The role of social cognition in decision making

Chris D Frith, Tania Singer, Chris D Frith, Tania Singer

Abstract

Successful decision making in a social setting depends on our ability to understand the intentions, emotions and beliefs of others. The mirror system allows us to understand other people's motor actions and action intentions. 'Empathy' allows us to understand and share emotions and sensations with others. 'Theory of mind' allows us to understand more abstract concepts such as beliefs or wishes in others. In all these cases, evidence has accumulated that we use the specific neural networks engaged in processing mental states in ourselves to understand the same mental states in others. However, the magnitude of the brain activity in these shared networks is modulated by contextual appraisal of the situation or the other person. An important feature of decision making in a social setting concerns the interaction of reason and emotion. We consider four domains where such interactions occur: our sense of fairness, altruistic punishment, trust and framing effects. In these cases, social motivations and emotions compete with each other, while higher-level control processes modulate the interactions of these low-level biases.

References

    1. Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio A.R. The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature. 1998;393:470–474.
    1. Amodio D.M, Frith C.D. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006;7:268–277.
    1. Amodio D.M, Kubota J.T, Harmon-Jones E, Devine P.G. Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs. external cues. Social Cognit. Affect. Neurosci. 2006;1:26–36.
    1. Avenanti A, Paluello I.M, Bufalari I, Aglioti S.M. Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others' pain. Neuroimage. 2006;32:316–324.
    1. Bavelas J.B, Black A, Lemery C.R, Mullett J. I show how you feel—motor mimicry as a communicative act. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 1986;50:322–329.
    1. Bayliss A.P, Tipper S.P. Predictive gaze cues and personality judgments: should eye trust you? Psychol. Sci. 2006;17:514–520.
    1. Bechara A, Damasio A.R. The somatic marker hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ. Behav. 2005;52:336–372.
    1. Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H. Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain. 2000;123:2189–2202.
    1. Blakemore S.J, Bristow D, Bird G, Frith C, Ward J. Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. Brain. 2005;128:1571–1583.
    1. Blount S. When social outcomes aren't fair—the effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1995;63:131–144.
    1. Bowles S, Gintis H. Behavioural science—homo reciprocans. Nature. 2002;415:125.
    1. Bowles S, Gintis H. The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2004;65:17–28.
    1. Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S, Richerson P.J. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:3531–3535.
    1. Brunet E, Sarfati Y, Hardy-Bayle M.C, Decety J. A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. Neuroimage. 2000;11:157–166.
    1. Camerer C, Thaler R.H. Ultimatums, dictators and manners. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995;9:209–219.
    1. Castelli F, Happe F, Frith U, Frith C. Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage. 2000;12:314–325.
    1. Chartrand T.L, Bargh J.A. The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1999;76:893–910.
    1. Cheng Y, Lin C.P, Liu H.L, Hsu Y.Y, Lim K.E, Hung D, Decety J. Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1708–1713.
    1. Clark H.H. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, MA: 1996. Using language.
    1. Craig A.D. How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;3:655–666.
    1. Cunningham W.A, Johnson M.K, Raye C.L, Chris Gatenby J, Gore J.C, Banaji M.R. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychol. Sci. 2004;15:806–813.
    1. Damasio A.R. G. P. Putnam's Sons; New York, NY: 1994. Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain.
    1. De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan R.J, Buck A, Fehr E. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science. 2006;313:684–687.
    1. de Quervain D.J, Fischbacher U, Treyer V, Schellhammer M, Schnyder U, Buck A, Fehr E. The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science. 2004;305:1254–1258.
    1. de Vignemont F, Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006;10:435–441.
    1. Decety J, Jackson P.L. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 2004;3:71–100.
    1. Decety J, Lamm C. Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006;6:1146–1163.
    1. Delgado M.R. Reward-related responses in the human striatum. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2007;1104:70–88.
    1. Delgado M.R, Frank R.H, Phelps E.A. Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nat. Neurosci. 2005;8:1611–1618.
    1. Dennett D.C. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 1987. The intentional stance.
    1. Dinstein I, Hasson U, Rubin N, Heeger D.J. Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. J. Neurophysiol. 2007;98:1415–1427.
    1. Engel C, Singer W, editors. Better than conscious: exploiting the capacity of humans to reach decisions by both serial and parallel processing of information. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 2008.
