millana A, Fico G, Fernández-Llatas C, Traver V. Performance assessment of a closed-loop system for diabetes management. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Feb 11;:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11517-015-1245-3.
    1. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd edition. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2013.

Source: PubMed

3
Prenumerera