Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults

C Frerk, V S Mitchell, A F McNarry, C Mendonca, R Bhagrath, A Patel, E P O'Sullivan, N M Woodall, I Ahmad, Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group, C Frerk, V S Mitchell, A F McNarry, C Mendonca, R Bhagrath, A Patel, E P O'Sullivan, N M Woodall, I Ahmad, Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group

Abstract

These guidelines provide a strategy to manage unanticipated difficulty with tracheal intubation. They are founded on published evidence. Where evidence is lacking, they have been directed by feedback from members of the Difficult Airway Society and based on expert opinion. These guidelines have been informed by advances in the understanding of crisis management; they emphasize the recognition and declaration of difficulty during airway management. A simplified, single algorithm now covers unanticipated difficulties in both routine intubation and rapid sequence induction. Planning for failed intubation should form part of the pre-induction briefing, particularly for urgent surgery. Emphasis is placed on assessment, preparation, positioning, preoxygenation, maintenance of oxygenation, and minimizing trauma from airway interventions. It is recommended that the number of airway interventions are limited, and blind techniques using a bougie or through supraglottic airway devices have been superseded by video- or fibre-optically guided intubation. If tracheal intubation fails, supraglottic airway devices are recommended to provide a route for oxygenation while reviewing how to proceed. Second-generation devices have advantages and are recommended. When both tracheal intubation and supraglottic airway device insertion have failed, waking the patient is the default option. If at this stage, face-mask oxygenation is impossible in the presence of muscle relaxation, cricothyroidotomy should follow immediately. Scalpel cricothyroidotomy is recommended as the preferred rescue technique and should be practised by all anaesthetists. The plans outlined are designed to be simple and easy to follow. They should be regularly rehearsed and made familiar to the whole theatre team.

Keywords: airway obstruction; complications; intubation; intubation, endotracheal; intubation, transtracheal; ventilation.

© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Difficult Airway Society difficult intubation guidelines: overview. Difficult Airway Society, 2015, by permission of the Difficult Airway Society. This image is not covered by the terms of the Creative Commons Licence of this publication. For permission to re-use, please contact the Difficult Airway Society. CICO, can't intubate can't oxygenate; SAD, supraglottic airway device.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults. Difficult Airway Society, 2015, by permission of the Difficult Airway Society. This image is not covered by the terms of the Creative Commons Licence of this publication. For permission to re-use, please contact the Difficult Airway Society. SAD, supraglottic airway device.
Fig 3
Fig 3
The laryngeal handshake. (a) The index finger and thumb grasp the top of the larynx (the greater cornu of the hyoid bone) and roll it from side to side. The bony and cartilaginous cage of the larynx is a cone, which connects to the trachea. (b) The fingers and thumb slide down over the thyroid laminae. (c) Middle finger and thumb rest on the cricoid cartilage, with the index finger palpating the cricothyroid membrane.
Fig 4
Fig 4
Cricothyroidotomy technique. Cricothyroid membrane palpable: scalpel technique; ‘stab, twist, bougie, tube’. (a) Identify cricothyroid membrane. (b) Make transverse stab incision through cricothyroid membrane. (c) Rotate scalpel so that sharp edge points caudally. (d) Pulling scalpel towards you to open up the incision, slide coude tip of bougie down scalpel blade into trachea. (e) Railroad tube into trachea.
Fig 5
Fig 5
Failed intubation, failed oxygenation in the paralysed, anaesthetized patient. Technique for scalpel cricothyroidotomy. Difficult Airway Society, 2015, by permission of the Difficult Airway Society. This image is not covered by the terms of the Creative Commons Licence of this publication. For permission to re-use, please contact the Difficult Airway Society.

References

    1. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP, Pearce AC. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 675–94
    1. 4th National Audit Project of The Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Difficult Airway Society. Major complications of airway management in the United Kingdom, Report and Findings. Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, 2011
    1. Black AE, Flynn PER, Smith HL, Thomas ML, Wilkinson KA. Development of a guideline for the management of the unanticipated difficult airway in pediatric practice. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25: 346–62
    1. Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1286–1306
    1. Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A. Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 318–40
    1. Hung O, Murphy M. Context-sensitive airway management. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 982–3
    1. Weller JM, Merry AF, Robinson BJ, Warman GR, Janssen A. The impact of trained assistance on error rates in anaesthesia: a simulation-based randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 126–30
    1. Smith AF. Creating guidelines and treating patients when there are no trials or systematic reviews. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30: 383–5
    1. Flin R, Fioratou E, Frerk C, Trotter C, Cook TM. Human factors in the development of complications of airway management: preliminary evaluation of an interview tool. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 817–25
    1. Reason J. Human error: models and management. Br Med J 2000; 320: 768–70
    1. Stiegler MP, Neelankavil JP, Canales C, Dhillon A. Cognitive errors detected in anaesthesiology: a literature review and pilot study. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 229–35
    1. Greenland KB, Acott C, Segal R, Goulding G, Riley RH, Merry AF. Emergency surgical airway in life-threatening acute airway emergencies—why are we so reluctant to do it? Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 578–84
    1. Marshall S. The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature. Anesth Analg 2013; 117: 1162–71
    1. Chrimes N, Fritz P. The Vortex Approach 2013. Available from (accessed 18 May 2015)
    1. ANZCA CPD Standards for Can't Intubate Can't Oxygenate (CICO) education session. Available from (accessed 22 February 2015)
    1. ANZCA Learning Objectives for CICO Course. Available from (accessed 22nd February 2015)
    1. Frengley RW, Weller JM, Torrie J, et al. The effect of a simulation-based training intervention on the performance of established critical care unit teams. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 2605–11
    1. Capella J, Smith S, Philp A, et al. Teamwork training improves the clinical care of trauma patients. J Surg Educ 2010; 67: 439–43
    1. CaPS Clinical Governance Unit. Communication and Patient Safety Course notes. Available from (accessed 22 July 2015)
    1. Kheterpal S, Healy D, Aziz MF, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of difficult mask ventilation combined with difficult laryngoscopy: a report from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 1360–9
    1. Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 272–81
    1. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, Sakamoto A. Predicting difficult intubation in apparently normal patients: a meta-analysis of bedside screening test performance. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 429–37
    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 491–9
    1. Modified version of the WHO Checklist for UK 2009. Available from (accessed 30 May 2015)
    1. Perry JJ, Lee JS, Sillberg VAH, Wells GA. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 16: CD002788.
    1. Sluga M, Ummenhofer W, Studer W, Siegemund M, Marsch SC. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation: a prospective, randomized trial in emergent cases. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1356–61
    1. Karcioglu O, Arnold J, Topacoglu H, Ozucelik DN, Kiran S, Sonmez N. Succinylcholine or rocuronium? A meta-analysis of the effects on intubation conditions. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60: 1638–46
    1. Mallon WK, Keim SM, Shoenberger JM, Walls RM. Rocuronium vs. succinylcholine in the emergency department: a critical appraisal. J Emerg Med 2009; 37: 183–8
    1. Marsch SC, Steiner L, Bucher E, et al. Succinylcholine versus rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation in intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2011; 15: R199.
    1. Sørensen MK, Bretlau C, Gätke MR, Sørensen AM, Rasmussen LS. Rapid sequence induction and intubation with rocuronium–sugammadex compared with succinylcholine: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 682–9
    1. Tang L, Li S, Huang S, Ma H, Wang Z. Desaturation following rapid sequence induction using succinylcholine vs. rocuronium in overweight patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 203–8
    1. Taha SK, El-Khatib MF, Baraka AS, et al. Effect of suxamethonium vs rocuronium on onset of oxygen desaturation during apnoea following rapid sequence induction. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 358–61
    1. Curtis R, Lomax S, Patel B. Use of sugammadex in a ‘can't intubate, can't ventilate’ situation. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 612–4
    1. Kyle BC, Gaylard D, Riley RH. A persistent ‘can't intubate, can't oxygenate’ crisis despite rocuronium reversal with sugammadex. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 344–6
    1. Bisschops MMA, Holleman C, Huitink JM. Can sugammadex save a patient in a simulated ‘cannot intubate, cannot ventilate’ situation? Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 936–41
    1. Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH, Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1020–5
    1. Koerber JP, Roberts GEW, Whitaker R, Thorpe CM. Variation in rapid sequence induction techniques: current practice in Wales. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 54–9
    1. Salem MR, Sellick BA, Elam JO. The historical background of cricoid pressure in anesthesia and resuscitation. Anesth Analg 1974; 53: 230–2
    1. Sellick BA. Cricoid pressure to control regurgitation of stomach contents during induction of anaesthesia. Lancet 1961; 2: 404–6
    1. Hartsilver EL, Vanner RG. Airway obstruction with cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 208–11
    1. Vanner RG, Asai T. Safe use of cricoid pressure. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1–3
    1. Vanner R. Techniques of cricoid pressure. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2001; 2: 362–3
    1. Tournadre JP, Chassard D, Berrada KR, Boulétreau P. Cricoid cartilage pressure decreases lower esophageal sphincter tone. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 7–9
    1. Salem MR, Bruninga KW, Dodlapatii J, Joseph NJ. Metoclopramide does not attenuate cricoid pressure-induced relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in awake volunteers. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 806–10
    1. Vanner RG, Clarke P, Moore WJ, Raftery S. The effect of cricoid pressure and neck support on the view at laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1997; 52: 896–900
    1. Meek T, Gittins N, Duggan JE. Cricoid pressure: knowledge and performance amongst anaesthetic assistants. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 59–62
    1. Palmer JHM, Ball DR. The effect of cricoid pressure on the cricoid cartilage and vocal cords: an endoscopic study in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 263–8
    1. Shorten GD, Alfille PH, Gliklich RE. Airway obstruction following application of cricoid pressure. J Clin Anesth 1991; 3: 403–5
    1. Ansermino JM, Blogg CE. Cricoid pressure may prevent insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69: 465–7
    1. Aoyama K, Takenaka I, Sata T, Shigematsu A. Cricoid pressure impedes positioning and ventilation through the laryngeal mask airway. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 1035–40
    1. Hocking G, Roberts FL, Thew ME. Airway obstruction with cricoid pressure and lateral tilt. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 825–8
    1. Allman KG. The effect of cricoid pressure application on airway patency. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 197–9
    1. Warters RD, Szabo T, Spinale FG, Desantis SM, Reves JG. The effect of neuromuscular blockade on mask ventilation. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 163–7
    1. Sachdeva R, Kannan TR, Mendonca C, Patteril M. Evaluation of changes in tidal volume during mask ventilation following administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 826–31
    1. Connelly NR, Ghandour K, Robbins L, Dunn S, Gibson C. Management of unexpected difficult airway at a teaching institution over a 7-year period. J Clin Anesth 2006; 18: 198–204
    1. Sakles JC, Chiu S, Mosier J, Walker C, Stolz U. The importance of first pass success when performing orotracheal intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 71–8
    1. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 33–9
    1. El-Orbany M, Woehlck H, Salem MR. Head and neck position for direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 103–9
    1. Adnet F, Baillard C, Borron SW, et al. Randomized study comparing the ‘sniffing position’ with simple head extension for laryngoscopic view in elective surgery patients. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 836–41
    1. Magill IW. Technique in endotracheal anaesthesia. Br Med J 1930; 2: 817–9
    1. Collins JS, Lemmens HJM, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the ‘sniff’ and ‘ramped’ positions. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1171–5
    1. Murphy C, Wong DT. Airway management and oxygenation in obese patients. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 929–45
    1. Ranieri D, Filho SM, Batista S, Do Nascimento P. Comparison of Macintosh and AirtraqTM laryngoscopes in obese patients placed in the ramped position. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 980–5
    1. Rao SL, Kunselman AR, Schuler HG, Desharnais S. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in the head-elevated position in obese patients: a randomized, controlled, equivalence trial. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1912–8
    1. Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012; 59: 165–75
    1. Cattano D, Melnikov V, Khalil Y, Sridhar S, Hagberg CA. An evaluation of the rapid airway management positioner in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass or laparoscopic gastric banding surgery. Obes Surg 2010; 20: 1436–41
    1. Bell MDD. Routine pre-oxygenation – a new ‘minimum standard’ of care? Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 943–5
    1. McGowan P, Skinner A. Preoxygenation—the importance of a good face mask seal. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 777–8
    1. Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F. Optimizing preoxygenation in adults. Can J Anaesth 2009; 56: 449–66
    1. Nimmagadda U, Chiravuri SD, Salem MR, et al. Preoxygenation with tidal volume and deep breathing techniques: the impact of duration of breathing and fresh gas flow. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1337–41
    1. Pandey M, Ursekar R, Aphale S. Three minute tidal breathing – a gold standard techniques for pre-oxygenation for elective surgeries. Innov J Med Health Sci 2014; 4: 194–7
    1. Pandit JJ, Duncan T, Robbins PA. Total oxygen uptake with two maximal breathing techniques and the tidal volume breathing technique: a physiologic study of preoxygenation. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 841–6
    1. Russell EC, Wrench I, Feast M, Mohammed F. Pre-oxygenation in pregnancy: the effect of fresh gas flow rates within a circle breathing system. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 833–6
    1. Taha SK, El-Khatib MF, Siddik-Sayyid SM, et al. Preoxygenation by 8 deep breaths in 60 seconds using the Mapleson A (Magill), the circle system, or the Mapleson D system. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 574–8
    1. Baraka AS, Taha SK, Aouad MT, El-Khatib MF, Kawkabani NI. Preoxygenation: comparison of maximal breathing and tidal volume breathing techniques. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 612–6
    1. Drummond GB, Park GR. Arterial oxygen saturation before intubation of the trachea. An assessment of oxygenation techniques. Br J Anaesth 1984; 56: 987–93
    1. Hirsch J, Führer I, Kuhly P, Schaffartzik W. Preoxygenation: a comparison of three different breathing systems. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 928–31
    1. Nimmagadda U, Salem MR, Joseph NJ, Miko I. Efficacy of preoxygenation using tidal volume and deep breathing techniques with and without prior maximal exhalation. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 448–52
    1. Gagnon C, Fortier L-P, Donati F. When a leak is unavoidable, preoxygenation is equally ineffective with vital capacity or tidal volume breathing. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 86–91
    1. Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, et al. Preoxygenation is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up position than in the supine position in severely obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 1110–5
    1. Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R, Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs supine position. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1064–7
    1. Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure to enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 680–4
    1. Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 580–4
    1. Herriger A, Frascarolo P, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. The effect of positive airway pressure during pre-oxygenation and induction of anaesthesia upon duration of non-hypoxic apnoea. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 243–7
    1. Taha SK, Siddik-Sayyid SM, El-Khatib MF, Dagher CM, Hakki MA, Baraka AS. Nasopharyngeal oxygen insufflation following pre-oxygenation using the four deep breath technique. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 427–30
    1. Ramachandran SK, Cosnowski A, Shanks A, Turner CR. Apneic oxygenation during prolonged laryngoscopy in obese patients: a randomized, controlled trial of nasal oxygen administration. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 164–8
    1. Levitan RM. NO DESAT! Nasal Oxygen During Efforts Securing A Tube 2010. Available from (acccessed 26 April 2015)
    1. Patel A, Nouraei SA. Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 323–9
    1. Miguel-Montanes R, Hajage D, Messika J, et al. Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to prevent desaturation during tracheal intubation of intensive care patients with mild-to-moderate hypoxemia. Crit Care Med 2015; 43: 574–83
    1. Vourc'h M, Asfar P, Volteau C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen during endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1538–48
    1. Brown GW, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and increased doses of thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 1103–4
    1. Ti LK, Chow MY, Lee TL. Comparison of sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 908–12
    1. Sury MRJ, Palmer JHMG, Cook TM, Pandit JJ. The State of UK anaesthesia: a survey of National Health Service activity in 2013. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 575–84
    1. MacG Palmer J, Pandit JJ. AAGA during induction of anaesthesia and transfer into theatre. In: Pandit JJ, Cook TM, eds. 5th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Accidental Awareness during General Anaesthesia in the United Kingdom and Ireland, 2014; 63–76
    1. Broomhead RH, Marks RJ, Ayton P. Confirmation of the ability to ventilate by facemask before administration of neuromuscular blocker: a non-instrumental piece of information? Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 313–7
    1. Calder I, Yentis SM. Could ‘safe practice’ be compromising safe practice? Should anaesthetists have to demonstrate that face mask ventilation is possible before giving a neuromuscular blocker? Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 113–5
    1. Chambers D, Paulden M, Paton F, et al. Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block after rapid sequence intubation: a systematic review and economic assessment. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105: 568–75
    1. Reddy JI, Cooke PJ, van Schalkwyk JM, Hannam JA, Fitzharris P, Mitchell SJ. Anaphylaxis is more common with rocuronium and succinylcholine than with atracurium. Anesthesiology 2015; 122: 39–45
    1. Sadleir PHM, Clarke RC, Bunning DL, Platt PR. Anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs: incidence and cross-reactivity in Western Australia from 2002 to 2011. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 981–7
    1. Von Goedecke A, Voelckel WG, Wenzel V, et al. Mechanical versus manual ventilation via a face mask during the induction of anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 260–3
    1. Isono S, Tanaka A, Ishikawa T, Tagaito Y, Nishino T. Sniffing position improves pharyngeal airway patency in anesthetized patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 489–94
    1. El-Orbany M, Woehlck HJ. Difficult mask ventilation. Anesth Analg 2009; 109: 1870–80
    1. Ramachandran SK, Kheterpal S. Difficult mask ventilation: does it matter? Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 40–4
    1. Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 1050–61
    1. Griesdale DEG, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 41–52
    1. Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 1090–7
    1. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, Cooper RM. Cardiothoracic anesthesia, respiration and airway; early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 191–8
    1. Thong SY, Lim Y. Video and optic laryngoscopy assisted tracheal intubation—the new era. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 219–33
    1. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 629–36
    1. Mosier JM, Whitmore SP, Bloom JW, et al. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care 2013; 17: R237.
    1. Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S, et al. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 898–904
    1. Cavus E, Neumann T, Doerges V, et al. First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation. Anesth Analg 2011; 112: 382–5
    1. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 546–50
    1. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79: S70–81
    1. Zaouter C, Calderon J, Hemmerling TM. Videolaryngoscopy as a new standard of care. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 181–3
    1. Kok T, George RB, McKeen D, Vakharia N, Pink A. Effectiveness and safety of the Levitan FPS ScopeTM for tracheal intubation under general anesthesia with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 743–50
    1. Aziz M, Metz S. Clinical evaluation of the Levitan Optical Stylet. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 579–81
    1. Bein B, Yan M, Tonner PH, Scholz J, Steinfath M, Dörges V. Tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1207–9
    1. Byhahn C, Nemetz S, Breitkreutz R, Zwissler B, Kaufmann M, Meininger D. Brief report: tracheal intubation using the Bonfils intubation fibrescope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2008; 55: 232–7
    1. Thong SY, Wong TG. Clinical uses of the Bonfils Retromolar Intubation Fiberscope: a review. Anesth Analg 2012; 115: 855–66
    1. Webb A, Kolawole H, Leong S, Loughnan TE, Crofts T, Bowden C. Comparison of the Bonfils and Levitan optical stylets for tracheal intubation: a clinical study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 1093–7
    1. Phua DS, Mah CL, Wang CF. The Shikani optical stylet as an alternative to the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult intubations—a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 402–6
    1. Koh KF, Hare JD, Calder I. Small tubes revisited. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 46–50
    1. Marfin AG, Iqbal R, Mihm F, Popat MT, Scott SH, Pandit JJ. Determination of the site of tracheal tube impingement during nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 646–50
    1. Jackson AH, Orr B, Yeo C, Parker C, Craven R, Greenberg SL. Multiple sites of impingement of a tracheal tube as it is advanced over a fibreoptic bronchoscope or tracheal tube introducer in anaesthetized, paralysed patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 444–9
    1. Jafari A, Gharaei B, Kamranmanesh MR, et al. Wire reinforced endotracheal tube compared with Parker Flex-Tip tube for oral fiberoptic intubation: a randomized clinical trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 324–9
    1. Heidegger T. Videos in clinical medicine. Fiberoptic intubation. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: e42.
    1. Barker KF, Bolton P, Cole S, Coe PA. Ease of laryngeal passage during fibreoptic intubation: a comparison of three endotracheal tubes. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45: 624–6
    1. Dogra S, Falconer R, Latto IP. Successful difficult intubation. Tracheal tube placement over a gum-elastic bougie. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 774–6
    1. Brull SJ, Wiklund R, Ferris C, Connelly NR, Ehrenwerth J, Silverman DG. Facilitation of fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with a flexible tracheal tube. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 746–8
    1. Kristensen MS. The Parker Flex-Tip tube versus a standard tube for fiberoptic orotracheal intubation: a randomized double-blind study. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 354–8
    1. Suzuki A, Tampo A, Abe N, et al. The Parker Flex-Tip tracheal tube makes endotracheal intubation with the Bullard laryngoscope easier and faster. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25: 43–7
    1. Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 607–13
    1. Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, et al. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med 2012; 60: 749–54
    1. Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S. 3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 42–8
    1. Griesdale DEG, Bosma TL, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock DR. Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 1835–42
    1. Schmitt HJ, Mang H. Head and neck elevation beyond the sniffing position improves laryngeal view in cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 335–8
    1. Knill RL. Difficult laryngoscopy made easy with a ‘BURP’. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 279–82
    1. Relle A. Difficult laryngoscopy — “BURP”. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 798–9
    1. Lam AM. The difficult airway and BURP — a truly Canadian perspective. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 298–9
    1. Benumof JL. Difficult laryngoscopy: obtaining the best view. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 361–5
    1. Levitan RM, Mickler T, Hollander JE. Bimanual laryngoscopy: a videographic study of external laryngeal manipulation by novice intubators. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40: 30–7
    1. Kaplan MB, Ward DS, Berci G. A new video laryngoscope—an aid to intubation and teaching. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 620–6
    1. Murphy MF, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation: tricks of the trade. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2008; 26: 1001–14
    1. Latto IP, Stacey M, Mecklenburgh J, Vaughan RS. Survey of the use of the gum elastic bougie in clinical practice. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 379–84
    1. Jabre P, Combes X, Leroux B, et al. Use of gum elastic bougie for prehospital difficult intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23: 552–5
    1. Hodzovic I, Wilkes AR, Latto IP. To shape or not to shape … simulated bougie-assisted difficult intubation in a manikin. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 792–7
    1. Kelly FE, Seller C. Snail trail. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 501.
    1. Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Ishimura H, Takenaka Y, Kadoya T. Approach combining the Airway Scope and the bougie for minimizing movement of the cervical spine during endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 1335–40
    1. Rai MR. The humble bougie … forty years and still counting? Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 199–203
    1. Cook TM. A new practical classification of laryngeal view. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 274–9
    1. Yentis SM, Lee DJ. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1041–4
    1. Marson BA, Anderson E, Wilkes AR, Hodzovic I. Bougie-related airway trauma: dangers of the hold-up sign. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 219–23
    1. Arndt GA, Cambray AJ, Tomasson J. Intubation bougie dissection of tracheal mucosa and intratracheal airway obstruction. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 603–4
    1. Evans H, Hodzovic I, Latto IP. Tracheal tube introducers: choose and use with care. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 859.
    1. Kidd JF, Dyson A, Latto IP. Successful difficult intubation. Use of the gum elastic bougie. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 437–8
    1. Batra R, Dhir R, Sharma S, Kumar K. Inadvertent pneumothorax caused by intubating bougie. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2015; 31: 271.
    1. Staikou C, Mani AA, Fassoulaki AG. Airway injury caused by a Portex single-use bougie. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 616–7
    1. Simpson JA, Duffy M. Airway injury and haemorrhage associated with the Frova intubating introducer. J Intensive Care Soc 2012; 13: 151–4
    1. Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, et al. The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 891–6
    1. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 191–8
    1. Batuwitage B, McDonald A, Nishikawa K, Lythgoe D, Mercer S, Charters P. Comparison between bougies and stylets for simulated tracheal intubation with the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 400–5
    1. Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 54–7
    1. Cross P, Cytryn J, Cheng KK. Perforation of the soft palate using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 588–9
    1. Amundson AW, Weingarten TN. Traumatic GlideScope® video laryngoscopy resulting in perforation of the soft palate. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 210–1
    1. Choo MKF, Yeo VST, See JJ. Another complication associated with videolaryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 322–4
    1. Dupanovic M. Maneuvers to prevent oropharyngeal injury during orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 152–4
    1. AAGBI Recommendations for standards of monitoring during anaesthesia and recovery 2007 (4th Edn). Available from (accessed 24 May 2011)
    1. Petrini F, Accorsi A, Adrario E, et al. Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol 2005; 71: 617–57
    1. Kristensen MS. Ultrasonography in the management of the airway. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55: 1155–73
    1. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and pleurae. Insights Imaging 2014; 5: 253–79
    1. Davies PRF, Tighe SQM, Greenslade GL, Evans GH. Laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube insertion by unskilled personnel. Lancet 1990; 336: 977–9
    1. Muller NV, Alberts AA. Unique™ Laryngeal Mask airway versus Cobra™ Perilaryngeal airway: learning curves for insertion. South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2014; 12: 21
    1. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Cebrian J, Arranz J. Laryngeal mask airway in pediatric practice: a prospective study of skill acquisition by anesthesia residents. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 807–11
    1. Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by one anaesthetist in adults undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 76–80
    1. Greaves JD. Training time and consultant practice. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 581–3
    1. Asai T, Barclay K, Power I, Vaughan RS. Cricoid pressure and the LMA: efficacy and interpretation. Br J Anaesth 1994; 73: 863–4
    1. Brimacombe J. Difficult Airway. In: Brimacombe J, ed. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia Principles and Practice, 2nd Edn Philadelphia: Saunders, 2005; 305–56
    1. Hashimoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Okuda Y. Effect of cricoid pressure on placement of the I-gel™: a randomised study. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 878–82
    1. Asai T, Goy RWL, Liu EHC. Cricoid pressure prevents placement of the laryngeal tube and laryngeal tube-suction II. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 282–5
    1. Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, et al. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients. Anesth Analg 2007; 104: 1195–8
    1. Cook TM, Kelly FE. Time to abandon the ‘vintage’ laryngeal mask airway and adopt second-generation supraglottic airway devices as first choice. Br J Anaesth 2015; 115: 497–9
    1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA ‘ProSeal’—a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84: 650–4
    1. Levitan RM, Kinkle WC. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1022–6
    1. Van Zundert A, Brimacombe J. The LMA Supreme™—a pilot study. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 209–10
    1. Tiefenthaler W, Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Fricke E, Keller C, Kaufmann M. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV™ Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme™ in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 600–4
    1. Miller DM, Lavelle M. A streamlined pharynx airway liner: a pilot study in 22 patients in controlled and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 759–61
    1. Youssef MMI, Lofty M, Hammad Y, Elmenshawy E. Comparative study between LMA-Proseal™ and Air-Q® Blocker for ventilation in adult eye trauma patients. Egypt J Anaesth 2014; 30: 227–33
    1. Alexiev V, Salim A, Kevin LG, Laffey JG. An observational study of the Baska® mask: a novel supraglottic airway. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 640–5
    1. Lopez Sala-Blanch X, Valero R, Prats AA. Cross-over assessment of the AmbuAuraGain, LMA Supreme New Cuff and Intersurgical I-Gel in fresh cadavers. Open J Anesthesiol 2014; 4: 332–9
    1. Mihai R, Knottenbelt G, Cook TM. Evaluation of the revised laryngeal tube suction: the laryngeal tube suction II in 100 patients. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 734–9
    1. Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N, Kaempfen B, Greif R. i-gel™ supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 990–5
    1. Cook TM, Gibbison B. Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 436–9
    1. Goldmann K, Hechtfischer C, Malik A, Kussin A, Freisburger C. Use of ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in 2114 adult patients: a prospective study. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1856–61
    1. Yao WY, Li SY, Sng BL, Lim Y, Sia AT. The LMA Supreme™ in 700 parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational study. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 648–54
    1. Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52: 739–60
    1. De Montblanc J, Ruscio L, Mazoit JX, Benhamou D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the i-gel® vs laryngeal mask airway in adults. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 1151–62
    1. Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 266–73
    1. Park SK, Choi GJ, Choi YS, Ahn EJ, Kang H. Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0119469.
    1. Chen X, Jiao J, Cong X, Liu L, Wu X. A comparison of the performance of the I-gel™ vs. the LMA-S™ during anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2013; 8: e71910.
    1. López AM, Valero R, Hurtado P, Gambús P, Pons M, Anglada T. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 265–71
    1. Seet E, Rajeev S, Firoz T, et al. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 602–7
    1. Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-Supreme™, comparison with LMA-Proseal™. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 852–7
    1. Lee AKY, Tey JBL, Lim Y, Sia ATH. Comparison of the single-use LMA Supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 815–9
    1. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C. The Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™—a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal™ in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 79–83
    1. Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel with LMA-ProSeal in elective surgeries. Indian J Anaesth 2009; 53: 302–5
    1. Chauhan G, Nayar P, Seth A, Gupta K, Panwar M, Agrawal N. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA Proseal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013; 29: 56–60
    1. Mukadder S, Zekine B, Erdogan KG, et al. Comparison of the proseal, supreme, and i-gel SAD in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries. Scientific World J 2015; 2015: 634320
    1. Schmidbauer W, Bercker S, Volk T, Bogusch G, Mager G, Kerner T. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel™ in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic™ and ProSeal™ using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 135–9
    1. Schmidbauer W, Genzwürker H, Ahlers O, Proquitte H, Kerner T. Cadaver study of oesophageal insufflation with supraglottic airway devices during positive pressure ventilation in an obstructed airway. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 454–8
    1. Russo SG, Cremer S, Galli T, et al. Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients . BMC Anesthesiol 2012; 12: 18.
    1. Shin W-J, Cheong Y-S, Yang H-S, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients . Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 598–601
    1. Teoh WHL, Lee KM, Suhitharan T, Yahaya Z, Teo MM, Sia ATH. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel™ in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1173–9
    1. Ragazzi R, Finessi L, Farinelli I, Alvisi R, Volta CA. LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™—a comparison of insertion success in novices. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 384–8
    1. Kang F, Li J, Chai X, Yu J-G, Zhang H-M, Tang C-L. Comparison of the I-gel laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-Supreme for airway management in patients undergoing elective lumbar vertebral surgery . J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2015; 27: 37–41
    1. Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, et al. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 55–62
    1. Pajiyar AK, Wen Z, Wang H, Ma L, Miao L, Wang G. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15: 69.
    1. Genzwuerker HV, Altmayer S, Hinkelbein J, Gernoth C, Viergutz T, Ocker H. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007; 51: 1373–7
    1. Jeon WJ, Cho SY, Baek SJ, Kim KH. Comparison of the Proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol 2012; 63: 510–4
    1. Sharma B, Sehgal R, Sahai C, Sood J. PLMA vs. I-gel: a comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2010; 26: 451–7
    1. Van Zundert TCRV, Brimacombe JR. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2012; 63: 35–41
    1. Chew EEF, Hashim NHM, Wang CY. Randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme with the I-Gel in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1018–22
    1. Joly N, Poulin L-P, Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F, St-Pierre P. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients. Can J Anaesth 2014; 61: 794–800
    1. Cook TM, Cranshaw J. Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 261–6
    1. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Asai T. Which supraglottic airway will serve my patient best? Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 1189–92
    1. Alexiev V, Ochana A, Abdelrahman D, et al. Comparison of the Baska® mask with the single-use laryngeal mask airway in low-risk female patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 1026–32
    1. Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK, Shanks AM, Kheterpal S. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed Laryngeal Mask Airway UniqueTM: a study of 15,795 patients. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 1217–26
    1. Saito T, Liu W, Chew STH, Ti LK. Incidence of and risk factors for difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device in a population of 14 480 patients from South-East Asia. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 1079–83
    1. Howath A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum-elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a new technique. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 624–7
    1. Taneja S, Agarwalt M, Dali JS, Agrawal G. Ease of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion and its fibreoptic view after placement using Gum Elastic Bougie: a comparison with conventional techniques. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37: 435–40
    1. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Judd DV. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 25–9
    1. El Beheiry H, Wong J, Nair G, et al. Improved esophageal patency when inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with an Eschmann tracheal tube introducer. Can J Anaesth 2009; 56: 725–32
    1. Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Stadlbauer KH, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1253–6
    1. Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Perkhofer D, Kaufmann M, Keller C. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal vs the i-gel? Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 913–6
    1. Halaseh BK, Sukkar ZF, Hassan LH, Sia AT, Bushnaq WA, Adarbeh H. The use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in caesarean section—experience in 3000 cases. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 1023–8
    1. Proseal LMA Instruction Manual. Available from (accessed 1 August 2014)
    1. Caponas G. Intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002; 30: 551–69
    1. Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I, Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1175–81
    1. Pandit JJ, MacLachlan K, Dravid RM, Popat MT. Comparison of times to achieve tracheal intubation with three techniques using the laryngeal or intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 128–32
    1. Joo HS, Kapoor S, Rose DK, Naik VN. The intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1342–6
    1. Ruxton L. Fatal accident enquiry 15 into the death of Mr Gordon Ewing. 2010. Glasgow: April. Available from (accessed 14 April 2014)
    1. Halwagi AE, Massicotte N, Lallo A, et al. Tracheal intubation through the I-gel™ supraglottic airway versus the LMA Fastrach™: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2012; 114: 152–6
    1. Theiler L, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N, Graf T, Luyet C, Greif R. Randomized clinical trial of the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal tube or single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube for blind intubation in anaesthetized patients with a predicted difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 243–50
    1. Bakker EJ, Valkenburg M, Galvin EM. Pilot study of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in clinical use. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 346–8
    1. McAleavey F, Michalek P. Aura-i laryngeal mask as a conduit for elective fibreoptic intubation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1151.
    1. Danha RF, Thompson JL, Popat MT, Pandit JJ. Comparison of fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic and single-use laryngeal mask airways. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 184–8
    1. Campbell J, Michalek P, Deighan M. I-gel supraglottic airway for rescue airway management and as a conduit for tracheal intubation in a patient with acute respiratory failure. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 963.
    1. Wong DT, Yang JJ, Mak HY, Jagannathan N. Use of intubation introducers through a supraglottic airway to facilitate tracheal intubation: a brief review. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59: 704–15
    1. Shimizu M, Yoshikawa N, Yagi Y, et al. [Fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation through the i-gel supraglottic airway]. Masui 2014; 63: 841–5
    1. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Theiler L, Urwyler N, Vogt A, Greif R. Randomized trial comparing the i-gel™ and Magill tracheal tube with the single-use ILMA™ and ILMA™ tracheal tube for fibreoptic-guided intubation in anaesthetized patients with a predicted difficult airway. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 251–7
    1. Darlong V, Biyani G, Baidya DK, Pandey R, Punj J. Air-Q blocker: a novel supraglottic airway device for patients with difficult airway and risk of aspiration. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2014; 30: 589–90
    1. Ott T, Fischer M, Limbach T, Schmidtmann I, Piepho T, Noppens RR. The novel intubating laryngeal tube (iLTS-D) is comparable to the intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) – a prospective randomised manikin study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2015; 23: 44.
    1. Atherton DP, O'Sullivan E, Lowe D, Charters P. A ventilation-exchange bougie for fibreoptic intubations with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1123–6
    1. Fibreoptic guided tracheal intubation through aintree intubation catheter. Available from (accessed 27 July 2015)
    1. Berkow LC, Schwartz JM, Kan K, Corridore M, Heitmiller ES. Use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Aintree Intubating Catheter-fiberoptic bronchoscope technique for difficult intubation. J Clin Anesth 2011; 23: 534–9
    1. Cook TM, Silsby J, Simpson TP. Airway rescue in acute upper airway obstruction using a ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway and an Aintree Catheter: a review of the ProSeal Laryngeal mask airway in the management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 1129–36
    1. Cook TM, Seller C, Gupta K, Thornton M, O'Sullivan E. Non-conventional uses of the Aintree Intubating Catheter in management of the difficult airway. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 169–74
    1. Izakson A, Cherniavsky G, Lazutkin A, Ezri T. The i-gel as a conduit for the Aintree intubation catheter for subsequent fiberoptic intubation Case description. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care 2014; 21: 131–3
    1. Van Zundert TC, Wong DT, Van Zundert AA. The LMA-SupremeTM as an intubation conduit in patients with known difficult airways: a prospective evaluation study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013; 57: 77–81
    1. Greenland KB, Tan H, Edwards M. Intubation via a laryngeal mask airway with an Aintree catheter - not all laryngeal masks are the same. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 966–7
    1. Baker PA, Flanagan BT, Greenland KB, et al. Equipment to manage a difficult airway during anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 16–34
    1. Michael Harmer. The Case of Elaine Bromiley. Available from (accessed 12 April 2015)
    1. Desforges JCW, McDonnell NJ. Sugammadex in the management of a failed intubation in a morbidly obese patient. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 763–4
    1. Mendonca C. Sugammadex to rescue a ‘can't ventilate’ scenario in an anticipated difficult intubation: is it the answer? Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 795–9
    1. Barbosa FT, da Cunha RM. Reversal of profound neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex after failure of rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: a case report. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2012; 62: 281–4
    1. Curtis RP. Persistent ‘can't intubate, can't oxygenate’ crisis despite reversal of rocuronium with sugammadex: the importance of timing. Anaesth Intensive Care 2012; 40: 722.
    1. Langvad S, Hyldmo PK, Nakstad AR, Vist GE, Sandberg M. Emergency cricothyrotomy – a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013; 21: 43.
    1. Heard A. Percutaneous Emergency Oxygenation Strategies in the ‘Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate’ Scenario. Smashworks Editions; 2013. Available from (accessed 5 January 2014)
    1. Lockey D, Crewdson K, Weaver A, Davies G. Observational study of the success rates of intubation and failed intubation airway rescue techniques in 7256 attempted intubations of trauma patients by pre-hospital physicians. Br J Anaesth 2014; 113: 220–5
    1. Mabry RL, Nichols MC, Shiner DC, Bolleter S, Frankfurt A. A comparison of two open surgical cricothyroidotomy techniques by military medics using a cadaver model. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 63: 1–5
    1. Pugh HE, LeClerc S, Mclennan J. A review of pre-admission advanced airway management in combat casualties, Helmand Province 2013. J R Army Med Corps 2015; 161: 121–6
    1. Howes TE, Lobo CA, Kelly FE, Cook TM. Rescuing the obese or burned airway: are conventional training manikins adequate? A simulation study. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 136–42
    1. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Baker PA. Percutaneous emergency airway access; prevention, preparation, technique and training. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 357–61
    1. Hamaekers AE, Henderson JJ. Equipment and strategies for emergency tracheal access in the adult patient. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 65–80
    1. Crewdson K, Lockey DJ. Needle, knife, or device – which choice in an airway crisis? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2013; 21: 49.
    1. Wong DT, Prabhu AJ, Coloma M, Imasogie N, Chung FF. What is the minimum training required for successful cricothyroidotomy? A study in mannequins. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 349–53
    1. Hubert V, Duwat A, Deransy R, Mahjoub Y, Dupont H. Effect of simulation training on compliance with difficult airway management algorithms, technical ability, and skills retention for emergency cricothyrotomy. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 999–1008
    1. Hubble MW, Wilfong DA, Brown LH, Hertelendy A, Benner RW. A meta-analysis of prehospital airway control techniques part II: alternative airway devices and cricothyrotomy success rates. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010; 14: 515–30
    1. Baker PA, Weller JM, Greenland KB, Riley RH, Merry AF. Education in airway management. Anaesthesia 2011; 66(Suppl 2): 101–11
    1. Mabry RL. An analysis of battlefield cricothyrotomy in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med 2012; 12: 17–23
    1. Levitan RM. Cricothyrotomy | Airway Cam - Airway Management Education and Training. Available from (accessed 4 August 2015)
    1. Airway and ventilatory management. In: Douglas P, ed. ATLS® Guidelines 9th Ed Kindle edition. Chicago: The American College of Surgeons, 2012
    1. Brofeldt BT, Panacek EA, Richards JR. An easy cricothyrotomy approach: the rapid four-step technique. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3: 1060–3
    1. Ross-Anderson DJ, Ferguson C, Patel A. Transtracheal jet ventilation in 50 patients with severe airway compromise and stridor. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 140–4
    1. Bourgain JL. Transtracheal high frequency jet ventilation for endoscopic airway surgery: a multicentre study. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 870–5
    1. Craven RM, Vanner RG. Ventilation of a model lung using various cricothyrotomy devices. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 595–9
    1. Heard A. Instructor Check-lists for Percutaneous Emergency Oxygenation Strategies in the ‘Can't Intubate, Can't Oxygenate’ Scenario 2014. Available from (accessed 23 April 2015)
    1. Heard AMB, Green RJ, Eakins P. The formulation and introduction of a ‘can't intubate, can't ventilate’ algorithm into clinical practice. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 601–8
    1. Melker JS, Gabrielli A. Melker Cricothyrotomy Kit: an alternative to the surgical technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005; 114: 525–8
    1. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Rudolph SS, et al. Structured approach to ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid membrane: a randomized comparison with the palpation method in the morbidly obese. Br J Anaesth 2015; 114: 1003–4
    1. Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Ross S, et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous tracheal puncture: a computer-tomographic controlled study in cadavers. Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 738–42
    1. Dinsmore J, Heard AMB, Green RJ. The use of ultrasound to guide time-critical cannula tracheotomy when anterior neck airway anatomy is unidentifiable. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 506–10
    1. Mallin M, Curtis K, Dawson M, Ockerse P, Ahern M. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided marking of the cricothyroid membrane before simulated failed intubation. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32: 61–3
    1. World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251–70
    1. Feinleib J, Foley L, Mark L. What we all should know about our patient's airway: difficult airway communications, database registries, and reporting systems registries. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33: 397–413
    1. Hagberg C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19: 641–59
    1. Domino KB, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. J Am Soc Anesthesiol 1999; 91: 1703
    1. Woodall NM, Harwood RJ, Barker GL. Complications of awake fibreoptic intubation without sedation in 200 healthy anaesthetists attending a training course. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 850–5
    1. Gamlin F, Caldicott LD, Shah MV. Mediastinitis and sepsis syndrome following intubation. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 883–5
    1. Barron FA, Ball DR, Jefferson P, Norrie J. ‘Airway Alerts’. How UK anaesthetists organise, document and communicate difficult airway management. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 73–7
    1. Mellado PF, Thunedborg LP, Swiatek F, Kristensen MS. Anaesthesiological airway management in Denmark: assessment, equipment and documentation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 350–4
    1. Wilkes M, Beattie C, Gardner C, McNarry AF. Difficult airway communication between anaesthetists and general practitioners. Scott Med J 2013; 58: 2–6
    1. Baker P, Moore C, Hopley L, Herzer K, Mark L. How do anaesthetists in New Zealand disseminate critical airway information? Anaesth Intensive Care 2013; 41: 334–41
    1. Difficult Airway Society. Airway Alert Form. Available from (accessed 4 August 2015)
    1. Liban JB. Medic Alert UK should start new section for patients with a difficult airway. Br Med J 1996; 313: 425.
    1. Medical Alert. Available from (accessed 4 August 2015)
    1. Banks IC. The application of Read Codes to anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 324–7
    1. Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management – Part 1 – Intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 1089–118
    1. Teoh WHL, Shah MK, Sia ATH. Randomised comparison of Pentax AirwayScope and Glidescope for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1125–9
    1. Hoshijima H, Kuratani N, Hirabayashi Y, Takeuchi R, Shiga T, Masaki E. Pentax Airway Scope® vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 911–8
    1. Behringer EC, Cooper RM, Luney S, Osborn IP. The comparative study of video laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope: defining proficiency is critical. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 158–9
    1. Behringer EC, Kristensen MS. Evidence for benefit vs novelty in new intubation equipment. Anaesthesia 2011; 66(Suppl 2): 57–64
    1. The Royal College of Anaesthetists CPD Matrix. Available from (accessed 4 August 2015)

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

3
Prenumerera