    1. Eslinger P.J, Damasio A.R. Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation: patient EVR. Neurology. 1985;35:1731–1741.
    1. Evans J.S. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003;7:454–459.
    1. Fehr E, Camerer C.F. Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007;11:419–427.
    1. Fehr E, Gachter S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature. 2002;415:137–140.
    1. Fletcher P.C, Happé F, Frith U, Baker S.C, Dolan R.J, Frackowiak R.S, Frith C.D. Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition. 1995;57:109–128.
    1. Forsythe R, Horowitz J.L, Savin N.E, Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Game Econ. Behav. 1994;6:347–369.
    1. Frith C.D. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the selection of action as revealed by functional imaging. In: Monsell S, Driver J, editors. Control of cognitive processes. MIT Press; Cambrdige, MA: 2000. pp. 549–565.
    1. Frith U. Blackwells; Oxford, UK: 1989. Autism: explaining the enigma.
    1. Frith U, Frith C.D. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Phil. Trans R. Soc. B. 2003;358:459–473.
    1. Gallagher H.L, Happe F, Brunswick N, Fletcher P.C, Frith U, Frith C.D. Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia. 2000;38:11–21.
    1. Gallagher H.L, Jack A.I, Roepstorff A, Frith C.D. Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. Neuroimage. 2002;16:814–821.
    1. Gallese V. The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Phil. Trans R. Soc. B. 2003;358:517–528.
    1. Gintis H. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. J. Theor. Biol. 2000;206:169–179.
    1. Goodenough O.R, Prehn K. A neuroscientific approach to normative judgment in law and justice. Phil. Trans R Soc. B. 2004;359:1709–1726.
    1. Greene J.D, Sommerville R.B, Nystrom L.E, Darley J.M, Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science. 2001;293:2105–2108.
    1. Gurerk O, Irlenbusch B, Rockenbach B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science. 2006;312:108–111.
    1. Hoffman E, McCabe K, Smith V.L. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. Am. Econ. Rev. 1996;86:653–660.
    1. Hutchison W.D, Davis K.D, Lozano A.M, Tasker R.R, Dostrovsky J.O. Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 1999;2:403–405.
    1. Jackson P.L, Brunet E, Meltzoff A.N, Decety J. Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel pain. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:752–761.
    1. Jacob P, Jeannerod M. The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005;9:21–25.
    1. Keltner D, Buswell B.N. Embarrassment: its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychol. Bull. 1997;122:250–270.
    1. Keysers C, Wicker B, Gazzola V, Anton J.L, Fogassi L, Gallese V. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron. 2004;42:335–346.
    1. Kilner J.M, Marchant J.L, Frith C.D. Modulation of the mirror system by social relevance. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2006;1:143–148.
    1. Kilner J.M, Paulignan Y, Blakemore S.J. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr. Biol. 2003;13:522–525.
    1. Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E. Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science. 2006;314:829–832.
    1. Koenigs M, Tranel D. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the ultimatum game. J. Neurosci. 2007;27:951–956.
    1. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Cushman F, Hauser M, Damasio A. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature. 2007;446:908–911.
    1. Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak P.J, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature. 2005;435:673–676.
    1. Lakin J.L, Chartrand T.L. Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychol. Sci. 2003;14:334–339.
    1. Lamm C, Batson C.D, Decety J. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007;19:42–58.
    1. Levinson S.C. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, MA: 1983. Pragmatics.
    1. Loewenstein G. Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 2000;90:426–432.
    1. Mauss M. Routledge; London, UK: 1924. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaiques. First published by Presses Universitaires de France in ’Sociologie et Anthropologie’. English translation by W D Halls 1990.
    1. McCabe, K. & Singer, T. 2008 Brain signatures of social decision making. In Strüngmann Forum report: better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions (eds C. Engél & W. Singer), pp. 103–122. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    1. McCabe K, Houser D, Ryan L, Smith V, Trouard T. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:11 832–11 835.
    1. Mitchell J.P, Banaji M.R, Macrae C.N. The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005;17:1306–1315.
    1. Morris J.S, Frith C.D, Perrett D.I, Rowland D, Young A.W. A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions. Nature. 1996;383:812–815.
    1. Morrison I, Lloyd D, di Pellegrino G, Roberts N. Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: is empathy a multisensory issue? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004;4:270–278.
    1. Morrison I, Peelen M.V, Downing P.E. The sight of others' pain modulates motor processing in human cingulate cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2007;17:2214–2222.
    1. Nowak M.A, Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature. 1998a;393:573–577.
    1. Nowak M.A, Sigmund K. The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 1998b;194:561–574.
    1. Ochsner K.N, Gross J.J. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005;9:242–249.
    1. Ochsner K.N, Lieberman M.D. The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. Am. Psychol. 2001;56:717–734.
    1. Phelps E.A, O'Connor K.J, Cunningham W.A, Funayama E.S, Gatenby J.C, Gore J.C, Banaji M.R. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000;12:729–738.
    1. Phelps E.A, Thomas L.A. Race, behavior, and the brain: the role of neuroimaging in understanding complex social behaviors. Political Psychol. 2003;24:747–758.
    1. Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. 2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci.27, 169–190. [Discussion 90–226.]
    1. Premack D, Woodruff G. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1978;4:515–526.
    1. Preston, S. D. & de Waal, F. B. 2002 Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci, 25, 1–20. [Discussion -71.]
    1. Rilling J.K, Glenn A.L, Jairam M.R, Pagnoni G, Goldsmith D.R, Elfenbein H.A, Lilienfeld S.O. Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy. Biol. Psychiatry. 2007;61:1260–1271.
    1. Rilling J.K, Sanfey A.G, Aronson J.A, Nystrom L.E, Cohen J.D. The neural correlates of theory of mind within interpersonal interactions. Neuroimage. 2004;22:1694–1703.
    1. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004;27:169–192.
    1. Sally D, Hill E. The development of interpersonal strategy: autism, theory-of-mind, cooperation and fairness. J. Econ. Psychol. 2006;27:73–97.
    1. Sanfey A.G, Rilling J.K, Aronson J.A, Nystrom L.E, Cohen J.D. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science. 2003;300:1755–1758.
    1. Saver J.L, Damasio A.R. Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia. 1991;29:1241–1249.
    1. Saxe R. Uniquely human social cognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006;16:235–239.
    1. Saxe R, Kanwisher N. People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1835–1842.
    1. Scheufele D.A, Tewksbury D. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. J. Commun. 2007;57:9–20.
    1. Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W. Representing others' actions: just like one's own? Cognition. 2003;88:B11–B21.
    1. Sebanz N, Rebbechi D, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Frith C.D. Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing. Socal Neurosci. 2007;2:81–95.
    1. Sher S, McKenzie C.R.M. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition. 2006;101:467–494.
    1. Shiv B, Loewenstein G, Bechara A, Damasio H, Damasio A.R. Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psychol. Sci. 2005;16:435–439.
    1. Shweder R.A, Mahapatra M, Miller J.G. Culture and moral development. In: Stigler J.W, Shweder R.A, Herdt G, editors. Cultural psychology—essays on comparative human development. Cambridge University Press; New York, NY: 1990. pp. 130–204.
    1. Singer T, Fehr E. The neuroeconomics of mind reading and empathy. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005;95:340–345.
    1. Singer T, Kiebel S.J, Winston J.S, Dolan R.J, Frith C.D. Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron. 2004a;41:653–662.
    1. Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan R.J, Frith C.D. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004b;303:1157–1162.
    1. Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Stephan K.E, Dolan R.J, Frith C.D. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature. 2006;439:466–469.
    1. Smith A.The theory of moral sentiments1759A Millar, in the Strand; London, UK
    1. Stanley J, Gowen E, Miall R.C. Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2007;33:915–926.
    1. Todorov T. Living alone together. New Literary History. 1996;27:1–14.
    1. Tomlin D, Kayali M.A, King-Casas B, Anen C, Camerer C.F, Quartz S.R, Montague P.R. Agent-specific responses in the cingulate cortex during economic exchanges. Science. 2006;312:1047–1050.
    1. Tsai C.C, Brass M. Does the human motor system simulate pinocchio's actions? Coacting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychol. Sci. 2007;18:1058–1062.
    1. Tsai C.C, Kuo W.J, Jing J.T, Hung D.L, Tzeng O.J. A common coding framework in self-other interaction: evidence from joint action task. Exp. Brain Res. 2006;175:353–362.
    1. Tsushima Y, Sasaki Y, Watanabe T. Greater disruption due to failure of inhibitory control on an ambiguous distractor. Science. 2006;314:1786–1788.
    1. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–458.
    1. van Baaren R.B, Holland R.W, Kawakami K, van Knippenberg A. Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2004;15:71–74.
    1. Wedekind C, Milinski M. Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science. 2000;288:850–852.
    1. Wicker B, Keysers C, Plailly J, Royet J.P, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron. 2003;40:655–664.
    1. Winkielman, P. & Schooler, J. In press. Unconscious, conscious, and meta-conscious in social cognition. In Social cognition: The basis of human interaction, (eds F. Strack, J. Förster). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
    1. Winston J.S, Strange B.A, O'Doherty J, Dolan R.J. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:277–283.
    1. Zeitlyn D. Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections. Res. Policy. 2003;32:1287–1291.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera